Jewish archeologists were left scrambling for answers when their DNA analysis of bones found in an ancient grave dating to as much as 6,000 years ago showed that some of the earliest inhabitants of the land of Israel were aryan-looking with fair skin and blue eyes:
Blue-eyed, fair-skinned settlers inhabited the Levant some 6,500 years ago, according to an international interdisciplinary team of scientists. An article released Monday in the peer-reviewed journal Nature Communications solves the mystery of how Chalcolithic culture got to the Galilee: via population migration.
When they mapped the genomes of bones from 22 of the 600 individual skeletons discovered in a massive necropolis near Peki’in in the north of the country, the scientists found a genetic mix quite unlike that of previous and successive settlers of the region.
In the article, “Ancient DNA from Chalcolithic Israel reveals the role of population mixture in cultural transformation,” the scientists concluded that the homogeneous community found in the cave could source ~57% of its ancestry from groups related to those of the local Levant Neolithic, ~26% from groups related to those of the Anatolian Neolithic, and ~17% from groups related to those of the Iran Chalcolithic.
“The genetic analysis provided an answer to the central question we set out to address,” said Harvard’s Reich. “It showed that the Peki’in people had substantial ancestry from northerners – similar to those living in Iran and Turkey – that was not present in earlier Levantine farmers.”
The Chalcolithic era, also dubbed the Copper Age, follows the Stone Age and precedes the Bronze Age. There are already several DNA analyses for Bronze Age settlement in the Levant, including last summer’s publication of research from Bronze Age burials that shows that 93 percent of the ancestry of modern Lebanese ancestry comes from the Canaanites. Now, the new Peki’in genome mapping fills in a void of 3,000 years of DNA analysis.
With the new study’s conclusion that some half of the indigenous Chalcolithic people’s genome derived from ancient Turkey and Iran, it appears that these artifacts may have arrived during migration, and were not merely as the byproducts of a trade route as previously suggested.
…The archaeologists saw indications that bodies were taken to the cave from all directions for internment — as far as the Jordan Valley, the Judean and Negev deserts, and the coast of Lebanon. “Clearly, great efforts were made to transport the bones of the dead to this revered site,” they write.
“Its cultic objects and grave goods exhibit artistic styles of various Levantine subcultures,” which, state the archaeologists, suggest the cave served as “a regional mortuary center, where people from all over ancient Palestine converged to bury their dead.” According to the new study, radiocarbon dating finds the cave was in use throughout the Late Chalcolithic (4500–3900 BCE).
The data extracted from the skeletal remains, taken from 22 individuals, “is of exceptional quality given the typically poor preservation of DNA in the warm Near East,” wrote the scientists.
“This study of 22 individuals is one of the largest ancient DNA studies carried out from a single archaeological site, and by far the largest ever reported in the Near East,” said Tel Aviv University researcher May.
The scientists uncovered some recessive genetic traits not usually expected in human remains from the Levant.
“Certain characteristics, such as genetic mutations contributing to blue eye color, were not seen in the DNA test results of earlier Levantine human remains,” said May.
The blue-eyed, fair-skinned community didn’t continue, but at least now researchers have an idea why. “These findings suggest that the rise and fall of the Chalcolithic culture are probably due to demographic changes in the region,” said May.
Of course, the Jews who conducted this study write off the fair skin and blue eyes as a “anomalous recessive genetic mutation,” but that’s because they have to continue to deny the fact that the original Israelites were White as was most of the Middle East— and certainly not the ancestors of today’s arab-looking Jews who now occupy the land of the ancient Israelites.
The Times of Israel article also fails to mention that both ancient Turkey (Anatolia), Iran (Persia), and Egypt were also occupied by White people at this time in ancient history, and therefore, it makes perfect sense that they would be related to these people found in this Chalcolithic cave in Northern Israel.
And notice at the conclusion of the article, the jewish writer is sure to point out that these fair-skinned, blue-eyed people “didn’t continue” to live in Israel. What does he base this on? The answer is nothing — except his fear of the truth that the world must never know — that today’s Jews who occupy that land are clearly not who they say they are. DNA tells us exactly who the ancient Israelites were.
Related:
DNA Studies Prove Ancient Egypt’s Caucasian Origin
Genghis Khan & the Mongol Invaders Were White Scythians
my former fb friend will not like this as she promotes the lie the falsehood of black hebrew israelites up to me unfriending her she was getting aggressive when i kept telling the truth apart from that she now pushes the narrative that china is trying to bring down america when its jews jewbag bankers she tells some truth but some lies also . they are as much as admitting that their whole identity is based on lies , the israelites worshipped god when jews and their talmud worship many gods like moloch engage in occult practices , on facebook years ago i was a member of a group probably long gone now but a person posted a article that says that jews steal identity and history that is not theirs a history that belongs to another people its like when they claim temple mount in jerusalem claiming there was a temple there but it was the roman fort antonia they pass off a roman fort as jewish site , thanks for this article it proves who the real israelites are and one other thing is why is there so many place names in wales the same as the biblical lands
I don’t agree with this idea that north-africa and the middle east were once all White, there is no basis of that and actually a lot against that, including Europe itself:
– How do you explain the Fayum mummy portraits? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fayum_mummy_portraits
– and the Severan Tondo? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Severan_Tondo
– And the phoenicians? https://phys.org/news/2016-05-ancient-dna-phoenician-carthage-european.html#:~:text=Ancient%20DNA%20study%20finds%20Phoenician%20from%20Carthage%20had,dubbed%20the%20%22Young%20Man%20of%20Byrsa%22%20or%20%22Ariche%22
– Duke Alessandro de’ Medici https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alessandro_de%27_Medici,_Duke_of_Florence#/media/File:Alessandro-the-moor.jpg
-Saint Maurice
Scientists agree that there was a genetic continuity between egyptians since 3100 B.C.
