The following is a lecture by Bertrand Comparet identifying Anglo-Saxon Israel as Daniel’s Fifth Kingdom in prophecy:
And I want to talk to you about Daniel’s Fifth Kingdom. It is universally recognized that many of the Bible’s greatest prophesies are found in the Book of Daniel. Many of these are phrased in such obscure language that they were hard to understand until their fulfillment made clear their meaning, and that is exactly what God intended for he had the angel tell Daniel,
But thou, O Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book, even to the time of the end….for the words are closed up and sealed till the time of the end. Many shall be purified, and made white, and tried; but the wicked shall do wickedly: and none of the wicked shall understand; but the wise shall understand. (Daniel 12:4, 9-10)
However, actual events which have followed through the centuries have fulfilled these prophesies so unmistakably that their meaning is now clear.
One of these prophesies is accepted by all churches that I know of, and they have agreed upon its meaning — that is, for the first four-fifths of it. Yet, this prophesy so clearly sets forth the Anglo-Israel doctrines that it is hard to see how the preachers of these churches can be blind to it. And now this is an especial challenge to all preachers who deny the truth of the Anglo-Israel doctrines. Follow this with me in your Bibles, and then let me hear you deny it.
I refer to Nebuchadnezzar’s image which Daniel explained as a prophecy sent by God — this is all in second chapter of Daniel. You will remember that in Babylon, King Nebuchadnezzar had a dream of such obvious importance that it greatly troubled him. But on awakening, he forgot his dream so he could not tell it to his wise men to ask their interpretation. Being a typical oriental monarch, he found a quick solution to this puzzle. And we read:
And in the second year of the reign of Nebuchadnezzar, Nebuchadnezzar dreamed dreams, wherewith his spirit was troubled and his sleep broke from him. Then the king commanded to call the magicians, and the astrologers, and the sorcerers and the Chaldeans for to show unto the king his dreams. So they came and stood before the king. And the king said unto them, I have dreamed a dream and my spirit was troubled to know the dream. Then spoke the Chaldeans to the king in Syriack, O king, live fore ever; tell thy servants the dream, and we will shew the interpretation. And the king answered and said to the Chaldeans, ‘The thing is gone from me. If ye will not make known unto me the dream, with the interpretation thereof, ye shall be cut in pieces and your houses shall be made a dunghill. (Daniel 2:1-5)
This was surely a startling unreasonable demand to make. These were sorcerers, old hands at the game of thinking up impressive but vague answers — vague and equivocal enough to let them fit their words into what ever might happened, an art they shared with some of the famous Greek oracles. But to be required to give an answer when you didn’t yet know what the question was, that was too much to expect. They replied,
There is not a man upon the earth that can know the king’s matter. Therefore there is no king, nor ruler, that has asked such things of any magician, astrologer or Chaldean. And It is a rare thing that the king requires and there is none other that can show it before the king except the gods whose dwelling is not with flesh. (Daniel 1: 10-11)
But this did not pacify the king who commanded that all the magicians, astrologers and Chaldeans be killed because their inability to explain his dream exposed them as frauds. Only Daniel and his Hebrew companions escaped this purge because God gave to Daniel the power both to recount the dream itself and also to explain it. In Daniel’s own words, this was the dream:
Thou O king sawest and beheld a great image. This great image, whose brightness was excellent, stood before thee and the form thereof was terrible. This image’s head was of fine gold, his breast and arms of silver, his belly and his thighs of brass, his legs of iron, his feet part of iron and part of clay. (Daniel 2: 31-33)
Then Daniel went on to explain to King Nebuchadnezzar the meaning of this image:
Thou O king art a king of kings for the God of heaven has given thee a kingdom, power, strength and glory. And wheresoever the children of men dwell, the beasts of the field and the fowls of heaven has he given unto thine hand and has made thee ruler over them all. Thou are this head of gold, and after thee shall rise another kingdom inferior to thee and another kingdom of brass, which shall bear rule over all the earth. And the fourth kingdom shall be strong as iron forasmuch as iron breaks in pieces and subdues all things and as iron that breaks from all these shall it break in pieces and bruise. And whereas thou sawest the feet and toes part of potter’s clay and part of iron, the kingdom shall be divided: but there shall be on it the strength of iron, forasmuch as thou sawest the iron mixed with miry clay. And as the toes of the feet were part of iron and part of clay, so the kingdom shall be partly strong and partly broken. Whereas thou sawest iron mingled with miry clay, they shall mingle themselves with the seed of men, but they shall not cleave one to another, even as iron is not mixed with clay. ( Daniel 2:37-43).
As I said, the churches are all in agreement that this image represents the Babylonian succession of empires. The head was Babylon itself under Nebuchadnezzar, who brought it to its pinnacle of power and wealth. In its day, it was the most important empire in the then-known world — that is, western Asia and the lands fronting the Mediterranean Sea. It ruled the entire Fertile Crescent, from the Persian Gulf even to Egypt.
The next succeeding empire of comparable power was that of the Medes and Persians, who conquered Babylon about 536 B.C. The kingdom of Media was absorbed in the rising power of Persia even before the conquest of Babylon. This Persian Empire extended from northwest India and Afghanistan across the Fertile Crescent over most of Asia Minor — which constitutes modern Turkey — down through Syria and Palestine, and even including Egypt.
