(Jewish Telegraphic Agency) Jews are the original “cultural appropriators” — and in decadent Weimar Germany, Jews had risen to dominate German arts and culture, but with the rise of Adolf Hitler and the National Socialists, they were stripped of their lofty and nepotistic status in order to restore German culture into the hands of the native German people:
Jews were forbidden today to give performances of Beethoven, Mozart and Goethe on the ostensible grounds that they must be allowed “to develop their own spiritual and creative genius.”
Explanation of the ban was offered by Hans Hinkel, Nazi Commissar for Jewish Cultural Affairs, who said:
“Jews must be allowed to develop their own spiritual and creative genius. If they are unable to or show themselves so poor in spiritual endowments that they cannot develop their own culture, it is all the more necessary to show the world that we cannot allow them to become the masters of our cultural life.”
Hans Hinkel, of course, knew full well that Jews were incapable of developing “their own spiritual and creative genius” — Jews are masters of mimicry — pleomorphic cultural chameleons — best depicted in Woody Allen’s film “Zelig” — able to recognize Aryan genius but capable of creating only pale facsimiles — such as Mendelssohn and Mahler.
Of course, in the classical music sphere, there were so many Jewish musicians and performers — and Germans such as conductor, Wilhelm Furtwängler who sympathized with their Jewish colleagues — that the National Socialists struggled to fill all the vacancies created by this 1937 ban.
But to better understand Jews in relation to classical music, take the example of Italian composer, Antonio Salieri — depicted in the 1984 film “Amadeus” by Jewish-looking actor F. Murray Abraham — who recognizes and envies Mozart’s genius, but is largely incapable of creating anything of lasting value on his own — so he attempts to sabotage Mozart instead.
In the film, Salieri says of Mozart, “Here again, is the very voice of God!” — and since Jewish identity is predicated upon the rejection of Christ — God come in the flesh — Jews have doomed themselves to frustrating status of recognizing that Voice but incapable of materializing it through art and culture — because they arrogantly believe that they are the living embodiment of God in the flesh while “gentiles” are merely useful animals to be exploited lacking the spirit of God.
This movie “Amadeus” is a thoroughly Jewish affair — based on the stage play by Jewish playwright Peter Shaffer and directed by Hungarian Jew Milos Forman — and featuring the Iago-like character Salieri, played by Abraham, who received an Academy Award for, no doubt, depicting the conflicted Jewish relationship to genuine classical music and art.
Johann Sebastian Bach — whom many consider the greatest composer who ever lived — inscribed each of his musical manuscripts with “S.D.G.” an abbreviation for “Soli Deo Gloria” or “for the glory of God” — a humble acknowledgment of his inspiration — while Jews, as mimics, are inspired by other, more accomplished composers rather than by God — a mere platonic shadow on the wall.
And while Jews have whined about being banned from performing German classical geniuses, they hypocritically have called for the banning of performances of Bach’s “St. John Passion” because of its “antisemitic” themes — of course, Jews hate the Gospel of John — the apostle beloved by Christ — and have called for it to be censored — preferably outright banned.
Because Jews cannot create God-inspired art, they tear it down — analyze it, deconstruct it — asking sophomoric questions like “Who says Beethoven is so great?” — a contemptuous attitude best exemplified in the words of Jewish feminist and pretentious scribbler, Susan Sontag:
“The truth is that Mozart, Pascal, Boolean Algebra, Shakespeare, parliamentary government, baroque churches, Newton, the emancipation of women, Kant, Marx, and Balanchine ballets don’t redeem what this particular civilization has wrought upon the world. The white race is the cancer of human history.”
–C.I.A.-funded Partisan Review, Winter 1967
This oft-quoted screed is a classic example of Jewish “sour grapes” — from Aesop’s fable of “The Fox and the Grapes — to belittle what you yourself cannot grasp or achieve.
Along a similar vein, the “British” Jew Norman Lebrecht — unfortunately one of the most influential classical music critics today — who was once described by a world-leading conductor as having “pompous, preposterous judgment” — claimed,
“Beethoven was an above average composer, promoted by whiteness and maleness.”
—Slipped Disc, July 31, 2020
Jewish sour grapes indeed.
After the fall of the Third Reich — our last Christian bulwark against the judeo-bolshevik onslaught — Jews quickly re-established their dominance and stranglehold on the culture, not only in Germany but in all western nations — and have enjoyed a virtual monopoly over the field of classical music.
