(Jewish Press) Despite the fact that virtually every original scientific advancement upon which our modern world is founded was produced by men of White aryan European descent — hardly a radical idea — this recent article about Philipp Lenard’s attacks on Albert Einstein’s theories shows once again that Jews think that calling someone an “antisemite” is sufficient “proof” to discredit Einstein’s many critics:
Alfred Nobel was an anti-Semite, and there have been many anti-Semites who have received Nobel Prizes, including Desmond Tutu (1984), Yasser Arafat (1994), and Barack Obama (2009), who were disgraceful awardees of Nobel “Peace” Prizes. But the supreme Nobel Prize-winning anti-Semite of all time may have been German physicist Philipp Lenard, who won the 1905 Nobel Prize for Physics for his discovery of many of the properties of cathode rays, including particularly that the energy (speed) of the electrons from a cathode depends on the wavelength of the light and not its intensity.
Lenard (1862-1947) is also renowned for his experimental realization of the photoelectric effect; for his important studies of phosphorescence and luminescence and the conductivity of flames; for his contributions in the area of conductivity of metals and the electricity of waterfalls; and for developing a model of an atom which was the predecessor of Ernest Rutherford’s better-known model, which reflected his discovery that most of the atom is empty space.
Lenard, who joined the National Socialist Party before it was popular, was a German nationalist who, as an active exponent of Nazi ideology, supported Hitler in the 1920s and ultimately rose to become the Führer’s advisor and his chief of Aryan Physics. As early as 1922, he accused German scientists of betraying their “racial allegiance” and, beginning almost ten years before Hitler’s rise to power, he became the leader of the “Deutsche Physik” movement, a political crusade which used the rhetoric of science to promote anti-Semitism.
Lenard celebrated the Deutsche Physik in Völkischer Beobachter (“The People’s Observer”), the National Socialist daily, as follows:
It had grown dark in physics. Einstein has provided the most outstanding example of the damaging influence on natural science from the Jewish side. One cannot even spare splendid researchers with solid accomplishments the reproach that they have allowed the “relativity Jews” to gain a foothold in Germany. The theoreticians active in leading positions should have watched over this development more carefully. Now, Hitler is watching over it. The ghost has collapsed; the foreign element is already voluntarily leaving the universities, yes even the country.
While regarding “Arabian physics” and “Negro physics” with utter contempt, Lenard believed that the most malignant of them all is “Jewish physics,” which in his mind became synonymous with the undermining of the German Weltanschauung and the Jewish bastardization of German culture. Rejecting the very idea that science is universal, Lenard and his Deutsche Physik supporters asserted that non-Aryan physics was fraudulent and maintained that “German physics” had been plagiarized by the English. As he writes in his four-volume textbook, German Physics (1936):
German physics? one asks. I might rather have said Aryan physics or the physics of the Nordic species of man . . . But, I shall be answered, “Science is and remains international.” That is false. Science, like every other human product, is racial and conditioned by blood.
Lenard led the national campaign to purge non-Aryan scientists from German universities and, in particular, to replace Jewish physicists with “Aryan physicists” but, by the time the Nüremberg laws were enacted in 1935, there were few Jewish scientists left to be replaced. With Einstein gone, Lenard became the “Führer” of German physics and, in recognition of his contributions to Aryan physics, he was awarded the National Science Prize by Alfred Rosenberg a year later at an important Nüremberg party rally attended by Hitler and Göebbels.
Sometimes the hand of G-d in Jewish history is unmistakable. Ironically, Lenard’s disdain for “Jewish physics” played a leading role in the failure of Hitler’s nuclear weapons program. The exodus of some 2,600 Jewish scientists – including 27 Nobel scientists to Britain and Einstein to the United States – badly damaged the Nazi nuclear program and boosted the Manhattan Project, which effectively ended WWII. One can only recoil in horror at the mere thought of what would have happened to the world – and to the Jewish people in particular – had the Nazis won the race to develop a nuclear bomb.
Lenard, whose guiding principle was that Germans must resist the deliberately misleading ideas of “Jewish physics,” made Einstein, whom he portrayed as a philosophical and scientific anarchist responsible for the “Jewish spirit” that had invaded the world of physics, his primary target. His anti-Semitism and German nationalism were at the core of his opposition to Einstein’s Theory of Relativity, which he branded as “the great Jewish fraud,” but the great fraud was Lenard himself, who lacked mathematical sophistication and opposed quantum physics because he was unable to understand it. He and his Deutsche Physik seemed to delight in constructing anti-Semitic nomenclature for the theory, including “the great pseudo-scientific swindle,” “Talmudic inflation physics,” “magical atheism,” and “the great Jewish world-bluff,” among other polemics.
