This 1994 case was big news in Denver when a jewish couple, Mitchell and Candace Aronson, in a fit of paranoia thought that their non-jewish neighbors, the Quigley’s, were trying to run them out of town just because they were jewish, so the Aronson’s took their beef to the jewish mafiosos at the Anti-Defamation League, who proceeded to publicly smear the Quigleys as antisemites:
‘At a 1994 news conference, the ADL accused the Quigleys of perpetrating the worst anti- Semitic incident in the area since the slaying of Jewish talk-show host Alan Berg 10 years earlier. They were accused of launching “Operation Aronson,” an effort to run their Jewish neighbors, Mitchell and Candace Aronson, out of town. Criminal and civil complaints filed by the Aronsons against the Quigleys, however, were eventually dropped by prosecutors or dismissed, and the Quigleys counter-sued the ADL, which had championed the Aronsons.’
The Quigleys claimed that the Aronsons, upon the advice of the ADL, began tape-recording the Quigleys’ cordless telephone calls and making notes of other clashes….[they] said the ADL “orchestrated a monstrous invasion of their privacy and a destruction of their good name.”
The ADL and Aronson’s had received legal advice that it was legal to tape cordless telephone calls. Their lawyers and the Deputy District Attorney with whom they conferred had been unaware that the statute had recently been changed to require a court wiretap order for cordless phone calls. There was a lot of embarassment all around, as the DA in Colorado dropped the criminal intimidation charges against the Quigleys. The lawyers were sued and settled. The ADL did not settle, and the case went to trial in 2000. The Quigley’s were represented by one of Denver’s finest civil litigators, Jay Horowitz. They won. The case has been on appeal since, and last week [in 2004] the Supreme Court refused to accept the case for review. The ADL has just paid up:
‘Thursday’s payout of $12,169,557.61 represents the largest defamation verdict in the history of Colorado and the largest Federal Wiretap Act verdict in the history of the United States, Horowitz said.’
A 2000 New York Times article has more details of the case and allegations. You can read all the ugly details in this 10th court opinion (html) upholding the judgment against the ADL.
Reactions from the parties (from today’s Denver Post article linked above):
‘In a written release, the ADL said it is “disappointed” that the U.S. Supreme Court denied a petition seeking a review of the judgment against the organization. The ADL will continue to fight “hatred, racism, bigotry, extremism, anti-Semitism and threats to our democracy.”
The Aronsons, who have since divorced, “could not be reached for comment.“
Not surprisingly, all the links to this case from the above-cited article have been scrubbed from the internet. This is how the ADL fights anyone who opposes them.
The sole purpose of the Anti-Defamation League is to defame anyone — especially White people — who dares to criticize any Jew anywhere for any reason, and that includes the foreign State of Israel, which makes the ADL an illegal and unregistered foreign agent.
The FBI has successfully investigated and prosecuted the ADL for illegal domestic spying, and yet despite that, the FBI now partners with the ADL to monitor the U.S. population for ‘hate crimes’, most recently investigating whether or not it’s okay to be White.
Either way, if this case with the Aronsons teaches us anything, it’s that Americans need to start suing the ADL every single time they publicly accuse anyone of being an antisemite, which given the disproportionate weight of this smear, can ruin anyone’s reputation and cause serious financial damages. They need to be financially punished to the point that even uttering the term ‘antisemite’ becomes a prohibitive liability.
About time justice was served on this hateful racist Jewish organization.
Any organization that was founded on the back of a the murderous Jew Leo Frank case, can’t be good.
The ADL and FBI have been working with each other at least since World War II, when the ADL was providing the FBI with information on the ‘America First’ opponents to Roosevelt’s aggressive judeo war policy toward Germany. The FBI used the ADL’s information to falsely arrest and prosecute these patriots. The FBI should have learned their lesson then. Hopefully there are still some good people working for the FBI who don’t fall for the ADL’s schtick.
>>”‘At a 1994 news conference, the ADL accused the Quigleys of perpetrating the worst anti- Semitic incident in the area since the slaying of Jewish talk-show host Alan Berg 10 years earlier.”
re Berg – the FBI sent agents to harass Pastor Pete Peters and he pointed out that if it had been him killed instead of a jew the FBI would be nowhere to found
precisely!
As stated above, (((they))) will NOT let this ever happen again.
That being said, we are in a catch-22. Forgetting the FACT that jews are NOT semites – hence being anti-jew is NOT being anti semitic – anyone with a brain is forced to lie if ever ‘accused’ of being anti semitic; of COURSE we are! No one with a shred of intelligence or honesty can NOT be against the nation wrecking, thieving, murdering spawns of satan. So yes, guilty as charged. [except I / we arent because they arent what they claim]
The issue is when did it become criminal to dislike someone or a group of someones ? Especially when they openly state their contempt for you and your folk and unashamedly call for your destruction and genocide?!? THERE is the issue; the fact that such a ‘charge’ is even heard is ludicrous, as well as illegal. The problem lies in the whole (((legal))) system – there is where the changes must be made.
