Twelve Honduran migrants who are part of the ‘human’ caravan headed to the U.S. border have already hired a U.S. law firm to defend their alleged rights under the U.S. Constitution to invade the U.S. and immediately take advantage of our social welfare system:
The plaintiffs, including six children, are alleging that President Trump’s plans to block the 4,000-odd Central American migrants currently streaming northward toward the US-Mexico border are “shockingly unconstitutional.” They are also suing the Department of Justice and Department of Homeland Security.
The lawsuit points out that it is common knowledge that Honduras, Guatemala and El Salvador are “undergoing a well-documented human rights crisis” and that asylum-seekers are allowed to declare their intentions anywhere, not just at lawful border-crossing points. They claim Trump has no right to keep migrants from entering the US when they have a credible claim of asylum.
Civil rights law firm Nexus Derechos Humanos is representing the migrants. The suit also claims the US is forbidden to send its troops across the Mexican border to block asylum-seekers because the claim process begins as soon as a prospective immigrant indicates they intend to apply for asylum. Ironically, it was right-wing Judge Antonin Scalia who determined in a 1993 ruling that “it is well established that the Fifth Amendment entitles clients to due process of law in a deportation proceeding.”
Asylum claims are granted based on the perception of “credible fear of persecution” in a migrant’s home country, as assessed in an interview, but because of the backlog of immigration cases, migrants often wait years before the hearing that determines whether they can stay in the US permanently. In conversation with Fox News’ Laura Ingraham last week, Trump proposed to build tent cities near the border to house asylum-seekers while they await their hearings, ending the practice of “catch and release” that he partially blames for the influx of illegal immigrants into the country.
Trump’s estimate of how many troops he wants to send south has been climbing steadily since the caravans started massing south of Mexico last month, and his fantasy army numbered about 15,000 at last count. There are currently about 5,200 troops at the border.
The lawsuit also questions whether Trump’s “tent cities” conform to the Flores rule, which prohibits the detention of minors for over 20 days and sets other limits on the conditions in which asylum seekers may be held. A California judge denied the administration’s request for a modification of Flores earlier this year.
The suit is ultimately looking for a legal declaration that Trump’s border plan is unconstitutional. Such a ruling would essentially throw open the gates to the hordes of migrants currently walking and being bused north through Guatemala and Mexico.
Social media reacted with confusion and amusement, marveling that the migrants had thought to pack a US lawyer with them, while others took note that the suit referred to Trump as ‘our’ President.
Our Founding Fathers would be shocked to say the least to find out that when they wrote the U.S. Constitution, they were inadvertently guaranteeing the “human rights” of Honduran natives to invade America. If only they had the foresight to have had jewish legal consultants at the time to close that gaping legal loophole. On top of that, it would also shock our Founding Fathers to find out that any Honduran would ever enjoy U.S. citizenship at all, but we all know just how racist they all were when they intended to create the U.S. only for White Christians and their descendants.
We should be grateful for all the jewish legal experts who have worked tirelessly over the years to undermine the U.S. Constitution by demonstrating how it was originally conceived as a “universalist” document that ensured the rights of citizenship to everyone in the world, regardless of their country of origin. We should also be thankful to these same Jews who have convinced us that we do not, in fact, have the legal right to defend our own borders, which are evil symbols of White supremacy and exclusivity.
Center For Immigration Studies, October 2001
The Jewish Stake in America’s Changing Demography
“It is simply astounding to contemplate the recent historical rise in Mexican immigration. In 1970, there were fewer than 800,000 Mexican immigrants; 30 years later the number is approaching 9 million, a 10-fold increase in one generation…
“The Jewish community is thus in a position where it will be able to DIVIDE AND CONQUER and enter into selective coalitions that support OUR [ORGANISED JEWRY’S] AGENDAS.” – Dr. Stephen Steinlight, Senior Policy Analyst at the Center for Immigration Studies and former National Affairs Director at the American Jewish Committee (AJC)
Most countries in the world do not offer birthright citizenship — only 30 out of the world’s 194 nations automatically grant citizenship to children born to illegal immigrant parents, according to the Center for Immigration Studies.
No European country has birthright citizenship, and the global trend over the past 30 years has been to halt the practice. Notable countries that have ended birthright citizenship in recent decades include the U.K. in 1983, Australia in 1986, India in 1987 and Ireland in 2004….The U.S. and Canada are alone among developed nations worldwide that automatically grant citizenship to people born within their territorial jurisdiction.
Because all of those children are U.S. citizens, they are eligible to eventually sponsor relatives for immigrant visas, creating a cycle of chain migration benefiting people who violated immigration law. Some reformers also argue that birthright citizenship promotes abuse of welfare programs because illegal immigrants can obtain benefits, including Medicaid, food stamps and certain tax credits, through their U.S. citizen children.
Then there is the issue of birth tourism, in which foreign nationals travel to the U.S. on business or tourist visas with the aim of giving birth to an American citizen. Estimates vary widely, but a 2015 CIS analysis found that more than 30,000 births to foreign “tourists” occur annually. Countries widely known for sending birth tourists to the U.S. include China, Russia and Mexico.” [A Lot More at the link]
Ottify and Chesterton, I’m sure both of you probably know this already, but I’ll state it anyway for the record in the event that some reader may not know, and leave a good link which helps with good information.
It was a failure by our earlier generation to see through the jewish subterfuge which somehow parades itself as being a religion [earlier jews may have seemed that way], and with their usage of their similar enough skin color and knowledge of our own cultural ways within our White societies, to infiltrate and engage in internationally organized networks of disruption and treachery. The early jews were the Trojan horses enabling others within jewry to follow behind and to monopolize, to cause changes that they desired and destroy.
Stealth tactics used by jewry, along with the failure of our own earlier people to publically call them out to identify that mongrel “race”, for what they were doing, allowed the jews to continue building their networks and to obtain influence and control within certain key areas. Some of the historically recent methods used by jews to politically sabotage our people are given inside this link below.
[Note that there are links to other countries at the top portion which suffer from the same type of affliction. Links to yet more countries are given in the very bottom section].
It is amazing how a nation and government created by “free white men” for themselves and their posterity through a contract made between themselves and their Christian God, has been illegally and unlawfully litigated by jews to the point that our U.S. Constitution now guarantees ‘rights’ to everyone except to whom those rights were specifically enumerated!
Yes…just like what they’ve done to our Bible…
It appears that the Jews “universalized” the U.S. Constitution the same way they universalized The Bible. A leopard never changes its spots.