Lenard fought hard to ensure that Einstein, the “pure-blooded Jew,” would not win a Nobel Prize; in fact, the decision by the Nobel Committee not to award any physics prize in 1921 was due, at least in part, to anti-Semitic pressure brought to bear by Lenard. Einstein was already despised by the National Socialists for his support for the Weimar Republic and for his pacifism, but his award of the Nobel Prize a year later – not for relativity, but for his “law of the photoelectric effect” – only exacerbated the frothing frenzy of hate against him.
As early as 1920, Lenard had instigated a vicious anti-Einstein campaign. A series of lectures denouncing Einstein as a fraud and a propagandist was held that August at the huge auditorium of the Berlin Philharmonic, where anti-Semitic leaflets were distributed and swastika lapel pins were sold along with Lenard’s anti-Einstein pamphlet. The campaign escalated to violent disruptions of Einstein’s lectures, Nazi mobs surrounding his home, death threats against him, and a bounty for his murder.
On August 27, 1920, Einstein published My Answer to Anti Relativity Co., Ltd. in Berliner Tageblatt, a liberal paper published by the prominent Jew Rudolph Mosse and known in anti-Semitic circles as “The Jew paper.” He infuriated Lenard and his supporters by pondering whether the opposition to the Theory of Relativity would have been as strident were he a non-Jewish Jewish National Socialist:
A variegated society has assembled whose provisional purpose of existence seems to be to degrade, in the eyes of nonscientists, the theory of relativity, as well as me as its originator . . . I have good reason to believe that motives other than the striving for truth are at the bottom of this business. If I were a German nationalist with or without a swastika instead of a Jew with liberal international views, then [I wonder if the opposition to my theory would have been so vociferous . . .]
On September 20, 1920, Einstein publicly debated Lenard at a meeting of the German Society of Scientists and Physicians in Bad Nauheim and, while no reliable account of the event exists, we know that the most important point raised by Lenard was that Einstein needed to invent “fictitious gravitational fields” to support his Jew theories and that Einstein responded by explaining the validity of his principle of equivalence. Einstein left the debate deeply distressed by Lenard, and his wife Elsa, who had been in attendance, suffered a nervous breakdown shortly thereafter. As the result of the events in Bad Nauheim, Einstein became wary of publicity and thereafter generally shunned public appearances.
In 1931, Lenard issued One Hundred Authors Against Einstein (1931), which challenged the theory of relativity, and in Great Men in Science, A History of Scientific Progress (1933), he conspicuously omitted any mention of Einstein. He also omitted any mention of Einstein’s non-Jewish supporters, including conspicuously Wilhelm Röentgen, who had been awarded the very first Nobel Prize in Physics for his discovery of X-rays (1901). Having been credited by the Third Reich for the discovery of X-rays, Lenard had the temerity to announce:
I am the mother of X-rays. Just as the midwife is not responsible for the mechanism of birth, so was Röentgen not responsible for the discovery of x-rays since all the groundwork had been prepared by me. Without me, the name of Röentgen would be unknown today.
This instance constitutes but one of countless examples where Lenard did not let the facts get in his way. In fact, he had acknowledged in several letters that Röentgen was the discoverer of X-rays and that he, Lenard, had played only a minor role.
Exhibited here is a historic July 22, 1927, correspondence from Lenard to fellow Nobel Prize-winning physicist Wilhelm Wien, whom he apparently believes shares his anti-Semitic views [see original article for the text]….
Wilhelm Wien (1864-1928) was a German physicist who used theories about heat and electromagnetism to deduce Wien’s Displacement Law (1893), which calculates the emission of a blackbody at any temperature from the emission at any one reference temperature. His work was instrumental in establishing the formulation of quantum mechanics, and he received the 1911 Nobel Prize for his work on heat radiation.
Ironically, it does not appear that Wien was anti-Einstein or that he shared Lenard’s views on “Jewish physics.” In fact, he believed that the theory of relativity had become subject to an unprecedentedly unseemly, bitter, and personal discourse and that criticism of Einstein had less to do with science than with boosting National Socialism. Concerned about the unprofessional entanglement of science with politics and dogma, he helped to draft a letter to German scientists and researchers demanding that Lenard cease his attacks for the sake of Germany’s international reputation.
