For your consideration we present Bertrand Comparet’s essay, God Discriminates — which is just as relevant today as it was when he wrote it in the turbulent 1960s when the so-called “Civil Rights Movement” was imposed on Christian America.
Contrary to how it is portrayed in the history books, this “Civil Rights” movement was not a popular, spontaneous “grassroots” ground swelling — but rather a calculated, un-constitutional edict of the Radical Left which had usurped control of America in a coup d’etat with the assassination of President Kennedy — the exact same modus operandi they used in the Bolshevik Revolution with their assassination of Czar Nicholas and his family.
And the first edict handed down by the Bolsheviks was the prohibition against “discrimination” — which became literally a capital offense. These nation-wreckers repeated this same edict in America, declaring any form of discrimination not only “un-American” but especially “un-Christian”. And all mainstream judeo-Christian churches immediately fell into lock-step with the Radical Left — and “discrimination” was elevated to the status of a mortal sin — in complete contradiction to Scripture, as Comparet demonstrates.
While the well-publicized “Counter Culture Revolution” promoted drugs, sexual license, race mixing, and New Age eastern mysticism — a parallel revolution was subverting Christianity — where the persona of Christ took on the “values” of that Bolshevik counter culture. This new, “improved” hippy Jesus was popularized in the play and movie, “Godspell” which was co-written by a Episcopalian homosexual and an atheist Jew.
Fifty years later, this hippy Jesus has taken these non-discrimination doctrines far beyond race — to the point that mainstream “conservative” churches are now presiding over gay weddings and transsexual baptisms — and even pedophiles are defended as “God’s children” too.
Christians who discriminate against anyone — regardless of their sin — are now denounced as “bigots” and “haters” and, of course, “White supremacists”– by their own congregations — with no end in sight.
The audio version of Comparet’s essay can be found at the end of our transcription.
Bertrand Comparet:
Part of the campaign of brainwashing to which the American public is being subjected is a huge and well -financed effort to make us believe that all discrimination is bad. Those of us whose memory reaches back 30 years or more will recall that the ability to discriminate between things of different value or utility was then recognized as the most essential part of intelligence.
Those who were too dull to see differences where they exist were considered stupid. How does it happen that the subsidized press, and radio and television commentators now so bitterly denounce all who have the intelligence to discriminate? They even try to make us believe that discrimination is un-Christian. Since all of the devil’s doctrines are now being preached by somebody under the false pretense of “Christianity,” let us examine the only source from which we can determine God’s own position on the subject of discrimination — that is, the Bible.
From beginning to end, the Bible is a book of discrimination — discrimination by God Himself and discrimination which God commanded us to make. We find the first record of God’s discrimination in Genesis 4, verses 3 to 5, where we read,
And in process of time it came to pass that Cain brought of the fruit of the ground an offering unto the Lord. And Abel also brought of the firstlings of his flock and of the fat thereof. And the Lord had respect unto Abel and to his offering: but unto Cain and to his offering He had not respect.
What’s this? When the governor hears about this, how the fur will fly!
But that’s only the beginning. In Genesis 5, verses 3 and 4, it describes Adam’s family, yet it mentions by name only one of his children — Seth — and barely notices the existence of the others. Discrimination? Yes, indeed — right on down through verse 31, this chapter notes the existence of each succeeding generation, yet it approves only one in each generation enough to give his name.
This brings us to Noah — and in Genesis 6, verses 17 and 18, we find that God Himself discriminated in favor of Noah and his family and against all the other people living in that land. God saw a difference between them? Of course — but today we are told that we must pretend that there is no difference between the races even when we clearly know that this pretense is a complete falsehood.
Follow on down through Genesis — and we find that God discriminated in favor of one and against others in every generation down to Abraham. Among Abraham’s children, God discriminated in favor of Isaac and against Ishmael. Among Isaac’s children, God again favored Jacob over Esau, making Jacob the father of God’s people and changing his name to Israel, while Esau and his descendants were cursed with God’s indignation forever.
Likewise, God favored Joseph over all his eleven brothers — and again God discriminated in favor of the Israelites and against the Egyptians. “How awful,” say our modern liberals — “Why, this is racism.” Yes, frankly, it is — and it’s God’s own choice at that. God has certainly lost the “minority group” vote and been expelled from the Democratic Party, but I am grateful to Him for setting an example which we can follow.
