An in-depth DNA study of mummies recently published in the journal Nature Communications, involving the University of Cambridge, the Polish Academy of Sciences, and the Berlin Society of Anthropology, Ethnology and Prehistory, shows that today’s Egyptians have far more sub-Saharan Black African genetic admixture than their ancient predecessors:
Now, an international team led by researchers at the University of Tübingen and the Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History in Jena, Germany, has recovered and analysed ancient DNA from Egyptian mummies dating from approximately 1400 BCE to 400 CE, including the first genome-wide nuclear data from three individuals. Nuclear data is significant because, at its most simple, it is inherited from all ancestors, while mitochondrial DNA stems from the maternal line only.
“Nuclear DNA represents the full human genome and therefore contains much more information as mitochondrial DNA that covers only a small part of the human genome and represents only the maternal ancestry,” author Verena Schuenemann, group leader at the University of Tübingen told [WIRED]. “Especially for admixture and ancestry analysis, it is important to look at as many informative/variable positions in the genome as possible to obtain a complete picture.”
For this study, the authors extracted nuclear DNA from mummies found on the archaeological site of Abusir el-Meleq, along the Nile River in Middle Egypt, hosted and curated at two anthropological collections in the University of Tübingen and the Felix von Luschan Skull Collection at the Museum of Prehistory of the Staatliche Museen zu Berlin, Stiftung Preussicher Kulturbesitz.
…This left the team with reliable samples from 90 individuals, and genome-wide datasets from three. From this, the team studied the genetic differentiation and population changes and continuity over a 1,300-year time span before comparing the results to modern populations.
…The results show that ancient Egyptians were most closely related to ancient populations in the Levant, as well as having close links to Neolithic populations from the Anatolian Peninsula and Europe, thus suggesting the genetics of the Abusir el-Meleq community did not undergo any major shifts. When compared with more recent DNA, the study also revealed modern Egyptians share approximately eight per cent more ancestry on the nuclear level with Sub-Saharan African populations than with Ancient Egyptians.
“This suggests an increase in Sub-Saharan African gene flow into Egypt occurred within the last 1,500 years,” said Stephan Schiffels, from the Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History in Jena. Possible reasons presented by the team include improved mobility down the Nile River, increased long-distance trade between Sub-Saharan Africa and Egypt, and the trans-Saharan slave trade that began approximately 1,300 years ago.
Isaiah 43:3 tells us that God gave up Egypt, Ethiopia, and Sheba in order to preserve the ancient Israelites, and once He fulfilled that promise, it was only a matter of time before those lands would be overrun and occupied by peoples outside of the original Genesis 10 Nations, which has been the case for the last 1,500 years or more. And this DNA merely confirms that this is exactly what happened, as those lands have grown progressively darker over time.
But, of course, these findings are not politically correct, as they reveal that the dark-skinned people who occupy the land of Egypt today are very different genetically from the original Egyptians who built that formerly great ancient civilization. The DNA study specifically states that the ancient Egyptians were closely related to those who dwelt in the ancient lands of the Levant, which is completely consistent with what the Bible tells us. And we also know that the DNA of these ancient mummies, including King Tut, largely matches the DNA of today’s White Europeans. This all goes to show that the Levant, at one time, must have had an immense White population which has since migrated elsewhere or, in the case of Egypt, been absorbed into the local populations.
i found this article many years ago looking for it again i found it its called “kingdom of the ark” about how many egyptians fled egypt and settled in britain akhenatens princess led a large number of egyptians to go on a journey to britain , akhenaten brought a new religion the worship of a singular god the creator , before the upheaval and eventual overthrow of akhenaten his princess and many others escaped to britain ,
so orthodox history says egyptians were black if akhenatens princess and her large group of egyptians were black they would be seen as foreigners arriving in britain but they were welcomed and merged with a irish clan why is that because the ancient egyptians were white, many mummies who still have traces of hair the hair was ginger among some mummies , king tuts dna matches that of europeans , back to kingdom of the ark akhenatens princess her name was changed to scota scota i wonder is where the name scotland comes from although its thought the other princesses died but what if they didn’t what if they went with akhenatens princess along with many other egyptians .
here is the article history is not what it seems to be https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/ciencia_suppressedearthhistory02.htm
If this is true then hoe do you explain Akhenaten?
The dude was the grandfather of King Tut and he clearly was a black man from his lips, face and skull.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akhenaten
You need to read your own authoritative sources more carefully. He wasn’t “black”, but he was depicted in very unusual artistic ways that experts speculate might have something to do with disease etc. Pharaohs were originally white. Period.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akhenaten#Artistic_depictions
If you look up all the old mummies that Google tries to hide, many were blonde and red-headed. They are lying to you in school.