This was the empire represented by the breast and arms of silver in Nebuchadnezzar’s dream image. It was conquered and absorbed into the empire of Alexander the Great of Macedon between the years 334 and 331 B.C. Alexander became king of Macedonia in 336 B.C.
By 332, he had conquered Asia Minor — that is modern Turkey — and Syria, Palestine and Egypt. He conquered the Tigris and Euphrates valleys in 331, swept over Persia, Bactria — which is largely the same as modern Afghanistan — and down into northern India. In ten years, he had built up an empire covering all the then known civilized world from Greece eastward to northern India. In 323 B.C., he died in a drunken debauchery in Babylon.
His huge but short-lived empire was the belly and the thighs of brass in Nebuchadnezzar’s dream image.
Fourth and last came the great empire of Rome, represented by the legs of iron. The city of Rome was founded in 753 B.C. and the Roman Republic — which began its greatness — was established about 500 B.C. Its empire began with the conquest of Macedonia and Egypt in 168 B.C.
Eventually, the Roman Empire expanded so that it ruled Italy, Spain, Gaul — which is modern France — Macedonia, Greece, North Africa, and Egypt, western Asia Minor, Syria and Palestine. Its frontiers were the Atlantic Ocean, the Irish Sea, the south border of Scotland, the North Sea, the River Rhine, the Danube River, the Black Sea, the Caucasus mountains, Armenia, to the middle of ancient Babylonia, the Arabian desert, the Red Sea, Nubia, and the Sahara desert, and the Moroccan mountains.
Its outstanding characteristic was its harsh and cruel treatment of its subject people. As Daniel said,
And the fourth kingdom shall be strong as iron: forasmuch as iron breaks in pieces and subdues all things: and as iron that breaks all these, shall it break in pieces and bruise. (Daniel 2:40)
Remember there were two legs of iron, so the Roman empire split into the western — or Roman Empire — and the eastern empire — often called Byzantine. Likewise each of these two was an enforced mixture of different peoples, having nothing in common except that they were ruled by the Roman army, and when the military force failed, they broke up into their original fragments.
As Daniel said,
As the toes of the feet were part of iron and part of clay, so the kingdom shall be partly strong and partly broken. And whereas those sawest iron mixed with miry clay they shall mingle themselves with the seed of men but they shall not cleave one to another, even as iron is not mixed with clay.
Up to this point, all the churches are with me one hundred percent. Their preachers all agree that these are the empires which Daniel’s prophesy foretold because they actually do fulfill that prophesy so perfectly.
Now we come to the place where most of the churches don’t want to recognize Daniel as a prophet. Let’s continue with what Daniel said. After concluding his description of the image and its interpretation as these four successive empires, then in the very next verse, Daniel 2, verse 44 he says,
And in the days of these kings shall the God of heaven set up a kingdom which shall never be destroyed: and the kingdom shall not be left to other people, but it shall break in pieces and consume all these kingdoms and it shall stand forever.
Now let’s analyze this — first of all, let us note that this Fifth Kingdom spoken of by Daniel is not like the first four. The first four were the creations of pagan men but, this Fifth Kingdom shall be set up by God himself. When shall it come into existence? Daniel says “in the days of these kings” — this is some time during the existence of the four empires of the Babylonian order.
So let us refresh memory as to their dates. The Babylon Empire came to an end in 536 B.C., when it was conquered by the Medo-Persian Empire. The Medo-Persian Empire came to an end when it was overrun and conquered by the armies of Alexander the Great in 331 B.C. After his death, Alexander’s empire just fell apart into four parts as another prophesy of Daniel’s had foretold. Alexander died in 323 B.C. These are the first three empires symbolized by Nebuchadnezzar’s dream image, so this leaves only the fourth and last one — Imperial Rome.
The city of Rome was founded in 753 B.C. — the Republic was established about 55 B.C. Expansion into an empire began with the conquest of Macedonia and Egypt in 168 B.C. We need not cover in detail the history of the Roman empire — enough to note that just as the dream image had two legs, so the Roman empire was divided into eastern and western parts.
This was first done by emperor Diocletian in 283 A. D. — and the division became permanent at the death of emperor Theodosius in 395 A. D. The two separate empires — that is, the western generally governed from Rome and always called Roman — and the eastern empire governed from Constantinople — the original name of which city had been Byzantium and generally called the Byzantine Empire — these two continued for some time after their separation.
The western — or Roman empire — fought a losing battle against the ever-increasing pressure of the invading peoples who were the Israelites, moving from Scythia into their new European homes. The Visigoths were an Israelite people and were largely Christian by 350 A.D. They were driven west by the pressure of the invading Huns. They entered the Roman empire in 376 A.D., scoring a decisive victory over Roman armies in 378, so Rome ceded them certain Roman territories. They invaded Italy itself in 400 A.D. — forced Rome to pay a ransom in 408 A.D. That year Rome withdrew its armies from Britain to aid in the defense of Rome — but to no avail for in 410 A.D., the Visigoths captured and looted the city of Rome itself.
In 412 A.D., they moved on into southern France and northern Spain, where they ruled Spain until the Moorish conquest in the year 711. In 476 A.D., Odoacer, the general of the German mercenary soldiers in the Roman army rebelled, captured the capital city of the western Roman empire and deposed the last emperor, Romulus Augustulus. And this date — 476 A.D. — is accepted by historians as marking the end of the western half of the Roman Empire.
