Here we would like to take a closer look at one of the Ten Commandments — Exodus 20:14 — the 7th Commandment — which virtually everyone takes at face value:
“Thou shalt not commit adultery.”
We don’t pretend to be experts on Bible translation, but we believe that if we look at the big picture — the major themes of Genesis and the Old Testament in general — and use some disciplined reasoning — we can succeed in following Paul’s words,
“Prove all things; hold fast that which is good.”
–1 Thessalonians 5:21
But also taking heed of Paul’s warning,
“But I fear, lest by any means, as the serpent beguiled Eve through his subtilty, so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ.”
–2 Corinthians 11:3
We will start by taking the words of Genesis 5:1 quite literally:
“This is the book of the generations of Adam. In the day that God created man, in the likeness of God made he him”
A cursory look at the Hebrew translation of this verse makes it clear that “generations” here means “genealogical annals” and that “man” is translated from the Hebrew word for “Adam”.
The word “generations” here comes from the Greek “genea” — Strong’s 1074 — which means “family” or “race” — that is, in more modern parlance,
“This is the book of the genealogical annals of the race of Adam.”
And note that Cain’s genealogy is not provided in the Bible — and the only reasonable conclusion to draw from that fact is that Cain’s descendants were not considered Adamic — because his wives were not Adamic — and therefore his children were not Adamic — and therefore, not included in the genealogy of Adam.
So we are told that “man” is narrowly defined as only those who are included in the genealogy of Adam — nowhere in Genesis do we find the universalist idea that every biped hominoid can make this claim.
By explicitly stating that Genesis is about the “race of Adam,” it is implicitly suggesting that there are others who are not included in this family or race — such as Cain’s descendants.
Universalism is a complication that has been projected on the Bible to squeeze in every person on Earth into the genealogy of Adam — and considering that Adam and Eve most assuredly were of the same flesh — the same DNA — it is impossible to account for all “races” on Earth coming from a racially homogeneous couple.
Genesis also tells us that all living things He created were distinct “kinds” — from which we get the English word, “kindred” — or those closely related by blood — whose English meaning can be traced back to the Greek “genea” — or race.
We are told that every living creature reproduced following the rule of “kind after kind” — the Hebrew word for “kind” is “palah” — Strong’s 6395 — which means “separate” and “distinct” — and that would include Adam who was also created as a “separate” and “distinct” kind.
The Bible tells us how to identify Adam — and the generations of Adam — by the simplicity of his name — derived from two words in Hebrew — “aw dam” — which, according to Strong’s Concordance means “To show blood (in the face), i.e. Flush or turn rosy” — or “ruddy” — a common trait of kindred white people.
The Book of Genesis confirms that the legitimate descendants of Adam — Adamkind or more ambiguously “Mankind” — who followed this law of “kind after kind” are represented in the preservation of Noah and his immediate family.
God tells us why He preserved Noah — whose genealogy can be traced back to Adam — in Genesis 6:9:
“These are the generations of Noah: Noah was a just man and perfect in his generations, and Noah walked with God.”
In other words, Noah’s “genealogical annals” — his “generations” — demonstrate that they were “flawless” — unblemished — his ancestors were all Adamic and had followed God’s law of “kind after kind” — remaining “distinct” and “separate.”
And again, an analysis of the Hebrew connotations of “generations” here makes this abundantly clear:
“Nm) rd (דר DR) – I. Generation: As a circle of the family. II. White: From the whiteness of the pearl. KJV (5): white, generation – Strongs: H1858 (דַּר), H1859 (דָּר)”
Like Adam, Noah could be identified as exhibiting “the whiteness of the pearl” — and many of those who were destroyed in the Flood must have violated the law of “kind after kind” by mixing with non-Adamic peoples and thereby losing their ability to truly “show blood in the face” which is possible only when you have the “whiteness the pearl.”
Given these very simple concepts regarding the Adamic creation — and how important the law of “kind after kind” is to the “generations of Adam” — and how the Israelite people were commanded to be a “holy and separate” people — would it be reasonable to expect that at least one of the original Ten Commandments would affirm this law?
If we take the 7th Commandment in Exodus 20:14 at face value with the English translation — “thou shalt not commit adultery” — is there another Commandment that covers the same idea?
The answer is yes — the 10th Commandment in Exodus 20:17 commands us,
“Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s wife.”
Clearly, “coveting thy neighbour’s wife” is the very definition of adultery — but notice that it doesn’t say, “Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor’s wife or husband” — why not?
For two reasons — the first is that the scriptures were read and studied only by men — and it was their duty to transmit the law of God to their wives and daughters — the “weaker vessels” according to 1 Peter 3:7.
The second reason is that if both married and single men do not covet their neighbors’ wives, adultery would be impossible for the wives to commit.
So why would God prohibit adultery in the 10th Commandment if He already prohibited it in the 7th Commandment?
Again, the “simplicity that is in Christ” should lead us to question why God would unnecessarily repeat Himself here — and if He is not repeating Himself, then we should consider that the 7th Commandment may not be about infidelity in marriage — and if not, then what?
The Hebrew word for adultery is “naaph” — Strong’s 5003 — and it’s a verb, not a compound word such as “commit adultery” — so as a simple verb it would connote “to adulterate” — and many take this to mean “adulterate a marriage” — but again, that concept is covered in the 10th Commandment.
And if adulterating a marriage is covered by the 10th Commandment, what kind of adulteration could the 7th Commandment refer to if not marriage?
Here we would like to introduce an analysis of Exodus 20:14 that we came across a few years ago — unfortunately, we do not have a link to the original source, but we find that it offers at least a plausible explanation for why the 7th Commandment cannot refer merely to marital infidelity.
What’s interesting is that it begins with the context of Ezra 9 and 10 — which describes the crisis among Israelites who had taken wives — in Jude’s words — of “strange flesh” during the captivity in Babylon:
“Ezra proclaimed to the Lord God that Ezra 9:2 “thy holy seed have mingled themselves with the people of those lands” — and Ezra 9:10, “for we have forsaken thy Commandments” — which is to transgress the Law.
In the original Ancient Hebrew text that is very similar to ancient Phoenician — and not to be confused with modern Hebrew which is quadratic script used by those who practice Judaism — was translated to Chaldee (Eastern Aramaic) after the Babylonian captivity.
Those texts were then written down in the Masoretic texts where we learn from those writings that the English words “commit adultery” are referred to as (na’aph – na’aph)” — or “adulterate adulterate.”
So the question is why would the Chaldee scribes write the word (na’aph) or “adulterate” twice?
This is where we have to investigate this much further. In other words, the Chaldee word for “commit” is (na’aph) or “adulterate” — and the Chaldee word for “adultery” is also (na’aph) or “adulterate.” To any legitimate Bible scholar this is a red flag that demands further investigation.