The fayum mummies are cleary not-White and one could tell simply by looking at them, same with ancient Pharaohs like Thutmose, Ramesses, Akhenaten, Seti for example.
The populations with the most in common with ancient Egyptians are the copts who actually look like them and are absolutely not the same as europeans: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/47/Egyptian_Unity.jpg
Also what exactly makes you all think that the thousands of syrians and other levant people living in the european part of the roman empire didn’t race-mix and were separated?
Bodies of Roman non-whites were found even up in York.
You clearly aren’t very well schooled in matters of genetics, what is your next article gonna be “Alexandre Dumas wasn’t black”?
Piry
I guess you don’t understand what “originally” means. The Near East became brown over time. And “scientists” are hardly objective. They are forced to conclude what the official narrative is: that this area of the world has always been brown.
I’ve met a guy who is from North Africa, and he knew that North Africa had originally been white. He knew it, and didn’t have a problem with the truth.
DNA of King Tut and his relatives show him to be indistinquishable from white Europeans:
https://christiansfortruth.com/dna-study-of-mummies-shows-that-egyptians-have-become-blacker-over-time/
https://christiansfortruth.com/bbc-documentary-reveals-king-tuts-great-grandmother-tjuyu-had-blonde-hair/
https://christiansfortruth.com/dna-studies-prove-ancient-egypts-caucasian-origin/
https://christiansfortruth.com/scientists-discover-adams-original-white-skin-gene-traced-back-to-one-man-in-middle-east-about-10000-years-ago/
The Phoenicians originally were white. What “historians” call Phoenicians could be anyone dug up along the coast of the Gaza area. And the artist rendering based on “DNA” is going to reflect that brown bias.
The portraits you refer to also come from later antiquity, and we know that some of the later Pharoahs had black admixture. But Cleopatra was most definitely white, a Macedonian by birth.
Thousands of remains have been excavated in Egypt and found them to have red and blonde hair.
And that D’Medici portrait you referred to – you do know that the Medici’s were crypto-Jewish, right? That would explain why he looks so Jewish, no?
But remember, historians are confined by political correctness to ignore this reality, and instead promote the narrative that you believe. That’s where the misguided “black Hebrews” get their spurious facts to appropriate white culture.
So to prove me wrong you quoted a bunch of biased, incorrect and misleading articles from this same website?
“And that D’Medici portrait you referred to – you do know that the Medici’s were crypto-Jewish, right? That would explain why he looks so Jewish, no?”
Are you for real? Is this the excuse you got for everything that doesn’t fit your worldview? That they must be jewish or a “black hebrew”?
Your thesis about the middle east being all white is easily disproven by the fact that the arabs themselves appear in the Bible and they do deals with king Solomon.
Also there are countless sources nowadays not done by jews or “black hebrews” but by middle eastern people that contradict your and this website views on Egypt, Turkey, Palestine, Persia and the list goes on.
Piry
The arabs are in the Bible, as bit players. They lived mostly on the fringes of society, desert dwelling. It was only after the rise of Islam, and the militarization of the arab people, that they swept across the Near East and conquered and pushed out the native whites. The fall of Byzantium to the arabs was the end of any white foothold in the Near East.
Too bad you want to impose today’s multi-cultural lie on ancient history, but that’s what the Jews want you to believe, and like a good goy, you are defending their distorted take on history. Well done.
Put your cards on the table, Piry….do you have a dog in this fight? Are you White?
“Put your cards on the table, Piry….do you have a dog in this fight? Are you White?”
I am white, I am Finnish but yes I have a dog in this fight which is that I hate liars, like what you do here by promoting falsehoods to appropriate other people’s cultures.
Also your theories that Arabs are a mixture of whites and Blacks doesn’t have any sense since extremely safe and factual dna tests done with the best technology avaiable on arabs doesn’t show that but rather it highlights their own unique race and the white and black admixture is very few, the max is 5% in Iraq and Yemen.
I am a Christian and I find extremely offensive what you all say about non-white Christians, without them there would be no Church at all, here’s some important ones:
– The Berbers Cyprian, Augustine of Hippo, Tertullian.
– The Syrians Symeon the Stylite, Ephrem, Severus of Antioch, Ignatius of Antioch.
And the list goes on, also as I showed the North-Africans especially in Egypt were brown skinned by 100 a.c therefore these people were already of that same ethnicity considering that most of these were born after 300 a.c.
Christianity is not just for whites but for everybody.
I wonder how can you people spit on the honest Faith of so many people because they are not white, that’s really heartless.
