(RMX News) For the Jews who insist that their behavior has nothing to do with “antisemitism,” they need look no further than this story out of France — where a wealthy Jewish socialite wants to use some of her own wealth — along with taxpayers’ money, of course — to relocate 70 migrant families — amounting to hundreds of people — to a small town in Brittany to allegedly help revitalize the local economy:
A wealthy family is attempting to implement a utopian experiment with the goal of settling 70 refugee families in the quaint French town of Callac, and while no member of the family actually lives in the town, they are willing to invest millions of euros from their fortune to make their vision a reality.
Known as the Horizon Project, the scheme would be funded with money from the private Merci fund, which was created by Marie-France Cohen and is managed by her three sons. While the Cohen’s fund is reportedly spearheading the project, other financing would come from federal taxpayer subsidies and the local municipality.
The Cohens have identified 75 vacant jobs in health, trade, and agriculture in the town of approximately 2,000, which they plan to fill with refugees. Their endowment fund is designed to cover the cost of relocating the refugee families to the town and providing them with jobs, but only for 10 years. After that, the town is mostly on its own, unless authorities can secure more taxpayer money for the project.
Despite the wealthy family’s desire to create what they describe as a multicultural “Noah’s Ark of modern times” that can be replicated in other towns, residents of Callas are resisting the project, pointing out that no one in the family will have to actually deal with the consequences of their experimental “Noah’s Ark” and the long-term consequences for their small town. That is why residents of the Brittany town of Callac have launched a citizens’ group opposed to the scheme, calling “for defending the identity of Callac,” with the group made up of Danielle Le Men, Michel Riou, and Moulay Drissi.
The individuals have sent an open letter to the mayor of Callac outlining the reasons behind their opposition.
“The objective would be to repopulate a small ‘aging’ town with migrants, to revitalize the town center and to develop economic activities. Migrants would therefore be supervised, housed, and trained, and 70 jobs would be found for them.
The arrival of 70 non-European families would totally upset the life of the municipality and the canton. Thirty-eight non-French-speaking children would be educated at the Callac school and divided into classes. This would further complicate the task of teachers.
How can you impose on the people of Callac such a project that calls into question the identity of our population and before the real cost of the project is determined?”
Given the unemployment struggles people from Callac have faced, the citizens’ group is asking why the Cohen family is not interested in helping employ the people in the town who already live there. In a petition, they write, “We believe that the millions of euros that this project would cost should be invested as a priority for the local population, via the renovation of housing, via energy aid, via the development of the town of Callac and the surrounding municipalities, to allow locals to flourish there and those who want to come and settle there without monetary assistance to do so later.”
In the group’s letter to the mayor, they also point to the French National Institute of Statistics and Economic Studies (INSEE) to validate their concerns, which states the unemployment rate in Callac was 17.6 percent for those aged 15 to 64 as of 2018. That means nearly one out of five working-age people has no job in the town, yet dozens of refugee families are being brought in and allegedly being set up with new jobs.
The citizens are now calling for a referendum on the whole scheme, saying that citizens living in the town should be able to decide about their own future.
“An urgent consultation of the population of the municipality by referendum is essential with precise figures on this Horizon project,” reads their open letter. Such a letter could very well halt such a project, as polling from Ifop has shown that 70 percent of French citizens in general want a halt to all immigration to the country, with the same poll also showing that they believe migrants make France less safe and 64 percent saying that immigration has a negative impact on the country. In rural areas like Callac, conservative positions on immigration are even more prevalent.
They also point to the massive societal ills associated with areas of France that already feature large migrant populations. “You are going to create in the middle of Brittany, in Argoat, a foreign community with all the issues related to these groups. You are going to move the problems of the big cities to the Breton countryside,” the citizens of Callac warn.
The problems of the “big cities” referred to in the letter are the levels of crime and cultural tensions reaching the point that Pierre Brochand, who served as the head of France’s top intelligence agency from 2002 to 2008, warning of civil war if France does not halt mass immigration. He pointed to attacks on police officers, murders, growing social tension, divisions over schooling, and cases of “urban guerilla warfare” in migrant neighborhoods as all signs that multiculturalism in France has failed.
Au contraire! Multiculturalism in France — and in all other white nations — has been wildly successful in undermining the fabric of society and ushering a virtual police state to keep the peace — just as it was intended to do.
Jews do not feel comfortable living in white homogeneous societies — they prefer living in racially diverse societies in which they are just one of many non-white minorities — soon to become majorities.
That’s why Jews can most often be found living in cities with high levels of diversity — conservative rural communities aren’t interested in the “blessings” that Jews like the Cohens bring with them.
And if the cities they live in don’t have much diversity, they will do whatever they can to increase diversity — regardless of how the locals feel about it.
But if Jews are truly interested in combating or lessening “antisemitism,” they would do well to stop engaging in this kind of self-serving, nation-wrecking behavior — and speak out against other Jews who engage in it.
But then again, Jews have admitted to flooding Europe with migrants so as to distract the white natives from addressing the eternal “Jewish Question.”
According to Bari Weiss — a Jewish writer formerly for the New York Times — it is definitely not a “conspiracy theory” that Jews are behind the massive flood of migrants into white nations — it’s a fact — and they are “proud” of it.
If you are going to speak about the Jews above a whisper, it must only be to praise them — in case you haven’t figured out what former President Woodrow Wilson did:
“Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men’s views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.”