Black First Land First leader Andile Mngxitama is not back-peddling on his expressed contempt and hatred for White people in South Africa, and claims that if he comes across any White person he wouldn’t hesitate to use his machete in a viral tweet:
The Citizen reported that Mngxitama told journalists that no court would stop the BLF from defending himself against “settlers”.
“We must be clear, any white person who touches us we will send them to hell. Any white person who touches us, we will go to their homes, we will go to where they eat, we will go to where they work, we will find them, and we will deal with them.
“No f**k*ng court is going to stop us from defending ourselves against settlers. They stole our land, they make us slaves, now today they are coming to take our dignity, and you believe we will not defend ourselves? That will not happen,” Mngxitama said.
There was a press release blamed “white monopoly capital via the SAHRC” for taking them to court, adding the case sought to have slogans the organisation uses, such as “Land or Death”, “by any means necessary” and “one settler one bullet”, declared hate speech.
Among those charged, apart from Mngxitama and the organisation itself, are BLF deputy president Zanele Lwana, national spokesperson Lindsay Maasdorp, deputy secretary-generals Tshidiso Tsimong and Zwelakhe Dubasi as well as treasurer-general Thandiswa Yaphi.
Virtually every Black voter in South Africa expects any Black political candidate and party to support “land expropriation” or theft from the White South Africans, and the reverse is also true: that Blacks who don’t advocate this land theft have no chance of getting support or elected. President Ramaphosa is trying to assure White voters that this land “redistribution” program can be done peacefully and “legally”, while the “radicals” like Mngxitama and Malema want it done violently and quickly.
There is not enough money in the South African treasury to purchase this land from Whites at a “fair market value”, and so the only alternative to this outright theft without compensation. Not only will the majority of Whites not be compensated for their property, they will be lucky to escape with their lives. In terms of the Marxist dialectic, the purpose of Mngxitama is to make Julius Malema look like a “moderate” and Ramaphosa look like an arch-conservative. In the end, Whites cannot trust or rely on any of them.
russ
Poor savage does not know its not man that can send you to Hell. But Hey! lets tolerate his ignorance in the matter.
russ
Right through Apartheid they had their own tribal homelands. Many whites lost farms to secure those homelands. Sadly they could not do it for themselves and the land lay mostly fallow. The ANC and their Jewish founders did not want this as they had conjoined ideas. The mines needed cheap labour and the ANC documents reveal they wanted squatter camps and illegal ingress into South Africa to make it ungovernable.
Today they cannot solve their own self created problem of squatter camps. The greatest part of the budget is going to State owned enterprises and debt to you know who. The SOE have failed through mismanagement corruption and blatant unpunished black theft. Now here is the truth they the blacks are now starting to flee to the white countries of Europe.
Yes ago I travelled through the home land Transkei. As a white I was ignored at the border post for 1hr while blacks were talking Xhosa and making jokes. This was at a time when apartheid was still going. You see the realities of what the international communities have unleashed in this man’s attitude. South Africa is a failed state that has no remedy. No one is able to fix this multi racial cesspool of racists.
Jake
I have heard it all before from these black bastards.
With the minimum of effort we could wipe this black rubbish off the face of the planet.
FredBarbarossa
The farmers also have the Criminal Banking Institutions to deal with: https://www.news.com.au/finance/economy/world-economy/south-african-bank-says-customers-must-honour-home-loan-payments-even-if-land-is-seized/news-story/dff832edcbf1672c060f6568658c3210
Excerpt: “bond payments remain due” regardless of any expropriation, “with or without compensation”.
I’d like to see them try that!
ottify
That was also covered here at ROTR. Check the archives.
Martha Rowe
If your land is taken and you do not live on the property no one can make you pay the bond. The banks will be the biggest loosers. The country will become even poorer.
russ
Martha there is a precedent to say you cannot force payment of land without a deeded responsibility. Recently the banksters all over the world sold mortgages to people who could not afford them. They bundled the investments together and sold them on quickly. So in South Africa a house older was asked to pay not the original bank but the new investment holder. Trouble was all the paper work was in a mess and the proof of debt could not be proven in court. The man walked away with his house and no repayments to make.
It was a bankster scam. It was all over Cart Blanche an SABC TV program. Lawyers know that banks haven’t go a leg to stand on. The banks themselves are well aware of this and so it will with time address itself in the courts. One problem for the blacks, they will not be able to raise capital from those banks as banks will not lend to inexperienced farmers. The risk is too great and the ANC is violation countless International Laws regarding there right to steal not their original Reserves and tribal lands but white owned enterprises.
I guess the Jews will sucker them into it and then move directly against the South African state to collect big. Poor blacks do not know the deception of a commie Jew backstabbing.