Piry,
“…easily disproven by the fact that the arabs themselves appear in the Bible and they do deals with king Solomon…”
Did you read/study — https://christiansfortruth.com/was-the-ethiopian-eunuch-an-israelite/
What Scripture would you site to defend your statement above?
Not to mention …………………………. We should lay some kind of ground work first —
What is your belief as to the origin of the Races — White, yellow, black and red?
“Arab” means to mix. So …………… Arabs were a mixed race people. What “races” make up an Arab in your estimation?
I suspect today’s “arab” would look completely different than any person that may appear “mixed” circa 500 BC.
Similar to “Indians”. The red dot kind. The original “Indians (India) were most likely White. Then the race-mixing began — then enter the “caste system”. Whites were eventually “bred-out” and now we have the modern Indian.
“Arab” is not a precise Race. It is a mix of peoples. Similar to mestizos.
Off topic …………
What is your theory as to the origin of the Races? Where do they come from; when did they start?
-“Did you read/study — https://christiansfortruth.com/was-the-ethiopian-eunuch-an-israelite/”
I knew already that the eunuch was most likely an israelite, I read it on a Christian Finnish blog and I found it plausible.
This said, I don’t see what that has to do with my objections regarding Northern Africans and also the eunuch being an Israelite doens’t mean that ethiopia and Nubia were white, the Pharaoh themselves described those populations as extremely Black skinned.
-“What is your belief as to the origin of the Races — White, yellow, black and red?”
“What is your theory as to the origin of the Races? Where do they come from; when did they start?”
God created us all tend of thousands of years ago and then he created Adam and Eve.
-“Arab” means to mix. So …………… Arabs were a mixed race people. What “races” make up an Arab in your estimation?”
No, this is totally wrong, the most plausible meaning is “inhabitant of the desert” and the other meaning “to grow dark” doesn’t refer at all at race-mixing but rather at the changing skin tones from whites to the Brown populations.
-“I suspect today’s “arab” would look completely different than any person that may appear “mixed” circa 500 BC.”
Listen I have been to Egypt, to Cairo and Giza more specifically and I can assure you that the Fayum mummy portraits look exactly like most Egyptians today look like.
Also if your theories about Arabs and Indians being a mixture of whites and Blacks then why their dna tests do not say that and instead the report say they are different races with similar skin tones?
If a Mulatto compare its dna with an Indian or Arab the result doesn’t match at all.
-“Similar to “Indians”. The red dot kind. The original “Indians (India) were most likely White. Then the race-mixing began — then enter the “caste system”. Whites were eventually “bred-out” and now we have the modern Indian.”
The problem with this theory is that nowadays only 3 to 10% of white people in most countries race-mix therefore it’s impossible for racist and clan based white populations to mixe like that even in hundreds of years.
Also if that was true then it would be bad cause whites created the gypsies, kinda like a self-own honestly.
Piry said “God created us all tend of thousands of years ago and then he created Adam and Eve.”
So you are claiming that “all of us” are part of a pre-Adamic creation tens of thousands of years ago? Where does it say this in the Bible?
Are you aware of what Genesis 5:1 states about the Bible? “This is the book of the generations of Adam. In the day that God created man, in the likeness of God made he him”
If everyone was created prior to Adam and Eve, who is the Bible about? I think you’re confused and haven’t scrutinized the implications of your premises. Nothing in the Bible says that everyone is a descendant of Adam and Eve, and Genesis 5:1 implies that there are people outside that creation.
Piry…..
Please read the comment from “John 8” as I would have the same questions too.
There is no sense in trying to have a discussion with you until you first elaborate on this most recent comment of yours.
But I do appreciate you “trying” to identify yourself here as to who you are and what you believe. I’m certainly confused, however.
It would be impossible to “contend for the faith” with someone who has a completely different foundation as it seems you have.
Regardless, of where Cleopatra was born, she was Greek. Many of the Egyptian leaders were different from the peoples that they ruled.
Satan is a liar .
10 lost Tribes of Israel are the Caucasian European people.
Correct, they were called the Scythians as they were migrating in the Caucasus to Europe from the fallen Assyrian empire.
The Celts are the 10 tribes out of Assyria. Which is why the Welsh call themselves the Cymry as an evolution of Khumry.
“The Greeks called the Khumry the ‘Cimmeroi’ and according to Mr Wilson, the Coelbren Alphabet is the alphabet described by Julius Caesar around 55 BC, also adding that Ammianus Marcellinus stated that the Greeks got their alphabet from the Khumric Welsh.
The term Cimmerians/Cimmeroi, Gimir and Gimmiri are thought to be interchangeable names for the Khumry, as the terms Galli/ Gauls /Keltoi and Celt later became names for them across Europe depending on who was doing the describing.”
See also: https://sovereignwales.com/tag/welsh-egyptian-hieroglyphics/
The Greeks got their alphabet from the Welsh because Britain is Phoenician, Trojan, and Israelite.
