Now that his soccer playing days are behind him, David Beckham is looking for something to do with the next 40 years of his life — and it appears that he’s discovered that when it comes to the success of any future endeavors, saying “I’m Jewish” will open a lot more doors than “I used to play soccer“:
He is one of the most famous men on the planet, instantly recognisable almost everywhere. Now some might say that David Beckham has broadened his appeal even further: he told a rapt audience at London’s JW3 that he sees himself as Jewish.
Mr Beckham, 41, made it clear that Judaism had been a part of his life, and paid tribute to his beloved Jewish grandfather, Joseph West. Asked “do you see yourself as Jewish in any way?” he replied: “My grandfather was Jewish, that was on my mother’s side, so yes, I do see myself…” The comment was interrupted by appreciative laughter but the former England captain continued: “I was never brought up Jewish, but like I said, my grandfather was, and every time we went to synagogue I was part of that.”
Mr Beckham was known to be close to his grandfather, who died in 2009, aged 83. Mr West was the father of Mr Beckham’s mother, Sandra, and was once described by the former Manchester United and Real Madred player as his “footballing inspiration”. He accompanied his grandson when he received his OBE in 2003. Mr Beckham mentioned his family regularly during the hour-long talk, hosted by broadcaster Kirsty Young, saying that he was “lucky” to have benefited from their support over his career.
Surprisingly Ms Young did not ask Beckham any questions with a Jewish theme, despite the fact that the audience was mainly Jewish and the event hosted at a Jewish community centre, as part of the The Alan Howard Foundation/JW3 Speaker Series. During the Q&A – which was attended by 270 guests who won tickets in a ballot – the former midfielder made it clear that he was saddened by the fact that only his eldest son, Brooklyn, had strong memories of Mr West…
The former footballer, who also played for LA Galaxy and Paris Saint-Germain, was appearing at JW3 in his capacity as a Unicef ambassador, and made it clear that his involvement with the charity – which now includes his own “Seven Fund” – is his main focus or “passion”. He returned from a trip to Swaziland only last week.
He said: “My first involvement with Unicef was with Manchester United 15 years ago. I knew that was what I wanted to do when I finished playing, to be involved with a charity that did so much for children around the world. “Even before I had children, I always really cared about children and children’s future. “When Kofi Annan contacted me and asked me to become an ambassador, it was amazing and very emotional for me because it was a charity that I really wanted to be involved in.”
He spoke in detail about his work with Unicef but was also happy to talk about football in general, his excitement about Manchester United’s new manager Jose Mourinho (“I’ve always loved him as a manager. I love his character. I think he’s great for the Premiership”) and how becoming England captain was the highlight of his career.
He also revealed that being sent off in the 1998 World Cup against Argentina had made him “stronger… I didn’t realise it at the time and I probably didn’t realise it for a number of years but it kind of changed me as a player, it changed me as a person. It made me grow up,” he said, adding: “Maybe I wouldn’t have had the career I’ve had and the life I’ve had if it hadn’t have happened, so I try and put as positive a spin on it as possible.”
And Mr Beckham also said that his relationship with wife, Victoria, was aided by Jewish businessman Michael Edelson, a non-executive director of Manchester United.
He recalled how he had met Victoria, then a member of the Spice Girls, at the players’ lounge following a match against Chelsea. “A week later she turned up at Old Trafford,” he added, saying that was when he “got her number”. Victoria was accompanied by Mr Edelson – who seems to have become something of a Jewish matchmaker. Asked by a member of the audience if Mr Edelson was telling the truth when he says he introduced the couple, Mr Beckham replied, to gales of laughter: “He actually did.” The perfect shidduch…
What kind of man sincerely dreams of caring about children and their “future” — especially while he’s the most famous soccer player in the world?
No one, not even David Beckham — and he certainly doesn’t want to spend the rest of his life in Africa doing photo ops with bloated-bellied Black babies in fly-infested remote villages with no running water.
But Jews get giddy when rich and famous co-ethnics like Beckham deign to get involved in “philanthropy” — tikkun olam — uplifting the “schvartzes” — and even adopting a few if it won’t interfere with his wife’s hobby of collecting million dollar handbags.