Meanwhile, the eastern empire — generally called the Byzantine Empire with Byzantium or later called Constantinople as its capital — claimed to be ruling even the western Roman empire, although this was more claim than fact except for brief periods. From 395 A.D., the western Roman empire was really separate. But enemy pressures were building up against the eastern empire — pressures too strong to be resisted.
By about 650 A. D., the Moslems had conquered Arabia, Syria, Palestine, Egypt, North Africa and Sicily. The Byzantine Empire was by that time reduced to Asia Minor and the Balkans. Then in 1074, the Turks captured most of Asia Minor. After that came enemies from an unexpected source — the combined forces of Venice and the fourth crusade captured Constantinople in 1204, taking also all the Balkan territories — and they set up the short-lived Latin Empire of Constantinople.
While the authority of the Byzantine Empire was restored in the city of Constantinople in the 1260’s A.D., all the Balkan territories were lost — they broke up into many small independent nations. Remember that Daniel said the toes were part iron and part clay and would not stick together? For two centuries more, just a shadow of the Byzantine Empire continued, consisting of just the city of Constantinople and its environs until the Turks captured the city in A.D. 1453, ending the last pretense of the existence of this leg of the Roman empire.
So the year 1453 marks the end of the four world empires of Nebuchadnezzar’s dream image. Remember now the words which many preachers won’t face because it ruins their doctrines — in Daniel 2, verse 44, Daniel said,
In the days of these kings shall the God of heaven set up a kingdom which shall never be destroyed. And the kingdom will not be left to other people, but it shall break in pieces and consume all these kingdoms and it shall stand forever.
So we must find God’s own kingdom in this world — not in some remote future to which the preachers would like to banish it — but now. It must have had its beginning in the days of these kings, and therefore we must study this period which we have seen extends from Daniel’s own time — about 600 B.C. — to not later than 1453 A.D. — for that is the period in which the kings of the Babylonian succession of empires ruled, as we have just seen.
Why do the preachers like to ignore this verse of Daniel’s prophesy? Because there is a great kingdom which was set up within that period — and which still exists — just as God promised through Daniel it would. But it is a nation of Anglo-Saxon Israel, and if they recognize this as a kingdom which the God of heaven set up, then they can no longer deny the truth of the Anglo-Israel doctrines. So, they would rather try to make a liar out of Daniel and his God than to admit that their own doctrines are in error — and that God has kept his promises to his people — Israel.
If it shocks you to think that the nations of Anglo-Saxon, Germanic and Scandinavian Israel today are the the kingdom of God, then be prepared to be shocked — for that is just what I am about to prove.
The kingdom of God is the only everlasting kingdom. Psalm 22, verses 27 and 28 says
All the ends of the world shall remember and turn unto the Lord, and all the kingdoms of the nations shall worship before Thee. For the kingdom is the Lord’s, and He is the governor among the nations.
Psalm 145, verses 13 and 14 says,
Thy kingdom is an everlasting kingdom and Thy dominion endureth throughout all generations.
Daniel 4, verse 3, adds,
How great are His signs and how mighty are His wonders! His kingdom is an everlasting kingdom, and His dominion is from generation to generation.
But this kingdom of God is not just an abstract idea — lost somewhere among the clouds — it is a very real kingdom upon this earth. It has not been governed as well while mere men rule it as it will be when Jesus Christ returns to be its king. Nevertheless, it is still the kingdom of God here on earth. Remember how Jesus Christ himself in Matthew 21, verse 43, told the Jewish usurpers who ruled in Judea,
Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof.
God had repeatedly promised to establish a kingdom — God’s own kingdom in this world and place descendants of King David upon the throne of God’s kingdom. In First Chronicles 17, verses 11, 12, and 14 God’s promise to David was this,
I will raise up thy seed after thee, which shall be of thy sons and I will establish His kingdom. He shall build me a house, and I will establish his throne forever. I will settle him in my house and in my kingdom forever, and his throne shall be established forevermore.
David believed God’s promise for in First Chronicles 28, verses 4 and 5, David said,
Howbeit the God of Israel chose me before all the house of my father to be king over Israel forever, for He hath chosen Judah to be the ruler and of the house of Judah, the house of my father. And among the sons of my father he liked me to make me king over all Israel. And of my sons, for the Lord hath given me many sons, he hath chosen Solomon, my son, to sit upon the throne of the kingdom of the Lord over Israel.
This is a very real and substantial kingdom on this earth. In His famous parable of the tares sown among the wheat in Matthew 13, verses 38 to 41 Jesus Christ said,
The field is the world, the good seed are the children of the kingdom but the tares are the children of the wicked one. The Son of man shall send forth His angels and they shall gather out of His kingdom all things that offend and them that do iniquity.
Now certainly the children of Satan — those who offend and do iniquity — are not in heaven with God, so they will yet have to be gathered out of heaven but are still here in this world living here among the nations of Anglo-Saxon, Germanic and Scandinavian Israel where you meet them and have business dealings with them every day. So, this is the same kingdom of God of which Jesus Christ spoke.
The Bible leaves no doubt that when Jesus Christ returns to rule the world, he will sit upon the throne of this very same kingdom. Isaiah 9, verse 7, which all of churches recognize as prophesying of Jesus Christ says,
Of the increase of His government and peace there shall be no end, upon the throne of David and upon his kingdom, to order it and to establish it with judgment and with justice from henceforth even forever. The zeal of the Lord of Hosts will perform this.