This is how we know that the Chaldee text was changed in the Masoretic text. With further analysis of the original Chaldee texts, we learn that the English word “adultery” used in the King James Bible should actually be the Chaldee word “dam” which means blood — [the same word that is part of Adam’s name — “aw dam” — or “to show blood in the face.”]
As such the 7th Commandment correctly should read, ‘Thou shalt not adulterate the blood.” Hence the Law or Commandment that Ezra is referring to.
Unfortunately, very few Christian theologians have done the in-depth research of studying the ancient Chaldee manuscripts which prove this. As such, many European Christians have been deceived going back many centuries. I know this is politically incorrect, but it is the truth confirmed by Ezra and the ancient Hebrew and Chaldee texts.”
Nor is it coincidental that when Ezra discovers the extent of these illicit marriages which produced “bastard” or “mamzer” offspring — and how they have broken commandments of God, he admits to “blushing” — and feeling “shame” — from the Hebrew “kalam” [Strong’s 3637] or “showing blood in his face”:
“O my God, I am ashamed and blush to lift up my face to thee, my God”
—Ezra 9:6
God gave Adam the unique ability to blush as a way of outwardly showing the shame of disobedience — an outward sign for all to see.
By mingling their “holy seed” in these illicit unions, Ezra tells us that they have broken more than one commandment:
“Should we again break thy commandments, and join in affinity with the people of these abominations?
—Ezra 9:14
They broke the first commandment by worshiping “strange gods” in Babylon — and in doing so, led them to inevitably breaking another commandment which prohibited the “mingling” their “holy seed” with “forbidden” and “strange” women — which must refer to the 7th Commandment against “adultery” or “adulteration” of “thy holy seed.”
If that is the real meaning of the 7th Commandment, then why has that meaning been obscured — if not hidden — in the translations — even the Masoretic Texts?
We need to understand that the Greek Septuagint was translated in the Third Century BC, but we don’t have the original Hebrew — and the Hebrew translations we now have are based on the Masoretic Text, which was translated back into Hebrew from the Greek and other texts — allegedly also Babylonian Aramaic Targums from the First Century AD.
The “Hebrew” of the Masoretic Texts is not the same as the ancient Hebrew of the original — it is merely an approximation or extrapolation.
Some Talmudic Jews have claimed that original Hebrew translations of the Old Testament were preserved in the temple in Jerusalem — and that the Masoretic Text is somehow based on those scrolls, but there’s no proof of that, and those “original” temple copies no longer exist.
The earliest complete Masoretic Hebrew translation — the Leningrad Codex — was codified in the early 11th Century AD — almost fourteen hundred years after the Septuagint — and over thirteen hundred years after the Dead Sea Scrolls.
And given that the “Jews” who translated the Masoretic Text were not real Hebrews — and they believed that the Babylonian Talmud took precedent over the original Torah — it would certainly be a mistake to trust that their translation is either reliable, objective, or lacking an underlying agenda.
The discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls in the 1940s showed that there are many radical differences between the Masoretic “Hebrew” translations and the Hebrew of the Dead Sea Scrolls — not surprising, considering it is an extrapolation and reconstruction of a long-dead ancient language.
In translating and understanding the Exodus 20:14 commandment on “adultery,” it’s useful to consider it from the perspective of those Talmudic Jews who translated it in the 11th Century AD — and by that time, “Jews” most certainly were not of the same racial stock as the ancient Hebrews.
And by the 2nd Century AD — according to rabbinical sources — “Jews” had changed the original law of Israelite identity in the Old Testament from patrilineal to matrilineal descent — that is, a Jew genetically inherited “Jewish” identity through the mother, not the father — suggesting that many Israelite men had taken non-Israelite, non-Adamic wives — just as Ezra recounts — and to justify this forbidden miscegenation — and the resultant “mamzer” offspring — they changed the law to cover it up and make it acceptable.
And, again, it’s hardly coincidental that these Talmudic rabbis justify this change to matrilineal descent by twisting the meaning Ezra 9 and 10 — falsely claiming that Ezra was asserting that Israelite identity was established through the Israelite mothers not the fathers — rather than the fact the mothers in Babylon were from prohibited bloodlines.
We know that an Israelite man is allowed to marry non-Israelite women because all 12 sons and grandsons of Jacob could take non-Israelite wives as long as they were from pure Adamic bloodlines — such as Joseph’s wife in Egypt — Asenath — whose father was an Egyptian high priest.
This fact alone provides prima facie proof that the rabbis are lying about the meaning of Ezra 9 and 10.
Under this self-justifying Talmudic perspective, as long as the mother was “Jewish,” the father could be of any race — Adamic or not — an apostasy that the original Israelites would never have condoned — as their laws of marriage were very strict.
Jews are masters at projection — when they interpret the Bible, they want it to reflect back to them and validate their own confused reality rather than what it actually says and means.
Knowing that they themselves are the offspring of proscribed, inter-racial marriages, it’s no wonder that these rabbinical “scholars” would intentionally obscure the original meaning of the 7th Commandment — as they are the living embodiment of its violation.
Another example of how Jews have attempted to hide the true meaning of Adam’s name — “aw dam” — is to claim that it is instead derived from “adamah” — Strong’s 127 — which is a feminine noun that means “dirt” or “soil” — and lacks any connotation of blood or the color of Adam’s blushing face.
We might ask why, when the Bible was translated from the Hebrew to Greek in the Septuigent, the scribes didn’t grasp the problem of “adultery” in the 7th Commandment if it was covered in the 10th Commandment?
The truth is that there was precedence for the Greeks to understand the term “adulterate” in terms of illicit race mixing.
In the Theological Dictionary of the New Testament we read the following different meanings of “commit adultery“:
“Pass. and med. “to be, or to allow oneself to be, seduced,” of the woman “to commit adultery,” fig. of the intermingling of animals and men or of different races, “Aristotle History of Animals,” 32, p. 619a, 10 f.: τὰ γὰρ ἄλλα γένη μέμικται καὶ μεμοίχευται ὑπʼ ἀλλήλων. The LXX uses μοιχεύειν and derivates for the root נאף and derivates, abs. Ex. 20:14 (13); Dt. 5:18 (17); Ez. 23:43; Hos. 4:14; 7:4; cf. Test. Jos. 4:6; 5:1; with acc. Jer. 3:9 (fig. ἐμοίχευσεν [sc. Ἰσραήλ] τὸ ξύλον καὶ τὸν λίθον), also med. with acc. of the man, pass. of the woman, Lv. 20:10: ἄνθρωπος ὃς ἂν μοιχεύσηται γυναῖκα ἀνδρὸς ἢ ὃς ἂν μοιχεύσηται γυναῖκα τοῦ πλησίον, θανάτῳ θανατούσθωσαν, ὁ μοιχεύων καὶ ἡ μοιχευομέην, Sir. 23:23 of the woman: ἐν πορνείᾳ ἐμοιχεύθη.”
