(Hobby Lark) Jews have a well-deserved reputation of stealing the ideas of others and making a fortune off their ill-gotten gains.
With the upcoming release of the Hollywood live-action movie based on the toy doll ‘Barbie’, Jews are gushing over the “Jewish” origins of the iconic doll, but in reality two Jewish toy makers — Mattel and Louis Marx and Co. — ‘usurped’ the rights of the original German doll, Bild Lilli, in a ‘hostile’ corporate takeover, then went on to make untold millions off this ‘stolen legacy’:
“In 1952, Reinhard Beuthien had been hired by company Axel Springer SE to draw a one-panel comic for their brand new tabloid Bild. The heavily nationalist and conservative tabloid needed a cartoon.
So he drew a nasty, unruly baby girl. It flopped with his editor.
So he grew her up, added a ponytail, gave her a buxom figure, and drew a gag where she was asking a fortune teller for the address and telephone number of the tall, dark, and handsome men most fortune tellers tell young ladies they see in their crystal balls.
On June 24, 1952, much of Germany fell in love with this mysterious blonde. It wouldn’t be long before the country would know her by one name, Bild Lilli.
Appealing to a mostly male demographic, Lilli turned heads. Comfortable in her femininity, Lilli was constantly seen wearing fashionable and somewhat risque clothes in skimpy and tight-fitting cuts. While her female friends and co-workers were jealous of her figure, and more religious readers were put off by her open sexuality, it was seldom that Lilli was purposefully flaunting her looks—unless, of course, she was actively trying to get a rich man’s attention.
This is a drawback to Lilli’s character, in that she saw men as objects and never as people. She was always more interested in their money and in their looks than in anything else, and she never had the same boyfriend twice…
Lilli’s popularity grew so fast that Bild decided to merchandise their new star. With the blessing of Axel Springer, Bild contacted toy designer Max Weissbrodt at the O&M Haußer toy company.
He designed a 12-inch plastic fashion doll with multiple parts for articulation. Her head turned separately from the rest of her body. A special doll wig was glued onto a special scalp, which was then attached to the head by a screw on the inside of the doll’s head. Her legs attached at the hip, so when she sat down, her legs stayed together. She had rooted eyelashes, painted nails, a full face of makeup, styled hair, and molded-on shoes. The patent was approved straight away.
By 1953, less than a year since her comic debut, Bild Lilli dolls found themselves at tobacconists and newspaper kiosks in plastic tubes with tiny doll-sized copies of recent issues of Bild. Bild Lilli was as innovative of a doll as she was scandalous.
Lilli wasn’t only the world’s first mass-marketed plastic fashion doll; she was also the first to come in different sizes…
Another trend Bild Lilli popularized was offering the same doll but in new outfits. These fashionable, daring, and gorgeous costumes were so well designed, that it wasn’t long before they were sold separately.
While she was a hit with men, it wasn’t too long before women started enjoying the dolls too. Newspaper ads encouraged men to buy them for their wives and girlfriends. Some women would even use the dolls as inspiration for new outfits for themselves, a revived trend from the 19th century when well-off women would purchase gowns based on ones seen on dolls for store windows.
Other toy companies noticed how children also enjoyed this doll, so they began to make unofficial dollhouses, furniture, clothes, and accessories to accommodate Lilli, while O&M Haußer released Lilli in new hair colors.
Soon, Lilli was being sold in Italy, Scandinavia, and England, and shockingly, she was in fact sold in the United States as just “Lilli” or as “Lilli Marleen/Marlene” and marketed very briefly to little girls.
As the 1950s marched on, knock-off dolls and bootlegs also began to become a big problem worldwide. In Hong Kong, bootleg Lilli dolls were sold in pink boxes where Lilli was smoking a cigarette. In Spain, Lilli had a darker-skinned “friend” with dark brown and black hair that was quickly rejected by religious families. “Miss Paris” and “Miss Marlene” found their way to America and France as more and more clones wound up under Christmas trees and on the shelves of thrift stores.
But this only fueled Lilli’s momentum. In 1958, the black and white murder comedy Lilli – ein Mädchen aus der Großstadt or Lilli A Girl From The Big City debuted in German cinemas. The live-action film starring Danish actress Ann Smyrner featured Lilli in a race against time to help the police stop a pastor-turned-gangster-and-murderer who is smuggling counterfeit bills. In the film, Lilli uses her charms and seductive good looks to deal with sleazy and suspicious men at a hotel while also holding down her job at a newspaper.