But some people have been misled by their churches into the belief that the Old Testament is only a record of God’s mistakes and failures — and that He had to abandon all this and make a new start in the New Testament, which changed everything. No greater falsehood was ever taught. God was right the first time — and all the time.
The Old Testament and the New Testament are perfectly consistent. There is as much Christianity in the Old Testament as there is in the New. And The New Testament is as much an “Israel book” as was the Old Testament.
No doubt many of you have heard many preachers say that discrimination is “un-Christian”. Let’s look into this. Who is the supreme authority on what is Christian? It cannot be anyone except Jesus Christ Himself. No one can tell me that Jesus Christ was un-Christian.
Fortunately, Jesus Christ never used any of the weasel-worded evasions which are considered polite today. He always fearlessly spoke the exact truth — in words too plain to be mistaken. All the Gospels record that — among the Jews — Jesus Christ spoke His teachings in parables which they could not understand. Later, He explained these parables to His disciples in private. At least three of the Gospels record that Jesus explained to His disciples why He took such pains to keep the Jews from understanding Him. In Mark 4, verses 11 to 21, we read,
And He said unto them, Unto you it is given to know the mysteries of the Kingdom of God: but unto them that are without, all these things are done in parables: That seeing, they may see and not perceive; and hearing, they may hear and not understand: Lest at any time they should be converted and their sins should be forgiven them.
Now that’s real discrimination — how could you make it any stronger?
But that is not all — both Matthew 15, verses 22 to 28, and Mark 7, verses 25 to 30, record that when a Canaanite woman asked Jesus Christ to drive the demon out of her daughter, He replied that it was not proper to take the children’s bread and cast it to the dogs. Not until she acknowledged that the children of God — the true Israelites — must first receive His gifts — and through them the Kingdom of God would be brought to the other races — not until then did He consent to heal her daughter.
Discrimination? Yes, indeed. Racism? Certainly — but who dares to call Jesus Christ un-Christian? Yes, I think that some of the liberal and modernist preachers would actually say that — but this only shows clearly how much Satanism is falsely masquerading as Christianity today.
But this discrimination becomes even stronger. In Matthew 7, verse 6, Jesus Christ warns all His followers,
Give not that which is holy unto the dogs, neither cast ye your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet and turn again and rend you.
Certainly everyone knows that Jesus Christ was not so foolish as to think that His disciples were going into the barnyard and start preaching to the four-legged animals there. When He spoke of “dogs” and “swine” He was speaking of the two-legged varieties. Discrimination between races? Certainly. But we haven’t had sense enough to believe Him and obey Him.
We have given that which is holy — our Christian religion — unto the dogs in Africa and Asia. And today, those missionaries who did not escape in time have been eaten in Africa or are slowly dying in Red Chinese prisons. The precious pearls which God gave to us — the inventive skill He placed in our minds — the high civilization which enables us to produce great abundance of every useful product — these we have cast before the swine of the earth — and they now trample under their feet the peaceful prosperity we tried to give them — and they use our science, our machines, even the surplus food we ship to them as weapons with which to destroy us.
Yes, I know how the minority groups and the mongrelizers are raging against what I am saying — but it is time that God’s truth be told before it is too late. Jesus Christ warned us to discriminate between races — just as He discriminated.
In His last talk with His disciples — in the fourteen through seventeenth chapters of John — Jesus Christ said that He would send them the Holy Spirit — the Spirit of Truth — whom the nations of the world order cannot receive because they do not see Him or know Him. Jesus said that He prayed only for those who were His — and not for those of the world’s system.
Jesus Christ knew the folly and falsehood of pretending that all people and all races are alike or equal. He knew that every sacrifice of truth on the polluted altar of expediency and politics brings its terrible penalty in national and racial degradation — which only their destruction has ever succeeded in cleansing.
All history is a vast junkyard of the wreckage of empires which ignored this lesson — and in consequence thereof — perished.
Several times in our past history we were on this path to destruction — and we were only saved by the direct intervention of God.
Today, we have allowed corrupt leaders to take us so far into this shadow of death that again only the promised intervention of God can now save us. We have His promise to do so — and we can always rely on Him to keep His word.
But it is no credit to us that we have disobeyed Him to this extent. While we can, let’s return to our God — discriminate between that which is good for us and that which is deadly — and between that which is our own and that which is alien to ourselves and to our God.
