On September 7, 1902 an article entitled “The Saxon Heptarchy — The Lost Tribes” appeared in The Times of Richmond, Virginia, newspaper — explaining the historical evidence that the people of Wales, England, descended from the Lost Tribes of Israel.
We have written previously on this subject in our article, How The ‘Lost’ Israelite Khumry of the Assyrian Captivity Migrated To Wales & Britain — however, we found this 1902 article to include additional important evidence that’s worth noting.
Between the 6th and 8th centuries, Anglo-Saxon England was divided into The Heptarchy — the seven kingdoms of East Anglia, Essex, Kent, Mercia, Northumbria, Sussex, and Wessex — and Wales was west of Mercia and Wessex:
This 1902 article explains the relationship between and influence of the Welsh Cymbri to these kingdoms of the Anglo-Saxon kingdoms.
Not surprisingly, this Israelitish history of the Welsh — and native British people — is not only ignored by mainstream British historians, it is unofficially censored and suppressed for what should be obvious reasons.
If the Welsh are indeed true Israelites, then who are the so-called “Jews” — the de facto cryptocracy that now rules of England?
Welsh secular historians Alan Wilson and Baram Blackett have written extensively on this subject — and for their efforts they have had their lives threatened and home set on fire.
After being expelled from England in 1290 by King Edward I for crimes against the people and the Crown, 300 years later they were readmitted to by the Puritan leader, Oliver Cromwell, under the pretense that Jews were true Israelites whose restoration in England would somehow hasten the Second Coming of Jesus Christ.
Instead of the Second Coming, the British people have become racial minorities in most of the land their ancestors settled, built, and died for.
Most Christians are taught to believe that the lost tribes of Israel literally disappeared into the mists of time — but if that were the case, then Christ’s explicit purpose — that He came to regather all of the Israelite tribes (Matthew 15:24) was a lost cause.
This 1902 article proves that Christ’s mission was not in vain — that He and His disciples succeed in bringing the Gospel to His lost sheep — even those in a remote corner of the British Isles.
[As an aside, a video containing a copy of this original 1902 article was posted on YouTube, but was removed — and the account that posted it was “terminated” for unspecified reasons — no doubt for “hateful” or “racist” smears.]
The Times of Richmond, Virginia:
“The Saxon Heptarchy — The Lost Tribes”
“On the map of Britain facing St. George’s channel, is a group of counties called Wales. Inhabited by a people distinct from and very little understood by those who surround them.
Their neighbors call them Welshmen. Walsh or Welsh is not a proper name, but a Teutonic term signifying strangers, and was applied to all persons who are not of that family; but the proper name of these people is Kymri. They are the last remnant of the Kimmeroi of Homer.
From the Combric Chersonesus (or Jubland), a portion of these [people] landed on the shores of Northumberland and gave their name to the county of Cumberland, and in process of time followed the seaside to their present resting place, where they still call themselves Kymri, and give their country a similar name.
Their history clear, concise, and authentic ascends to a higher antiquity. Their language was embodied in verse (see samples of the Welsh Triads, in Sharon Turner, History of the Anglo-Saxons, Vol. III) “long before the languages now spoken rose into notice, and their literature, cultivated and abundant, lays claim to being the most ancient in modern Europe” [from Thomas Stephens’ Literature of the Kymri).
“The identity of the Cymri of Wales” (says Professor George Rawlinson), “with the Cimbri of the Romans, seems worthy of being accepted as an historical fact upon the grounds stated by Nieburh and Arnold. They were known to their neighbors as Cimmerii, Gimmerii, or Gommerii (see Genesis 10), and attained considerable power in Western Asia and Eastern Europe about 800 B.C.” (see Bible date of the captivity of Ten Tribes, 721 B.C.) “…is a fact that can scarcely admit of doubt.”
Herodotus calls these people Cimmerian (Kumri) — a people whose antiquity is above twenty-five hundred years, and “has spread from the Steppes of the Ukraine in to the mountains of Wales” (see Professor George Rawlinson’s Ancient Monarchies).
“Gomer” (see Genesis 10) was the progenitor of the Cimmerians, Cimbri and other branches of the Celtic family, as well as of the modern Chael and Cymri. Cymri is the original name, with slight variations” (see Young’s Concordance under “Gomer”. Also see the original Cimmerian in Zephaniah 1:4, occurs here only in the Bible.