Not only have many of the famous conductors of major symphonies been Jews — such as George Szell, Eugene Ormandy, Andre Previn, and Leonard Bernstein — but music criticism is also dominated by Jews, such as the above-mentioned Norman Lebrecht.
And it should therefore come as no surprise that the most performed classical music composer today is not Beethoven, Bach, or Brahms — but rather the second-rate Jewish Bohemian, Gustav Mahler.
And perhaps the most monetarily successful and famous of post-war Jewish composers and conductors — the homosexual Leonard Bernstein — was a great admirer of Mahler.
Speaking of “pompous and preposterous judgment,” listen to Leonard Bernstein project the Jewish virtue of “ambiguity” on both Mahler and Mozart — in a pretentious, rambling, and nonsensical lecture available here.
As someone once trenchantly observed,
“Leonard Bernstein was brilliant, and nobody appreciated that more than himself.”
And one of the most celebrated classical pianists of the post-war era was another Jewish homosexual — Vladimir Horowitz — once famously described as a “master of distortion and exaggeration” — whose talent “illustrates that an astounding instrumental gift carries no guarantee about musical understanding.”
Is it fair to ask if we should trust Jewish homosexuals to correctly interpret and perform the greatest masterpieces of white Christian culture?
We certainly wouldn’t be offended if Jews insisted that only fellow Jews should interpret and perform Mendelssohn or Mahler — but apparently even Jews themselves might not be up to the task.
For example, we can see this conflict between the German and Jewish spirit played out in an infamous argument that arose when Leonard Bernstein conducted Mahler’s “Das Lied von der Erde” performed by the Israel Philharmonic — when the lead vocalist — the German soprano, Christa Ludwig — who was certainly one of the greatest classical vocalists of the 20th Century — got into an argument with Bernstein about his misinterpretation of the rhythm of the piece:
Ironically, even a German is better at interpreting the Jewish composer Mahler than the Jewish conductor, Bernstein — an apt metaphor for the degraded state of classical music today.
Jews are very touchy about Mahler’s reputation — such as Woody Allen — in his 1979 film “Manhattan” — who becomes incensed when his intellectually pretentious friends call Mahler “overrated”:
Lol that is brilliant. What better way to expose the absolute lack of jewish creativity? They can only imitate and/or destroy.
Why do Jews lack unique, long-lasting creativity?
“Evil cannot create anything new. They can only corrupt and ruin what good forces have invented or made.”
—J.R.R. Tolkien
Agree with bulk of article with the exception of it’s position on Gustav Mahler: even Richard Wagner’s wife Cosima – who was even more anti- Jewish than her hubby( jawohl) – stated that she never heard a better interpreter of Wagner’s opuses than Mahler’s. And he could do the Bee like few others, I’d add.
Mahler worshiped Wagner, so it’s not surprising that he would meticulously try to conduct Wagner with the utmost care and stay true to its intent.
But Mahler’s limitations as an artist may come from his typical Jewish identity, of which he wrote, “thrice homeless, as a native of Bohemia in Austria, as an Austrian among Germans, as a Jew throughout the world—always an intruder, never welcomed” (Alma Mahler, Memories and Letters 109).
And many assume that Mahler converted to Christianity for political and social advancement, as did Mendelssohn.
Had it not been for the celebrity of Leonard Bernstein and his personal mission to resuscitate Mahler’s reputation, it’s doubtful he would be more than a minor figure in classical music today.
Mahler tried hard to be assimilated, and even distanced himself from friends who were “too Jewish”. Many Jews saw him as a “self-hating Jew” because of this.
When Mahler moved to New York in later life, he was repelled by the Jews he saw there and did not relate to them at all.
Despite his refusal to identify as a “Jew”, Mahler is still loved by Jews because, well, he’s all they have except for Mendelssohn. They blame his “self-hating” on antisemites who forced him to deny his Jewishness in order to succeed in classical music in Vienna.
Why yes… some hardcore Zionist BagelEaters such as the late Irv Rubin of JDL infamy castigated Mahler as a self hater who loved Hitler’s favorite
composer( Wagner), converted to the goyishe Church of Rome and married a wanton” shiska” ( Alma). Ol’ Irv had an ax to grind with The Three Stooges too, if I recollect correctly…
I don’t like the pro-nazi direction this website is taking with these last 2 articles, after all the bullshit Hitler did, there are still people willing to follow his garbage ideas.