–Kittel, G., Bromiley, G. W., & Friedrich, G. (Eds.). (1964–). μνεία, μνήμη, μνῆμα, μνημεῖον, μνημονεύω. Theological Dictionary of the New Testament (electronic ed., Vol. 4, pp. 729–735). Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
And given how strict even the Adamic pagan Greeks were when it came to the rules of marriage, it shouldn’t surprise us that the Adamic Israelites also strictly forbade the “intermingling” of “different races” — and perhaps the original readers of the Greek Septuigent would have understood that implication.
As we stated above, none of the Commandments were specifically directed at women — such as warning them to “not allow oneself to be seduced” as many theologians believe — rather, the 10th Commandment prohibits men, married or unmarried, from “coveting” any married woman — if there are no seducers, then wives cannot commit adultery regardless of her intent.
Of course, mainstream judeo-Christians have been misled to believe the exact opposite — and will robotically cite Acts 17:26 to “prove” that all races are of ‘one blood’ in Christ — but we have shown in a previous essay that the meaning of “blood” in this verse does not connote racial or filial commonality.
To sum up, we are certainly not claiming that our proposition here for the meaning of Exodus 20:14 — the 7th Commandment — is the absolute truth — there just isn’t enough evidence in either the Greek or the Masoretic Text to make any such claim.
However, we do believe that there is enough circumstantial evidence — especially from Ezra 9 and 10 — to suggest that there is a commandment against illicit marriages to “strange” women — a commandment that is not adequately explained by taking the seeming prohibition against “adultery” to account for its meaning.
We would also welcome any further evidence to support our theory about Exodus 20:14 from our readers — and if it is persuasive, we’d be willing to incorporate it into the body of this essay.
We certainly are not claiming that this is the last word on this subject — but merely a starting point for further investigation.
“A miscegenated people is ungovernable. The anarchy of the Latin American republic is the proof.”
—Gustave le Bon (1841-1931), French author polymath, anthropolist
Numbers 26.51 Israel was numbered/counted at 601,730
Numbers 31.18 Israel warred against the Midianites and killed all but the virgin females
Numbers 31.35 There were 32,000 Midianite females left alive.
32k / 602k = 5.3% dillution in their DNA just for this one war is pretty significant IMHO.
Ezra 10.2 the Israelite leaders were guilty of taking strange wives…???
Something is not adding up for me ! !
BC:
Not sure what you are saying here. Numbers 31:16 tells us why Israel went to war against the Midianites, and that’s because they lured the Israelites into sin by taking “counsel of Balaam”, meaning worshiping another God, not because the Midianites were racially impure.
The fact that the Midianite virgin females were spared and could be taken for wives proves this.
There’s no “dilution of DNA” here.
I have a question about this topic that I have been wondering for a while:
I am a white male, almost purely. I have light skin & red hair, blue eyes, my background is English & Irish with some Scandinavian. However, my grandfather 5 generations ago married & had kids with a Native American woman, it’s a part of my family’s genealogy. I took a DNA test & I came up about 97.6% white, 1.6% Native American & 0.8% Arabic (so maybe my grandmother was 1/2 native 1/2 mulatto & lied to pass as a Native). My extended family members took DNA tests & came up with similar results. I bring this up having already read the CFT article on how Jews manipulate DNA test results, incorporating extra mixed race DNA in otherwise-white people to promote the idea everyone is already mixed race when they aren’t, but that isn’t my family’s case.
So, again, being an almost-pure white male of 97% English, Irish & Scandinavian background, who looks more like a traditional Aryan than anything that was ever mixed… with me being 5 generations separated from an impurity of blood, where does that leave me with “adulterating of blood” & this very traditionalist form of Christianity? Because one of my ancestors technically already separated my family from the race of Adam.
Heeby, most people who believe they have Native American ancestors do not. They will swear they do. It becomes part of the family lore, but most often than not it’s not true. 100 years ago, it was very trendy to make this claim, as the Indians were romanticized in popular fiction. It’s called “Pocahantas Syndrome”.
The fact that your results also say you are part “arabic” should be a big red flag. How could that be possible? If you were part arab, you’d know how. That’s a rare admixture for a white European, especially an American. Many Sicilians have arab admixture but don’t show that admixture on their DNA results.
How many generations has your family been in America? Where did they live that they could have come in contact with Indians?
The fact that the rest of your extended family had “similar results” is also problematic. These tests are notoriously inconsistent, showing twins and triplets having very different results.
The DNA tests that you take are not real DNA tests. They merely compare your DNA profile to others, and then extrapolate as to what it “probably” is. That’s why “extended” family members should have different results, because if you have Native American ancestry, it is from only one of your parents, and depending on which parent, it won’t show up in your Y DNA results.
Father’s (white) side of the family came to America in the 1700s, his side is where the DNA comes from, mother’s family came to America in the late 1800s/early 1900s from Ireland I believe. It may be an “error” in the DNA test, however I don’t think it is, I’ll have to look at the genealogy again. There was some woman who integrated into the family at the time named something native-sounding like “Pumasetch Littleflower”, but I forget the actual name.
My theory as to where the Arabic DNA may have come from, if legitimate, is grandmother may have been a mixed race, part-native Melungeon lying and saying she was Cherokee to get more people interested in her, which was how grandfather may have been able to buy her in the first place (if that rumor is true). The Melungeons were created by captured native slaves (owned by slave-owning Native Americans) breeding with brown slaves brought to America, some of whom were Arab, so that’s one theory.
It may be a hoax since these tests & rumors are unreliable though, you’re right, I’ll have to look into it again & discuss this with relatives when I get a chance.
I’ve never heard of arab slaves being brought to America. Arabs were slave traders, but Arab slave traders weren’t known to trade in America.
They say that the “error” rate on DNA tests is around 5%, so any DNA results under 5% can be written off as within that probability of error.
Here’s a university president who claimed Indian ancestry, and when it was checked, it turns out it wasn’t true, though she believed it to be true…happens all the time:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/mar/15/vianne-timmons-canadian-university-president-indigenous-claim
Heeby: Good question – I say God bless your GGGGGrandfather – you’re here and here being jew wise. I think that’s better than like West said below in a comment always hoping for blond kids but maybe not having any?
And like CFT pointed out the claim of absolute truth — and God only knows.
My opinion is Blacks have DNA markers that no one else has — and have a culture that’s very different – and jews are of their father, the devil – evil religion and doers anyone that looks can see.
I don’t want to be like them or with them, so how about jews look at non-jews as animals in human form – that’s what this is about?
james …………………………..