No doubt we can expect the newly circumcized Beckham to regularly speak out against “antisemitism” — which is apparently a serious problem among soccer fans — and even some of the players.
In fact, it shouldn’t surprise us if he’s appointed to some sort of official-sounding position like “Antisemitism Czar” for FIFA — where yarmulked Beckham will escort recalcitrant “antisemitic” players and fans on personally guided tours of reconstructed “gas chambers” at Auschwitz to hopefully rehabilitate them as “shabbos goyim.”
His eldest son — who is named after Brooklyn, the most Jewish of all the New York City boroughs — recently married the daughter of Nelson Peltz — a New York Jewish billionaire and corporate raider — whose “humble” roots are in the Cypress Hill section of Brooklyn — a formerly Jewish neighborhood that is now Black and “coincidentally” crime-ridden.
So even if David Beckham isn’t exactly “hallachically” Jewish himself, his grandchildren will be — “Hashem” permitting — and they will most assuredly will grow up to know what it feels like to be an “oppressed minority.”
A Jewish mother may be the criteria for them, but I’ve found through researching who people are that it doesn’t matter at all — it’s the one drop rule. Every single time.
But wait. He’s already rich like the jews. This is a BS story to perpetuate BS by those who lie for a living.
I was trying to remember to say this. It seems the people who have any kind of blood in them besides White , seem to resemble, prefer or accept their non White blood background. Megan Merkel married a White , lived in White society as an actress, apparently realized she didn’t really need a man to support her or fall back on if she couldn’t support herself so she divorced him. Then when she had a chance to date Harry, it is said that she said :”he’s a good catch.” Even marrying into the royal family, eating , dressing, living, traveling, having servants, and so many other things, she makes her husband , a White monarchy , who was well liked and respected, reviled and despised by her anger , jealously, or whatever it is , treatment, she feels of her life in the Royal Family. If you listen to news videos of British news, they despise Megan Merkel, and seem to believe that Harry is hen pecked and have lost respect for him. They have even lost respect for Harry. She took Harry on the Oprah Winfrey show, another Black , to criticize his own family and defend her attitude. If you look at her from a distance, she looks White, but up close , can see signs of her Black background.
Even Kamela Harris is using her background to support minorities. It seems when these kinds of people find out they are not what they seem or thought they are, they have an inner hatred for it that comes out or to consciousness. I believe that Megan Merkel , being an American, thought she was going to marry into the Royal family and show those stiff necked , old fashioned British Royalty, American independence, that American women do what they want, are independent, free spirits ands all the British say, “all the other rubbish.” But she is frustrated they didn’t bow down to her as she thought they would. It seems Megan Merkel thought that the Royal Family would be blessed with her presence in the family and became angry over time, that she wasn’t shown the dignity she thought she deserved as a Black.
Meghan Markle is 1/4 Black. Her Father is 100% White, her Mother is 50% White 50% Black, which makes Meghan 25% Black. For her “career”, she always played White. All her 3 husbands were White. But now that anybody listens to her (when they never did before because she’s a nobody), suddenly it’s about racism and her being traumatized by racism! Give me a break! She’s an opportunist and nothing more.
The more I read and learn, the more vague things seem to me. I came across a Black website where Blacks claim the Bible is theirs and other things. But videos of them were available years ago claiming such things. One example is they claim they don’t have to wear clothes because their Black skin pigment protects them from the sun whereas White’s do not have the pigment and must clothe themselves to prevent sunburn, etc. I guess to prove something. Who cares about pigment except scientists and medical doctors?
To me, I believe that if it is true , that the Old Testament is the book of the Jews history, then it is no wonder so many people claim to have Jewish blood in them . They carried on the slave trade, owned slave plantations , used and sold their female slaves as they saw fit, their Old Testament tells them to destroy their enemies goods and take the young girls , women as slaves and concubines, and young boys , cattle and destroy everything else. So the Jews have spread their genes throughout history through their trading, slavery, marriages, arranging marriages of Jewish women with wealth and power and monarchy’s etc. They were also to be expert at shanghaiing men for their ships when they needed crewmen. The Arabs did the same with White Christian women as slaves . Put them in their harems, bought and sold them and the men were used as slaves. How do we tell and Arab from a Jew when you hear a supposed Arab in a video in Europe shouting out that we will take your women, we will rape your women, we will destroy you, when the Arabs and Jews are so alike .