All the carnage he caused on White Christians is evidently something you don’t care about like when he razed Rotterdam to the ground and killed so many of my people.
Also as a “Pro-White” website you don’t seem to care that the nazis didn’t care about White people and that they considered Turks, Georgians, Armenians and Persians as Aryans and allowed them to freely race-mix, in comparison today German conservative who is anti-turkish would be considered more extreme than them.
If this behaviour from you of whitewashing the nazis continues I will have no choice but to leave this website.
Bos: BS. The bolshevism, jewish evil was ok with you ? see ya.
“Bos” could not possibly be a regular reader here. The articles CFT writes are consistent, never contradict themselves, and have explained all his objections many times before.
So obviously he’s a troll who is trying to sow seeds of division by making stawman arguments.
And the idea that anyone cares whether he stays or leaves is laughable. He must be very self-absorbed with an inflated ego to think that his foundless opinions would have any influence on the smart readers here.
I would guess he could perhaps be Dutch himself, and he can’t look objectively at his own country’s military leadership and see their incompetence. Instead he wants to see the Dutch as “victims” of “Hitler’s bullshit”….
Many Poles are the same way. Polish leadership was responsible for ignoring Hitler’s many peace overtures, and when Hitler finally had had enough and invaded, the Poles cried victim, just like the Dutch.
And it’s the Jews who encourage these nations to still see themselves as victims of German “aggression”. Sad that they haven’t figured that out yet.
Out of curiosity I did a search of the CFT archives and found lots of articles that they have done defending the Dutch people against the Jewish/Liberal cabal that runs and is ruining their country:
https://christiansfortruth.com/?s=dutch
https://christiansfortruth.com/?s=netherlands
https://christiansfortruth.com/?s=holland
I doubt there is even one website in the Netherlands which has published such material in their own defense.
And CFT would be illegal in that country, and those who run it or comment here could be prosecuted for “hate crimes”.
So anyone in the Netherlands should be grateful that CFT even exists for the small minority there who aren’t brainwashed by their judeo-overlords.
Bos
What “pro-Nazi direction” is CFT “recently” taking? We have written countless articles about the Germans in the last 5 years, and never have done so in order to “endorse Nazis”.
We expose the lies that the Jews and their lackeys have told about them. We run those articles to expose judeo-bolshevik lies and tyranny, and that the “Nazis” were the only white nation in Europe to stand up to them and attempt to destroy them in order to liberate Europe from the communist menace, and the judeo-banker stranglehold on the economies.
The “Nazis” considered Turks, Georgians, Armenians, and Persians “honorary” aryans simply because they were willing to fight along side them. From a racial point of view, they never would have endorsed inter-marriage with them, as all those people had arabic blood.
The Germans cared deeply about the white Europeans, but they would not tolerate those white nations who chose to side with the Jews who wanted to destroy Germany and make Europe safe for the eventual bolshevik takeover.
Sounds like you don’t really understand why the Germans resorted to bombing Rotterdam. They had no interest in bombing the city in order to secure it. In fact, on May 14, 1940 the Germans, who had the Dutch cornered and surrounded issued an ultimatum — surrender or the bombing of Rotterdam will commence.
“Three German negotiators carried the ultimatum to the Maas bridges. The three men held the banner of truce, but were nevertheless treated harshly by the Dutch. They were stripped of all their weapons, which were thrown into the water, and then blindfolded.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Rotterdam#14_May
The Dutch commander played games with the Germans, and the Germans naturally took this as an act of refusal to surrender, and the aerial bombing of Rotterdam was ordered. The Dutch have no one to blame but themselves for what happened to Rotterdam.
If you really want to understand the war from the German perspective, and to understand that Hitler did not want to destroy western Europe in order to secure the western front prior to his invasion of Russia in the east, we strongly recommend you read David Irving’s, “Hitler’s War”, by far the best book on the subject.
We don’t “whitewash” anything about Germany, and if you foolishly think that, you don’t really understand the whole point of this website, and we would urge you to find another one that coincides with your distorted understanding of history and what is really happening in the world today.
We will not change to pander to your ignorance on these subjects.
Well said, major GOOD on you…upholding the TRUTH.
btw….{{{{WHO}}}} owns the {{{{JEWISH}}}} MEDIA…?
and {{{{WHO}}}} prints the CURRENCY, and pays all the {{{{JEW}}} worshipping
CRACK WHORES in… {{{{CONGRESS}}} ?