The Hebrews suffixed the name of God, El(ail), to their personal names. See Hebrew nouns ending in El, such as Emmanuel, Gabriel, Samuel, Israel & c., and compare the etymology of An-Gael-ish — English.
But to return to Sharon Turner, who witnesses for us, never against us.
“The Kimmerians may be regarded as our first ancestors. The Cimmerian tongue is in the farthest part of the West, in the British Islands. That the Kimmeroi of the Greeks were the Cimbri of the Latin writers was the opinion of the Greeks themselves.”
–Sharon Turner, History of the Anglo-Saxons
At some early period, after they reached the shores of the German Ocean (in their overland route from Asia), they crossed it in their rude vessels to Great Britain. It is agreed by the British antiquaries that the most ancient inhabitants of our land were called Cymbri (Kimri): they are so named in all that remains of ancient British literature.
The Welsh, who are their descendants, have given the same name to the earliest colonies of our island. That a district in the north of England was inhabited by a part of the ancient British nation, and called Cumbria, when the present Cumberland, is favorable to this presumption. It is a safe inference that the Camry of Britain originated from the continental Kimmerians.
The Welsh historians state that the Cymri were the first inhabitants of Britain. They first obtained it, and that before their advent “nothing else but bears, wolves and oxen roamed its trackless forests” (see Sharon Turner’s Anglo-Saxon History)
Not only have we the testimony of these historians and others, but chiseled upon the imperishable stone — the hoary monuments of Babylon and of Nineveh, we read the same truth.
On an obelisk found by Austen Henry Layard, now in the British Museum, the name “Khumrie” and “Beth Khumrie” is found, referring to Omri, father of Ahab. Omri was the renowned king of the Ten Tribes (1 Kings 16). The Assyrians called him and the house of Omri, Khumri and Beth (house), Khumrie (of Khumri).
“Upon the Babylonian monuments the term Gimmerie, Gimeri, means ‘the tribes’ — and is the Semitic equivalent of the Aryan Sacae.”
–George Rawlinson’s Ancient Monarchies
The House of Rhumri (Beth Rhumri) was, therefore, [simply] the Assyrian designation of the House of Omri (1 Kings 16).
Thus, these disinterested witnesses trace the Welsh of Britain to their ancestors — the Cymri; the Cymri to the Roman Cimbri; the Cimbri to the Greek Kimmeroi; the Kimmeroi to the Gimeri (Gomer in Genesis 10), who are identified by Professor Rawlinson with the Assyrian Rhumri, which was the Assyrian name for the Israelites (Ten Lost Tribes).
In other words, the Welsh called themselves Cymri — in the mouth of the Romans they became “Cimbri” — in the mouth of the Greeks “Kimmeroi” — in the mouth of the Assyrians “Rhumri” — and in the mouth of the Hebrews “Omri” (1 Kings 16).
Now the Simonii (tribe of Simeon) was but a branch of the Cymri who settled in Wales, and joining the Saxon Confederacy, made the ninth tribe — the tribe of Simeon. Dan had already settled in Ireland, and made the tenth.
Here then the regathering of the Ten Lost Tribes.”
Without being a historian but a History reader, one of the early English historian, Hume omits
any relevant inclusion of Jews in England, perhaps due to the Anglican rule and Jews returning
from Portuguese, Netherlands and the Rothschild Banking interference in British politics.
Whenever placing a magnifying glass on Jewish-Britain relations, it’s worth a comment on Bernard
Lazare’s “Antisemitism and it’s Causes” warning about Jews loosing Britain’s support, indeed not
because of political convenience but from parting ways from a symbiotic connivance resulting from
Freemasonry, brought from and growing from the 1st Century of the Roman conquest that mixed
with already dwelling 27 tribes according to Tacitus and Ptolomeic History. More tractable path can be find
between the Sages of Israel and the Druids (Wales), considered the 10th tribe of Judah. In Coincidence,
were persecuted by roman Legions about the same time of 1st Century.