Confirming this in the New Testament, we find the same thing in Luke 1, verses 32 and 33,
He shall be great and shall be called the Son of the Highest. And the Lord God shall give unto Him the throne of his father David and He shall reign over the house of Jacob forever and of His kingdom there shall be no end.
But this is still the same kingdom of Israel which God established under David — a kingdom of God’s saints who are the children of Israel. Daniel 7, verse 27 again confirms it,
And the kingdom and dominion and the greatness of the kingdom under the whole heaven shall be given to the people of the saints of the Most High whose kingdom is an everlasting kingdom and all dominions shall serve and obey him.
So now we know these things — the time within which God will set up the fifth great empire which is in the days of these kings of the Babylonian series of four gentile empires — that is, between 600 B.C. and 1453 A. D. Second — that the kingdom which God will set up is an everlasting kingdom and only the kingdom of God is everlasting. And third — that it is an Israel kingdom in fulfillment of God’s promises to David and to God’s chosen people — Israel.
Now for a little foundation information, we must go back even before 1500 B.C. The Israelites were then in Egypt. In Genesis 49, verses 8 to 10, the throne had been promised to the tribe of Judah, until Jesus Christ personally takes the throne. Judah had twin sons — Pharez and Zarah — but Pharez was born before Zarah, so Pharez inherited the right to the throne. Ancient writings record that the descendants of Zarah were very able men — even King Solomon being compared to them in wisdom.
Since they could never take the throne in Palestine where their ability could be used in governing the people, a large part of the descendants of Zarah left Egypt even before the general Exodus, looking for places where their abilities could be fully used. They migrated northward along the east coast of the Mediterranean Sea where they settled along the coasts of Asia Minor and in parts of Greece. They founded the city of Troy and also the city Miletus. It is accepted British history that after the fall of Troy — as described in Homer’s great poem The Iliad — Brutus the Trojan led a party of Trojans to the west and finally landed in England where they founded the city of London. The place where he landed is marked by a monument today.
The city of Miletus became powerful and famous. Its coins were stamped with the lion of Judah, Milesian mercenary troops were hired by Egypt as border guards. It established several colonies — the most important of which was in Spain. This Milesian colony in Spain became powerful and an expedition which they sent to Ireland captured the entire island. Before that time there were several tribal kings in various parts of Ireland, but the Milesians united them in one kingdom — Eochaidh the Heremon [Érimón] became the first king of all Ireland somewhat before 600 B.C. The Melisian kings ruled Ireland until the overthrow of Roderic O’Conor — the last native Irish king — by the invading Anglo-Norman armies under King Henry the Second of England in 1171 A.D. The Irish of today who have names beginning with “Mac” or “O” are descendants of the Milesians.
In the early centuries of the Christian era, Ireland was known as Scotia and its people as Scots. More and more settlements were made by them on the northern part of the island of Great Britain until by a little after 500 A. D., they founded a separate nation there — Scotland. For a time, Ireland was called Scotia Major, and Scotland — Scotia Minor.
Meanwhile, the raids of the fierce Norse and Danish Vikings on the east coast of England had become so terrible — after the withdrawal of the last of the Roman legions in 408 A.D. — that the Britons invited settlements along the Channel coast by the Jutes, Angles and Saxons — Jutland being a part of modern Denmark, the Angles coming from what is modem Schleswig in Germany, and the Saxons being part of the people who gave their name to Saxony in Germany.
You will recall that before the Israelites left Scythia, two of their tribes were already known as the Angles and the Saxons. So by the year 600, we have Ireland, Scotland and England settled by Israelite people. Norse and Danish Vikings also settled areas along the English Channel coast. In my discussion of “Historic Proof of Israel’s Migration,” I have mentioned the proof of the migration of the Israelites from Scythia into northern and western Europe, so there can be no doubt that the settlers of the British Isles are the Israelites.
However this period did not bring a consolidation of them into a single kingdom. Only Ireland was united under a single king, while the island of Great Britain was broken into many petty kingdoms, always at war with each other. So we must look to a later date to find the consolidation into one kingdom.
It is well-established history that Norse Vikings raided the coasts of Gaul — which is modern France — for many centuries — even capturing and looting the city of Paris three different times. Finally, in the year 911 A. D., King Charles the Third of France ceded the entire province of Normandy on the Channel coast, to a Viking chief named Rollo, who became the first Duke of Normandy. This was done on condition that Rollo would settle large numbers of Norsemen there to form a buffer against further raids by other Vikings chiefs.
In fact, the word Norman is really just a form of Norseman and shows the racial makeup of its population. From Normandy came Duke William of Normandy — William the Conqueror in the year 1066 A.D., in a successful invasion of England. His Norman followers were all Israelite Norsemen of the same racial strain as the population of England.
William the Conqueror established the English kingdom which has continued without a break since the year 1066 A.D. True, there have been some battles between competing claimants of the throne, but the successful contender never was a conqueror setting up his own new kingdom — he was always a claimant to the existing throne of the kingdom of England. This kingdom has had an unbroken existence since the year 1066 A. D.
It is a well-established historical fact that the kings of England — and the queens in the two reigns when there was no king — have all been descendants of King David of Israel. Thus God’s promise in Jeremiah 33, verse 17, that David shall never lack a descendant to set upon the throne of Israel has all been fulfilled.