In 1956, [American Jew] Ruth Handler took a vacation with her husband and children Barbara (Barbie) and Kenneth (Ken) Handler to Germany. There, she purchased a few Bild Lilli dolls for herself, admiring the cute fashions. She was already thinking about how she wanted a 3D version of the paper dolls her daughter enjoyed playing with, something that was more grown-up than the Cissy doll, a 1955 fashion doll with a teenage body but a baby doll head, and Bild Lilli had the proportions she was looking for.
Ruth worked on prototype sketches. In 1958, she got the copyright and trademark for the name “Barbie,” which was then sent to Random House to be used on tie-in books for her new project, including the mystery book Barbie’s Secret, which was written in 1958 and would be published in 1964.
Then in 1959, an 11 1/2 inch plastic fashion doll with rooted—not glued hair, painted finger and toenails, legs that stayed closed when she sat, and a head on a swivel debuted in a black and white striped one-piece.
Her name was Barbie, and she looked exactly like Bild Lilli.
Around this time, the rights to Bild Lilli’s dolls were usurped by Louis Marx and Company, while Mattel began a hostile takeover of the Bild Lilli copyrights, ousting Bild, O&M Haußer, and Reinhard Beuthien from the world they had created.
By 1961, Lilli no longer appeared in any new comics, and most of her cartoons and her film are largely suppressed…
O&M Haußer and Marx would close doors in the 1980s, while Bild continues today as a conservative tabloid in Germany.
Barbie’s legacy is one that sprouted from a Lilli.”
As the French novelist Honore de Balzac wrote, “Behind every great fortune lies a great crime.”
One of the great ironies of this story is that during the 1930s and 1940s German toy company — Elastolin — that made Bild Lilli — produced toy figures of the popular National Socialists leaders, such as Adolf Hiter, Hermann Göring, Josef Goebbels — and even Hitler Youth.
So it shouldn’t come as a surprise that after the war, Elastolin would produce Bild Lilli — a female doll who represented the ideal of youthful aryan beauty — albeit sexualized and marketed to adult males.
But leave it to the Jew, Ruth Handler — who looks like a cross between the Jews Madeleine Albright and Bela Abzug — to appropriate that sexualized doll and market it to young, impressionable American girls as “Barbie” — who came of age during the so-called “Sexual Revolution” of the 1960s.
Of course, Ruth Handler had no problem marketing this sexualized ideal of aryan beauty to young girls — as long as millions of dollars kept rolling in.
And when Jewish feminists inevitably began targeting “Barbie” in the 1960s as an unrealistic and “unattainable” (for Jews) stereotype of feminine beauty which caused young girls to develop eating disorders, Handler merely brushed off the criticism, claiming that Barbie was actually a strong, independent career woman like herself.
Other Jews have tried to rationalize the Jewish promotion of Barbie as some kind of metaphor for Jewish assimilation into White American culture — but the only Jewish aspects about Barbie is that Handler became wealthy off of it — and it contributed to the sexualizaton of young girls.
It’s also worth noting that Ruth Handler’s company — Mattel — used their trademark control to suppress the live-action Bild Lilli movie that came out in 1958 — Lilli: ein Mädchen aus der Großstadt — and still to this day, that movie is impossible to find in any format — even clips from the movie are absent on YouTube, which is highly unusual for such a popular movie.
Now, 65 years after that film came out, Jewish movie producers in Hollywood are finally getting around to making their own live-action Barbie movie — and you can bet your bottom dollar that this movie will be Jewish to its core — promoting Jewish “values” such as homosexuality, anti-White diversity, feminism, and transgenderism.
An early trailer preview of the new “Barbie” movie has been released, featuring much too old actors Margot Robbie — who is 33 — and Ryan Gosling who is 43 — together they look more like a pathetic middle-aged couple trying to hold on to their quickly fading youth.
Of course, the movie depicts Barbie’s boyfriend — Ken — played by ambiguous actor Ryan Gosling — as a campy, effeminate homosexual who looks like a cross between the dykes Ellen DeGeneres and soccer player Megan Rapinoe.
Apparently, the central Jewish theme of the new movie is that Barbie has “trouble fitting into her perfect life in Barbie Land” — just like Jews have trouble fitting into White societies because they can never live up to White ideals and values.
And rest assured, a sequel to this yet-to-be released movie is already in the works — where Ken will be replaced by Barbie’s new Black boyfriend, a rapper DJ named Jamal — who helps her discover that she’s really a Jewish lesbian “trapped” in the body of a White heterosexual girl.