The anglos are from HAM – CHAM. There was large population of people in english isles BEFORE EXODUS. So how they Amglos can be any of the twelve tribes. The SAXON came much later to english isles. The SAXON are fro 12 tribes. The word HAM – CHAM is all over the england.-NotingHAM – Hamsted – WestHam – Tottenham – BirmingHAM………
The word HAM – CHAM means cruel as the anglos are and their father CHAM who “seen nakedness of his father”. The SAXON have nothing to do with SAXON. I see the anglos as liars and heartless beast, when they starved two million Irish and thousands sold to slavery. They starve 25 thousend White Boers children in South Africa on behalf the jewish rats who owned the english isles from 1694 and call it “Brishit empire”, yes for jewish rats in London.
Adolf,
We aren’t sure where you got this information, but it is incorrect. There is no indication that the descendants of Ham settled England or Europe.
There were earlier tribes, such as the Japethites, that settled in Europe before the Israelites, but that doesn’t prove that the Israelites did not arrive in later waves of migration.
The word “ham” found in many British place-names has nothing to do with Ham of the Bible.
In Old English, the word “ham” means “village” or “home”. The English word “home” has Germanic origins — from the word “heim” — similar to the German towns and cities that end in “heim” — common in Germany, Denmark, and Norway:
home. Proto-Germanic *haimaz “home” (source also of Old Frisian hem “home, village,” Old Norse heimr “residence, world,” heima “home,” Danish hjem, Middle Dutch heem, German heim “home,” Gothic haims “village”). This is reconstructed to be from a suffixed form of PIE root *tkei- “to settle, dwell, be home.”
https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=home
You will find many German towns and cities with the “heim” suffix:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cities_and_towns_in_Germany
Of course, just like English, the German word “heim” has nothing to do with Ham of the Bible.
The descendants of HAM – CHAM came to england isles long before Jacob and his sons settle in Egypt. Before exodus was large population, hundred of thousands if not millions of White people in english isles. So how they can’t be of twelve tribes when is a Biblical record of Jacob descendants how many they came to Egypt and how many came out in Exodus.
The whole north Africa was White, so they find their way to so call english isles. They HAMITES from Cham came from north Africa and took right ANGLE north to enlish isles. I read that somewhere long time a go in my 35 years study, I don’t remember what book. I think that was some book in German or Russian language. When I find out I let you know. HAM – CHAM means CRUEL as the english are, they kill millions of their White Brothers from Jacob and never feel sorry about that. Mentality of the anglos are much different than European from JACOB twelve tribes. Brishit empire was for few rotten jews in London who own the Brishit central bank on england.
PROOF me wrong.
Adolf,
You’re simply repeating yourself, and haven’t offered any new evidence or proof to support your claim.
Since you have made a positive claim — that the English people descend from Ham — it is your obligation to prove it, and not our obligation to disprove it.
Above, we most certainly disproved your claim that English town names derive from the name of “Ham” in the Bible — and showed that both English and German towns have this same Germanic word in common.
We also made it clear that the Isralites came into Europe in waves, not all at one time, so it’s irrelevant to claim which people got here first. Different tribes from the Near East mixed with each other over thousands of years — they do not have one single ancestry.
What is true, as this article points out, is that the Welsh speak a language that comes from the Near East from a people who are Israelite in origins. You have not disproven that.
The ancient Aryans from Persia were descended from different Adamic peoples — whether Cushites, Japhethites, and/or Shemites — but they are but one of many tribes that would eventually comprise the Germanic people of Europe.
For example, the Goths — a Germanic people — mostly likely descended from the Parthians and Scythians — who were mixed with Israelites, Medes, and others from former Assyria. But all the Goths didn’t settle just in Germany — many moved west into France (Gaul), Spain, and Portugal.
It’s way too simple to claim that either the English or German people descend from single tribes mentioned in the Bible or ancient history. Germany is in the heart of Europe — so many different tribes moved into and through Germany to the west as it was settled, mixing many different tribes.
The archeological evidence across Europe proves that migration happened in waves at different times, and yes, the Israelites were among the later waves, but still around 500 BC isn’t exactly early….
Read Stephen Collins’ book on the subject in our library:
The Lost Ten Tribes of Israel…Found
https://christiansfortruth.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/The-Lost-Ten-Tribes-Of-Israel…Found_.pdf
—– Adolf Richtar —–
No offense — but please just say what you believe is your Theory. Nothing wrong with speculating/postulating/theorizing.
When we go so far back in time — you really better have concrete Proofs of your Objective Statements.