Now let’s get back to Daniel and his five kingdoms. All the churches agree that history has proved that the four kingdoms represented by Nebuchadnezzar’s image were Babylon, Medo-Persia, Alexander’s empire, and Rome. Then Daniel goes on to say in Daniel 2, verse 44 that “in the days of these kings,” and in the preceding verses he has been careful to mention only four kingdoms — the last of which we know to be the Roman empire. “In the days of these kings shall the God of heaven set up a kingdom which shall never be destroyed.” Daniel never speaks of the toes or the clay in them as being either kings or kingdoms.
The continuity of the throne of David — through Ireland, Scotland and England — is historically established. Now, what about the time of its establishment as the kingdom of England? As we saw, the final end of the Roman Empire came in the year 1453 A.D., but the present kingdom of England was established in the year 1066 A.D., well within what Daniel calls, “the days of these kings.”
All the churches are willing to recognize Daniel as an inspired prophet throughout the interpretation of the vision of the image as representing the four successive world empires. “In the days of these kings,” the kingdom of England was established, and it became a world empire many times greater than all the previous world empires of world history.
If this is not the kingdom set up by the God of heaven himself — as Daniel says — then how did God happen to overlook the most remarkable kingdom in all human history?
No, I know this isn’t according to the accepted doctrines of most churches. And they would rather reject the word of God than to admit any of their doctrines might be mistaken. It is a bitter pill for them to swallow — for it proves that we who preach the Anglo-Saxon identity message are right. The God of Heaven did set up His kingdom “in the days of these kings.”
I have a couple questions about the Anglo-Saxons:
What is your opinion about Henry VIII destroying most English Churches and monasteries and all that art and culture? Creating the anglican “Church” which is by far the most heretical and theologically wrong Church in existence?
I have a particular theory of mine, in 66 A.C. the First Jewish–Roman War happened and as a result the temple was detroyed and the jews defeated, later in the year 1066 (66 being their lucky number or something) William the bastard conquered England and brought there, for the first time in English history, the jews.
After getting readmitted by Cromwell, in 1666 in London the great plague happens alongside the great fire which destroys the Great Cathedral of St. Paul and much of the city.
What do you make of this?
I have a question, you say that the real Israelites are White people but do you also follow some other kind of hierarchy?
I mean that you seem to put among Whites the “Anglo-Saxons” above all others but I don’t understand why, I know that most people here are White Americans and therefore of mostly English ancestry and it’s fine for you to be proud of yourself and so on but nowadays all Whites in all countries are under attack and I don’t see how English people are better than other White populations like the French and the Germans for example.
Also the term “Anglo-Saxons” is very out-dated, most White English people nowadays are a mixture of anglos, saxons, scandivians, normans, scots, welsh and irish.
On metapedia, a far-right website they put some interesting criticism to the idea of the “Anglo-Saxons” being “The chosen ones”: https://en.metapedia.org/wiki/British_Israelism
-“This ideology “coincidentally” was invented during an era when a group of Jewish financiers under the Rothschilds, known as The Cousinhood had come to prominence in the British Empire and Benjamin Disraeli was made Prime Minister.”
-“British Israelism lacks evidence such as history or archaeology to back up any of its claims. A paper supporting British Israelism was delivered to the London Anthropological Society in 1876, by Edward Hine, but which was met with ridicule. Hine’s “evidence” rested on biblical scripture alone, which he believed demonstrated the British were Israelites. As an example he cited a passage asserting the lost tribes in exile, or rather a specific tribe, would be discovered to be drunk. He then noted that the British people are well known for drinking, and therefore that this is an “identification”. However this passage can be applied to virtually anyone. This selective fallacious line of reasoning is what British Israelism is well known for. Typically British Israelites cite many classical sources, such as Herodotus, Pliny the Elder or Strabo, but entirely omit ancient quotes on the same topic that says something very different.”
Also believers of British israelism hate other Whites like the Irish and the Welsh even if I saw that you wrote some positive articles about them and their history, you believe welsh and scots to be totally separated from the English or “Anglo-Saxons”?
There are many holes in your “Ethnic beliefs”.
You point is well taken. The whole “Anglo-Saxon” dominance of Christian Identity simply comes from the fact that the concept/belief arose first among those people. Most people in CI will mention the “Anglo-Saxons” first, but then say “and other kindred peoples”. I don’t know of any CI people who believe only the so-called “Anglo-Saxons” are descendants of Israelites.
As far as Europeans go, you’ll find that the further south east you go into the Balkans, there’s been a lot more mixing with Turkish and Arab peoples. Not all, but many. Same is true in southern Italy which was conquered by the Muslim, such as Sicily. Same with southern Spain and Portugal, historically a lot of mixing with Muslims and Jews.
The core of Europeans are still white, and if you didn’t know what country they came from, often it would be hard to tell just by looking at them because they are all closely related, with minor variations.
Yes, the British are snobs and look down on the Irish and Welsh, which is ironic because both those races of people are older and more pure than the British. And unfortunately, CI started in Britain, so they have an arrogance about themselves that’s a hangover from when they ruled the world.