You said — “…… I think that’s better than like West said below in a comment always hoping for blond kids but maybe not having any? ………………….”
I don’t like to assume if I can help it — but I’m curious what you mean? It kind of sounds like a slight rebuke, but I want to give you the benefit of the doubt.
Would you please explain to me what you meant?
I’m not clear at all what my comment has to do with Heeby’s question/concern.
Thank you.
West, I read your comment and thought how you said a long time ago that your soul would suffer from a mistake of having kids with a non-white girl? Well, Heeby’s question is how he has some non-white in him?
So his question where does that leave him being of adulterated blood? I don’t know? But his question maybe a good one for you – no slight intended – it’s a good question for anyone here. I said I don’t want to be like jews that think non-Adamic people are like animals like jews think of us . That’s up to God
james ………………….
First, let me commend you for your willingness to engage in a civil discourse. I keep pointing this out because this comment section is devolving into a place where all anyone does is rail on the jews and no one has “fellowship” any longer. CFT and the regular readers don’t need to be reminded of how evil the Js are. These people who are always railing on the Js ………. I sure hope they are informing people in other places more than they do here. There is a place of course for exposing the JQ. But, “Fellowship” amongst like-minded believers is far more important.
You said — “…..I read your comment and thought how you said a long time ago that your soul would suffer from a mistake of having kids with a non-white girl? ……”
Your memory is better than mine!
I have only been sexually involved with ONE non-white girl when I was in my twenties. A girl from Chile who looked white, but had that slight admixture that often makes a White woman just a bit more mysterious. She was very attractive.
You could be right in that I may have asked the question to myself — what if she were pregnant or what if I had taken her for a wife in the twenties when I was without the Holy Spirit.
And I agree with you when you say that at the end of the day — it’s in God’s hands.
But for me ………………. this issue of Universalism ultimately needs to be answered by the ONLY Absolute Authority that we have — the Scriptures.
Would you agree? What do the Scriptures say?
This is what we all want to know, don’t we? We can’t “guess” or make up our own Theology.
I have said over and over and over again —- I will never tell a non-white person that they have no business reading their bible and believing themselves to be a Follower of Jesus Christ. Never, no-way.
My concern …………………… what do we do now —- for those who have been enlightened with the Truth of revelation through the power of the Holy Spirit?
My problem with accepting Universalism as fact — just opens the door to one of the reasons we are in trouble as a People to begin with. White people have enough problems following God in an all White society or Nation. Accepting Universalism as a Scriptural principle opens the door even more to simply accepting everyone without qualification into our Lands.
It just confuses the problem when we bring in people who are not of us. If this is not already self-evident, I don’t know what is.
Question to you james — do you still hold to the belief that the non-white races — yellow, black and red — come from Adam and Eve or Noah and his immediate family?
I hope you will answer. Just answer from a strictly “Scriptural” point of view.
Of course I used to believe this. I believed it for over 20 years as a judeo-christian. But, since, I have been presented with a different Theological interpretation. And I can’t argue the facts. I find the arguments Universalists make to be very weak and not substantiated with Scripture. The only explanation is one of a “Miracle”. God just with a snap of a finger “changed” a homogenous people into a mixed conglomerate of varying DNA and genetic expression creating 4 totally different people groups — White, yellow, black and red. I just don’t buy it. Why would He do that? And if He did that, why did he not make them equal? No sane White person would ever move to the heart of the Congo. We are incredibly different peoples.
If that Theological Interpertation were true, then I agree with the jews that we should all become brown. So that we are equal. Whites can’t live with blacks. It just doesn’t work.
Also — I don’t think when those of us who do not believe the non-white races come from Adam and Eve are equal to jews. That is an insult and a completely unfair comparison. Those are fighting words! This is where I get frustrated and even angry.
When I say that I believe in Pre-Adamites, I am not saying that non-white peoples are “animals” in the strictest sense; or the same as to how jews view us (goyim).
Not to mention — I love animals. I probably enjoy the company of animals right now over people to be honest. I love horses and dogs and all kinds of friendly animals. I have deer, elk, moose, bald eagles ……….. all in my back yard. I love Nature now in my old age more than I do engaging with people. People in 2023 are mean, unfriendly, selfish, and I find nothing in common with them. I would never call a non-white person an animal. I simply believe they were created prior to Adam and Eve.
When I encounter any person White or non-white, I treat them with respect and kindness UNTIL they reveal their character. I’m not rude to non-white peoples. I still open doors for a non-white lady or even an older non-white man.
White people have incredible empathy for everybody and everything in nature. I can’t say the same for the other races. At least not from my 50+ years of living on this earth.
It really irritates me when those here who are Universalists CONDEMN me to hell because I don’t believe that the non-white races come from Adam and Eve. They are the ones who have the onus of proof. Prove to me that non-white peoples come from the Loins of Adam and Eve or Noah and his family. This they never do.
I’m not saying you have done this. At least I can’t remember if you have done this. But there have been several others. And those who do — will NEVER address articles such as this one.
While I have you james, do you have an objection to this article that you would like to share? Can you offer any Scriptural argument to counter this Article? Or the many others on this site?
I’m at a place in my Spiritual journey where I am very open-minded. I believe I am grounded in Solid Doctrine, but I never want to be so close-minded that I might be missing something.
I just have not heard a good argument “Yet” for the idea that every race of people all descend from ONE common parent.
I am not saying that non-white peoples have no relationship to our Father in Heaven. I don’t know the answer to that question. How will God deal with non-white peoples when they die? I don’t know.
But I have come to the conclusion that I do not believe that God wanted us to integrate in society with them. Look at the condition or fate of the White Western World today. We can’t ignore that being mixed with every race and mixed race peoples from the far corners of the earth has not denigrated us as a whole and has hurt us tremendously.
I mean it wasn’t that long ago — 50 years — when our Lands where majority White and we would be crazy not to want to go back to that time in history. I am constantly missing my life as it was in the 70’s and 80’s. I have a “Remember the 50’s” feed on my Facebook account and everyday I cry looking at photos from the 50’s. What a beautiful place our Nations once were. Did we have problems? Of course. But “violence” wasn’t one of them.
A question I always ask White people —- when White people become a powerless minority in our own lands, will the non-white peoples treat us as we have treated them?
What would your answer be? Do you think asians will step up to the plate for us? Do you think mexicans will come to our rescue? Do you think blacks will allow us safe space?
Seriously think about this question. I believe the answer is NO. And I believe TIME is proving me correct.
Not sure if you pay attention, but the majority of non-white peoples really don’t like us. Of course there will always be the Outlier.
One of my friends that I do business with is from Thailand. She is married to a White man. She is incredibly sweet and friendly and no doubt she would give me “safe harbor” if I ever needed help.
But can we say that about the majority of them? I think they will turn on us on a dime if our Lands ever turn lawless.