The Jews are, have, and bragged that they can impersonate other peoples. They do it in the movies they make. But when they portray, Whites or Christians , they do it like Archie Bunker where they use a supposed White man , who is a racist, to portray the idea of bigotry, and anti semistism. We Whites are not allowed by the Jews to believe in , idolize, anything Hitler or German, but the Jews can make a film series called “Hogan’s Heros ” and make WW11 prison camp a comedy and brag of how successful a program it is. The Jews have made the Halocaust a part of their history and no one else is allowed to change it or criticize it. When Trump was being harassed by the Democrats and their attempted impeachment, I could see all of the Jewish faces and names , to impeach him and also to defend him. Why? Maybe just to set a precedent or to have it on record , for another President who acts as he owns the Government and country instead of being appointed for 4 years . I saw a video where it was said Trump took Rothschild money in the past to save his business’s. No wonder he and Alex Jones were pushing “Fake News.” If you searched the internet ,you missed criticism of them, where they got their news, and other valuable information. Alex Jones has no world wide news staff, but gets his news from others who say he steals their news , claims it as his own and gives them no credit. Yes , and he uses this method and his articles as proof of his phony predictions.
If you look at the Saudi Arabian monarchy, they look and dress Arab. But they are , and I say , supposed to be , Jews, because I don’t have the article that says they are a Jewish tribal family. Even what is called the Young Turks of Turkey who killed thousands and thousands of Armenians are said to be Jews. So that is how the Jews hides among us and makes us believe he is like us. He could have, over the last 2000 years made a civilization any where in the world as other countries like Rhodesia and South Africa has done, but no! They have lived among all races to support themselves over the ages, using and stealing anything and everything they could to survive and now they have, through a book called the Bible , use it to claim that the land they call Israel is theirs. If that is true , the American Indian and other people’s have more proof of ownership of territory. The South Africans say the Cape was uninhabited when trading posts and resupply points were made and the Blacks later came into the area. Yet today, they claim it is theirs, that it was stolen from them. We are getting the same treatment here in the US, but in a different way: White’s are blamed for Black slavery when even Tarzan movies show the truth about Black slavery: Blacks and Arabs, capturing, selling their own kind.
Maybe if he became more informed and did something positive for his own race then he might be more respected and personally, I will never get this obsession with irrelevant sports like football.
If he did anything positive for his own race, or even showed the slightest bit of White racial consciousness, then the media, world of sports, and even many of his brain dead fans would make his life miserable very quickly. He could have just continued to be ambiguous about topics like religion. Taking the path of least resistance. But to continue being famous and relevant, he knew embracing his 1/4 (or whatever) jewish side would bring him new (((friends))) and adulation.
But let’s face it, if you’ve ever listened to David Beckham in an interview, he’s obviously not the brightest bulb in the pack, inarticulate, unsure of himself off the soccer field. He’s as deep as the image he presents in his tattoo-filled underwear ads. Outside of football, he’s probably clueless about what is really going on in the world, which is why he’s an ideal tool for (((TPTBs))).
What’s secret shall be revealed.
Maybe its when Jesus said those who call themselves jews they are not but of the synagogue of satan. So they still like being called jews .
Oh, yuk.
I’ve always detested this tattooed thicko, and now there’s one more reason to add to the list.
This Beckham character is an Enigma to me. Like Paul Newman.
Are they really Jewish by blood? Or is it simply Nurture.
I tell this story from my own life — I dated two girls before my twenties. One was a non-Jew who discovered 20 years later that she was half-Jewish and now she is a flaming anti-white liberal, jew loving freak. The other had Jewish parents but found out when her dad died, that she was adopted. Her paternal parents were pure White. She is now a “religious” Jew and when I talk to her, I can tell that her “nature” wants to be White. But sadly, she has a husband who is a Jew so she is brainwashed to a certain degree.