“Many holes”? Please–Put the mostly one-sided thinking aside, and do some digging. Hearing only one voice is not research. It is now accepted by researchers that the British (UK)/Welsh/French/The Netherlands/France/Scandinavian people are descended from ONE common stock. This has always been fairly obvious to anyone with eyes in their head. Skin color? Let the Bible speak to the matter.  “Israel’s Nazarites are described as being “purer than snow, they were whiter than milk, they were more ruddy in body than rubies” (Lam. 4:7 KJV). This word “ruddy” is from the Hebrew word “awdome” and means “rosy.” (i.e. Red cheeks/ruddy complexion.)  “My beloved [husband/Solomon] is white and ruddy…” (Song of Solomon 5:10 KJV). This is the same description of David. And since Jesus is a direct descendant of David, and Solomon; its only logical that Jesus resembled David.  The Seventh Dead Sea Scroll has a physical description of Sarah; Abraham’s wife, and half-sister. “And how beautiful the look of her face . . . And how fine is the hair of her head, how fair indeed are her eyes and how pleasing her nose and all the radiance of her face . . . How beautiful her breast and how lovely all her whiteness.” TIME [magazine] “Religion: The Beauty of Sarah.” November 19, 1956. https://content.time.com/time/subscriber/article/0,33009,867284,00.html
There were two houses after the death of Solomon. The two tribes of the house of Judah, and the ten tribes of the house of Israel. God exiled the northern kingdom of Israel–Read all about this in the Book of Hosea. After their divorce, and exile; God promised to eventually “multiply them like fish.” Meaning: They would become multitudinous. Judah–post Babylon–Went on to become the antecedents of the Messiah. Note well: Jacob had twelve sons; one of whom was Judah. His descendants were the Judahites; later (improperly) shortened to “Jews.” ONLY one born into the tribe of Judah was a Judahite/Jew. The Bible NEVER refers to any of the ten tribes as Jews/Judahites. A child born into the tribe of Dan was a Danite; not a Judahite. Therefore; logically/genetically–not a Jew. A Reubenite was not a Judahite. Therefore; not a Jew. A Judahite simply identified one born into the tribe of Judah. We could call a Danite a “Dan.” Same idea. The descendants of the ten tribes were non-Judahite/Non-Jews. They were Israelites, and Hebrews. Not Jews. Summary: Literally, and genetically; only children descended from Jacob’s son Judah later became known as Jews. Exception: Religious proselytes. (Converts to Babylonian derived Judaism.) “Judeo-Christian” is an oxymoron. Talmudic Judaism has almost nothing in common with the Hebrew Bible. Christianity and Judaism are strongly; irrevocably opposed to each other. The proper term is “Hebraic-Christian.”
Joseph’s two non-Judahite born sons were given the birthright promises. Not Judah; who were given the honor of becoming the royal tribe; through whom Messiah would come (and be rejected by same.) Ephraim and Manasseh were prophesied to have (“latter day” fruition; see Genesis 49:1; KJV, among other translations.) Most Bible scholars concede that the “latter days” began with the Christian era. The promise? The latter day descendants of the two sons would form a [Great] “Nation, and Commonwealth/Company of Nations.” They would NOT be known by their former name of Israel. They would be God’s “Servant People.” A group of blood related nations–Having great wealth/choice countries/not bothered by their enemies of old/fertile lands/protected by oceans/have many natural resources/powerful militaries and navies. In short; highly blessed.
Which “[Great] Nation, and Commonwealth of nations” fit the bill?? China? The Mid-East? Russia? Korea? African countries? South America? Which country sowed the seeds of God’s Word around the world? Hint: It started with British missionaries, and Christ’s “Go” command has been fulfilled by the Christian West. No other countries can lay claim to that distinction. Moreover; only the West has a tone time used all ~ seventy-five tribal emblems of the ten tribes. (The study of heraldry.) Nations do not usually steal heraldry from other nations.
The archaeological/linguistic/historical/biblical/folklore/church history and records evidence is strong, and fairly abundant. The “holes” close very fast. As a starting point; consider the DNA evidence; probably stronger since this publication: https://www.associationcovenantpeople.org/the-biblical-dna-of-the-british-isles/
The descendants of the “lost” ten tribes did not “die out;” nor were they permanently rejected by God. The first century Jewish historian Josephus knew where they were. Jesus knew where they were. “I have not come but for the lost sheep of the house of Israel.” Note well: Israel; not the house of Judah. Josephus: “There are but two tribes in Europe and Asia subject to the Romans. The ten tribes are beyond the Euphrates; an immense multitude, and not to be estimated by numbers” (*Antiquities of the Jews* 11:133).
“Beyond the Euphrates”? They had formed the mighty nation of Parthia; twice defeating the Romans. Parthia bordered the “other side” of the Euphrates River. When Parthia eventually fell; its innumerable inhabitants traversed the Caucasus Mountain range; crossing into early Europe. The multitudinous ancestors of the future “West” did not appear “out of the mists of time.” Have you ever wondered about the origin of the name “Caucasian”? It’s derived from two words; Caucasus, and Asia. The (White) ancestors of the “lost” ten tribes–Indeed; all twelve tribes–Settled the UK, and Western Europe. Tiny Britain quickly colonized over one-quarter of the then known earth. This amazes historians; who have no answer for this stupendous feat.