SEE: Matthew 13:39-43 !!!!!
“The enemy that sowed them is the devil; the harvest is the end of the world; and the reapers are the angels. As therefore the tares are gathered and burned in the fire; so shall it be in the end of this world. The Son of man shall send forth his angels, and they shall gather out of his kingdom all things that offend, and them which do iniquity;
And shall cast them into a furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth. Then shall the righteous shine forth as the sun in the kingdom of their Father. Who hath ears to hear, let him hear.”
“…WHO owns the JEWISH MEDIA…?
Is this a trick question — kin to — “…who is buried in Grant’s Tomb?”
Good one, West!
Kevin ………………
Not sure if you pay any attention to “A Clifton’s” comments. ???
He is a real Enigma. Esoteric. I can never get a straight answer out of him. He endorses Willie Martin but then has a totally different theological belief than Martin. So, it really makes no sense why he continues to endorse Martin. Unless it is a subtle play to get people over to Bill.
The guy has serious issues. He is just not a normal human being.
“Christians” are supposed to want to have interest in other brothers in the Faith. Clifton must have his own because he has no interest in ours. The guy simply won’t have a normal conversation. It’s all Code.
I actually feel bad for him. Something missing in his soul. I had a real interest in “whatever” point he was trying to make when he first appeared. But now ……………… again, he is simply an enigma.
Shill, bored, or very confused.
…..beings that “I” am supposedly ….Shill, bored, or very confused…..
might the inquiry be made regarding Matthew 13:39-43…like was that
“overlooked” in the haste for a witty rejoinder….
cause you know it’s like I have been on this trail for a little over 60 years
and there’s still plenty to do to keep busy….like you know….?
any Dallas Cowboys at the Alamo ….yet ?
CAUSE…you know like there’s still no {{{{JEWS}}}} in the Old Testament !!!
keep climbing
A. Clifton ….
Just “talk” like a normal human being.
CFT, Great points and the truth.
It’s sad America calls jews our “greatest ally” – and it is all against white Christians, same thing over and over when whites wake up?
The jews will have made deals with China to war with all whites – bio chemicals and nukes and anything?
Let’s not let the jews hide what they have so far. And not leave it to chance.
@CFT: Great comment thank you ❤️.
Sorry to be a debby downer, but this would be a good time to address the theories circulating that Hitler was a Rothschild puppet paid off by the Warburgs (supported by the document “Hitler’s Secret Backers” by Sidney Warburg). There’s also the 1960 article from the Jewish Telegraphic Agency, “Rothschild Family Seeks to Recover Part of Ransom Paid to Hitler” that says Hitler was paid $20M in 1939 for the release of a member of the Rothschild family (which, if Hitler were truly anti-Jewish Bolshevism, would never have happened in the first place).
There’s also some evidence that Hitler had help from a Rothschild proxy in writing Mein Kampf, similarly to how Marx had help from Engels (Rothschild proxy) to write Das Kapital.
Hitler was theoretically put in place to destabilize Germany & prevent the armed movements within there from actually defeating Communism, and he was possibly related to the house of Hossenzollern (the physical resemblances are uncanny, esp. between Hitler & prince Sigissmund).
And it was why he was so friendly to the Jews; at the beginning of the National Socialist regime, there was huge support from German Jews, and Hitler signed the Havaara agreement specifically to help build a Jewish state in Palestine.
And as CFT conclusively proved, Hitler DIDN’T kill 6M Jews for innumerable reasons, even though he had reason to & the world would be a very different place today if the Jewish population had actually been reduced by 6M, instead of maybe 1.5M over 6 years of war.
The NaZi name apparently came from “NAtional Socialist” and “ZIonist” (NaZi), because of the Zionist Haavara agreement & the large Jewish-Zionist support for Hitler in the early-mid 30s.
The Bush Crime Family, Zionists to their core, have also been proven supporters of the Nazis, and what American financial support for Germany there was allowed numerous factories that had some western business dealings to, coincidentally, avoid getting destroyed by Allied bombing campaigns.
There were numerous Jews that were in the SS secret police (the famous Jewish squadrons that were depicted in the film “The Pianist” as well as in “Schindler’s List”).