“The Aliens [Israelites] were driven from the country [Egypt], and the most outstanding and active among them banded together and, as some say, were cast ashore in Greece and certain other regions, their leaders were notable men, chief among them being Dardanus and Chalcol.” Diodorus Sicilus, Bibliotheca Historica 40.3
“The sons of Zerah: Zimri, Ethan, Heman, Kalkol and Darda –five in all.” (1 Chronicles 2:6)
Darda/Dardanus & Kalkol/Chalcol
If you were a rich, short, fat, ugly, dark haried, draconian, adrenochrome addicted, draculean, POS like most of their regressibe dero gened brood, would you care about other people? NO!
You would be rich and have a nice house and car and life like they were guaranteed to have by their “lucky sperm”.
Take race and religion out of judaism and you have real judaism. Global monetary manipulation through secret usury and secret members aka ‘judeah’.
Inconvenient history agrees: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gVAYBvuGB8A
Nice article mind if I republish it at my website for SEO and cross referencing? I have something you will be interested in :). Feel free to use any material from my website. Blessings 🙂
The Real Israelites – The Scythians
http://esotericawakening.com/scythians
Sure.
Thank you I hope you find material on my website you can use to help your readers find some light in this dark age. God Bless
Oh btw these are two articles you may find helpful as well
The Truth Will Stand On Its Own Merit – Benjamin Freedman Speaks
http://esotericawakening.com/the-truth-will-stand-on-its-own-merit
Occult Numerology, History and Rune Magic
http://esotericawakening.com/occult-numerology-history-and-rune-magic
Lots of other stuff to sift through from my research over the years as well. Blessings
I have been praying about this. Thank you for your article. It confirms everything the Lord is showing me. I found that my some of my ancestors were named after Oliver Cromwell, but I found it strange that many of these same ancestors had very Hebrew names also, like Hiram, or Mosche. Come to find out Cromwell allowed the Jewish people back into England after they had been kicked out by the Monarch. They don’t teach you that part in school.
It’s odd that American white people are the only people in the world, really, that are so mixed they have completely lost their history. Or another thing I have found odd in my studies is the Celtic people are the only other “tribe” where supposedly all information about them is “lost” and they seem to push this doctrine they were so pagan and witch doctor types, but if you read their ancient writings they write about things like Leviathan and God, which they worshiped with much tradition the caldrons found were not for sacrifice of people, but for their temple.
I always try to find history in the art even though most of it is hidden now. It’s terribly sad that our history has been hidden from us. But it is all coming out now and I’m thankful, the Hebrew people will prevail and be blessed for all their suffering in this life. Thank you again for your research.
Rebecca, Cromwell and his dupes wrongly believed that in order for Christ to return, the “Jews” would have to return to England or Zion in their eyes after their expulsion. Protestants, unlike Catholics, worship Jews to the point that they now believe the “Jews” must build their new temple in Jerusalem for Christ to return. It never ends.
Know your Bible. 6000 years ago it wasn’t Israel it was Canaan.
I wouldn’t trust the dating system or the timelines they use completely.
They said they were Iranian, in other words “Aryan” or very, very archaic (much less “ereb”) Syrian, like the people called “Hyksos” in Egypt.
Phoenicians were white, if they were anything else, Europe would be a lot more mixed, since they were the ones seeding those shorelines & establishing trade routes.
Exactly
It wasn’t Israel 6000 years ago either. No where in the bible is the word Israel used as a geographical location description. Israel always has been, is currently and always will be a people, chosen by the LORD God to be his servant race and witnesses. And these people are not jews! The State of Israeli (NOT Nation of Israel) in Palestine today is NOT Israel [http://www.1948.org.uk/un-resolution-181].
“Gen_35:10 And God said unto him, Thy name is Jacob: thy name shall not be called any more Jacob, but Israel shall be thy name: and he called his name Israel.
Gen 48:14 And Israel stretched out his right hand, and laid it upon Ephraim’s head, who was the younger, and his left hand upon Manasseh’s head, guiding his hands wittingly; for Manasseh was the firstborn. (15) And he blessed Joseph, and said, God, before whom my fathers Abraham and Isaac did walk, the God which fed me all my life long unto this day, (16) The Angel which redeemed me from all evil, bless the lads; and let my name be named on them, and the name of my fathers Abraham and Isaac; and let them grow into a multitude in the midst of the earth.”
You find the same mythos with Norse & Germanic tribes too.
Like Jörmungandr the world serpent.
I do think the Celtic & Germanic tribes sacrificed people, it is said the victims of it were typically prisoners/ slaves, criminals or outcasts- in the case of native British, the practices were not written down and instead kept as oral tradition by the Druids, so not much is known about it for sure, one practice I can recall is spilling the guts of a man to then use them for divination.
The Oera Linda book seems to talk about the Druids from an alleged Frisian perspective, it’s not positive.
The actual Israelites were recorded as engaging in human sacrifice too though, and Carthaginians were a branch of Phoenicians leftover, and historians found tophet burials that confirmed witness testimonies from outsiders, that they did continue the Baal worship which the Bible points out.
Ever notice the world will be against whatever God is for? The Lord showed me this when I was a kid. It’s one reason people only use God and Jesus name when they curse. The devil doesn’t need to curse any other this is the only truth. The others are a curse. We’ve entered the times where everything that’s evil is considered good and good trades for evil. I watch that because I know who the devils after. All you have to do is ask who is getting persecuted.