Do some research. Celtic-Anglo-Israel has multiple; academically acceptable attestation. An honest evaluation of the evidence buries the mainly unexamined claims of its critics. They claim to “rightly divide the Word of Truth.” In this case; they should be embarrassed, and ashamed. Aside from the promised Redeemer; a huge portion of the Old Testament is devoted to the ten tribes of Israel; a smaller portion to Judah. The ten tribes have “disappeared?” They are scattered in small; disparate groups world-wide”? Really? Then throw your Bible out the window, and call God a liar.
I think you will find what I have to say interesting, even if you just see it as a new perspective-
The statue & beasts are the Legacy of Nebuchadnezzar within the descendants of Shem.
The metals are symbolic of value and strength, but they are all begat by Shem, like the original Babylonians, for his descendants were blessed above those of the other two progenitors.
If you search for scriptures about “Clay” in the Bible, you will see it was often used in reference to Israelites. The mixing of Iron & Clay is the first part of the fall of Nebuchadnezzar’s Legacy.
The promised King comes in the form of the rock and the rock shatters the Legacy of Nebuchadnezzar into dust.
But that’s not the end, as there is another beast mentioned in Revelation, which is an amalgamation of the four beasts of Daniel, the one with a head that was mortally wounded-
Daniel 7:11 “Then I kept watching because of the arrogant words the horn was speaking. As I continued to watch, the beast was slain, and its body was destroyed and thrown into the blazing fire.”
(The talking horn must be the ‘God-Emperor’ & Pope/ Supreme Pontiff.)
Revelation 13:3 “One of the heads of the beast appeared to be mortally wounded. But the mortal wound was healed, and the whole world marvelled and followed the beast.”
Revelation 13:7 “Then the beast was permitted to wage war against the saints and to conquer them, and it was given authority over every tribe and people and tongue and nation.”
https://i.imgur.com/wyq5sLj.jpg https://i.imgur.com/fmLNDZE.jpg (Richard Carlile’s Manual of Freemasonry)
https://i.imgur.com/U3cHDB9.jpg (New York Times Paper)
The blasphemies against God are related to Gnosticism- IE “the creator of the material realm is an evil demiurge”, “the material realm is a never-ending hell,” “most people are soulless automatons- their suffering doesn’t matter,” “absolute power corrupts absolutely,” “monarchs are always dictators,” or even just simple degenerate Atheistic/ humanistic teachings. There is even an old Gnostic cult called “Cainites.” One feature of Gnosticism is that they meld Neo-Paganism (eclectic Paganism) with ‘Abrahamic’ books, and use the Neo-paganism to frame their understanding of the existence of the Bible or their understanding of the different peoples.
Religions like Islam validate their worldview & mystic experiences.
It is all born of Esoteric Judaism and related to “Luciferianism” or “Satanism” although there are different brands (snares) according to the different natures of different people.
Since Morality is based on the material world and the “Demiurge,” they are completely Antinomian/ Libertine. It is all connected to Kabbalah, although the magic arts predate the founding of that name, it is rooted in Paganism, for it was the works of Magi and was passed down to the select few, orally.
Even the extreme “Equality” teaching & hatred of natural hierarchy is based in Gnosticism, for they believe all humanity is united within the supreme deity, ‘spiritually’ (it’s mysticism), and that to escape their material prison, they must destroy all the works of the demiurge, and complete “The Great Alchemical Work,” which is the “Sacred Marriage,” by any and all means possible. If there were a people whom they saw as the chosen people of what they see as the Demiurge, they would despise them like nothing else in existence. Justifying all manner of bestial sadism & callousness towards them, although, turning them into mockeries of the creator & against their own flesh (like Janissaries) would also be seen as a priority too. (Hence why they groom all political angles with some kind of Gnostic teaching, even if they are motivated by different forms of hatred towards this ‘Demiurge’ figure and may not have the same feelings towards ‘material reality’.)
The Great Harlot is the antithesis to the Bride, it can only be those who could have been the Bride but instead turned to false gods and delusions- and adopt the sadistic, vampiric hatred towards the Bride. Hence why she is described as a ‘widow’ in denial. There are a lot of scriptural connection between the Great Harlot and Edom as well as the Curse towards the Pharisee’s ‘Genea’ (that their hands would be stained with the blood of all the righteous.)
The main connection is with Belshazzar in the Book of Daniel, whom gave the vessel’s (sacred cups) of God to literal Harlots, for them to use- the writing on the wall then communicated the sentence against the entirety of Babylon.
The amalgamation beast will despise the Harlot, for the Harlot has drenched it in blood, staining it a scarlet red, and God has put it into the heart of the beast to hate the Harlot.
But the Beast will associate the Harlot with the Bride, and so it will try to eliminate both.
The Sea is chaotic, formless, engulfing, saline/ uninhabitable and is presided over by the great serpent.
The Earth is an orderly foundation, a habitation for “green things” but only if seeds are planted and they are nourished by the waters.
The green things or vegetation grows and reaches up to heaven, sometimes they wither or are uprooted, the ones that endure will keep growing.
Within the growths of vegetation is a paradise or oasis, from which all waters flow, around that font of water, the rock that gives forth living water, there are five trees, whom are evergreen & everlasting, and have given their accounts & wisdom to guide the other vegetation.
The heaven is set-apart from the earth and seas, it seems untouchable, but the persistent, long suffering trees do reach it.
The Amalgamation Beast rises out of the Sea where as the Lamb Beast rises out of the Earth.
And the Lamb Beast is able to deceive even the elect.
So the question is: what is the Earth representative of?
