• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer
Christians for Truth

Christians for Truth

  • Home
  • Categories
    • All Posts
    • Bible Studies and Christian History
    • Core Topics
    • Egalitarian Myth
    • Entertainment
    • Health
    • COVID “Pandemic”
    • History
    • Hidden Hand
    • Must Read
    • Diversity Kills
    • South Africa
    • Fake Right
    • Right Direction
    • God’s “Chosen People”
    • Faith
    • Evangelical Zionism
    • Judeo-Churchianity
  • Resources
    • Books
    • Videos
    • Memes/Pics
  • About
  • Donations

Elite Jewish Law Professor Admits ‘Separation Of Church And State’ Is A ‘Jewish Conspiracy’ To Undermine A Christian America

December 10, 2021 By CFT Team -- 10 Comments

(Forward) If there is one thing Jews like to do amongst themselves is openly brag about Jewish power and their domination of certain professions — and none more than the legal profession and law school faculties which — according to a prominent Jewish law professor — are “dominated” by “elite” Ivy League-trained Jews:

Lawyers: Are they good for the Jews?

It doesn’t take a statistician to observe that there are a lot of Jews in the legal profession, and even more in the legal academy. But why are there so many Jews in the American legal world, and what significance, if any, do the numbers have?

To address these questions, and many others, more than 150 scholars, lawyers and observers gathered last week at Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law for a conference on “Jews and the Legal Profession.” Presenters ranged from legal celebrities (Alan Dershowitz, Hebrew University’s Ruth Gavison and others) to younger scholars, like myself. And topics ran the gamut, from whether the separation of church and state is “good for the Jews” to the legal theories of Satmar Hasidim.

Sanford Levinson, a noted constitutional theorist who teaches at The University of Texas School of Law, put the central question this way: “Sandy Koufax was a legendary Jewish baseball player because he didn’t pitch the World Series on Yom Kippur — not because he ‘pitched like a Jew.’ But we do ask what’s Jewish about Jewish lawyers.”

Suzanne Last Stone, professor at the Cardozo School of Law and co-host of the conference, with University of Wisconsin Law School professor Marc Galanter, said that there is something distinctive to Jewish law and lawyers — what she called “an odd intellectual grammar, that can be traced to deep structures in rabbinic thought, that has to do with holding to ideas that are somehow dialectically linked, and you keep them in tension with each other. You never resolve the contradiction — you just keep using them to travel through time.” In other words, I joked, Jews like to argue.

Curiously, though, most of this Jewish legal sensibility is expressed by Jews who have very little traditional religious background. As Galanter observed, almost none of today’s Jewish constitutional theorists — who make up not only a disproportionate share but also an overwhelming majority of the constitutional law professors at Harvard and Yale — had a religious education. Indeed, as Yale law professor Robert Post noted in his presentation, the real religious division today is between not Christians and Jews but religionists and secularists. And Jews — at least the elite, educated Jews who dominate the legal academy — are overwhelmingly on the side of the secularists.

David Hollinger, chair of the history department at the University of California, Berkeley, said in his presentation that this was no accident. “In the 1950s and 1960s, many people thought that the separation of church and state was a Jewish conspiracy,” he said. “Well, it was — and a good thing, too.” Joking that “Jewish conspiracies are not always bad,” Hollinger argued that the Jewish contribution to American legal thought is traceable less to rabbinic ideals than to the notion of secular modernity itself. Arguing for a “materialist account of Jewish history,” Hollander said that “Jews were especially well prepared for capitalist modernity,” especially its professional classes.

Still, it is curious how law itself is sometimes regarded as “Jewish.” Several presenters, including Galanter and myself, observed how many of our contemporary stereotypes about lawyers — that they are devious, legalistic, greedy and parasitic, for example — are longtime stereotypes about Jews. What’s more, these stereotypes do not attach themselves to other Jewish-heavy professions, such as medicine, and this suggests there’s something about the law itself that is seen to be “Jewish.”

In my own work, that something is legalism. The rants of today’s critics of the “litigation explosion” — which, Galanter’s work shows, never really happened — are the same complaints lodged by the apostle Paul against the Jews 2,000 years ago: too much letter, not enough spirit; too much body, not enough spirit; too much “hair-splitting” and not enough “common sense.” Perhaps what we are really talking about when we talk about the law is the soul.