The jews want to replace the word discriminate, a good thing btw, with violence. To discriminate is to think and choose what is in your best interest as an individual or member of a group. It’s smart. It’s normal. It’s what has kept the human species from becoming extinct. We discriminate and choose what our actions will be. We learn what poison is and we don’t allow it to ruin us next time. At least we are supposed to. Discrimination is a good thing. Gay does not mean homosexual and rainbows are Gods’ symbol, not faggots.
Jesus is Lord
Alright everyone, I have a question for you all… and I am really keen to see what you reckon.
Matthew chapter 16, verse 16 thru to 23.
Jesus says he will build his church on Peter and gives Peter the keys to the Kingdom, and then turns around in the next breath and calls him Satan…??? What???
Firstly… we all know that the Catholics use this as a “Peter was the first Pope” reasoning. Seeing as the Romans killed Xtians by the number, I do not agree that Peter was the first catholic pope and that there was an “unbroken line of popes” thru the ages as catholics claim. It is hard to be a Roman catholic pope ruleing from Rome when Romans are killing you…
My question is twofold: firstly, why did Jesus build His church on Peter? What does that mean? If Jesus is the rock, as we see all thru the Bible, why is Peter now the rock? Peter means rock, does it not?
Secondly, why did He then call Peter Satan?
“And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.” (Matthew 16:23)
Here’s the problem with the Catholic interpretation of this go-to verse for them. The Greek word for Peter here is “petros” which means a “small rock”; whereas the next reference to “rock” here comes from the Greek “petra” which means “large rock”, the kind one would use for a foundation.
https://scripture4all.org/OnlineInterlinear/NTpdf/mat16.pdf
Clearly, the “large rock” upon which Christ would built his “church” from the Greek “ecclesia” or “called out ones” would be Himself. Christ is the foundation of his church, not Peter. All members of Christ’s “ecclesia” are like Peter, they are the “small stones” that make up his “church”.
Is there any evidence that Peter ever set foot in Rome as the Catholics claim? If there is, I must have missed it.
First things first, I’m personally not too bothered with what the Catholics believe with my personal interpretation of the Scripture. Catholicism and “Popery” is obviously a separate evil, and another matter of discussion.
There are a few verses which I think provide some clarity to the situation. The most relevant I believe is Revelation 21:14 which says, “And the wall of the city had twelve foundation stones, and on them were the twelve names of the twelve apostles of the Lamb.”
The Lord says to Peter in Matthew 16:19, “I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven; and whatever you bind on earth shall have been bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall have been loosed in heaven.”
However later in Matthew 18:18, the Lord says as a result of the Christian due process, “Truly I say to you, whatever you bind on earth shall have been bound in heaven; and whatever you loose on earth shall have been loosed in heaven.” In John 20:23 the Lord says to all the apostles, “If you forgive the sins of any, their sins have been forgiven them; if you retain the sins of any, they have been retained.”
In this way, we can see the context for “keys to the Kingdom”, as it seems that the apostles had some authority regarding the forgiveness of sins. They were able to lock or unlock the doors for others by forgiving or condemning them. The deaths of Ananias and Sapphira in Acts 5 seems to be an example of this.
So maybe Peter had some eminence in this respect, as he did seem to be the most passionate and dedicated of the apostles, but in my opinion, it was something which the Lord bestowed on them all. They were all to be the foundation on which the Lord built the church, which is confirmed by the Revelation and these passages.
In Matthew 16:23, Peter was rebuking the Lord because Peter feared the Lord’s death. Hebrews 2:14 says, “through death He might destroy the one who has the power of death, that is, the devil”. Revelation 12:11 confirms and says, “And they overcame him [Satan] because of the blood of the Lamb and because of the word of their testimony, and they did not love their life even when faced with death…” Fear of death is something Satan uses as leverage against those he wants to corrupt, and Peter was rebuking the Lord in fear of His death. Therefore, Peter was under the power of Satan, which in my opinion explains why the Lord said what He did.
In John 21:18-19, the Lord confirms to Peter that Peter himself would die by crucifixion, and that Peter’s death would glorify Him. Therefore, even though Peter was under the power of Satan at one point, he most certainly was not under Satan’s power later. This is what the Lord’s death and resurrection did for them, and us all.
Unfortunately though, Satan exercises the power of death and money over the world today, and the faithless fall to his whims…
Thank you both, that is very useful knowledge.