What say you?
In Summary — I would really enjoy hearing a counter-argument to this article, if you have one. This is where our focus must lie. What do the Scriptures say?
Controlling the narrative.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-ancestry-m-a-blackstone-group/blackstone-to-acquire-ancestry-com-for-4-7-billion-idUSKCN2512ES
Wow, West, good comment – better then what I can do ? So first I also have jew fatigue we see too much. Fellowship. I recently was told to stop saying jew info at A friend’s bible study. I didn’t know one was a convert jew, so I said I can’t stop, so I’m out – no way jews are 2% .
The memory comes from talking about Raquel Welsh, God bless her soul. For universalism, it’s new to me from here and what Christian denomination or what has been changed or mis-interpreted. I have faith in Jesus and God. Scripturally you ask? about the races, my opinion Blacks have DNA and bone structure only – they have I respect apx 7% of them probably pre Adamic – everyone else is similar DNA could be related?
As to the comparison to what jews think of us and me not wanting think of others is true for me. But jews we should do unto them as they would unto us. I love animals also, but zoos look like jail to me. I have no objection to anything on this site pursuit of the truth, freedom of speech #1.
Whites are 7% of the world – it should be obvious to every non-jew that white people are the Best at everything, good looking, nicest, helping, reasonable, smart, trusting, to make the world better for all.
I see a lot of useful idiots traitors that mock God that are white – and they like all the others that are a problem and taught to hate us. But do not have the true desire or the power to destroy us – it’s all symptoms of the Disease: JOHN 8.44
Hey James …………….
You said — “…….blacks are probably pre Adamic ………………………….”
Probably? Where else would they have originated if not during the Pre-Adamic Creation?
Some people will say “blacks” are the result of Demonic/Angelic Sexual Activity with hominids. I don’t buy that theory. But’s its a theory, nonetheless.
You then said — “………everyone else is similar DNA could be related? ………”
Related to WHOM???
By the way —– what is your Native Land? I suspect English is not your native tongue. Aussie? Scot? Welsh? Irish?
Hey, West:
Ya, I said probably pre-Adamic – it’s obvious, but I didn’t create them. Ya, I’m from USA – I just didn’t like school, so my writing shows.
CFT has cleaned it up sometimes for me – thanks.
Heeby still had a good question: where does that leave him?
James …..
In regards to Heeby, I don’t think it changes anything. He continues to Follow Jesus and strive to do His Will.
End of story.
Why care about having Native American blood.
Be glad you have no black or Jewish blood. The American Indian was a more civilized race than the blacks ever were and the blacks shared a continent and closeness with Whites in Europe. Only two races in the world scream discrimination to cover their backwardness, jealously and envy of White’s and it is the Jews and blacks.
Gene ………………………………..
You said — “……..Why care about having Native American blood……………….”
Question Gene — Did you read the article, or just the comments?
The Article is about the sin of Adultery — which the article defines as having sex with a non-adamic (non-white) person. Whether you realize it or not — you just disagreed with CFT.
In regards to Heeby …………………. let us set him aside for a moment. CFT makes a very good point — it is doubtful, based on Heeby’s description of himself, that his great, great, great Grandfather had a child with an amerasian woman (american indian).
Not to mention — it’s not Heeby’s fault if his ancestor did indeed do such a thing.
But let’s forget about all that for a moment —-
Gene — What do you think about the truth that is being revealed in this article?
Is it a Sin for a White man or woman to mix their blood with a non-white? That is the question.
Do you have any Scriptural rebuttal to the arguments made in the article?
We all have “Opinions” about things. But Scripture is our ONLY Absolute Authority. What does the Scripture say? Not what anyone “thinks” about the intrinsic things of life.
The second part of this discussion would be what is being proposed as the “1 Drop Rule”. Let’s forget that for now. That is a much, much deeper question/issue. We all can agree to disagree on that issue because it is a gray area in my opinion and all we can do is trust God that He is a Fair and Righteous Judge. Nothing we can do about it now here on earth.
I guess if it bothers Heeby that he has native American blood in his veins which he can do nothing about, then he should follow the advice some of you — he should wait and hope – is it ten generations of White marriages, might cleanse his ancestors or children’s blood of the infection?
You want biblical proof? How to prove it? The Jews proclaim racial purity among themselves even though they marry Whites and blacks and Asian women.
Gene …..
You could have just said “No” to my question.
The question was — do you have a Scriptural rebuttal to the ARTICLE.
I wonder if you even read the article.
Gene, that’s obvious – one is very different. One is very Evil.
Wasn’t there some quote by an ancient Greek (I can’t remember who it was) who said (and I’m paraphrasing here) that bastards are the enemy of those of pure blood? Anybody recall that?
Strabo said that the Edomites mixed with the Nabataean Arabs. Since “Ereb” means mixed, that means Jews might even have pre-Adamite blood. However, not much is known about those two groups, even as the satanic Talmud mentions that Esau’s head was buried in a cave. I think Jews and Arabs are in mutual agreement to keep Edomite history a secret because DNA tests would prove that both groups descend from them, and Christians would find out who their enemies are.
James Smith ……………….
You said something interesting I hope you will unpack.
You said — “….that means Jews might even have pre-Adamite blood…….”
What do you mean by “might have”?
Is this not what defines a modern jew? Jews are jews because they are of mixed race, first and foremost. Second is their satanic religion — the Babylonian Talmud.
If we found a White person, claiming to be a jew, and he is 100% White, then he would be an Israelite/Adamite.
Right?
Or do you have a different opinion about what constitutes a jew.
Thanks.
“What do you mean by “might have”?
Is this not what defines a modern jew? Jews are jews because they are of mixed race, first and foremost.”
Do you know for sure who they mixed with though?
I’ve been trying to figure out the origins of Arabs and Jews. I’ve seen an article that says they’re both mostly of Canaanite ancestry (which runs contrary to conventional wisdom that Arabs are from Ishmael, who was Semitic and Adamic).
Edomites were Adamic as late as the Pentateuch was written (Deuteronomy 23:8), but they could have mixed with other groups more recently.
Ashkenazi Jews did come from the Khazar kingdom (it’s a red flag that their Y-DNA J1 Cohanim common ancestor is only 1,100 years old; it run contrary to their claims of being Israelites), but the Jews formed the elite class, who would have been more Caucasian than the general population, so they don’t appear to have much Mongoloid ancestry. Some might not have it at all.
Perhaps Y-DNA J1 is an Arabic/Edomite marker that came when the Edomites mixed with Nabataean Arabs.
I’m starting to put the pieces together that Jews are Arabs + Europeans, but their Mongoloid and Negroid admixture is small to non-existent.
James Smith ……………….
Thanks for the reply.