Apart from the possible Jewishness of law and lawyering, there is also the more prosaic question of how law affects the Jews. One of the most heated moments during the three-day conference came in an exchange between Dershowitz — notorious in the Jewish community for defending not only O.J. Simpson but also the right of neo-Nazis to march in Skokie, Ill. — and Nathan Lewin, who has litigated countless cases on behalf of Jews wishing to light menorahs on public property, which in civil libertarian circles is seen as problematic for the separation of church and state Lewin took Dershowitz, the American Jewish Congress and most of the American Jewish establishment to task for defending the constitution more than they defended “their own people.” Dershowitz, in turn, attacked Lewin for short-sightedness. “Having more religion in the public square may seem ‘good for the Jews’ in the short term,” he said, “but in the long term, it’s extremely dangerous.” Dershowitz, who in recent years has been an outspoken defender of Israel, also surprised many in the audience when he said, “I don’t want to be a Jewish lawyer — I want to be a human rights lawyer.” But, Dershowitz said, the mistreatment that Israel has received in the media demanded his efforts to rectify the injustice.

For many in the younger generation of academics, myself included, this whole exchange, joined by Irwin Cotler, former minister of justice and attorney general of Canada, had an air of parochialism — “Borscht Belt,” one of my colleagues called it. Another pointed out that, in the whole harangue over Israel in the media, none of the speakers could even come to say the word “Palestinian.” While Dershowitz and Lewin dueled over what’s good for the Jews, some of us asked whether ethnocentrism, in the year 2006, is good for anyone.

This, perhaps, was an important part of the story. Dershowitz, Lewin and Cotler are all part of the generation, born in the years surrounding World War II, that “made good” as the children of immigrants or of Holocaust survivors. Theirs is the generation that filled the leading law faculties, helped create modern doctrines of secularism, and defended (or created) the separation of church and state out of both lofty ideals of liberalism and admittedly parochial concerns. As Post put it, “Postwar Jews were confident enough to litigate to protect their interests, but insecure enough to feel they had to litigate to protect their interests.”

Today, we Jewish legal thinkers are different. Less haunted by antisemitism, and privileged never to have known the exclusiveness and prejudice that once greeted every young Jewish lawyer, we see Jewishness in multicultural terms, as part of a diverse range of particularist voices that, together, create not a secular-liberal melting pot but the mosaic of multi-ethnic America. Hence, Stone’s pioneering work on the varying ways in which Jewish law is used as an identity marker in law schools, universities and other communities, and a fascinating account by Nomi Stolzenberg, professor at the University of California law school, of the way in which very traditional Jews — the litigious Satmar Hasidim — find within Jewish law itself a need for secular legal authority.

If legal academics are less interested in traditional questions of secular liberalism, it seems that the Jewish community is shifting its priority, as well. Marc Stern, legal counsel for the American Jewish Congress, bewailed the fact that the Jewish community has abandoned the fight for separation of church and state. “The Golden Rule in the Jewish community is that whoever has the gold, rules,” he said. “And today, there is little interest in issues of church and state.” Given the ascendancy of the Christian right, Stern predicted a “battle royale” over religion in public life, for which the Jewish community is completely unprepared.

Indeed, as the secular institutions of American life have been eroded over the past decade, it’s ironic that so many Jews have turned a blind eye, more interested in the Bush administration’s coddling of Israel’s right wing than in its Christianization of America. Perhaps Stern is right that we’ve grown complacent — or perhaps Lewin is right that we have more in common with religious Christians than with secularizers such as the AJCongress. Perhaps all of them are right — or none. One thing is for certain: With all this arguing, it was a very Jewish conference.

There’s a lot to unpack here — too much to cover in these brief comments — but we have previously written about how Jews have been the prime movers behind the so-called “separation of church and state” agenda which they completely fabricated out of thin air — no, it is not written anywhere in the U.S. Constitution or the Bill of Rights.

To repeat, the concept of the “separation of church and state” was originally derived from a private letter written by Thomas Jefferson to the Danbury Baptist Association explaining how the U.S. Constitution protects their right to practice their particular sect of Christianity — that the dominant church denominations don’t have the right to dictate how other Christians wish to practice their version of Christianity.

The Founding Fathers most certainly did not write the Constitution and Bill of Rights to protect the rights of Americans to be Jews, Muslims, Hindus and Buddhists — but that’s how Jews have successfully “spun” this into a legal weapon of mass destruction that’s “good for Jews” and suicidal for white Americans.

And here we have it — directly from the kosher horses’ mouths — yes, Jews are behind this “conspiracy” to enforce this artificial “separation of church and state” — and it’s indeed a “conspiracy” because it is indeed illegal — that is, it ignores the spirit of the law — religious freedom for all Christians — by hyper-focusing on the letter of the law, which doesn’t even exist in the first place — and subverts the very foundation of our American identity.

This secular Jewish obsession with the letter of the law is indeed a talmudic tradition passed down from their spiritual patriarchs, the Pharisees — whose insistence on the letter of the law ultimately led to their calling for the murder of Jesus Christ — who is the embodiment of “Logos” or spiritual reason.

Jews must remove Christ from our law, our Constitution, and all of our shared public institutions because He stands in the way of their ability to dominate and control — as Jewish historian Max Nordau admitted, “Logic is a Greek art, and Jews cannot tolerate it.”

