Roman Polanski, the convicted rapist and pedophile, who was recently in Venice to promote his new film, lashed out at his accusers, casting a shadow over the star-studded celebration of cinema:
Polanski’s “An Officer and a Spy”, a historical thriller about the persecution of the French Jewish army officer Alfred Dreyfus, has been a lightning rod for criticism of the film festival, already embroiled in a second year of controversy over the place of female film-makers.
The 86-year-old, who was convicted for the statutory rape of a 13-year-old in 1978, is not due to appear at the festival.
Venice organizers have been forced to defend the decision to include “An Officer and a Spy” among the 21 movies selected to compete for the top prize. Only two films in the running are directed by women…
“This is a new world and behavior that would have been swept under the carpet and dismissed as ‘this is just the way it is’ is no longer acceptable,” Melissa Silverstein, founder of Women and Hollywood, told AFP.
Polanski on Thursday responded via an interview with French writer Pascal Bruckner in which he dismissed new abuse claims against him.
He said these were “absurd stories by women I have never seen before in my life who accuse me of things which supposedly happened more than half a century ago.”
In the interview, contained in a press pack released to accompany his film, the director was asked by Bruckner if “as a Jew” he will “survive the present-day neo-feminist McCarthyism.”
The director draws a parallel with his film, which traces the history of the late 19th century Dreyfus Affair — the wrongful conviction of a Jewish officer against a backdrop of virulent anti-Semitism.
“In the story, I sometimes find moments I have experienced myself, I can see the same determination to deny the facts and condemn me for things I have not done. Most of the people who harass me do not know me and know nothing about the case,” Polanski said.
Just to clarify, Polanski was charged not merely with having sexual relations with an underage girl, he allegedly drugged a 13 year old child and anally raped her while she was unconscious. He should have spent 30 years in prison in America and been subjected to the same treatment, but instead escaped to Europe where powerful Jews not only protected him from extradition but also continued to allow him to make films and live the lavish life of a celebrated director.
His last two major films have been about two jewish hobby horses — the Holocaust and antisemtism — probably as payback to the powerful Jews who have protected him all these years. And now he conveniently identifies with “persecuted” jewish spy Alfred Dreyfus.
As is the case with Leo Frank, the Jews are obsessed with exonerating Dreyfus, and have proclaimed his “innocence” because some of the investigators were allegedly “antisemitic”. Jews, unfortunately, have a long, sordid history of being caught spying, and Dreyfus was no different.
First, he’s wrong about the antisemitism. It’s anticanaanitism. Second, pedophilia is a hallmark of the edomite/canaanite jew. Certainly this reprobate is cavalier about this unconscionable wickedness foisted upon our children.
Fellow director Quentin Tarrantino has always known how to kiss jewish ass in Hollywood, which explains his great success with such limited talent. He married an Israeli jewess just to make sure his jewish bosses ever doubted him.
And Tarrantino defended Polanski, going to far as to say the 13 year old rape victim “wanted it”. If the victim had been a Jew instead of Polanski, Tarrantino’s career would have ended right then and there:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5358267/Quentin-Tarantino-defends-Roman-Polanski-2003-interview.html
A November 4, 2017 article tells us of another time that Pedo-Polanski was “honored” by the jews and by Hollywoodians who depend on the jews for fame and fortune, and some details about what Polanski did to the 13 year old girl.
“Weinstein gave cover to these stars by writing an op-ed at the time referring to what Polanski did as a “so-called crime.” What he was saying is that it is a “so-called crime” to ply a child with alcohol and drugs, and then rape her orally, vaginally, and anally. Whoopi Goldberg agreed, saying “I don’t believe it was ‘rape-rape.'”
—
“Polanski was arrested in September 2009 for what he did in 1977. He got a 13-year-old girl drunk, forced her to take a Quaalude with champagne, and then tried to rape her in a Jacuzzi. She resisted. Then he followed her into a bedroom, kissed her, and performed oral sex on her. Then he had intercourse with her. Then he had anal sex with her.
And what did the Hollywood crowd and their European counterparts do when Polanski was arrested? They signed a petition in his defense. Weinstein said, “We are calling upon every filmmaker we can to help fix this terrible situation.” The “terrible situation” was not sodomizing a girl; it was restrictions on Polanski’s travel plans.
Weinstein garnered plenty of support for his fellow molester.” ….
https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/bill-donohue/2017/11/04/roman-polanski-honored-his-own-kind-again
I love how the original article includes the mewlings of feminist b!tch jewess Melissa Silverstein to help deflect focus from the child rapist. It is morbidly amusing that she is more concerned that there isn’t enough jewess representation at this ‘film festival’ than whether or not she and other women should be rubbing shoulders with this scum in the first place. Any self respecting ‘person’ would tell the festival to go shove it, that you wouldn’t want to be involved with anything that promotes slime like him anyway. But since “this is a new world”, apparently anything goes…
This is nothing new. These ideas have been destroying civilizations since the original adamic creation in Genesis 1:26. Adam in Genesis 2:7 was separate and subsquent adamic creation occuring in the 7th day, not the 6th day. It is not a parallelism as some promote. The serpent was the proto-jew and the beast of the field were the other races that God did create as hunter gatherers that adamic man was supposed to rule over. Where do you think Seth got his wife? He certainly could not have married his own sister in violation of the law and they did have the law because if they didn’t, God could not have condemned them to mortal death. The first adamic creation had the full law. Cain was Adam’s son but he went the way of the proto-jew, which jews are asiatics in their blood. Cain denied the birth right and salvation; hence, the offering of his own hands. Abel was given the birthright which drove Cain to jealousy. The same scenario with Esau and Jacob.