Lenard’s segue to complaining about Einstein’s recent acceptance by “the Munich Academy” is a reference to Einstein’s appointment on February 19, 1927, as a member of the mathematical-scientific class at the Bavarian Academy of Science, which was located in Munich. He was barely able to secure the required three-fourths vote of the membership, and his controversial election brought additional anti-Semitic attention to him. On March 28, 1933, he wrote to the Academy asking that it cancel his membership because, among other reasons, he could not condone the Academy’s acceptance of discrimination against non-Aryan scientists and that “I do not want to be a member of such a society which – however, under pressure from the outside – takes such a stance.”
The Deutsche Physik movement ultimately failed because of Lenard’s political ineptness and due to its inability to gain broader political support or backing from most physics authorities, and its usefulness to the Reich ended when Einstein and his fellow Jewish physicists were forced to leave Germany. As Allied forces approached Heidelberg, where Lenard served in an honorary position after his retirement in 1931 as professor of theoretical physics at Heidelberg University, Lenard, believing that the Allies were determined to arrest him and put him on trial, fled to Mieselhausen, a small German village.
In fact, the paranoid and narcissistic Lenard could never imagine that no one was actually interested in him and, seeking to “throw himself on the mercy of the court,” he needlessly turned himself in to American authorities. Ultimately excused by the Allies due to his advanced age, he was kept under house arrest in Mieselhausen until his death less than two years later.
Finally, it is difficult to understand how a Nobel Prize-winning scientist – even if an anti-Semite – could label a scientific discovery as “decadent” and a proven physics theory as “degenerate.” The take-away from the Lenard fiasco must be that having a sterling reputation as a prominent scientist does not guarantee sagacity or humanity; that “pure science” may not offer protection against absurdity and zealotry; that scientists, even brilliant scientists, have their own prejudices and manifest their own personal psychological and political pathologies; and that we must carefully consider their ideology, biases and agendas before ceding important civil rights to “follow the science.”
Actually, we should all “recoil in horror” at the prospect that the Jews — using American scientists as their proxies — could have gotten their hands on atomic weapons before Germany had surrendered in 1945.
The so-called “pacifist” — Einstein — wanted the U.S. to use those weapons on Germany, probably in retaliation for the public humiliation he had experienced by the likes of Lenard.
In fact, after the war Einstein all but admitted that his desire to see atomic weapons developed and used was solely based on his animosity toward Germany: “Had I known that the Germans would not succeed in developing an atomic bomb, I would have done nothing for the bomb.”
Contrary to what his army of apologists claim, Einstein refused to debate his theories publicly — not because he was publicity shy or for fear of “antisemitism” — but because he knew he couldn’t defend the theory without the help of other people running interference for him.
Einstein loved the spotlight — a media whore who never shied away from aggrandizing himself and his image — and the Jewish-controlled press created — and still promotes — his celebrity and “genius” the same way the promoted other Jewish “geniuses” like Sigmund Freud.
After failing an entrance exam to an engineering school and then working as a clerk in Switzerland, he published his “original” theory of relativity in 1905 without any footnotes or acknowledgment of the work of others — such as Henri Poincaré, Fritz Hasenöhrl, and James Maxwell.
But Einstein — like Charles Darwin — will always have fervent defenders because the world’s deep-pocketed satanic overlords — the architects of Mystery Babylon — promote pluralism, relativity, and evolution as their preferred weapons of mass destruction — and handsomely reward those who defend these concepts and discredit their critics.
Nikola Tesla, the greatest scientific and engineering mind of the 20th century observed,
The theory of relativity is a beggar wrapped in purple whom ignorant people take for a king and a mass of error and deceptive ideas violently opposed to the techniques of great men of science of the past and even to common sense….The theory wraps all of these errors and fallacies and clothes them in magnificent mathematical garb which fascinates, dazzles and makes people blind to the underlying errors. Its exponents are very brilliant men, but they are meta-physicists rather than scientists.
But like Alfred Nobel — and many other great and gifted men — Nikola Tesla was an “antisemite” whose greatest contribution to the world may have been the simple advice he gave to his secretary: “Never trust a Jew.”