Dr. Ze’ev Herzog caused quite an angry bunch over in Israel. His original paper was published in 1999 in their online news. Leaders had it scrubbed, oops, but not soon enough. Herzog, has proven there were no “israelites” ever in Egypt and since that is true, they could never leave Egypt. In fact, Herzog has proven the bible to be an undeniable bunch of shoddy history and not any better than fairy tales.
Baghdad ancient archaeology is the Origin of Humanity, Israel leaders knew it, it is why they hurried into IRAQ first after 911, Baghdad is ancient Mesopotamia. It is proof the chosen ones are not chosen by a god, if fact, they’re no more special than anyone else living or dead. So, the Iraqi wars is to a last ditch effort of the chosenites are trying to hold onto their biblical chosen by god status.
Oopsy! They failed. Big time.
All Jewish archeologists cannot be trusted because they falsely proclaim that they are the only living descendants of the Israelites, and that is patently false. They are Khazars pretending to be Israelites. It’s called “LARPING” or Live Action Role Playing. They will never be able to prove that “Jews” of today have any legitimate connection to the ancient land of Israel except as the descendants of the Edomites, the enemies of God’s Children.
Jews do not care about the skin color of their ancestors. The Bible itself describes King David as radish and clear eyes. For Jews it is difficult to be in a conspiracy. They seldom agree. It seems that when it comes to medicine, science, art, commerce, economy and other andevours you do not hesitate to trust Jews. Even your god was a Jew. 20% of the Nobel price winners are Jewish. It is not the skin color, it is the talent, culture and moral backbone.
False, the Bible (1 Samuel 17:42) describes David as “ruddy” (Strong’s #H132 cross referenced with Strong’s #119) which in today’s parlance means “show blood in the face”, i.e. able to blush, i.e., a trait of White people. It also describes him as “fair” (Strong’s #3303), meaning handsome, beautiful–and in English, “fair” means white-skinned, neither are traits of today’s “Jews”.
Adam, David’s direct ancestor, was given that name “Aw dam” for the same reason, meaning “ruddy” and “to show blood in the face” (Strong’s Concordance #119). Jews try to deny this, falsely claiming that it means Adam came from the red earth, which is laughable. Adam and David were of the same race, the special Adamic creation, which by its very name means “ruddy” or White.
There were indeed pre-Adamic peoples mentioned in Genesis from whom Cain took his Kenite, non-Adamic wives–and became the Bible’s first race mixer–assuming he was Adam’s actual son, which even Talmudic rabbis dispute.
Sorry, not biblical. There were no pre-Adamic peoples. Remember, “In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth….” Thee process took God 6 days. No extra biblical stuff, because then you taint the whole thing with pick and choose. Adam lived nearly 10 centuries. He made lots of children. Some of the children were cursed. Out of him came all the blood lines. But then it happened all over again with Noah and his wife, his sons and sons wives.
Adam also means “clay,” specifically the red clay, hence why it is also used for “blushing” or “ruddy.”
I have to ask why anyone who has consciously thought on the matter believes the Jews are typical of the people of the Covenant, when they are all mixed, and mostly lactose intolerant, and the ones among them who are actually lactose tolerant must have received it from their European ancestry. What is unique to them, from our perspective, is found in ancient peoples like the Hittites.
Why give a “land of milk and honey” to people who aren’t lactose tolerant?
The only reason Indians drink milk is because of the Aryans who invaded, and heavily influenced their culture/ religions.
I mean it’s a pretty obvious association. Plus, these people are not farmers or shepherds, they are merchants & magi. They were nomadic sojourners, but in the same way the pagan ‘Romani’ Gypsies are, in other words, not like steppe peoples, who are self-sustaining off the land.
Absolutely wrong, they do care. They will always depict them as some kind of Arabic mix, and complain profusely if they are depicted anything close to Celtic/ Germanic.
Although Karaites are not representative at all.
“Even your god was a Jew.”
Jew does not equal Legitimate descendant of Judah. This is like saying he was African just because the Africans claim to be Jews. Henry Ford was right, as long as White Christians believe the Jews are who they say they are, they will remain enslaved to them.
Jews are, in part, the descendants of those who opposed & killed Christ, that is all you need to know.
Jews have contributed to science, IE, like Einstein, but most of the time it’s like Freud or Transsexuality ‘sciences.’ If we were to put all their genuinely positive contributions to our people, against all their negative, the positives wouldn’t even be a drop in the ocean of negatives.
Their main talents are manipulation, lying with chutzpah, backstabbing, usury, fraud, blackmail, general organised crime, slave trading, flesh peddling… so on, so forth, the works of total psychopaths.
Do you know roughly what “Goyim” means to them? They use “Goyim” but they don’t mean “other nations,” what they are really saying is “Hylic” or “Somatic.”
Soulless ones, hominid fauna of the material world, animalistic automatons.
Kabbalah is inherently “Gnostic” and that it can only stem from Canaan/ Babylon.
You probably aren’t aware that “Mk Ultra” was not devised by “Nazis” but was in fact American Jewish research done into a ritual practice of theirs, passed down as secret within bloodlines. Using trauma & sorcery to reprogram a ‘Hylic’, in order to make a better, more loyal slave.