Jews fight tooth and nail to ensure that America never returns to having a Christian ethos as a nation because that would inevitably lead to their exclusion from all halls of power — from our governments, our classrooms, and especially from the courtrooms where the law is determined.

It isn’t easily-subverted “white nationalism” that Jews fear most — it’s Christian nationalism — Christians of common birth coming together under God and raising their swords against the secular Jewish tyranny of liberalism and humanism, the spiritual swamp in which Jews thrive.

When we allow Jews to remove Christ from our nation — under their ruse of “democracy” — we are destined to be ruled over by them — and alienated from our God.


Also on Christians for Truth:

  • Jewish Law Professor Resigns In Protest Over 'Antisemitic' Opposition To Zionist Genocide In Palestine
  • Jewish Supremacists Celebrate Hanukkah By Gaslighting America About 'Antisemitism'
  • Flashback 1933: Jewish Press Runs Hit Piece Insinuating Adolf Hitler Was Jewish

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Dave

    December 17, 2021 at 1:29 pm

    “Reuters”, World refugees not vaccinated because drugmakers fear lawsuits due to adverse effects.

    I would suggest, that contrary to the claims by Reuters, which is Rothschild owned, the real reason for not vaccinating the refugees, is that after the vaccine cull of the resident population, the refugees are the replacement population. Ian.

    https://tapnewswire.com/2021/12/reuters-world-refugees-not-vaccinated-because-drugmakers-fear-lawsuits-due-to-adverse-effects/

    Reply
  2. 1890 Civilita Cattolica

    December 13, 2021 at 4:42 pm

    “Arguing for a “materialist account of Jewish history,” Hollander said that “Jews were especially well prepared for capitalist modernity,” especially its professional classes.”

    See how they want us to believe they are sharper and smarter, but it’s never been this. It’s never been anything but their banking power – a power that has given them the ability to appoint all the winners, direct policy, acquire the labour of the goyim, and split the goyim into warring factions.

    They won the game. Now what?

    Reply
    • Chesterton

      December 13, 2021 at 5:51 pm

      It’s very easy for Jews to appear smart than the goyim because they aren’t constrained by morals or ethnics to do whatever it takes to win. Psychopaths always think they are smarter than their stupid and gullible victims.

      Reply
  3. Rick 2.0

    December 13, 2021 at 8:53 am

    The most obnoxious jewboy I went through school with grew up to be such a stereotype of his people. Went to lefty university, became a lawyer, and is now an entertainment industry lawyer and agent, living in Beverly Hills. In other words never did any real work yet is living the
    high life. I’m sure he misguidedly takes pride in his “accomplishments” but I don’t envy him one bit. I have actually built and repaired things as opposed to engaging in parasitic work.

    Reply
  4. Sheepdog

    December 12, 2021 at 2:50 pm

    He shall speak pompous words against the Most High,
    Shall persecute the saints of the Most High,
    And shall intend to change times and law.
    Then the saints shall be given into his hand
    For a time and times and half a time.
    (Daniel 7:25)

    Reply
  5. Flanders

    December 11, 2021 at 12:29 am

    Freemasonic brotherhood secularism lead to subversions, and to attitudes within general society which are little better than that expressed by Andrew Koppelman, the jew author in this comment below. Koppelman had made it clear about his jewish upbringing and aversion to Christian culture in this excerpt, in another article regarding state of emergency powers.
    https://files.catbox.moe/hxynpn.png

    From an article by Andrew Koppelman in [Hill com], where he expounds on the vaccine mandates decision.
    —-
    “I am terrified by a paragraph that Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote a few weeks ago. You should be, too. He and two other justices think the Constitution forbids states from imposing, on religious dissenters, the kind of vaccination requirements that freed the United States from diphtheria, measles and polio. If these judges have their way, those diseases may come back.”

    The article that terrifies the jewish Koppelman is the one below:

    “I accept that what we said 11 months ago remains true today — that ‘[s]temming the spread of COVID–19’ qualifies as ‘a compelling inter­est.’ At the same time, I would acknowledge that this interest cannot qualify as such forever. Back when we decided Roman Catholic Diocese, there were no widely distributed vac­cines. Today there are three. At that time, the country had comparably few treatments for those suffering with the disease. Today we have additional treatments and more appear near. If human nature and history teach anything, it is that civil liberties face grave risks when governments proclaim indefinite states of emergency.”
    —-
    [The above was an edited version of a comment which was left with links at Voat by v0atmage].
    https://archive.md/21olO
    https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/584198-neil-gorsuchs-terrifying-paragraph

    Reply
  6. Patrick White

    December 10, 2021 at 1:45 pm

    Never in history have they been as hated as they are now, or by as many people.