While this was a great win for falsely accused white folk, the rest of us would either have a better chance of winning the lottery or being struck by lightning than have that kind of success with this kangaroo court system. Their jewish lawyer set a precedent that will never be achieved again, exposing a loophole somewhere. (((They))) will see to it that never happens again.
There are a lot of excellent White Constitutional lawyers who could take these high-profile cases pro bono, or get paid only if there is a pay out. Or start a class action lawsuit against the ADL, piling hundreds of slandered clients together all at once.
The courts are corrupt, but if the ADL got inundated with defamation lawsuits, they would not want to fight them all. And the point would be to get the ADL to back off, make it hard to publicly smear people without real evidence, not necessarily win a huge settlement against them. Beat the Jews at their own legal games.
I will only partially agree based on this: The notorious multi-million dollar settlement for the hot coffee on the lap incident in the late 80’s (early 90’s? and McD’s?) precipitated a landslide of changes through the entire restaurant industry with warning labels, different cups and lids, etc…what kind of changes occurred in the practices of the ADL? I’ve noticed nothing even close to comparable.
Yeah, but the ADL is much more powerful than MacDonald’s Inc., but they both are susceptible to public opinion. It won’t take just one lawsuit against the ADL, more like a flood to get them to think twice about their smear campaigns.
Can’t really argue with that, lol!
>>>”There are a lot of excellent White Constitutional lawyers who could take these high-profile cases pro bono, or get paid only if there is a pay out. Or start a class action lawsuit against the ADL, piling hundreds of slandered clients together all at once.”
yeah, where are they?
rich white people are worthless, selfish, scum of the earth
they abandoned their race so they could have another yacht
Amen! Isn’t that the truth!
As our American right to free speech is being steadily eroded, by who else – the jews, where are the lawyers to speak up and out against it?! The answer: accept for the principled and honorable John Whitehead – NOWHERE!
How many lawyers in America? About 1.4 million. Shouldn’t there be thousands speaking out?! Well, there aren’t. These cheap and greedy no-goods are too busy sucking money out of clients FORCED to fork it over to save their asses! And often entirely innocent, like I was. Screw the lawyers. Greedy, cheap, selfish bastards!
The legal system really is corrupt to the core. Sadly, you have to be screwed over for it to really sink in.
The arrogance of some White people who push the Jews “poor and disadvantaged minorities” non-sense are a major part of the problem. They allow Jews to persecute anyone who doesn’t play their morally corrupt games with impunity. Just pay attention who the billionaires are today……White people squander their heritage because they don’t care enough to defend it.
How many Americans could afford, let alone persevere, thru 10 years of litigation against the ADL–Another Damn Lie?
There must be thousands of Americans who have been stomped by the ADL thugs, but had no recourse, since they had no money to hire a lawyer.
See my comment above–attorneys work pro bono, or get paid only if you win, or a class action suit. Not that hard.
Jewish lawyer’s through organizations do it all the time and they get rich…..
“The Incorruptible Judiciary
“One of the people that the Anti-Defamation League had tagged as anti-Semitic was the wife of Paul ‘Pete’ McCloskey – a military veteran, a lawyer practicing in Redwood City, California, and a former United States Representative, elected to Congress – apparently as a result of her opposition to Israeli apartheid – which was, it seems, interpreted as support for the Palestinian cause, hence, opposition to Israel.
“Mr. McCloskey represented his wife in a defamation suit against the ADL, and, after ten years, prevailed; not monetarily, no, the rewards barely covered his time and expenses, but he did succeed in establishing the astonishing fact that the judge hearing his case against the ADL, in Los Angeles, was actually the chairman of the Los Angeles branch of the Anti-Defamation League … and had refused to excuse himself from hearing a case involving what was an obvious conflict of interest.
“The exact relationship between the JDL and the ADL is largely undocumented … but I believe that it would be fair to infer that one exists.
“It would be easy to dismiss my conclusions … but in order to do so, you will have to ignore the fact that the International Jewish Peace Union agrees with my analysis.”
Source: https://web.archive.org/web/20040408124353/http://www.orafraud.org:80/Oracle/terminator.html#The%20Incorruptible%20Judiciary
>>>but he did succeed in establishing the astonishing fact that the judge hearing his case against the ADL, in Los Angeles, was actually the chairman of the Los Angeles branch of the Anti-Defamation League … and had refused to excuse himself from hearing a case involving what was an obvious conflict of interest.
(((they))) never do – Kagan on the obozocare, one crooked jew after another