Golem = Clay automaton
“Goylem” = Yiddish for someone dim-witted or lethargic
Clay = “Programmable Matter”
They believe the stories within the Old Testament are allegorical fable, not records, so they are already bias. They tell the Freemasons that the Israelites did not exist as a nation, and they also tell them that they are Grandmaster Magi, and the implication is that the Bible is a fabrication.
Also whenever they are looking into these things, putting aside the fact that it’s dumb to trust them, they are looking for themselves in Egypt, so if they are not actually anything to do with the real people of the Covenant, they may simply ignore things or hide their existence.
We don’t actually have access to all the history of Egypt, a lot of things are destroyed or lost, but even so there are the “Hyksos” who were also Iranians/ Syrians from the Levant. They were able to establish a sizeable city, which was built over by later Egyptians.
You need to research them, there was household very much like one Joseph would have had, with twelve pillars in the main house, and other details like that, and inside a small burial pyramid was the broken statue of a red-headed official.
The smoking gun is, Dr. Ze’ev Herzog, top Israeli Tel Aviv archaeologist & team.
It’s a MUST read http://noahkennedy.net/zeev-herzog-and-the-historicity-of-the-bible/
This has all been thoroughly refuted b PATTERNS OF EVIDENCE.
https://patternsofevidence.com
The bible says it all, so please read the bible, and you will understand everything.
No matter the racial makeup in the Middle East in 6000 BC, the nation of Israel began with the immigration of Semetic Abraham into the area … much later (around 1750 BC) …
In addition, the studies linked to support the article only recognized a presence of some Japhetic descendants in the area, … which is not surprising when one notes that Egyptian artifacts show a culture of mixed descent.
The article gives itself away with its concluding statement …
“And notice at the conclusion of the article, the jewish writer is sure to point out that these fair-skinned, blue-eyed people “didn’t continue” to live in Israel. What does he base this on? The answer is nothing — except his fear of the truth that the world must never know — that today’s Jews who occupy that land are clearly not who they say they are. DNA tells us exactly who the ancient Israelites were.”
Once again, today’s Jews are descended from Abraham, … not from whoever occupied the area in 6000 BC.
Some Jews may be partially descended from Abraham, but then again most Arabs can also make that claim, but that doesn’t make them legitimate Israelites (who were forbidden to race mix). Once race-mixed, they were no longer Israelites. For example, Ezra left his non-Israelite wife and mixed race children to please God.
And the Egyptians originally were not a mixed culture–they were Whites who eventually succumbed to the immigration pressures of the non-White hordes, and so today’s Egyptians are merely arabs who claim to be Egyptians simply because they live in the area of the former kingdom.
You are correct.
Chesterton,
Arabs are not a tribal nation. It is a collection of peoples who speak Arabic that Nasser in the 60’s tried to combine into one nation. (language is the basis for a nation by modern standards.) Arabs are a collection of many tribes (Chamula) that came out of Saudi, Persia, Egypt, Assyria, Babylonia and so on.
The Jews are such, not only because we are of the seed of Abraham but because we live Jewish life. We speak the language of our ancestors and study their teachings. We continue to evolve as Jews. The Muslims never went in the ways of Abraham and from the twelve tribes of Ishmael, no one survived.
Wrong. Arabs are fiercely tribal, and the Torah stated that out of Ishamail would come today’s Arabic nations/tribes. Jews like to pretend that Arabs are “not a people” or not “real nations” as an excuse to destroy them. But their nations were part of the Abrahamic prophecy. And, yes, there are 12 principal Arabic nations today:
“And as for Ishmael, I have heard thee: Behold, I have blessed him, and will make him fruitful, and will multiply him exceedingly; twelve princes shall he beget, and I will make him a great nation. (Genesis 17:20)
Christ countered these same Edomite ‘jews’ making the same claim – that they were children of Abraham. He first told them that if they were indeed children of Abraham (physical decendants according to the laws written in the Scriptures), they would have behaved as Abraham did. Then He went on to differentiate the true Children of Abraham from the false ones that these jews indeed were…by stating that he could create more of them from the very stones they stood on, thereby making a telling statement that they were empty and lifeless – twice dead, clouds without water, whited sepulchers full of dead men’s bones.
AMEN!
Why are you so jealous? The Jews are not a pure race and were never intended to be a race genetically. Jews are decadents of Abraham who married some women from other nations. I do not know why you have an issue with the skin. What makes the Jews to be such is the Torah that passed from father to son for Thousands of years. It is the annual story that we were slaves in Egypt and therefore be compassionate with strangers. That is what makes a Jew. Not someone’s blue eyes. I’ll get you a blue eyed Bambi to be your kin. You want to be a Jew? start studying.
Jews are not real Israelites, which is why they are not a pure race, they are imposters. They are Edomites pretending or wishing that they were real Judahites/Levites. They are play acting like children playing dress up on Halloween.
The Torah is clear: no racial mixing is allowed for Israelites. Read Deuteronomy 7:3, 23:2. Do NOT inter-marry. No racial bastard shall enter the congregation forever. Once race mixed you lose your tribal identity as an Israelite. See Ezra. And Noah was preserved by God because he was unmixed, “perfect in his generations” (Genesis 6:9). Know your Torah!