Why, o why, did the translators not just say “Peter, thou art a little rock, and upon the big rock will I build my church”? That would make it much clearer!
I care not what the catholics think, say, or do, particularly, either. However, the pope holds huge sway on a lot of good Israelites who cling to the “one true church” doctrine, and so it is good to know, for my own part, why and how, they have it wrong… so, thanks again.
CHRIST IS KING wrote, “and so it is good to know, for my own part, why and how, they have it wrong”
For sure. I just included that little piece in my post as a disclaimer against people who accuse me of believing something similar to Catholics, however remote. Glad it helped though.
I have discerned that there are some great comments here following a great article.
I was just thinking, all those WHAT WOULD JESUS DO? bracelets that people, especially kids, were wearing a wee while ago… the bracelets were asking a question… a question of… what would Jesus DISCERN?
As an aside, I always thought that question for the wearers fairly amusing: who, of the wearers of the bracelets, does as Christ did? Talked in parables to everyone who wasn’t a family member or friend, threw tables over and flung a whip round, refused to answer questions if their question wasn’t answered first, and most importantly, spoke of the Kingdom of Heaven no matter what the outcome? Ohhhhh, that’s right… hippy Jesus just loves. What would Jesus do? He would love unconditionally and never discern, coz that would show hate. And Jesus only loves… or so I am told haha!
Yes, and “Hippy Jesus” allegedly was a regular user of marijuana — and many claim that he was actually “anointed” with marijuana-infused oils:
https://truthsaves.org/jesus-used-marijuana/
Jesus “healed” with cannabis oil — not with his spiritual powers:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/jan/06/science.religion
In fact, Jesus and his disciple were all tripping on hallucinogens:
https://psychedelicgospels.com/
Cor blimey! After having a look at those three links, I still couldn’t find any scripture that was used to support such claims. Funny that.
Where do people get these strange notions?
A catholic releative of mine said the other week that John must have “been totally doped off his head” when he wrote Revelation. So much for a reading of a revelation from God, I suppose; nope, just another druggy rambling aparently.
Until someone can point to a piece of scripture that says mind altering drugs for recreational use are good, I shan’t accept it. I have discerned that drugs are bad, mkay lol.
The Left has made discrimination a dirty word. All discriminate means is to differentiate. If we didn’t “discriminate” in general, we’d be dead. For example, If you could not discriminate between a bottle of poison vs a bottle of soda, you’d be dead. If you could not discriminate between putting a friendly puppy dog vs a ferocious hyena, you’d be dead. Same with discriminating against perverts, criminals, degenerates, predators, and violent groups of people.
“White flight” is clearly a form of discrimination — when crime-prone Blacks move in, Whites move out. That’s discernment in action. Though Whites lie to themselves and claim they are moving for “better schools”.
But Blacks are discerning too. When Blacks make enough money, they move away from their fellow Blacks into whiter and safer neighborhoods. Yes, even Blacks “discriminate” against other Blacks — to save their own lives.
amen
“If the tide of history does not quickly turn toward Communism then the Jewish race is doomed.” George Marlen, 1937.
“Wars are the Jews’ harvest, for with them we wipe out the Christians and get control of their gold. We have already killed 100 million of them, and the end is not yet.” Rabbi Reichorn, Chief Rabbi of France, 1859.
https://pointtalkers.com/2020/07/14/christians-duped-unholiest-hoax-in-all-history-so-called-jews/
Discrimination is the ability to apply knowledge for the benefit of the individual or group. Discrimination is the result of critical thinking. Discrimination is logic in action. Discrimination is preference in action. Discrimination is natural and normal in nature. Discrimination did not always have a negative connotation like the word “gay”.
If you are too stupid to think for yourself and discriminate (choose) things that are beneficial to you and yours, than you deserve to be discriminated against and you will. Just how it is. Racial differences are genetic. That is what the “vax” is about. Homogenizing the goyim races while preserving thier jewish race. Discriminating tastes these jews have eh?
God bless.
The Shulamite bride is a good one to consider when relating to discrimination…
Song of Songs 1:6, “Do not stare at me because I am dark,
For the sun has tanned me.”
Song of Songs 4:5, “Your two breasts are like two fawns,
Twins of a gazelle
That graze among the lilies.”
Song of Songs 7:2, “Your belly is like a heap of wheat,
Surrounded with lilies.”