I have been reading Hitler’s War for a while, in addition to other materials, and even Irving seems to unwittingly corroborate this theory that Hitler was a puppet, by giving direct quotations of Hitler’s statements in crucial decisionmaking periods, which don’t really give good justifications for some of Hitler’s choices (but Irving makes no comment on that, being an Historian & impartial to opinion). Surely, if he weren’t a puppet, there would be better reasons beyond complicated logistics & disagreements on the delivery of an airplane, for why the Wehrmacht & Hitler were at such constant odds.
Hitler also engaged in the classic “say one thing & do another” tactic when it came to escalating the war, such as when he launched an ICBM at Britain as he was trying to encourage a ceasefire towards the war’s end; or declaring war on America & hastening their entry into the war as he was supposedly doing everything in his power to preserve & secure Germany’s military resources. His decision to declare war on America is still questionable to this day, Hitler’s speech where he declared war doesn’t really give enough good reasons for hastening a large consumption of Germany’s resources on a 3rd foe– resources that he still desperately needed while securing the oil fields of North Africa & the Middle-East from the British.
The curmudgeonly user “Bos” now adds the fact that Hitler encouraged racemixing, thereby hindering progression of restoring the White Christian Aryan race that he promoted his entire life around helping.
Finally, it is undeniable that Hitler made an astonishing amount of mistakes as commander-in-chief during the war;
– His generals were begging him to not even begin the battle of Kursk, which was the Nazis last chance to turn the tide of the war in the east, which ended in failure. Hitler’s response to his generals, according the PBS Battlefields series on Kursk was something to the effect of, “I know, every time I think of this battle it makes my stomach turn. But once I know a decision is the correct path, I simply must do everything I can to see it is accomplished.” (…….) The massive loss of German equipment to the Soviets, in part due to events like the Battle of Kursk, was what powered up the post-WW2 Soviet military to the point where the Americans were terrified of combatting the German-equipped Red Army. Which was something Goerring illustrated quite hauntingly in his suicide letter to Winston Churchill.
– Backtracking from the disaster of Kursk, during the Battle of Britain, Hitler had a perfect opportunity to destroy the British & take over the island with his far superior Luftwaffe, but did not follow his admiral’s advice to do full Blitzkrieg-style bombardments of the entire British island because he wanted to preserve the British culture, as he felt they were fellow Aryans (……….); instead of having the Luftwaffe use their bombers to destroy a horribly unprepared & underequipped, understaffed & undertrained Royal Air Force’s air bases, as was in the original plan laid out by his admirals, he at the last minute ordered the planes to redirect their flight patterns from all over Britain, to refocus and bomb London, and of course this did not end well for Germany; the British won and were able to re-calibrate their defenses later to repel German raids, and Hitler’s bizarre hesitancy to destroy England as brutally as he would later destroy eastern Europe, cost him the perfect & only opportunity he really had to take Britain & win WW2 right at the beginning.
– According to Anthony Beevor, during Stalingrad, Hitler ordered his men to leave their tanks & storm the center of Stalingrad, because he needed every man available to take the hill, including the men in the tanks (…….), and when this failed the Germans lost their tank crews & they had to try to re-take the center several more times with severely diminished manpower due to Hitler’s “mistake”. Beevor describes numerous mistakes like this that Hitler made in the battle in his book “Stalingrad”, but that one stuck with me.
– Hitler overtly refused to adhere to Rommel’s advice during the Allied invasion of France, and this led to massive casualties on the German side due to Hitler’s insistence on counter-offensives instead of strategic withdrawals to secure defensive positions & repel the advance of the allies. By the time Hitler did retreat back into Germany, he had lost so much of his military that it was impossible for him to defend Germany, and considering the Germans were a superior armed force in every way & the Allies were taking huge casualties in spite of their victories, this poor strategizing is really indefensible. Hitler could have won the war if he listened to his generals (again, Irving doesn’t really go into detail of Hitler’s decision making process during these logistical-planning moments of the war, that’s not really what the book’s about).
– During the initial phases of Operation Barbarossa, Hitler took a commanding role in many of the operations & put a focus on destroying the Red army instead of taking land (…….), and it caused large halts in progress & did little real damage to the Red Army that couldn’t not be replenished (as Stalin so maliciously did, vividly detailed in Hitler: The Greatest Story Never Told) and cost valuable time that could have been spent taking Moscow & destroying Communism forever.