ALSO, MOSES IS SAID TO LOOK EXACTLY LIKE ANCIENT EGYPTIANS BEING THE WHITE RACE.
This is completely backward how sad it show
Over , and over again that the people of the region was African Egypt is in Africa and those oldest antiquity are black I’ve been there ,,and
Seen them with my own eyes read the story about kush the whole region was Africa till
the 1800 and they created the word Middle East these people were all Black to begin with the people of Ethiopia are very different they
have Arib features but are black in fact all Africa
Is like that from the first two people on earth the people you see in the Middle East have a lot of French inherent-acne some of my friends from the Arib region has a French last names explain that? that why the look has changed were all going to get a big surprise one day when the ture comes ,please be thankful that
these people of Africa were able to weather
the hard times because it results in all of us today being here
WE
WUZ
KANGZ
How can nefertiti change from white to black
I don’t believe this story
Do you not understand how race mixing works? A white person and a non-white have a child, and that child usually is less white than the white parent. When that race mixed child then has a child of their own with another non-white, their child becomes even darker. That’s how the Egyptians became as black as they are today. Simple.
So who fathered the black race? Ham, Shem or Japheth?
None of Noah’s sons fathered the Black race. That’s the whole point, Reginald.
Solomon Jegede Enaboakpe, a Nigerian, wrote a book that confirms that Blacks are outside of the Adamic creation in the Bible.
The book is “Black Man: Not Descendant Of Adam” and Enaboakpe has a website where you will find this statement:
“A primary school pupil would hardly be convinced that a White person can give birth to a Black person. It is not recorded in the Bible and there is no history of such event on earth. Blacks give birth to Blacks while Whites give birth to Whites. The Holy Scripture never gave any name of a person of the lineage of Adam that was dark skin.”
http://blackmannotdescendantofadam.blogspot.com/2017/10/black-mans-history.html
The study says that the modern Egyptians have 8% more Subsahahran DNA then their ancestors that otherwise identical. So over all the they in large the same people. What is politically or not politically correct in that?.
In particular the study finds “that ancient Egyptians are most closely related to Neolithic and Bronze Age samples in the Levant, as well as to Neolithic Anatolian and European populations”
Ancient Egyptians, Levantines and Central Asians were all closer genetically to us, than to any of the Arab or Turkic bastards that dwell in those lands today.
The author is absolutely right.
The ancient Egyptians were White, probably up to about 800BC. Even dna evidence is not needed to prove it. One only has to look at paintings, drawings and statues over time, and it is obvious. Preserved mummies provide further evidence.
I hasten to add that the gradual acquisition of black races’ dna now explains a lot of history. Why did Rome fall? For exactly the same reason. The Romans gradually got blacker. Again, pictorial evidence makes it easy to see.
That is why it is utter madness to come into contact with blacks by slavery, employment or immigration. They must be kept at completely away from Whites.
That’s why it is utter madness to include ANY non-whites into our societies as it is the ultimate death wish. This is the exact same moral of the story with Adam and Eve and the Garden – “the wages of sin is death.”
precisely. ya know, its all really very simple and very obvious – wonder why most cant seem to ‘see’…
There were almost no blacks in Rome (except for the mixed population of Egypt). There were also a few Arab-Canaanite types on the fringes of the empire. But they didn’t mix with them that much, it was the Arab conquest of 7th century that totally destroyed the middle east and north africa
“……Isaiah 43:3 tells us that God gave up Egypt, Ethiopia, and Sheba in order to preserve the ancient Israelites….”.
Yešā’ayāhū 43:3 must be translated,
“For I am YHWH (Jehovah), your mighty one, the set-apart one of Yiśrā’ēl who is saving you. Underneath you, I gave Egypt, Kūš, and Sebā your cover‘”.
“Kūš” does NOT refer to Ethiopia here. But, it refers to Kish, a Sumerian urban state.
Though Śabā‘ and Šeba‘ sound similar, they are different.
The descendants of Śabā‘ settled in Sumer. But, the descendants of Šeba‘ (Sabaeans) settled in south Arabia.
Though they settled in southern Arabia, they were not Arabs until the coming of Islam, which scattered the Arabs throughout the Middle East and North Africa.
In other words, YHWH (Jehovah) gave up Egypt, Kūš, and Sebā (three sons of Ham) to ransom Yiśrā’ēl.