Songs of Songs 7:4, “Your neck is like a tower of ivory,
Your eyes like the pools in Heshbon”
This is clearly describing a tanned, white woman. Her breasts are like fawns, which is a fair reddish brown, possibly tapering to white. They feed among lilies, which likely white, or with some pink admixture. This vividly shows the color of the nipples among a white breast.
Her belly is like a heap of wheat, because her belly is tanned. It is fenced with lilies, because there are areas around which are not tanned and are showing fences of white or pink. Her neck is a tower of ivory, because ivory is white and her neck is not tanned. Her eyes are like pools in Heshbon, so they are blue or green in color.
Song of Solomon 4:1, “Your hair is like a flock of goats
That have descended from Mount Gilead.”
While white and black goats occur, a flock will give a brown to golden color. She clearly has a hair color somewhere between brown and blonde.
Song of Solomon 4:3, “Your lips are like a scarlet thread,
And your mouth is beautiful.
Your temples are like a slice of a pomegranate
Behind your veil.”
She has red, flesh colored lips like a white person. Pomegranates are red, so she has ruddy features which only white people have.
This is clearly describing a white woman…
2 Chronicles 14:12 So the LORD smote the Ethiopians [BLACK ETHIOPIANS?] before Asa, and before Judah; and the Ethiopians fled. (so how can Judah be black when they smote the black Ethiopians?)
Zephaniah 2:12 Ye Ethiopians also, ye shall be slain by my sword.
Ezekiel 30:5 Ethiopia, and Libya, and Lydia, and all the mingled people, and Chub, and the men of the land that is in league, shall fall with them by the sword.
Genesis 9:25 And he said, Cursed be Canaan; a servant [SERVANT = slave] of servants shall he be unto his brethren.
Genesis 10:6 And the sons of Ham; Cush, and Mizraim, and Phut, and Canaan. (ham was daddy to the above)
we are entering or getting close to the time of Jacob’s trouble.
WHY they HATE WHITES the Bible has the answer.
Revelation 1:14 – His [Jesus] HEAD head and his hairs were WHITE white like wool, as WHITE white as SNOW snow; and his eyes were as a flame of fire; 15 And his feet like unto fine brass,[Brass is made of copper which is REDDISH GOLDEN, not black] as if they burned in a furnace; and his voice as the sound of many waters.
The world hates white Christians esp.
Strong’s Hebrew word: “ADAM”
H – 119 ‘adam aw-dam’ to show blood (in the face), i.e. flush or turn rosy:–be (dyed, made) red (ruddy). (to be able to blush)
H – 120 ‘adam aw-dawm’ from 119; ruddy
1 Samuel 17:42 – And when [Goliath] the Philistine looked about, and saw David, he disdained him: for he was but a youth, and RUDDY ruddy, and of a fair countenance.
fair countenance = fair complexion (Webster 1828 Dictionary) BLACK is not fair complexion
Ruddy = having a healthy reddish color, a ruddy complexion
ie rosy red blush as the Irish are ruddy. Blacks are not ruddy
David was a relative of Jesus and look in Revelation 1 as Jesus had white head and white hair…hmmm
Bible book Song of Solomon 5:10 – My beloved is WHITE white and RUDDY ruddy, the chiefest among ten thousand.
Bible book Lamentations 4:7 – Her Nazarites were purer than snow, they were WHITER whiter than milk, they were more RUDDY ruddy in body than rubies, their polishing was of sapphire: (Ruddy means reddish as in blush)
Revelation 1:14 – His (Jesus) HEAD head and his hairs were WHITE white like wool, as WHITE white as SNOW snow; and his eyes were as a flame of fire; 15 And his feet like unto fine brass, (Brass is made of copper which is REDDISH GOLDEN BROWN) as if they burned in a furnace; and his voice as the sound of many waters. The world hates white Christians especially it seems today.
Strong’s Hebrew word: “ADAM”
H – 119 ‘adam aw-dam’ to show blood (in the face), i.e. flush or turn rosy:–be (dyed, made) red (ruddy). (to be able to blush)
H – 120 ‘adam aw-dawm’ from 119; ruddy
Adam the first white man
so were the Hebrews white?
Can any dark race can blush and show blood in the face….?
Why the unlimited 3rd world immigration into the USA and Europe?
Who printed the Bibles and built all the churches?