– When George Patton saw Hitler’s troops break out of the forest & attack during the Battle of the Bulge (Hitler’s closest thing to a major triumph in the war), Patton’s reaction was, “Goddammit! The sonofabitch has put his **** in a meatgrinder!!” and the battle, of course, ended in disaster for Germany; they lost most of what few troops they had left.
Irving’s “Hitler’s War” doesn’t really give many good justifications for these decisions, but it does give a lot of insight into the chaotic inner nature of the 3rd Reich’s government & an honest portrait of Hitler as he was in the moment, instead of as a Hollywood propaganda monster that most people see him as. The fact Hitler had so much power & the inner workings of the 3rd Reich were also so chaotic, shows that perhaps Hitler never really intended on running his government like a well-oiled German machine…..
Now, if you just look at everything above and take it for what it is, and apply it to the conventional knowledge people have of WW2, so many of Hitler’s confirmed historical decisions make little sense on every side of the political spectrum.
If Hitler was an evil monster who killed all the Jews, why are the Jews lying about the Holocaust, why did they start a war against Germany to create the conditions to create the state of Israel, and why did Hitler do so much good for the people of Germany during the 1930s & tell the truth about Jews & Communism?
If Hitler was actually a Great Man of History who combatted Judeo-Bolshevik Communism & Marxism, why did he make so many horrible decisions that cost Germany millions of dead & the entire war, and why did he take money from Rothschild proxies like the Warburgs, and help the Jews so much? And why did he use so much Marxist theory in his government, like arguments against Capital & the collection of wealth in the hands of a few individuals, and centralize the government & instill a police state, as he was attacking Marxism?
Neither theory makes sense, but if you factor in that Hitler was a Rothschild puppet & a member of the Hossenzollern family, and there never was a real “Adolf Hitler” (or if there was he was killed & identity assumed), but a member of the German aristocracy playing “Hitler”, whose job was to hold back Germany’s nationalistic rebellion against Jewish tyranny & to destroy the German army from within…..
…….. And that the entire second World War was a psychopathic full-spectrum-domination racketeering operation by the Zionist Khazarian-Chabad Oligarchs in the banking world, to destroy human lives & reap in the profits of war, as Smedley Butler so brilliantly described in “War Is A Racket”……
…… If you factor in this, then all of Hitler’s decisions make perfect sense.
The counter theories I’ve been able to sparse through on this (this is a very niche discussion so not too many people talk about it) admit Hitler originally was a Rothschild puppet, but then he “went rogue” at some point in the 1930s or 40s. But if that were true, then his decisions during the war are even more preposterous; Hitler going “rogue”, led to a far greater destruction of Germany from the inside out due to poor decisionmaking at beyond-crucial periods of the war, than ever could have been possible had Hitler just stayed a puppet.
I have far too much other material on this subject to read before I can come to my own conclusion on it, it is all so complicated. That being said, my hunch is maybe Hitler’s Rothschild handler (possibly the man the JTA says the Rothschilds gave Hitler $20M for) goaded him on, saying something like “a ceasefire is just around the corner you just have to lose a few more troops or the British will think you’ll just attack again” and then backstabbed him way too late for Hitler to do anything, at which point he made himself a figure of history.
Which would explain why Hitler seems so ambivalent all the time if you read some of the documented conversations he had with his staff, why he kept pursuing a diplomatic solution as he was being reactionary in the war & launching ICBMs & constant counter-offensives that were killing hundreds of thousands of British & Americans, why he softballed his attacks on Britain (which is where the Jewish financial world was largely housed) but played hardball with the USSR. And why, in the recording of him talking to Mannerheim, he sounds so lost when it came to underestimating the strength of the USSR.
So I will end with a quote from Winston Churchill at a 4th of July dinner in 1950, archived on the New York Times July 5th, 1950 article, “Churchill Bids US Depend On Britain”:
“… The Russians would have been pushed east of the Urals and perhaps conquered by Hitler’s Germany, had it not been for the generous & timely help from the Western Allies.”
I believe this is the source for the quote popularly misattributed to Churchill (but which has little historical validation), “We butchered the wrong pig.”
Heeby,
This comment is far too long to address all your points, almost like you threw everything at the wall to see what would stick. We hope in the future, you keep your comments shorter and to the point so as to make it possible to address the material in a more organized way.
First off, you cite “Sidney Warburg”, but the problem is no such person ever existed and that book is pretty much accepted by revisionists as a communist-written anti-Hitler screed. Nothing in it is provable, and it’s purpose was to discredit Hitler. Some believe the commie Strassers were behind it. Can’t take anything in it seriously. Other books came out at the time, alleged former NS “insiders” who tried to discredit Hitler, none of them word the paper they are written on.