Correction:
After WWII, nationalist publications ( including history books, literature, novels, poetry, art, etc. ) of any kind were removed, confiscated from all public arena by the Allies. Axel Springer Verlag to this very day is owned by Jews. The Bild Zeitung ( one among many trash publications ) was neither a heavily nationalist nor a conservative tabloid since the end of WWII. Bild is one of the worst tabloids filled with sensationalism, lies and make believe stories fitting in with America’s trash tabloids found stashed next to the checkout in your local supermarket. Germany’s publications, entertainment, music, arts, politicians, economy, religious institutions, medical industry, is owned or heavily laced with Jews. So is Europe!
———————————————
For her actual appearance, Lilli was dressed in lovely designs, well coiffured, elegant and stylish in feminine fashions. French dress designers were the inspiration for the latest outfits. Adults who earned enough money ( Germany was slowly being rebuild ) were able to purchase the doll as a gift. In later years the doll was available for girls. A Family with enough income was able to buy one doll as a gift for under the Christmas tree, to be shared between sisters. Many families in the 50s and 60s still struggled to make ends meet.
—————————————————————-
Anorexia and bulimia was not inspired by Lilli or the later stolen copy of Barbie. The British petite model ‘Twiggy’, which was peddled as the ‘New Look’ (aka adult pre-puperty girl) in fashion magazines all over Europe had a devastating and profound impact among teenagers and adult women. The British invasion via ‘The Beatles’ was another of such caliber, unleashed to get into the minds of the young and gullible.
————————————————–
Amusing review of Barbie movie….”misandrist dogsh*t”…..
https://files.catbox.moe/9p0s5a.mp4
“I want ‘Barbie’ movie to feel like ‘Shabbat dinner” says Jewish director Greta Gerwig…
The director has said she was inspired by her Jewish childhood friends:
https://www.thejc.com/life-and-culture/all/i-want-barbie-movie-to-feel-like-shabbat-dinner-says-director-greta-gerwig-6OBMmwWsSSr2jpAXFc0VnM
Jewish Women for Black men Facebook page:
https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100069247335377
HITLER 2024!
They cannot create They can only steal, desacrate and destroy.
I’m pretty much sure that is a sign of not being an imager.
Israel has become a tiny super power of a nation through farming, construction, and energy innovation while surviving the onslaught of attacks from enemies stupid enough to think they can destroy a fierce and unapologetic nation of survivors.
Btw, how are things in your mothers basement?
Lol. Megalomaniac kike. Your illegitimate bandit state of misnomed Yidsrael could not survive without constant and endless American money, stolen from the American tax-payers and without the American Army fighting your wars. Yidsraelie ‘Army’ cowards in diapers, only brave enough to slaughter old women, babies, cripples or little kids that play soccer at a beach. You could not even win against Hezbollah in Lebanon, they kicked your kosher asses really good. Your rat-faced, moronic and ugly soldiers came back in body bags and the survivors were not ‘fierce’ at all- they were crying and whimpering like the neurotic cowards they are. Farming? When have kikes ever done manual work? They use mostly slave labor or gullible idiot gentiles as workforce, also in construction and housekeeping, since jewesses are such dirty sluts. They hate honest work, they are leeches. Yidsrael- a nation of swindlers, thieves, squatters and paranoid schizophrenics with delusions of grandeur.
You were stupid enough to make your American host sick unto death and soon there will be no longer a USA to protect you and fight your enemies. This proves that you jews are even incompetent parasites, because only the dumbest parasite will kill its host. And there is no replacing the American host either, yid. The Chinese won’t play your games, you cannot guilt-trip them into compliance and they are not hampered by concepts of christian charity and holofraud narrative.
Laura Loomer is a good example of one of these jewess mongrels who try to attain White Adamic beauty through many plastic surgeries. They are like Ruth Handler, but they cut themselves (jews like to cut and suck) instead of just making toy models .
Now , Laura Loomer looks like a pathetic crypt keeper along the lines of Michael Jackson as the failed attempts to make her look White European backfire and create a memorial to jewish abomination and unnatural satanic ugliness.
In addition to the Jewish acts of thievery, plagiarism, subversion & perversion, Ruth Handler [Handler – (German) One who bought and sold goods, a dealer or trader…. What a typical name for a Jew to camouflauge themselves with, maybe family fortune came from “handling” the slave ships?] commits an act of Jewish incestuousness by naming Barbie & Ken, a girlfriend & boyfriend, after her daughter & son.