We were having this conversation on a different article some time ago. Now I can’t remember which article, so I’m not able to cite it.
I think for me, I just try to keep this “question” as simple as possible.
If you study the anthropologists/archaeologists/genealogists of the early 20th century (Madison Grant, Lothrop Stoddard as an example) they seem to classify the races into 4 distinct “Kinds” —- White, black, yellow and red.
Check out the cover of this book written in 1888 — http://esau.today/pre-adamites-humanoids-before-the-first-white-man/
The author makes 7 — Pre-adamite classifications or “kinds”.
I tend to use the 3 Pre-adamite “kinds” thesis as it just makes it easier to process. But it could very well be true that there were more than 3 different “kinds” of pre-adamites. How would we ever know? It’s impossible.
For simplicity —- I believe the yellows were planted in Asia; the blacks were planted in the heart of Africa; and the reds were planted in remote corners of the Earth. I suspect the first Adamites came into contact first with the yellows in the beginning.
Back to my main point —
So, for me, to keep things simple, as soon as an Adamite or an Israelite mixed his/her seed and produced a child —- this is the first “Jew”.
Then it just becomes a mess after that.
You said — “…..I’m starting to put the pieces together that Jews are Arabs + Europeans, but their Mongoloid and Negroid admixture is small to non-existent……”
Agreed.
You also said — “…..but the jews formed the elite class, who would have been more Caucasian than the general population, so they don’t appear to have much Mongoloid ancestry. Some might not have it at all……”
Yes! I agree as well. It seems to me, the more “Caucasian” blood a jew has, the more dangerous they are intellectually. The less Caucasian blood, the more violent. Both working together is a nightmare — ie., the Bolshevik terror.
On your last sentence — “….some might not have it at all ……….”
I think you are suggesting there may very well be PURE Israelites believing themselves to be “jewish” and acting like a jew? That is a possibility.
Thanks for the reply and weighing in! Cheers.
West, it seems to me that judeo-universalism depends on Christians being completely ignorant of how genetics works. Even micro-evolution, small adaptations, not speciation, allegedly takes 10,000s of years.
If Adam was created only 7,000 to 10,000 years ago, according to the Bible, that’s simply not enough time for any significant genetic changes to take place. And definitely not enough to change from one race to another from Noah’s descendants, and that’s even a much shorter time.
DNA is incredibly stable and resists any changes because it has to be, otherwise chaos, mutations and death.
Many Christians have compromised, even the Pope did, and now claim that God created man through evolution, for some such blather. But evolution doesn’t change much in such a short amount of time.
Christians need to stop being so gullible, and universalism demands that they throw all common sense out the window.
Mike ….
Amen! Let us pin your comment to the Top of every article!!!
Attn: Those who believe in One Blood — Please Read Comment.
🙂
Good argument; great site; as always, thank you.
I agree, this is my favorite site, hands down. Always look forward to their new articles. And they are pretty funny too.
Phinehas —-
Is yet another supporting reference.
I know there has been some discussions regarding who the “Midianites” were. This is where I am not “strong” in knowledge. So, maybe someone who is educated as to anthropology/history/archaeology might weigh in.
But I suspect that if this Midianite woman was “White”, Phinehas would not have known with complete confidence that the Israelite was in violation of “adultery”.
And I have a hard time believing God put a plague on all of Israel if the violation was simple adultery between an Israelite man and a White woman. The Israelites were allowed to take “virgin girls” from conquering tribes for wives. Not to mention, Jesus rebukes Moses for allowing divorce and remarriage as it is implied, happened often (Matthew 19:8).
I tend to believe the Midianite woman was obviously not White, as therefore, the implications were obvious.
Anyone else?
Midian was the son of Abraham and Keturah, so he must have been Adamic.
Cozbi the daughter of Zur was a Midianite and therefore Adamic (Numbers 25:15)
Moses’ wife was a Midianite, and must have been Adamic (Exodus 2:16-22)
And in Judges 1:16 Moses’ father-in-law is referred to as a Kenite, which means that both the Midianites and original Kenites must have been closely related and Adamic.
I do believe that all of these tribes eventually became mixed with the arabic peoples.
Mark ……….
Thank you.
But this woman from Media, could have been a mixed race non-adamic.
I’m just trying to understand how Phinehas knew clearly what he was doing.
I don’t know what married women wore back in those days to identify themselves as a man’s wife. I’m certain they didn’t wear diamond rings on their finger.
So, the “Plague” was simply men having affairs with women ineligible for marriage??? (Rhetorical)
A “Plague”. That’s pretty intense.
Deuteronomy 24, I don’t believe, is permission for divorce and remarriage. I believe Deuteronomy 24 is an instruction that if a man puts away a legitimate wife and then wants her back after she has gone and laid with another man — that the first husband must not take her back as she has been defiled.
It appears by Jesus’ words in Matthew 19 that this kind of thing was happening maybe rather frequently. But no mention of a plague.
So ……………. what brought about this “Plague”? Again …………. rhetorical, because we can’t really know for sure.
But I wonder if the reason God was so upset was because the Israelites were having sex with mixed race women. Just a thought or an opinion.
The moment Phinehas drove his spear through both — the plague ended. That’s a pretty strong message.
Thank you very much for weighing in. This is the kind of discussions I grow from here at CFT.
I’m so tired of talking about the jews.
We need a section for Newbies —- informing them of the JQ. And then we need a section for those who are past drinking milk and are now into the eating of meat. 🙂
Thanks, Mark.
The Newbies apparently are those who question the Bible and the Jewish question or doubt it or think differently or disagree and those drinking the milk, who agree with yours and other’s views about the Bible being the absolute knowledge of everything.
Or that, to justify the evil in the world that we are told that we are here to suffer.
Anthropology is proving that the Jewish claim of the earth being about 5800 or so years old is not true and that many races or civilizations have been on Earth, tens, hundreds, or even thousands of years ago and animals may existed millions of years ago.
So when did god create the world? He created it apparently in cycles, but some say that he had help. Help?
They say Christians are the least informed.
This comment is incoherent and impossible to respond to. I won’t even attempt to try to understand it.
Gene just want to say if you wrote a book I would be interested in reading it.
I can’t understand all of the references to Israel, as being taken for granted as White, when the Jews consider the Bible to be their book and given their religious beliefs to the Christian world as they claim that Jesus and Mary were also Jews.
And even religious preachers and churches convey or promote the idea of Solomon, David, Moses and others were Jewish. Or that the bible is a Jewish book .
There is one Christian program, in which a rabbi explains Bible prophecy and the women sit in awe of his explanation, as though they can’t believe his knowledge and is so learned in Bible history when , right to their Christian faces , he is describing the bringing about, not of their Jesus , but the Jewish kingdom on Earth.
