A female blogger has come under heavy criticism for an article that apparently triggered the feminists:
An article and photo from a blogger arguing that Christian men “prefer debt free virgins with no tattoos” went viral this week, and received much pushback.
The piece, which was published Monday on the blog of Lori Alexander, who is known as “The Transformed Wife” asserted that “young women should carefully consider whether or not they go to college” if they desire to be wives and mothers, and went to great lengths to explain why women should remain chaste.
“Secular universities teach against the God of the Bible and His ways. It’s far from what God calls women to be and do: it teaches them to be independent, loud, and immodest instead of having meek and quiet spirits,” Alexander argued.
…When she posted the article on Facebook, she asked: “Do you know how much more attractive debt-free virgins (without tattoos) are to young men? Unfortunately, there are so few of these types of young women anymore because of the high costs of college (debt) and sexual promiscuity even within those in the church.”
As of Friday, the post received over 47,000 reactions, more than 55,000 comments, and nearly 44,000 shares, with many people expressing their anger at how judged they felt. Alexander is followed by approximately 79,000 people on Facebook. She has defended her perspective on her page a few times since publishing the blog Monday, citing various scriptures.
There are probably even a lot of White non-Christian men who would agree with this ideal for a woman, which makes the negative reaction that it got from other so-called Christian women even more remarkable.
Feminism has become a dominant force in Christian communities today, and it is a major contributor to the decline of traditional marriages and families – and Christian congregations.
If there ever was a contradiction in terms, it is a “Christian feminist”.
What she says is not only absolutely 100% correct, but is supported Biblically, as well as historically for our people. Its true, so it must cause outrage!!!
I reckon all the tramps and ‘feminists’ who were so outraged were either prompted by their marxist indoctrination or their sense of guilt, if any of them are still capable of shame….
Most women cannot handle any form of criticism or correction–their sense of self is so fragile and built on such an unstable foundation of feminist lies that their world comes crashing down if anyone disagrees with anything that they have said, done, or thought. Pathetic, really….
One silent message here too was urging women to reconsider going to college and not because she thinks an education is bad for a women, but rather college glorfies and brings out ungodly qualities in women and is therefore implied to be destructive to their spirits.
“And if thine eye offend thee, pluck it out: it is better for thee to enter into the kingdom of God with one eye, than having two eyes to be cast into hell fire”
But, we live in a world where women and sometimes men are offended when a women is called meek. What good is strength without weakness and leadership without a following? The two work together perfectly and need each other to thrive and survive.
A man should allow a woman to be a woman, and a woman should allow a man to be a man.
It’s great to see a young lady with the courage to speak out in this wicked and perverse age.
Seems like people are looking to be offended about something these days. I guess racially aware whites and people with opinions on morality are the only one’s who should be censored and criticized. How long until all truth is outlawed altogether?
I don’t know. A strategically placed “tramp-stamp” can be appealing to some decent white men, I suppose, but the debt?…..unh-uhhh…no,no,no.