Unfortunately, Anthony Sutton took “Sidney Warburg” seriously when he wrote his book “Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler” which you seem to allude to. That book is worthless and full of speculation and hearsay.
It’s really hard to address most of what you say when you use such vague phrases as “there is some evidence” or “Hitler theoretically…” It’s not worth addressing such unfounded speculation.
The best book on the financing of Hitler’s rise is “Who Financed Hitler: The Secret Funding of Hitler’s Rise to Power, 1919-1933” by James Pool. The “Rothschild” rumors are addressed and debunked. Pool provides examples of how wealthy Jews did make overtures to finance Hitler, but Hitler rejected them.
There were two Rothschlds arrested. Robert Rothschild was sent to Dachau and eventually released, no ransom paid.
https://collections.ushmm.org/search/catalog/irn505501
The other was Louis Nathaniel de Rothschild was arrested but “imprisoned” in a posh hotel where, yes, his family negotiated his release in exchange for a large sum of money which the National Socialists gladly took. The fact that he was arrested and his property seized and not returned is proof that Hitler was not a “Rothschild puppet”.
The term “Nazi” is a Jewish contrivance, not a German one. And it had nothing to do with the Transfer Agreement which happened after the fact. Jews coined “Nazi” to disparage the National Socialists. Period. The “socialism” in National Socialism does not in any way refer to Marx but rather to classic 19th German ideas of social responsibility.
Hitler declared war on America because America attacked his ally Japan, and the treaty he signed make it necessary. And it was FDR who knew about this mutual defense agreement, and that’s why he orchestrated Pearl Harbor, to force Germany to declare war on America and justify America’s entry into the European war.
Hitler used V-bombs on England to stop them from targeting German civilian targets. Dresden is a perfect example. No military importance. Pure psychological terror bombing.
If you’ve read about Hitler’s handling of the war, then you know that he was constantly being undermined by his generals. Those generals would go on to plot his assassination. Many strategic mistakes were made but that proves nothing about Hitler being a “Rothschld puppet”. Are you aware of how many blunders the Allies made? That cost thousands of lives of American troops? Why don’t you claim that’s proof the America’s were “paid off” to intentionally try to lose the war?
Ultimately, the whole idea that Hitler was a “Rothschild puppet” or financed by Jews originally came from Jews themselves, mostly from communist Jewish newspapers in Germany and the West in order to discredit him and demoralize his supporters.
Today, the most prominent purveyor of this Jewish misinformation campaign is the Jew Henry Makow. As Nikola Tesla once said, “Never trust a Jew”, but it looks like that’s exactly what you’ve done, Heeby. You need to read more reliable, balanced accounts of the war.
It’s a bit shocking that any regular CFT reader would believe what this “Heeby Kikeburger” is claiming. I think he showed up here recently, maybe waiting for the right time to drop his “Rothschild puppet” conspiracy theory and cause confusion by debating his wild speculations.
Didn’t “The Bear” try to promote this kind of nonsense recently?
He needs to start reading CFT’s archived “History” articles and the ones specifically related to Hitler….which have debunked most of his claims….before he spouts this nonsense and waste all of our time:
https://christiansfortruth.com/?s=hitler
https://christiansfortruth.com/category/history/
Sounds like Heeby Kike-burger is hanging with Henry Makow who spews the kind of nonsense Heeby puts forth.
Heeby, all I can do when I read this crap is SMH. You spew lies like your proud of it instead of humbling yourself to know the actual truth. That’s what jews do all over the internet is insert absolute lies for the idol worship they depend on.
First off…Why on earth would A. Hitler go all the way to the Bolshevik Russia with the fight if he intentionally wanted to undermine Germany? IT JUST MAKES NO SENSE AT ALL. Specifically…Bull Sh*t. Have fun spreading lies about a war that Hitler NEVER WANTED and tried many times for peace. The evil allies didn’t want peace…as Pearl Harbor was orchestrated, planned and executed by FDR to get it rolling. I do know now for a fact that had the Germans not encountered snow storms just as Stalin was losing the war and EXECUTING HIS OWN SOLDIERS WHO TURNED BACK…they would have hands down won the war. It is a fact that the Russians were using weather warfare at that time…and I believe that is why the ‘snow storms’ showed up at the right time. That very weather warfare is being used to this day.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7yJnYCpboGU
The TRUE story of Nikola Tesla – told by Lt. Col. Thomas Bearden – Free Energy device explained !!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z0Ggmi_6JFU
4/29/2022 — Secret Super Weapons That Drive Disarmament Negotiations – Lt. Col. Thomas Bearden
@ Heeby again…
[…”Hitler signed the Havaara agreement specifically to help build a Jewish state in Palestine.”]