In regard to Charles Darwin, everyone should read this article below, where the jews falsely built a supposed Darwin follower into a national figure of heroic stance.
John Scopes, of the famous Monkey Trial of 1925, was recruited by the ACLU to challenge the Butler Act in Tennessee. Scopes had never taught evolution theory or Darwin’s ideas. People have the impression they have about the trial and verdict because of a movie which intentionally depicted events counter to the actual facts. You can get the truth and details about that at this article, “Trial by Hollywood”.
Ironically, Lenard did real, actual work on the photoelectric effect, unlike Einstein,
yet somehow Einstein was awarded his Nobel for work on the photoelectric effect, not for the theory of relativity….
this irony was completely missed by the Jewish author of this article who was far too intent upon discrediting Lenard to stand back and see the big picture….
Furious frog !
Both about the photoelectric effect and about the relativity Einstein was a plagiarist. And for anything else.
Furious frog !
Einstein discovered nothing. Special relativity ? It was an opus of the French scientist Henri Poincaré (1905). General relativity ? Due to the German scientist David Hilbert (1915).
Was Albert Einstein also anti-Semitic? He refused to move to Israel, & didn’t mince words when he wrote bout those psycho butchers:
Mr. Shepard Rifkin
American Friends of the Fighters
for the Freedom of Israel
149 Second Ave.
New York 3,N.Y.
When a real and final catastrophe should befall us in Palestine the first responsible for it would be the British and the second responsible for it the Terrorist organizations build up from our own ranks [Jewish].
I am not willing to see anybody associated with those misled and criminal people.
There have always been some jews who speak out against the plans of the boldest jews, (like Einstein regarding the jew terrorism campaign in British Palestine), but there’s no evidence their opposition is ever predicated on moral considerations. Rather, it always only ever fear of negative consequences to jews as a result, just as is alluded to in the Einstein letter you included which is about the “final catastrophe should befall US”.
Interestingly, again and again, events have always ended up proving those more fearful or timid jews wrong, as those boldest among them keep succeeding with their risky schemes without real blowback.
I call that fake wrestling I always use that phrase. The goyim has all the reason to never really trust a jew .
Furious frog !
Albert Einstein: an anti-Zionist or an internationalist unable, because of his bias against nationalism, to openly and fully claim his Zionism?
In my opinion, a left-wing Zionist. And zionism is, I believe, internalionalism and babelism.
Here a quotation from an article published 83 years ago, and trying to make readers believe that Einstein was one of the greatest scientists of any time, and dealing with his political views too.
Edwin Muller, Einstein in Princeton, The Nation, volume 147, issue 3820 (17th of September 1938), pp. 267-268  :
« … his theory … », « … Nazi[‘s] … greatest scientist … »: it was everything but his theory. Also for sure they meant Germany’s greatest scientist, but it was incredibly silly, for he was a plagiarist, and nothing else.
Regarding the atomic bomb, Einstein never worked on it; he was be unable to do, and it would have been childish to ask him to. He wrote, on Leó Szilárd demand, a letter to Roosevelt, asking him to found research in that area, in order to prevent Germany to have it first. In fact, as soon as 1942 Germany abandoned almost any atomic research. The reason was that they found that the bomb wouldn’t be ready before 1945, whereas, for lack of resources and raw materials, no victory would be possible later than in 1944.
Just below that article, another one (The Nation, ibidem):
The scientific method with its requirement of objectivity and disciplined logic is a reflection of the biological White brains that created it as a way to get to the truth of matters while keeping out the taint of subjectivity and bias.
Biological jews are literally incapable of this science. They neither think with sufficient logical discipline nor can they be sufficiently objective. In fact, the biological jew has a weird innate propensity (akin to a mental disorder) that he is the center from which all existence springs and thus he is capable of creating reality merely by thinking something or proclaiming it so. (This is not an exaggeration. Jews literally have this innate belief and I could cite many examples and manifestations.)
Jews tout their disproportionate number of Nobel Prize winners for science, but know that 1) The award is given by politicians, not scientists 2) Part of the determination of winners are votes by previous winners. That is to say, once some jews finagled their way in as prize winners, they will then favor their racial kinsmen in voting for future awards, where White winners will split their votes among the other multiple contenders. 3) Most jew Nobel winners are for theoretical physics, that is to say, things that have never been proven (and never will be, because in reality, they are simply made up and were never true) but merely “supported” by math which only shows how it could be possible, not that it’s real.