I think Cain must have encountered the Yellow peoples first — so his wife was most likely yellow. Can I prove that? NO. But it makes the most sense to me, based on where the other non-adamics were most likely originated. Can’t prove any of it. But I can theorize the most likely scenario.
The blacks were most likely in Central Africa and they didn’t have the IQ nor the skills to travel outside of Central Africa. I highly doubt Cain made his way into central Africa. Most likely he went East and encountered the yellow peoples who are probably the oldest hominins. Again …. all Theory.
There is a man who believes the Garden of Eden was Britain. He always speaks “Matter of Fact” but offers no proof. So, it’s just his theory. Interesting nonetheless.
Your “Theory” is interesting. But I think CFT has thrown at you plenty of reasons to doubt your theory. “Ham” is a mystery. What did that curse actually mean for the future generations of Ham??? Who knows.
This entire subject just seems silly to take such an Objective stand.
I think your motivation is ‘hate’ for the British. That would be my guess. I certainly can understand that. The British seem to be the first real Traitors of our People in the modern world. Going back to Cromwell.
Anyway ……………. just “speculate”. No big deal. Call it your Theory.
Cheers.
This thread is about the Welsh though. The Welsh, much like the Irish, are not Anglo-Saxon (though I don’t dispute that they have may traces of Anglo-Saxon DNA). I think the Welsh might have the closest phenotype to the ancient Israelites.
—– James Smith —–
Clarification — Who are you replying to? “… this thread is about the Welsh though…”
If you notice — at some point in the comment thread, WHO is being replied to is not direct. Once the thread grows, it is very hard to tell WHO is being replied to.
Curious though — Would you not say that when we are talking about Adamic Man — once we get into, for a lack of a better term — Tribes of Adamic Peoples — what we are really talking about is “Ethnicity”. Right?
Not Race i.e., Kind.
The Israelites were of Hebrew Ethnicity — BUT — were Pure Adamic Man.
The French, the Spanish, the Germans, the Danes, the Welsh …. et., al., at one point in time were PURE Adamic Man — most likely from one or a mix of the Tribes of Israel. With the possibility of Japeth seed being mixed in as well.
Agreed?
Ps. Pure Adamic Man = White/Caucasian/European.
@West
I was replying to Adolf Richtar in the post I made about the Welsh. I’ll try adding @ more often. I just didn’t think it would affect that post.
And yes, all Europeans have an Adamic origin. Northwestern Europeans are likely to be the closest to the Israelites though.
There were Japhethites in Spain, Greece, and the Slavic lands. I believe Israelites mixed with the Japhethites that were present in those nations. I question how Adamic those nations are now though.
And talking about another point you’ve made in this thread, do you think Cain’s descendants are still around? If so, what kind of nations?
—- James Smith —–
Thank you for your understanding.
You asked — “…. do you think Cain’s descendants are still around? If so, what kind of nations? ……”
Great Question. Thanks for asking.
I believe, or, in my opinion, when Cain was “driven away”, he wandered East and found the Yellow pre-adamites.
Is his DNA still around? I suppose it is possible. I am not a scientist who might understand DNA i.e., blood, as it may or may not be completely eradicated through continual procreation of a different “kind”. Question — can Adamic Blood be completely eradicated through continual procreation with a non-adamic? Dilution.
I think it is possible that maybe Cain himself, or his first progeny may have procreated “back into” Adamic Man. Which would have then extended the life of his blood. Maybe this is the first true “Jew”.
For me ….. a “Jew” would be an Adamic man or woman who mixes their seed with a non-adamic — thus the result, the mamzer, would be a “Jew” i.e., a broken vessel. More susceptible to the spirit of anti-christ. Odd definition, but it works in my mind. Sure …. an Adamic man can still open his spirit to the spirit of anti-christ, but I would say the mamzer to have the more likelihood of evil. Kind of like opening that portal to hell.
This is the only way that I can explain the peculiar evil of modern jewry. They just are so unique. Howard Stern comes to mind only because I am familiar with him. The guy just can’t help himself. I think his mom is a so called “gentile”. You can see this inner turmoil — he can be sweet and genuine for a minute, then a total vile disgusting creature the next. All jews tend to be like this. They just can’t help themselves, even though sometimes they seem good hearted.