Gene, you haven’t figured out yet that Jews have been lying about the Bible for the last 2,000 years? They lie about everything else, but you think they are telling the truth about the Bible just because other brain dead Christians listen to what the Jews say about it?
I get the feeling you haven’t read any of CFT’s articles on the Bible, and you’re just more interested in using this comment section to vent your own ideas rather than trying to engage with what’s actually said here.
Then if the Jews are promoting the Bible and lying about the authorship about it, why do you people keep talking to each other and trying to convince those who discover this site and make comments that you are authorities on the Bible. They are already here. and not because of any of you, but because they were searching and came upon, either by another reference or fate. It not as some of you who spend all your time reading and telling everyone what they should and should not believe.
Why not prove to others outside this site that the bible is not a Jewish book. That they lie. And as far as using this site to make my own comments, how about taking the names of the commenters on this site and counting up and keeping track of how many others they correct to see who is using this site to push their own agenda, knowledge and whatever is in the back of their mind..
I began to believe a long time ago , that the? Bible was being used as a blue print for world domination. And that is why religious preachers preach and believe that the bible is prophetic.
OK , Kevin, you can tell or vent your own idea’s here. You can quote the Bible all you want while as they say : the world is going to Hell in as hand basket.
Is your Bible quotes solving any of the world’s problems?
.
Gene, you obviously have never read any of our essays on the Bible, which prove that it isn’t a “Jewish” book written by “Jews”. If you read them, which we doubt, you didn’t understand them or made no attempt to understand them. You’ve rarely if ever commented on those articles, so we assume you haven’t read them.
Start here with this essay, and if you can’t refute it or don’t understand it, there’s no point in going any further with you:
https://christiansfortruth.com/who-are-jews/
If it makes sense to you, then we suggest you read the following essays, if you truly want to know why it’s not a “Jewish” book:
https://christiansfortruth.com/category/bible-studies/
As far as the so-called “Jews” making Biblical prophecy come true, well, that’s part of their deception. And any Christian preacher who claims they know when the End Times will come based on world events are LIARS. Even Christ said He doesn’t know when the End will come, so how can they arrogantly predict it? And how can you criticize the Bible if these Jews and preachers misuse and abuse it?
And, no, Gene, we’ve never put ourselves in the position of being “authorities” on the Bible. We have written many essays on the Bible, and used extensive verses to back up what we believe, but we always encourage our readers to think for themselves, and if they don’t agree with our exegesis, we encourage them to prove where we are wrong, but most are not willing to do so. They’d rather just tell us that we are “going to burn in Hell.”
If you are not willing to show us where we are wrong in our Bible essays, please refrain from leaving any more comments about the Bible. We will no longer publish your comments on that subject if you aren’t willing to engage us in a rational, logical discussion.
Interesting. I honestly never noticed that the tenth commandment was directed only toward men coveting another’s wife. And yet all mainstream Christian theologians explain the seventh commandment as directed toward both men and women.
Makes no sense.
The redundancy is a big red flag.
That fact alone should make every Christian want to figure out this contradiction, but they don’t because their pastors don’t.
Imagine how different Christianity would be today if every Christian believed that “thou shall not adulterate thy bloodline”…..the whole house of cards would come crashing down….
I wonder how long it’s going to take for some judeo-christian to read this essay and quote Galatians 3:28, their go-to verse….
“There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.”
If you tell them that the Galatians were Israelites from the lost tribes, they will have no idea how that changes the meaning of that pet verse.
The fact that Jews so heavily promote race mixing in the media is all the proof I need that it is evil, in rebellion of God, and it serves their satanic agenda.
The fact that Jews after WWI and WWII have flooded Germany with blacks and muslims is proof that they are using race mixing to destroy their Christian enemies.
And they’ve brainwashed Christians into believing that there’s nothing wrong with race mixing, to the point that Christians will robotically do the Jews’ bidding and demonize any Christian who frowns upon it.
I find it unfathomable that Jesus Christ would condone a marriage between an Israelite and an African negro, arab, or asian.
But Christians at this point now worship a “different” Jesus, a kosher Jesus who just so happens to agree with Marxist Jews.
How did we get here?
The same way that we arrived at The Chosen having Joseph be black as the night and Mary being some swarthy Arab, with Christendom having no outrage over this.
I know I bring this up often, but it chaps my hide that all of the supposed Israelites in that show are of entirely different racial makeup from one another, meanwhile most of the Romans are pasty white fellows who are just a swastika away from being Waffen SS stereotypes.
But I can only guess that even this was too much white for its Mormon & Jew (is there a difference?) showrunners, and its evangelical director, as they made the Germanic white Roman into Arnold Schwarzenegger: he knocked up his non-white maid.
For extra sand kicked in our faces, the show is telegraphing that this swarthy byblow is going to be the servant of the Centurion who is healed remotely by Jesus.
A recent Gallup poll found that 94% of Americans approved of marriages between blacks and whites today, compared to only 4% in 1960 around the time I was born. Amazing.
https://files.catbox.moe/0t7pv8.jpg
Polls can be faked – I do not trust official polls.
Paul Michael …………………
True, but what are you saying — that secretly most white peoples hate the fact that there is so much race-mixing???
It seems no one is putting much resistance up.
How about Scott Adams!!! Of Dilbert fame. I thought by now he would have bowed down to the gods of diversity; but he is holding firmly.
I’ve always wondered when someone with recognition would finally have the balls to speak Truth to power. He can afford it. Most can’t.
I think a lot of white people would claim they approve of inter-racial marriage because they don’t want to appear “racist” to the pollster, but when it came time to actually choosing a spouse, they would almost always choose another white person.
100% agree. Propaganda
Thanks to the television shows, Archie Bunker and in the Heat of the Night, we can , by law be required to tolerate homosexuality, mixed marriages and relationships.
And the gun issue and reparations for the blacks is becoming a common topic in the news.
Lawrence ………….
Great point!
I mean really, this is all we are seeing now in society as a result of that massive brainwashing program/propaganda.
“…The fact that Jews so heavily promote race mixing in the media is all the proof I need that it is evil, in rebellion of God, and it serves their satanic agenda….”
Astute Observation.
“…..How did we get here? ……..”
I think your question was Rhetorical
I believe God hardened our hearts post ww2. This is when it seems we really lost our bearings.
We failed to study history and think for ourselves. We allow the Js to do the thinking for us.
Big mistake.
Henry Ford and Charles Lindbergh were warning our fathers and grandfathers but they didn’t listen. My dad is guilty. I tried to talk to him before his death and he admitted to me that he was aware of both Lindbergh and Ford, but didn’t give any credence to their warnings. Shame on him.
Look how hard it is today to wake people up to the Khazarian Sabbatean “Jews”…
I don’t think you should condemn your father for that, but that is my (worthless) opinion.