At least two books have been written specifically on how Einstein was a fraud if you want the details on the General Relativity saga, with relativity being a theory that Einstein did not make up. It’s called “Einstein’s general relativity” theory because of the specific explanations he came up with as the possible explanation for relativity (invented out of nothing but his imagination, really). Einstein was not even a scientist. He was a mathematician. Jews do not like real science because it often involves tedious hard work of meticulous observation and experimentation. Jews just want to invent ideas and then do some math to claim they’re true.
Jews did not do the science of the repugnant atomic bomb. Jews were made the project managers set over the Whites who did the actual science (with at least one of those jews, Oppenheimer, known to have been giving those secrets to his fellow jews running the Soviet Union).
Similarly, jews did not do the science of their sloppy, faulty covid vaccine. Whites invented the underlying technology of mRNA delivery into cells using lipids. It was jews who then came up with the idea to commercialize it by using it as a brand new untested for creating an immune response.
Jew science is JUNK SCIENCE. If not for the past 100 years of jewish corruption of our scientific understanding of the world, we’d have colonies in other solar systems by now, be living to 200, and have gravity-neutralizing technology.
Yes, and the disastrous Salk polio vaccine is another example of Jewish genius….it killed and paralyzed so many children after it was originally released that it had to be withdrawn. And still to this day, Jews brag about what a genius Salk was and how he was an American “hero” or some sort. Like Einstein, just another fraud.
As far as Einstein’s math “acumen” goes, there’s plenty of evidence that his wife actually did the math for his relativity theory….and, as Bjerknes points out in his book “Saint Einstein”, Einstein had to hire a French mathematician to work out the math problems for Einstein’s follow-up, “Special theory of relativity.”
There’s also the fact that Einstein was very uncomfortable even having private conversations with real experts in physics. I can’t recall his name, but a young German physicist once visited Einstein in Princeton and tried to ask him about his theories, and he was shocked to find that Einstein didn’t want to talk about it, and he got the sense from the responses that he did get that Einstein didn’t understand the questions.
Good post. One of the reasons given by jews for lauding Salk as a hero is that he didn’t make any money off the vaccine. The truth is, that’s only because HE TRIED TO AND FAILED. His application for a patent on it was rejected because it was based on too much prior work of others. Imagine any claim of a jew voluntarily turning down an opportunity to enrich himself! Preposterous!
And you’re also correct there’s reason to think that Einstein’s wife (who was Serbian, like Tesla) likely did a lot of the math, uncredited, that he presented in his relativity paper, but I don’t discount that he was capable of doing higher math himself.
Robert Oppenheimer, the Jew who led the Manhattan Project, was a certified psychopath. He once bragged, “I am become death, the destroyer of worlds.” Oppenheimer showed psychopathic tendencies very early on in his life, starting when he admitted to trying to poison his mentor at Cambridge, a real physicist named Patrick Blackett. Oppenheimer’s wealthy parents used their influence to hush up the attempted murder and keep him from being expelled.
Do a piece on evolution.
When examined closely, it’s an indefensible (((freemasonic))) pipe-dream which just plain fails to stand any serious scrutiny whatsoever, whether in the light of the fossil record or the principle of entropy applied to genetics (it’s called Genetic Entropy and rules out even the remotest theoretical possibility of evolution).
The “scientific community” must still stand by this ridiculous 18th century hypothesis (check out Erasmus Darwin, Charles’ mason grandpa) however, lest the goyim wake up from their delusions and have to face the fact that a system written in a hyper-advanced multi-layered base-4 programming language really can’t create itself after all (im talking life here) and thereby have to consider the unnerving possibility that they were the fools all their lives and maybe, a God really does exist after all.
“The evidence we find in the geologic record is not nearly as compatible with darwinian natural selection as we would like it to be. Darwin was completely aware of this. He was embarrassed by the fossil record because it didn’t look the way he predicted it would…. Well, we are now about 120 years after Darwin and the knowledge of the fossil record has been greatly expanded. We now have a quarter of a million fossil species but the situation hasn’t changed much. ….ironically, we have even fewer examples of evolutionary transition than we had in Darwin’s time. By this I mean that some of the classic cases of darwinian change in the fossil record, such as the evolution of the horse in North America, have had to be discarded or modified as the result of more detailed information.”
David M. Raup, U. Chicago; C.