Schrodinger’s Jew – incest among Jews is both a nonexistent antisemitic stereotype; and the scientific reason the Jewish community has so many genetic disorders, because incest kept the money in the family (eg. Rothschilds).
Jews don’t destroy nations, it’s just that nations end up dying after coincidentally being infected by Jews.
Jews – Repent & Atone, Christ is the Way.
We’re told that jews are so successful, 90% of the top 1% in the USA, because they’re so much smarter than the goyim.
Yet despite their supposed smarts these yids couldn’t even design a doll for kids?
I’m a bit thrown by that as jews control the fashion industry and can, as Richard Nixon lamented, make women pay for clothes/accessories that uglify and debase them, and the yids somehow made (((Marilyn Monroe))) into a sex symbol, but yet they couldn’t make their own jewish doll that appealed to young girls?
I saw that the Jews refer to the king of the toy makers, the Jew Louis Marx, as “the Henry Ford of toys”….
Comparing a guy who makes cheap, simple toys to one of the titans of industry who revolutionized mass production….
That’s what we call Jewish chutzpah.
Louis Marx, what a schlep.
The (((Allies))) stole over 400,000 German patents as plunder after WWII ended.
Jews do as their father does. Lie, Steal, Kill, and not in any order! It’s all they can do. They are not Israel, and are not Adamic. they are Khazars. Sons of Belial.
The Lord Jesus said that they would do the lusts of their father, and that’s what they do, all the time!
I hope that all of you are aware that Yahweh, the God of This world, is NOT the Father of the Lord Jesus Christ.
Remember when The Lord Jesus asked which one of you, if your son was hungry and asked you for a fish, or an egg would give him a serpent?
Yahweh would do just that! Remember when the people were hungry and asked for food Yahweh sent serpents among them, and killed thousands, unti Moses made a brass serpent on a pole to save those who were bitten.
And just another example of this Gods ‘love’ for the people.
Yahweh killed 70,000 just because David made a census of the people, all in one day. His own people he supposedly loved! With a God like that you don’t need any help being killed by your enemies.
Biggy Rat, So you reject the Old Testament yet-somehow-accept the New Testament as only Scriptural truth? That makes no sense you cant have it both ways.
Nothing new or even contradictory that followers of Christ reject the Judaic Old Testament or parts of it. Marcion, the Valentinians, are a few historical references.
Atreides: Tell us what parts of the Old Testament did Jesus Christ or his apostles “reject”? The Old Testament is not some sort of smorgasbord that you can pick or choose.
They only thing that Christ rejected was certain vain practices, such as animal sacrifice, circumcision, and other rituals that were impossible to keep.
What you are describing are Antinomian Christians, those who choose what they do and do not accept from the Gospels and Old Testament. They are heretics.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antinomianism#Biblical_law_in_Christianity
The old testament is the word,law the new testament is the power. Corinthians 4:20 the kingdom of God is not the word but the power
Kevin: Well, *orthodox * Church Fathers
” picked and choosed” what they deemed canonical scripture from the onset:
the Ur -Muratorian Canon(170AD) omitted Hebrews, James, 1&2 Peter then the Laodicean Canon in 363 AD added on the above but tossed Revelations and added one of the Apocrypha texts…
Early Church Father’s from Clement to Ireanaeus were never in accord the number that of NT books that were sanctioned to be read out in the various churches.
Though none above rejected the Old Testament , my point is that its very evident the orthodox did see what became as the New Testament as a a la carte cafeteria, as stated.
Atreides …..
It appears you completely shifted gears. Your original argument was —
“… followers of Christ reject the Judaic Old Testament or parts of it….”
Which then Kevin challenged you and asked “whom” of the NT characters — Jesus, Paul, Mark, Luke, John, Peter, James, Jude etc., — can confirm that which you state.
Your Next reply is to then change gears and change the subject —
“….Though none above rejected the Old Testament , my point is that its very evident the orthodox did see what became as the New Testament as a a la carte cafeteria, as stated…..”
Now you are casting suspicions on the reliability of what we consider the NT Canon.
What gives? Are you a White Christian who Identifies himself as a descendant from the 12 Tribes of Israel, as most of us here at CFT do?
Or something else?
WHO are you? What is your story. Are you an x-Christian, now somewhere in the middle?
I’m very confused. Are you “One of Us” ………… or something else.
West, what Atreides is doing is called “moving the goal posts”….a argumentative tactic when they are proven wrong, they quickly change the subject and claim what they really meant was….[fill in the blank]…..
Such nonsensical ranting gives me a headache. Get some help biggyrat.