Anyway ……………… is Beckman really a NON-Adamic person??? Is Beckham a good example of the “one drop” rule? How would we ever truly know?
Interesting.
Pulling a conservative number out of the air, probably one in one hundred children are adopted. Therefore, your subjective experience represents the exception, not the rule. If someone says they have a Jewish ancestor, and we can verify that ancestor (Cherokee princess myth notwithstanding), then we can safely assume that they are partly Jewish and not white.
To cast every such instance into doubt over one very exceptional experience would throw everything into disarray. So yes, Beckham is a good example of the “one drop” rule and we can already truly know.
I agree. But we are also assuming that Beckham’s Jewish “ancestor” was a non-white. How far back do we have to go and “what” is the undeniable proof? (Rhetorical) I don’t believe there is a sure answer here.
I’m not trying to sow confusion or division here. Please don’t misunderstand me. This is a conversation that I was a part of several months ago. That convo just kind of fizzled out.
I’m just talking amongst friends (like-minded believers) here.
I mean, just to look at Beckham, he looks like an Anglo-Saxon Aryan to me.
It is just a very interesting topic. Newman, on the other hand, does have a slightly curved nose.
My theory — if you recall from that conversation months ago — is any White person with non-white admixture would be a “jew” in my opinion. This is when most of us in that conversation agreed that to be a Jew is both Nature and Nurture. And then let’s be honest …… guys or girls like Beckham are very rare. In other words …….. I really can’t think of anyone else to throw into that ‘example’ of a Jew who looks very White.
No big deal. Just talking. Cheers.
“But we are also assuming that Beckham’s Jewish “ancestor” was a non-white.”
“Ancestor”? Are you implying Beckham’s grandfather was adopted as well? Refer back to my reply above. We’re going in circles…
I don’t know. How would we know?
I guess it just brings me back to my original quandary — “What is a Jew”?
This all started when we were dissecting the Edomite question and it became pretty clear that most of us have come to believe that the Edomites of Christ’s time were Adamic peoples.
So …………… when did the “Jew” come to be???
Back to my original thesis — I have come to conclude that a jew is a White person with non-white admixture.
Or better stated — a Jew is a person with non-Adamic admixture.
At the end of the day — this conversation is completely inconsequential.
Maybe, I shouldn’t have brought it up. I just think Beckham is an enigma.
It would be interesting to be able to see photographic evidence of his family tree. Just to find something obvious.
Oh well. Not worth spending anymore time on it. Cheers Grass.
Why is it so hard for you to believe that Beckham is race mixed? Jews are already very white to begin with….the whitest of all non-whites. So when you mixed a Jew with pure whites for a couple generations as is the case with Beckham, whatever stereotypical Jewish features will be very slight if at all. I strongly suspect that many more people who identify as white are actually mixed. I suspect that only 30% of American “whites” are actually white at this point. Very little of southern and far eastern Europe is white any longer. Many people that you think look “aryan” to you may not be white. Our race has become so degenerate that it would probably be unrecognizable to whites from 2,000 years ago. If you were able to stand Noah side by side with Beckham, it would probably be obvious that Beckham was not white.
Interesting point Edward.
I am not sure that Judaism is nurture.
South Korea has more people studying the Talmud than Israel, yet it has not become a nation of jews.
Can Judaism truly be learned by those without any ancestry? From my experience, even those born Jews who are supposedly non religious can and do act like jews.
FWIW, kikes themselves in The Big Lebowski, contended that no gentile could ever truly become a jew.
From all that, I propose that Judaism is nature.
I agree with you on this one. Whether religious or secular, 98% of the time jews act like jews. I have even seen it in peeps who are only 1/4 jewish, including a couple of relatives who were baptized and raised catholic… catholic schools and all.
That leads me to believe that the jew gene is pretty dominant. On the plus side, at the rate they are marrying gentiles, that jew gene will be so diluted that I think many will stop acting and thinking like jews.
RB …. you make a very important observation.
I wasn’t speaking about “nurture” in pure non-adamic peoples.