Only Abraham’s children through Issac and Jacob mattered to God–you are being deceitful. The Covenant was only with the 12 tribes of Israelites, no one else. Today’s Jews are NOT members of any of those tribes–like the Arabs, they are all mixed now. The Israelites were/are patriarchal, but today’s Jews are matriarchal. Clearly a different people.
Jews aren’t Jews because of the Torah–they defy the Torah. They are Jews because of the Talmud, which they call “the Torah”. Their “religion” which is based on the Talmud comes out of Babylon, not Israel, as you well know. Enough of this deception!
John 8:37 “I know you are Abraham’s descendants, but you are trying to kill Me because My word has no place within you.”
I think it’s a matter of Christ saying they are illegitimate, and that they take after another forefather rather than Abraham, hence why they protest by saying they are not bastards.
It’s interesting that the Jews said “Abraham is our father” and not “Jacob is our father” or “Judah is our father.”
Why Ishmael was sent away without an inheritance if mixing the peoples descended from the three progenitors didn’t matter?
Not hardly Chuck; less than 5% of ‘jews’ are even Adamic, much less descended from Abraham thru Isaac and Jacob/Israel. They know it, they even admit it in their own writings, but keep the ruse up with the goy to support their parasitic existence.
“Semetic” is a term for their language, which is distinct from Indo-European branches.
What does “semetic” mean aside from that? Descendant of Shem?
The Babylonians are Semitic, right?
And their scribes said they were originally (during the founding) blonde w/ blue eyes, like the people of Aratta, to the north, before they chose to mix with the Dilmun migrants.
The progenitors of TODAY’s Jews and Israelis did NOT inhabit the land of Israel long before the Palestinians. Instead, the Israelites of old did.
Many of today’s Jews’ own anthropologists and historians admit the today’s Jews are not genetic descendants of the Old Testament Israelites. For example:
“Strictly speaking, it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a ‘Jew’ or to call a contemporary Jew an ‘Israelite’ or a ‘Hebrew.’” (Richard Siegel and Carl Rheins, eds., “Identity Crisis,” The Jewish Almanac, (New York, NY: Bantam Books, 1980) p. 3.)
That sentence is the opening sentence of the First Chapter entitled “IDENTITY CRISIS” of the 1980 Jewish Almanac. That today’s Jews are not genetic Israelites is also admitted in “The Jewish Encyclopedia,” the “Enyclopedia Judaica,” “The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia,” “The Standard Jewish Encyclopedia,” and by many of their historians.
According to three Jewish encyclopedias and Flavius Josephus, the entire Edomite nation was forced into converting to Judaism and became known as Judahites at the time of the high priest John Hyrcanus (Maccabaeus):
“…in the days of John Hyrcanus (end of the second century B.C.E.) … the Edomites became a section of the Jewish people.” (“Edom,” Encyclopaedia Judaica (Jerusalem, Israel: Encyclopaedia Judaica Company, 1971) Volume 6, p. 378.)
“They were then incorporated with the Jewish nation….” (“Edom, Idumea,” The Jewish Encyclopedia (New York & London: Funk and Wagnalls Company, 1904) Volume V, p. 41.)
“…from then on they constituted a part of the Jewish people, Herod [King of Judea] being one of their descendants.” (Cecil Roth and Geoffrey Wigoden, “Edom (Idumea),” The New Standard Jewish Encyclopedia (Garden City, NY: Doubleday & Company, Inc., 1977) p. 589.)
“…they submitted to the use of circumcision, and the rest of the Jewish ways of living; at which time … they were hereafter no other than Jews.” (Flavius Josephus, “The Antiquities of the Jews,” Josephus, (Grand Rapids, MI: Kregel Publications, 1960) Book XIII, Chapter IX, Verse 1, p. 279.)
We keep hearing that if we don’t bless the modern State of Israel (which America has been doing since at least 1948) that we will be cursed. However, it seems it’s been just the opposite, Since 1948, you name it, and there’s not an area in America wherein she hasn’t become worse off.
For more, see “The Mystery of the Gentiles: Where Are They and Where Are They Now?”
Revelation 2:9 …I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.“… Who calls themselves jews—JEWS! There were two groups that called themselves Jews, (that are not). The Shelahmites who were from Judah’s Canaanite wife-aka bad fig jews. Jesus symbolized their fate in Matthew 21:19 And when he saw a fig tree in the way, he came to it, and found nothing thereon, but leaves only, and said unto it, Let no fruit grow on thee henceforward for ever. And presently the fig tree withered away.
The second group was the Idumeam (edom) that were from Esau who married Hittite women.
Josephus’ Antiquities 13:9:1:
“… Hyrcanus took also Dora and Marissa, cities of Idumea, and subdued all the Idumeans; and permitted them to stay in that country, if they would circumcise their genitals, and make use of the laws of the Jews
Josephus’ Wars 2:8:2, states:
“For there are three philosophical sects among the Judeans. The followers of the first of whom are the Pharisees*; of the second the Sadducees; and the third sect, who pretends to a severer discipline, are called Essenes. These last are Judah by birth, and seem to have a greater affection for one another than the other sects have.”
(These first two are the ones responsible for the death of Jesus.)
Matthew 15:24 (SHEEP MEANS ISRAELITE)
But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost “sheep” of the house of Israel.