    The Jew’s victory is always a pyrrhic one, for he is forever damned.

    Reply
  7. circle game

    December 10, 2021 at 10:55 am

    If we quote a Jew admitting that Jews are behind the separation of church and state, we are antisemitic conspiracy theorists.

    Reply
  8. Orthodox Realist

    December 10, 2021 at 10:52 am

    “It isn’t easily-subverted “white nationalism” that Jews fear most — it’s Christian nationalism”
    ikr. even as a secular WN i used to wonder why the “scholarly consensus” was always against the Bible no matter what and why so many of those “scholars” had names like Israel Finkelstein and Moshe Greenberg.

    Reply
    • bally hoo

      December 10, 2021 at 12:04 pm

      Far too many white nationalists consider Jews to be white. Even the national socialists made exceptions for Germans married to Jews and their mischling offspring.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Franz Kafka Repulsed Witnessing Drunk Rabbis Sucking Blood Off Baby’s Penis During Circumcision
  • New Study Claims Trauma Of Holocaust™ May Have Shrunk Brains of Jewish ‘Survivors’ And Their Children
  • 1960: Jews Demand ‘Denazification Commission’ After Stasi False Flag ‘Antisemitic’ Incidents In West Germany
  • ‘Outraged’ Jews Demand Painting Of Jesus Saving Sailors Removed From Merchant Marine Academy
  • How Converso Jews Used The ‘Holocaust’ To Shame The Catholic Church Into Accepting Vatican II ‘Reforms’
  • Major Cocaine Dealer Claims Jewish Fraternities Were His Best Customers – ‘They Had Vacuums For Noses’
  • Jews Smear Mel Gibson’s ‘Passion Of Christ’ As ‘Religious Porn’ And An ‘Invitation To Hate Jews’
  • The Israeli Mossad And Anti-Defamation League Connections To The Assassination Of Martin Luther King
  • Jew Complains About The ‘De-Jewification’ of Jesus Christ — ‘Erasing’ What Never Was
  • Meet The Army Of Jews Defending Drag Queen Story Hour Against ‘White Supremacists’
  • Jews Claim They Are ‘Unwelcome’ Because They Destabilize ‘Unjust’ Social Orders Based On ‘White Supremacy’
  • NFL Player Collapses Of Cardiac Arrest During Game – Media Attacks And Censors Links To Deadly COVID Vaccine
  • Abortion Is An ‘Integral’ Part Of Jewish Identity And A Deeply Held ‘Religious Conviction’
  • 1929: Jewish Press Declares ‘There Are No More Jews Among Communist Leaders’

Recent Comments

  • Mark on Franz Kafka Repulsed Witnessing Drunk Rabbis Sucking Blood Off Baby’s Penis During CircumcisionAfter reading this article, I am struck with the absolute impossibility that Jews like Kafka could ever be honest and
  • Biset on Franz Kafka Repulsed Witnessing Drunk Rabbis Sucking Blood Off Baby’s Penis During CircumcisionYes, and Bach is "problematic" because he was an antisemite: https://christiansfortruth.com/j-s-bach-smeared-for-depicting-jews-as-murderers-and-liars/ So was Tchaikovsky: https://christiansfortruth.com/flashback-jewish-conductor-in-hot-water-for-tchaikovsky-piece-about-the-jews-killing-christ/
  • Nada on Jews Smear Mel Gibson’s ‘Passion Of Christ’ As ‘Religious Porn’ And An ‘Invitation To Hate Jews’Rivers Roast (Holojoke)...more hooks than a bait shop..... great family entertainment. https://www.google.com/search?q=joan+rivers+full+roast+video&client=opera&hs=u0R&sxsrf=AJOqlzXV7kAleCKDtfbyT49zvKbZ0hOQLg:1675140457735&source=lnms&tbm=vid&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjLk7q_gPH8AhXNjYkEHS3qAIMQ_AUoAXoECAEQAw&biw=1302&bih=706&dpr=1.25#fpstate=ive&vld=cid:976dc8f1,vid:S9SStRvGg8I
  • Heeby Kikeburger on Franz Kafka Repulsed Witnessing Drunk Rabbis Sucking Blood Off Baby’s Penis During CircumcisionAnother example of Jews ruining art with depravity, is classical Jewish musician Felix Mendelssohn-- son of banker Abraham Mendelssohn; the
  • Bojangles Whip on Abortion Is An ‘Integral’ Part Of Jewish Identity And A Deeply Held ‘Religious Conviction’George Soros used to sit on the Satanic council - a real organization. He has been replaced by Barack Obama.

Resources

Book Library
Video Library
Anonymous, Free Speech Hosting
VPN (Virtual Private Network)

Copyright © 2023 · ChristiansForTruth.com · Terms · Privacy Policy · Contact · Login