Only in those non-whites who have some Adamic blood. I suspect the Koreans are a pure blooded people.
I think the mixing of Adamic blood with non-adamic blood can produce a more hostile individual than a pure blooded non-white. If that makes any sense.
I think it has something to do with a “vessel” for a Spirit. I honestly do not believe a non-white person has the capacity to have a spirit — good or bad. Certainly our Father can possess an animal with a spirit for an isolated case (pigs, donkeys). But a non-white person with some Adamic admixture may have the capacity to possess an evil spirit and be used for such purposes continually. CFT wouldn’t exist without the hostile spirit of the Jew. They prove it day after day after day after day. They are born with it, it seems. I just think “nurture” can make it more severe. In my profession, I knew a handful of jews. They did not consider themselves religious jews and therefore they were very docile individuals. But they have the capacity to become very militant — which my x girlfriend from high school has proven. She flat out told me she hates white people.
This is a difficult subject to get my thoughts concise. I try to keep it as simple as possible.
The more curious question for me — “.. when did it first occur?” When was the “Jew” created?
I have two books in my library about “Jewish History”. But the problem is that both authors assume modern jewry are the same people as Ancient Israelites and Israelites of the first century. But they can “trace” Israelites from the first century to Modern Jewry.
My curiosity is trying to understand when did the two diverge. When did the first Israelite, or Adamic man, mix his seed with a non-adamic person and create the mixed blooded “jew”. And when then did these “jews” become collective.
We can assume that Israelites of the Captivity may have mixed with foreigners. And we can assume that the Israelites who rejected Christ and made it through AD 70 also eventually mixed with foreign women.
The “Jews” around 300 ad — when the Talmud came to print — were they mostly Israelites? Or are these the first “Jews” collectively?
Lots of questions.
My point overall however is not important enough for this to become divisive. If people here start getting irritated over this topic — let’s shut it down.
We live in a time where having “friendships” isn’t as easy as it was when we were kids decades ago. My only “friends” are online or on the phone. So, I don’t get to just “talk” like I would want to. We learn from others shared knowledge.
Hope anyone reading this can understand.
I would never “divide” over this conversation.
There are Ukrainians who simply call themselves “Jews” but they reject the Talmud and have no relation to the Ashkenazi. They are called “Karaite”, I think.
I wonder why they believe themselves to be “Jews”?
Who were the first “Jews” I wonder. I suspect those Israelites who rejected Christ in the first Century eventually sowed their seed with non-adamic peoples and — the Jew came to be.
Certainly there could also have been Israelites of the Dispersion who intermarried with non-adamic peoples as well. I suspect the less obvious would have been those who mixed with the Yellow non-adamics. Mixing with a black makes an obvious admixture.
It is rumored that Adamic men made their way to the continent of Japan and thus we have the “Japanese”. I have heard that there is even a sect of Japanese who believe themselves to be related to Israelites.
Boggles the mind.
His mother is not jewish so he is NOT jewish.
But maybe the tribe will throw some shekels his way anyway.
That’s just way too simplistic. Jews have always changed the “rules” for Jewish identity depending on the situation, and what benefits them. For example, when they needed warm bodies to fill the new state of Israel in 1948, they considered anyone with at least one grand parent as “Jewish” and qualified for citizenship. Once they had enough people, they changed it again. Jews also have “dispensations” that can be appealed to the rabbis, so if the father is Jewish but the mother is not, they will almost always allow the children to “convert” and be officially Jewish. Whether your mother or father is Jewish is irrelevant because you’re still 50% Jewish, whatever that means.
No.
Jewish mother means they are jewish. That is the official rule and I believe this is the current rule for right of return, as well as the DNA test.
It’s tiresome to argue with people about the one drop rule because it does NOT apply to jews.
Judaism is matrilineal.
https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/601092/jewish/Why-Is-Jewishness-Matrilineal.htm
Idiots kept insisting that the reason Molyneux avoided the JQ was because he’s “jewish.” He is NOT jewish and he does NOT identify as jewish. He said he had a distant grandparent that was jewish so the alt-right had a fit calling him a jew.