John 10:26 (talking to pharisee jews)
But ye believe not, because ye are not of my “sheep”, as I said unto you.
You use Matthew 21:19 as a miraculous metaphor for the Edomites. Yet you say they are still here! How can that be was the miracle a methephoric failure. You see it does not refer to nation as the Edomites already lost their Independence under Hurcanus. So fruit must mean something else. Yet the Jews know in Judea as the fig tree lost their Kingdom, covenant and place in Gods creation. A nation technically needs a land. It is a forced assumption and classical exegesis to suppose the Edomites are Jews. They did not kill the prophets, nor the Christ. Neither did they substitute Gods word for the traditions of the Rabbis. Of this I am certain as the Faith revealed heaps condemnation upon the sons of the flesh and circumcision. Only Abraham’s children believe without circumcision. Accepting by faith not looking for a cut penis nor a genealogy of their own. Circumcision is done by Father God through the Spirit not human earthly fathers. In our exasperation to throw off the yoke of Juwish domination of our governments and debt we go too far. They are no longer the Holy nation of God. The meek were a class of Jews who sought the face of God not mammon and distortion of the Jew Rabbis. The tree immediately withered see.
Wrong all over. “Fruits” are not necessarily offspring but can mean acts. Edomites produce no good fruit in that they are in capable of doing good in God’s eyes. “I hated Esau.”
A people does NOT need a physical land to be a people. The Edomites were long associated with Mount Seir, but when they moved into Judea, they didn’t stop being Edomites even though people don’t associate Judea with Edom. The Israelites were scattered for many hundreds of years with no land to identify them with and yet they were still a people and still referred to a NATION or NATIONS many times in the Bible.
You conveniently forget that Esau took Canaanite wives, so his descendants, Esau-Edom are also Canaanites. And, yes, there were indeed Canaanites in Babylon and Canaanites among the Israelite priesthood in Judea–fact. Rabbi Stephen Wise admitted that Judaism as it is practiced today comes from Babylon.
Abraham was NOT a Jew–stop listening to your rabbi friend, Russ. Issac was NOT a Jew. Jacob was NOT a Jew. Circumcision was a ritual of the law that was done away with with the new covenant with Israel. Christ said he was the circumcision. God circumcised the heart’s of Israel so that physical circumcision was no longer necessary. Your little obedient Jew is a fiction. Your judeo ministers and pastors have filled your head with a bunch of nonsense–scrutinize all things.
Interesting point there, I suppose it’s down to whether or not Esau was considered a potential ‘fig tree’ before he was disinherited. I don’t think God expects anyone other than legitimate Israelites to bare the responsibilities given to them though.
I do agree that “nation” is referring to greater family/ blood-relations, not borders or cultures.
What matters to humans is not what matters to God, and the Bible has many genealogical records, if they didn’t matter to him, they wouldn’t have been recorded.
Josephus says Herod destroyed the genealogical records of that time to cover for his Edomite heritage. And nowadays many Jews say both Jesus and Josephus never existed.
Also, Rabbinical Circumcision (and the circumcision promoted by Americans) is Brit Peri’ah where as they say the Brit Milah is what they used to practice. The severity of the former compared to the latter is stark, the Brit Milah just takes a bit off the end. And we don’t know what practice the Israelites actually did.
I don’t see how Fig Trees can be symbolic of Edomites, since they were never charged with ‘producing fruit.’ It isn’t an expectation of them, or other Abrahamics, I mean.
Oh please… There was no Israel before 1948. Not a single ancient map makes note of it, not a single piece of paper makes note of it… Jews are are of Mongolian descent. We all know the Khazarian history. The possibility that fair skinned blue eyed people lived there is very good if one considers the proximity to Greece etc etc. Jews have openly denies being white, they have openly rejected this for decades and now trying to say they were or are…
The Black Obelisk depicts King Jehu of Israel and other Assyrian vassals offering their tributes before the Assyrian monarch, Shalmaneser III.
https://duckduckgo.com/l/?uddg=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ancient.eu%2Farticle%2F850%2Fmesopotamian-effects-on-israel-during-the-iron-age%2F
Steve their is a mountain of evidence for the existence of ancient Israel. I gues you are what you read.
They were looking in the wrong time period and they didn’t have ‘clearly defined borders’ back then, besides Israel was a confederacy of 12 Tribes, each running their own affairs, not one “state.”
Exactly
Jews always lying. Damn parasites
I like the blurb that refers to a previous jewish publication indicating that 93% of modern Lebanese are decended from the Canaanites. What a telling admission that is. While the jews have their own spin for it, any Bible believing Christian should be able to understand it for what it is. I was taught in Catholic School that all these people named as God’s enemies, these people called children of foreign gods, were not able to be identified with any of modern humanity, that they were essentially “untraceable” and therefore lent creedance to the concept that much of the Old Testament is “mythical”.
The jews are having a tough time explaining this. Here’s the Jewish Press trying to spin this finding: “Blue Eyed Blondes Invaded Israel 6,500 Years Ago: DNA Study”
http://www.jewishpress.com/news/israel/blue-eyed-blondes-invaded-israel-6500-years-ago-dna-study/2018/08/21/