Africa? NO
Asia? NO
Europe and the USA = Yes
Bible book hated of interracial marriages Ezra 9:2 – For they have taken of their daughters for themselves, and for their sons: so that the holy [HOLY SEED] seed have mingled themselves with the people of those lands: yea, the hand of the princes and rulers hath been chief in this trespass.
IF there is a HOLY SEED then there needs to be an UNHOLY SEED…
that would explain why the Joos (serpent seed) hates white christians so much…..and the so called “black hebrews’
There is a growing movement in the USA that Yashua was black, that Joseph married a black Egyptian and that Egyptians were black. I recently watched a video on DNA research proving same generation inbreeding of the Pharaohs. It was very disturbing – sister to brother etcetera. The reason was because they thought they were gods and so only mated with each other. If you pull up the subject of Yashua’s skin color on the internet you are bombarded with every article stating Yashua was black – none that I could find on many many pages dispute this. Would you please consider writing a factual article on this subject so I can converse intelligently on the subject with believers getting caught up in this blasphemy.
“christians” also boast that Moses married a negro. It is a badge of honor as they parade their adopted black nigglet through the congregation.
SUPERNATURAL.
Its mostly all just the usual Cutural Appropriation. Blacks having a plethora of innate and learnt tendencies similar to jew master simply Take copy characteristics of foreign cultures , remodel it in own image call it their own creation or experience and even throw it back at actual owners, its a no-brainer.
Beck, see Chaplain Bob Walker’s comment above for biblical sources proving that the Israelites were White.
The white genocide agenda is under direct orders from the Kehilla (aka Cahilla) — the modern-day Sanhedrin made up of Pharisees that runs the world via the banking system, and this is where reform must begin. When every corporation and most politicians tout gender dysphoria, illegal immigration, and miscegenation, you know they are all controlled by the Jewish central banks. The Fed must be nationalized, and debt (i.e. Federal Reserve Notes) created from thin air renounced.
http://themillenniumreport.com/2018/03/who-is-the-international-banking-crime-syndicate-that-controls-the-world/
HarryB. That’s the problem as I see it, or perhaps I should say the key. Somehow we need to break away from jew control of commerce by breaking the present jew control of “money”.
We could create our own coins and banknotes (I can’t imagine digital currencies surviving the loss of the internet), but the enemy would use OUR technology to create a million perfect copies by morning, rendering our currencies worthless overnight.
One way would be to declare ALL metals of equal value, reducing the value of gold and silver to that of steel and enabling anyone to create “money” from what comes to hand.
Our real opportunity is just round the corner though. It’s a great tragedy, a disaster for Humankind (by which I mean primarily our own people), but millions of gullible sheeple are already in the process of being “culled” (murdered) by accepting this poison “vaccine” against an imaginary disease.
As for the unfortunate victims of this great crime against God and man, all I can say is “Father forgive them for they know not what they do”. Most people really believe the continual brainwashing that there is a “deadly disease” that will kill us all unless we get the killer vaccine. They’re terrified, and the propaganda never lets up.
As vast numbers die off, the towns and cities will collapse. The survivors (the remnant?) will be forced into the countryside in search of, and to grow their own, food.
A vastly reduced population will be busy working together for the common good because it will be the only way to survive. They won’t be as susceptible to being “ruled” by parasites. We know right from wrong, and that we’ll need to help each other, pooling skills and resources in order to ensure our survival.
In short, we’ll be living closer to God than we’ve been allowed to do throughout recorded history.
The world is NOT over-populated, but the devil’s vermin (the jews) have been able to control us by cramming us all together and forcing us into an un-natural existence. This is a time of great evil, and we’ll all lose Loved ones (who we’ll meet again in a much better place), but imho “the great die off” is necessary if Humans are to be free.
We have to think of it as a necessary “reset” (and not the kind envisaged by the satanic Klaus Schwab). It will be a terribly sad time for everyone, but those who get through it will have an opportunity to start again.
I can’t see peoples dying as great opportunity for anybody except them because it’s what they want. Remaining survivors won’t be able resist as much because there will be Judas who will kill and oppress their own for promised carrot like ticket to their new world. They already been using peoples against each other for benefit of Jews like blacks against whites and all those sexualities against normal or women against men. Watch “EUROPA: THE LAST BATTLE”, can be found on Bitchute and there is a lot but gives great understanding into world.