https://twitter.com/RealZeist/status/1555338514321051650
Yishai Fleischer at #CPACTexas :
“Israel was formed from a more communistic place, it came out of Russian Jews”
Heeby claims that “Hitler signed the Haavara agreement specifically to help build a Jewish state in Palestine”
Wrong. Hitler didn’t personally sign that agreement, but he allowed Germany to enter into that agreement to get the Jews out of Germany. Eichmann orchestrated and implemented that agreement.
Hitler was against the Jews establishing their own country in Palestine and said so in “Mein Kampf”. He wrote,
“For while the Zionists try to make the rest of the world believe that the national consciousness of the Jew finds its satisfaction in the creation of a Palestinian state, the Jews again slyly dupe the dumb Goyim [gentile]. It doesn’t even enter their heads to build up a Jewish state in Palestine for the purpose of living there; all they want is a central organization for their international world swindle, endowed with its own sovereign rights and removed from the intervention of other states: a haven for convicted scoundrels and a university for budding crooks.”
Please go, Bos.
You do not belong in the company of those who value truth and life. Bye.
Bos
By all means do a Jew boycott…I, for one, welcome it.
Lies will never stand, which unfortunately you don’t GET.
It’s past time true Bold Christians/Believers in our Savior Jesus Christ stand their ground in the Truth against our enemies and their poison.
And don’t forget that enemies of Truth are enemies of God.
Please go where you can swim in the swamps of sin. BYE!!!
Keep up the good fight of faith, CFT et al.
Great article.
It’s not just music. The Jews do the same thing in the sciences.
They’re a race of narcissists who get triggered whenever someone reminds them of their complete lack of accomplishment.
The “Big Bang” theory is a perfect example of Jewish “science”….straight out of the Kabbalah…literally
Why do you keep misidentifying F. Murray Abraham as a jew when in reality he is a Christian of Arab and Italian descent? This isn’t the first time you call him a jew for no reason at all.
https://ethnicelebs.com/f-murray-abraham
“He is the son of Josephine (Stello) and Fred T. Abraham. His father was born into the Antiochian Orthodox Christian faith in Myklos/Muqlus, Syria, a small village in the Valley of the Christians/Wadi al-Nasara. His mother was born in Pennsylvania, to Italian parents; she became a member of the Orthodox Christian religion. His family’s surname was evidently originally Ibrahim.
F. Murray is the first Arab-American to have won a Best Actor Academy Award.”
Nicolas asks “Why do you keep misidentifying F. Murray Abraham as a jew…”?
Well, we just assumed it for three reasons.
1) his name, which appears quintessentially Jewish.
2) He looks like a Jew.
3) Hollywood promoted him and awarded him.
You say he’s “arab” and “italian”. Both of those ethnicities commonly have some Jewish ancestry, depending on the families. It would surprise us if he didn’t have some Jewish ancestry in his not-so distant past.
That said, we will change the article and go along with the scant information on his family that Wiki provides, not that it changes anything as far as the main thrust of the article.
Nicolas ……
Nicolas thinks F Murray Abraham is a Christian!!!
Nicolas has a huge blind spot.
Like Swatting Flies but Swallowing Camels.
SMH
If Christianity’s survival were dependent on “Christian” arabs or africans our faith is doomed.
Brings to mind the Methodist conference from a few years back when it was the Asians and the Africans who put the kibosh on the push to make the church go full gay.
Right, and then “conservative” white Christians use those examples of asian and africans who stood up to gays as “proof” that they are valuable to Christians. Such as circus. Fox News does the same thing with their “rainbow” coalition of “conservatives”.
Just like the Jew copycat and overturning of George Frederick Handle’s “Messiah” with the ultra depressing dark “Hallelujah ” by Leonard Cohen. It has literally drowned out one of the most anointed scriptural piece ever to be played about the birth, death and resurrection of our Lord Jesus Christ.
https://youtu.be/wbmgVQKY5YU