Another leftist politician is promoting “zero population growth” and admonishing “irresponsible breeders” while completely ignoring the population statistics based on race:
A millionaire Democrat running for U.S. Congress in Pennsylvania is a population control zealot who believes in taxing families with more than two kids for being “irresponsible breeders.”
As a challenger to U.S. Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick for the 1st Congressional District of Pennsylvania, Scott Wallace has received endorsements from both Planned Parenthood and the National Organization for Women (NOW). According to PJ Media, Wallace has donated close to $7 million to population control groups over the past 20 years through his Wallace Global Fund. Some of the groups Wallace has donated to advocate for taxing families with more than two children. More from PJ Media:
Between 1997 and 2003, Wallace gave $420,000 to Zero Population Growth (ZPG) — now Population Connection — an organization co-founded by ‘Population Bomb’ author Paul Ehrlich, Fox News reported.
From before its inception, ZPG had announced its intentions to tax large families for the ‘privilege of irresponsible breeding.’ A 1968 brochure advocated abortion to stabilize population growth and claimed that ‘no responsible family should have more than two children.’ Therefore, ‘irresponsible people who have more than two children should be taxed to the hilt for the privilege of irresponsible breeding.’
Of course, the only people who will listen to this windbag are educated Whites who can easily support more than two children without being a burden on society. The non-Whites will ignore his guilt-inducing rhetoric and breed like rabbits.
However, it’s worth noting that Wallace refers to heterosexual couples as “breeders” which is the derogatory terminology that homosexuals use to describe straight people. But then again, having sexual intercourse without creating children is what homosexuals do – and apparently that is now the height of “responsible” behavior.
Karl the Hammer
The goal has never been about controlling the human population for “the good of the earth;” it’s always been about depopulating the White race. Why else is this rhetoric promoted in America and Europe but not to the comparatively booming populations of Asia and Africa.
The process runs in this way (especially, as we see it in Europe): (1) promote “population control” to a White country or condition the economy to create difficulty in raising large to average-sized families.
(2) as “experts” observe that the lack of population growth will create a lack of laborers and tax slaves, it becomes “necessary” to import immigrants from “less fortunate” countries to fill in the gap.
Either way, the goal is evident.
Chesterton
That’s true. I have never seen a news story about there being a worker shortage in Africa, China or India. For years China had a “one child” per family policy, and they never had a worker shortage.
The difference is that the White race is capable of always creating new technologies that can replace inefficient workers. We are more than capable of filling any labor shortage with technology that will improve production and reduce its cost.