I am very uncomfortable around mixed race peoples with White admixture. They just seem more unpredictable than a pure non-white. I’ve had a few non-white associations and I was more comfortable around them than any mixed race white person. If that makes any sense.
I have a theory that some of the dispersed Israelites went East — procreated with the Yellow and perhaps this is the Japanese. There is a small tribe of Japanese who study Judaism and I think claim to be Israelites. Can’t help to wonder if the Japanese have Israelite admixture. Especially the light or pale ones. The females are sometimes very beautiful.
Hope that wasn’t too confusing. 😉 Cheers.
Angles didn’t arrive in the British Isles until the 5th century AD, so people living in the British Isles doesn’t mean they aren’t from the 12 tribes. The population in Northern Europe was low before the Exodus.
The Bell Beaker were the first white group there. I have good reason to believe the Bell Beaker culture came from Shem’s son Lud.
The Celts were the second major group in the British Isles, then the Germanic tribes such as the Angles were third.
The only European groups that I can see plausibly having Ham as an ancestor are all in Southern Europe.
It’s amazing how this has been so suppressed. You’d think churches would be spreading this, but they all seem to have swallowed “the jews” propaganda from the Khazars. Thankfully, I think Magog’s time is almost up, and it’s going to be ugly when it comes.
You’d think….yes, and it would allow them to all get rid of their dispensational dog and pony show, and not fret how the “gentiles” will somehow get saved. It would make the gospels much easier to understand….the simplicity that is in Christ, as Paul said.
Maybe white Europeans just don’t want the responsibility of being literal Israelites….they’d have to change their ways. Who wants that?
What really gets me is that not only is there actual historical documentation that indicates these folks have one of the oldest churches around (a good indicator of being actual Israelites, as that’s who Jesus and the apostils targeted specifically).
The Bible is clear that Israel was commanded not to mix, even in exile. It’s obvious white westerns didn’t do that that I can see, they just married older waves of Israelites who had left in previous decades.
I remember seeing some folks from one of the founding orthodox churches in Asian that still spoke Aramaic, and they were as Caucasoid and white as they could be (blue eyes included).
So good to see you back brother ! I hope all is well again.
I myself suffered my 5th heart attack last week. Jesus definetly has our backs for sure.
Im currently reading “Christ the Healer” by F.F Bosworth. Pretty inspiring read.
I remember the Welsh historian Alan Wilson said in an interview that the Khumrie inscriptions on the obelisk found by Layard in Nineveh, if read aloud, could be understood by any Welsh speaker. Real smoking gun proof that this evidence is not just guess work.
Is there any group I can join to further discuss this?
Med:
If you’re asking if there is a specific group that discusses this part of Welsh history, we do not know of any, but that doesn’t mean they don’t exist.
Alan Wilson’s old website has now shut down after his death.
If you want to discuss the Israelite Identity of the European people, this website has a lot of knowledgeable people to help answer your questions.
Excellent. Thank you.
For more on this, see writings by E Raymond Capt.
I was Protestant CI for many decades….WPGale….then remarkably I was introduced to traditional Catholicism….doubted it at first….did the research….amazing find.
CI is embedded in original Catholicism….’poor banished children of Eve’….look it up….now I got it all..
my website has further info in the forum..
I am currently fighting all the fake Catholic Churches….yes there are many..
St Ambrose of Milan–
Saint Ambrose (b. around 340), another prominent Church Father, described the Jews in 379 as,
“…the most worthless of all men. They are lecherous, greedy, rapacious. They are perfidious murderers of Christ. They worship the Devil. Their religion is a sickness. The Jews are the odious assassins of Christ and for killing God there is no expiation possible, no indulgence or pardon. Christians may never cease vengeance, and the Jew must live in servitude forever. God always hated the Jews. It is essential that all Christians hate them.”
In 388 Ambrose defended another bishop accused before the emperor of burning down a synagogue. The emperor ordered the offending bishop to rebuild the synagogue, to which Ambrose demanded of the emperor,
“Who cares if a synagogue – a home of unbelief, a house of impiety, a receptacle of folly, which God himself has condemned – is burned?”
“Coming down from the altar to face him, the bishop declared he would not continue the Eucharist until the emperor obeyed. The emperor bowed to this threat of excommunication.”