He didn’t avoid the JQ because he’s jewish; he avoided the JQ so he could try to remain on Youtube. But the jews kicked him off anyway.
Most gentiles are utterly clueless about jews and the comments on this site are a testament to this fact.
Yes, and if someone has a Jewish ancestor they still aren’t white… Just like Molyneux. From that regard, who cares what the Jews think?
Bonham: Sounds like you are taking this subject rather personally. Do you have any Jewish ancestry, even a little? Your comments sound needlessly angry and full of self-justification. Sounds like you have a dog in this fight.
I agree with you, Condor.
To all who just don’t get it yet: This is very simple to understand: what jews say does not matter; what God says does matter. God says that if you have ANY mixed blood then you will NOT be welcome in the Kingdom of Heaven. My opinion, your opinion, my mechanics opinion, my cats opinion simply just doesn’t matter. What God says, rules. The Lord God has an unchanging hand!
Ah we don’t care because they lie about that stuff all the time, what are they even retaining by not mixing with others? Delusions? Deformities?
The concern is towards biological inheritance and what they inherit from being mentored by a Jewish parent. If there is any abuse going on the household, like SRA, it will be cyclical.
Jews are just yet another “mixed multitude.” The only thing that makes Ashkenazi & Sephardi divergent from Palestinian mixtures and Turkish or Arab mixtures is more heterogenous admixture with Europeans.
That being said, I’m sure, at this point, many “Whites” probably have divergent ancestry somewhere along the line. That’s one of the points people bring up, accompanied with something like “so why do you care about diversity [in other words: being ethnically replaced]?”
What was Christ’s understanding of race or nation?
Was Herod an Israelite or an Edomite or a Canaanite?
Or didn’t it matter?
Pro 5:14 “In a little while I was in all evil, In the midst of an assembly and a congregation.”
Pro 5:15 Drink water from your own cistern, And running water from your own well.
Pro 5:16 Should your springs be scattered abroad, Rivers of water in the streets?
Pro 5:17 Let them be only your own, And not for strangers with you.
Pro 5:18 Let your fountain be blessed, And rejoice with the wife of your youth –
Pro 5:19 A loving deer and a pleasant doe! Let her nipples satisfy you at all times. And be captivated by her love always.
Pro 5:20 For why should you, my son, Be captivated by a strange woman, And embrace the bosom of a foreigner?
Pro 5:21 For the ways of man Are before the eyes of YHWH, And He considers all his paths.
Pro 5:22 The wrong one is entrapped In his own crookednesses, And he is caught in the cords of his sin.
Pro 5:23 He dies for lack of discipline, And in the greatness of his folly He goes astray.
Lam 4:1 How dim the gold has become, The fine gold changed! The stones of the set-apart place Are scattered at the head of every street.
Lam 4:2 The precious sons of Tsiyon Who were weighed against fine gold, How they have been reckoned as clay pots, The work of the hands of the potter!
Lam 4:7 Her Nazirites were brighter than snow And whiter than milk; More ruddy in body than rubies, Their cut [polishing] like sapphire.
These genetic anomalies known as recessive traits all occurred at the same point in history, from the same source, alongside the mutation which provides the advantage of being able to drink milk into adulthood, which provides a huge advantage in winter climates. They are an anomaly that bears witness, a gift that should not be squandered, nor should the cosmetic visage be gifted in order to make vessels that can hold no water.
These genetic anomalies known as recessive traits all occurred at the same point in history,
Same point in History — You are speaking of the Garden (Adam and Eve) … correct?
“Awake, O north wind; and come, thou south; blow upon my garden, that the spices thereof may flow out. Let my beloved come into his garden, and eat his pleasant fruits.”
John 8 tells us all we need to know.
Indeed, John 8:37 applies to people who cling to Jewish fables, like tales of copulating serpents, “I know that ye are Abraham’s seed; but ye seek to kill me, because my word hath no place in you.”
JULY 29TH 2021 EPIC COMMUNICATION FOR ALL POLICE VINCE GIRCYS RETIRED OPP OFFICER.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/6mVMOBc7gIEt/