JB ………………
I agree with you re: the difficulty of addressing the JQ in the year 2023.
But back in the early 20th Century, it was Ok to talk about the JQ. We could talk about them in public then. Today ………………. no way!
So ………………. if there ever was a time to have stopped this Menace, it was pre-ww2.
I mean, Henry Ford was huge back then. He wrote articles (which turned into a book) addressing “facts” about jewish perfidy. Then comes Charles Lindbergh and Father Charles Coughlin.
There is no excuse for my father’s generation.
I’m not condemning him by the way. I will let God sort that one out. I’m just ashamed of him, that’s all.
He was a good provider — he was a physician and we had food on the table and a roof over our head. But as far as being a teacher of Truth and Wisdom, he failed miserably.
Again ………………….. he is in God’s purview now. I trust God to deal with him accordingly.
“7 And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.”
That’s why maybe the jews think that the name Adam derives from the Hebrew noun “adamah”, meaning “the ground” or “earth”.
That’s certainly the excuse they use to interpret Adam’s name that way, but names often have more than one meaning, and they chose to completely ignore the other meaning, which is telling.
This is the very reason The Teacher (The Holy Spirit) was given to us. So to know Jesus Christ, The Word made flesh (Adam), the Aleph and Tav (Alpha and Omega), the First and Last, the First Covenant and the Last Covenant, by Truth and Spirit a sharp two edged sword…to enter back into the Kingdom we have been ‘divorced’ from because of sin. [Book of Hosea]
Revelation 2:12-17
New American Standard Bible
Message to Pergamum
12 “And to the angel of the church in Pergamum write:
The One who has the sharp two-edged sword says this:
13 ‘I know where you dwell, where Satan’s throne is; and you hold firmly to My name, and did not deny My faith even in the days of Antipas, My witness, My faithful one, who was killed among you, where Satan dwells. 14 But I have a few things against you, because you have some there who hold the teaching of Balaam, who kept teaching Balak to put a stumbling block before the sons of Israel, to eat things sacrificed to idols and to commit sexual immorality. 15 So you too, have some who in the same way hold to the teaching of the Nicolaitans. 16 Therefore repent; or else I am coming to you quickly, and I will wage war against them with the sword of My mouth. 17 The one who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches. To the one who overcomes, I will give some of the hidden manna, and I will give him a white stone, and a new name written on the stone which no one knows except the one who receives it.
Strange women, prostitutes, sexual immorality, wine and many more words to describe Babylon (Satan’s throne) who is the great whore.
Television, movies, the internet, the library are all avenues to this great whore who lies 24/7 and who causes us to ‘eat’ things sacrificed to idols (man). It is any writing and teaching that is not The Word of God.
This great whore is what defiles our blood and our covenant with God.
She is hated by Him.
From her comes all manner of worship to include being a slave to her by ‘paycheck’ or ‘silver and gold’ from her.
Everything that we know that has not been taught to us by Truth and Spirit is the cause of our destruction. The Sons of God are not made of flesh…but are the fruit of the Spirit.
Babylon produces the opposite which is the fruit of death.
In simplicity The Word by Truth and Spirit (Tree of Life) which gives us revelation of the knowledge of God (instead of good and evil) grants us redemption (silver) and salvation (gold) to enter back into the Kingdom of God with a marriage certificate as His Bride.
Hebrew comes from the word Eber (or E’ver) which means to cross over (crossing over into the spirit into the Promise Land)…and it is where the word Passover comes from.
Only by Truth and Spirit can that happen and not by religious observances. Understand that the number ‘seven’ means ‘Oath’ and by an oath there is a witness (two)…
Sparrow ……………..
Are you “agreeing” with the article?
The article is an argument against Universalism.
But you have made comments here rebuking those who disagree with Universalism.
So ………….. I’m just a little confused by the point of your comment.
Maybe you could elaborate?
My comment does not agree with ‘Universalism’. That is why I pointed to the problem…Babylon the great whore and explained why God hates her. Everything that we are witnessing is the fruit of the great whore.
I also suggested to understand what God deems as evil from it being laid out in the Book of Hosea. He also reminds Israel how we are to repent and return to Him and be forgiven. Gods Kingdom is spiritual by understanding Him and knowing Him.
Only in this can what we witness today with all of the evil of Babylon is by returning to Him and doing what He sent His Word (who is both covenants) Jesus Christ to Israel…the lost. Most Christians are still in Babylon where Satan’s throne is.
When we identify the world’s condition…this is what it is. No ‘religion’ can usurp God’s Promise by making a mockery of it.
He knows who the liars are.
Sparrow …
Thank you for the clarification.
Would you like to address the actual article?
I’d be curious to hear your thoughts/objections.
I don’t rebuke you for having your beliefs about Universalism.
My problem Sparrow, has been that you have a problem with me. You have condemned me for asking questions about non-adamic peoples. Shaming me for having thoughts and doubts.
Just so we are clear.
Thanks.
The Sixth Law of God
By V.S. Herell
adulteration, adultery, Mamzers, Mix, mixed, Pastor V.S. Herrell, Race Mixing, sixth law
https://dualseedlinechristianidentity.home.blog/2020/02/11/the-sixth-law-of-god
or
http://everettramseydd.com/adultery_vs_herrell.html
Just thought of something else… the idea of ‘do not adulterate’ is so prevalent in Scripture that God tells us to not even mix the threads/materials in garments! See Leviticus 19.
So the position this article on the more correct meaning of the Commandment is made even stronger by example.
Fascinating interpretations of what appears to be seriously complicated ancient texts.
I think it was the British or all of the European colonial powers back in the day that translated them (i.e The Bible) for the benefit of the uneducated masses who were at least 80% illiterate back then, stretching right up to this century.
To me it’s doubtful they could have understood/comprehended it all as intended. Many don’t even understand today, or want to, regardless whether they can read and write or not.
Chris Maley ………..
To me it’s doubtful they could have understood/comprehended it all as intended.
I tend to agree with you. But what about “instinct”?
We used to have it. The Js would call us racist for it — White Flight as an example.
In my youth, before finding Jesus, I was attracted to any hot looking girl. I grew up in S. California so we didn’t have blacks. But we had asians and south americans and I dated a few.
BUT I NEVER EVER CONSIDERED THE IDEA OF TAKING ONE FOR A WIFE.
I always dreamt of having little blonde headed blue eyed babies running around my house. Boys and girls who looked like me.
That was “instinct”. God’s Ways written upon our hearts.
It wasn’t long ago when taking a non-white for a wife was taboo and only a very few would do such a thing.
How will God judge in the end??? I haven’t a clue.
I suspect if a White man has a non-white wife ………………….. he has other Theological issues as well (2 Corinthians 11:1-4). But that’s just an opinion.
Makes perfect sense to me.