In the Old Testament, the Heavens are linked with the Levitical Priesthood, where as the Earth is linked with the Kingdoms. In my opinion, it can only be those whom have the covenant with Christ, and have God’s laws inscribed within their hearts and minds- as the seeds and waters of life are related to Christ’s teachings.
Please use prophecy/prophesy correctly. The prophecy of Daniel (noun), Daniel would prophesy (verb)
Please keep in mind too: Matthew 21:28 But what think ye? A certain man had two sons; and he came to the first, and said, Son, go work to day in my vineyard.
29He answered and said, I will not: but afterward he repented, and went.
30And he came to the second, and said likewise. And he answered and said, I go, sir: and went not.
31Whether of them twain did the will of his father? They say unto him, The first. Jesus saith unto them, Verily I say unto you, That the publicans and the harlots go into the kingdom of God before you.
this symbolizes Israel vs Judah
Israel was disobedient and then chose to obey. We all know what the nation of judah gave us
Thanx for posting this article; spot on and important. Oh, well, not mentioning Celts in there – as we are certainly Israelites – is an omission of note, but we’ll let it slide this time…we all know it was an accidental oversight… 🙂
Well, for those in the know, Celts are Scythians, and the article mentions them, of course. Virtually all western migrations up through the Caucasus were Scythians. You see the Celtic iconography in the folk art of every people from the Ukraine, Poland, Lithuania, Czech, German, Scot, Irish, etc….they left their mark everywhere they settled….
Yeah but… we’re kinda sensitive sometimes. [somehow my little ‘smiley’ deal didnt come thru. 😉 🙂 ;)]
Some Celts descend from the Scythians or Saka, but most descend from the Phoenicians as do the Italics. Of course, the Phoenicians were part of the Hebrew people and were also known as the Celto-Iberians. The Germanic people are largely the descendants of the Scythians or Saka.
Yes, the western and later migrations of Scythians were Celts, and the earlier eastern proto-Celts were indeed Phoenicians and other Israelites who came out of Egypt prior to the Exodus, as the article mentions.
Video: “Where Are The Kings Of Judah Today?”
Thank you for posting that.
There’s no need to follow this genealogy though, because the correct one to Christ is given. He is our King, as it says in Luke 1:31-33, “And behold, you will conceive in your womb and give birth to a son, and you shall name Him Jesus. He will be great and will be called the Son of the Most High; and the Lord God will give Him the throne of His father David; and He will reign over the house of Jacob forever, and His kingdom will have no end.”
Christ has been given the throne of David already, as it says in Zechariah 9:9, “Rejoice greatly, daughter of Zion! Shout in triumph, daughter of Jerusalem! Behold, your king is coming to you; He is righteous and endowed with salvation, Humble, and mounted on a donkey, Even on a colt, the foal of a donkey.”
They confirm in Luke 19:38, “Blessed is the King, the One who comes in the name of the Lord;
Peace in heaven and glory in the highest!”
He is king by his birth and He was acknowledged as king, fulfilling the prophecy. He continues to be king, because He is alive. I don’t mean to comment on anything else or the identity of Israel, but only this one point.
I didn’t mean to suggest that the genealogies given in the video were important to establish the continuity of the prophecy per se, but rather that Europe’s aristocracy can indeed trace its origins back to Israel.
Personally, I agree with you, that Christ is on the throne of Judah forever, and He is the eternal king of the Israelite people regardless of what physical nation in which they dwell and regardless of who politically rules over them.
The only White nation to officially acknowledge that Christ is their king, regardless of political ruling class, is Poland. More would follow their lead but for fear of the Jews.
Good video. Although, I don’t know how “royal” any of these modern day so-called Royal Families are that we’re shown in the video, if at all.
Yeah, “royal” families in degenerate, atheistic, anti-nationalist Europe seem ridiculous at this point. Why bother?
Even if Elizabeth II was a Queen then her reign ended in 2015 with the end of the Rothschild breeding rights that started in 1815 (Nathan Lionel Rothschild had a two-hundred-year contract over the breeding rights of the Monarchy). Now you might understand why the former Prime Minister John Mayor (Privy Council, Order of the Garter) said that Elizabeth II (didn’t address her as Queen) is now a commoner.
At any rate, according to Dr. John Coleman, the Windor’s are Guelph’s from Venice. They keeping moving around and changing their name so that it’s more difficult to track them.
Eustace Mullins considered John Coleman to be the greatest plagiarist who ever breathed.
You can study their DNA.
I posted this on a previous article:
The Lion is the symbol for the Tribe of Judah which can be be found on most flags and coats of arms of the provinces, and many cities too, in the Germanic countries. Belgium, Netherlands, Germany, Austria, Denmark, Sweden, Norway. The Angles and the Saxons are Germanic tribes (Tribe of Judah) from Northern Germany that migrated to England.
The Jutland peninsula in Northern Germany and in Denmark is named for the Tribe of Judah when they first settled the area. They then spread out over time across northern Europe. That’s why all of the Germanic languages are so similar and intelligible, because they were all originally one language.
The Angles and the Saxons are Germanic tribes (Tribe of Judah) from Northern Germany that migrated to England.
The word Adam (Adawm) means “to show blood in the face.” No other race can blush except for Caucasions. We got our name after we escaped Babaloynian slavery and traveled north turning west through the Caucasas mountain range. That area is still known today as The Pass of Israel.