A new law proposed to the Israeli Knesset would create an official memorial day for the victims of the Inquisition — who fled Spain and Portugal for the New World where they were instrumental in creating the Mestizo “race”:
Created by the Catholic Church in the Middle Ages to root out heresy, the Inquisition brutally persecuted Spanish Jews who had been forcibly converted to Christianity but continued to practice Judaism in secret, becoming known in Hebrew as Anusim (forced ones).
The law was proposed by Member of Knesset Michal Cotler-Wunsh and would create a Day to Commemorate the Victims of the Inquisition, which would be held on November 1, the date the Spanish Inquisition was formally established in 1478. Co-signatories to the bill include Knesset members from most of Israel’s major parties, including the governing Likud party.
The day will be marked with educational activities that will teach the history of the Spanish crypto-Jews, as well as the mass expulsion of Jews from Spain and Portugal. Knesset discussions of the issue will also be held.
In addition, the Minister of Diaspora Affairs will host an official state ceremony to mark the occasion.
Cotler-Wunsh said of the proposed law, “This bill will create a day of memory and reminder in the Knesset for us to recognize this tragic event in our collective history and learn from it, in order to ensure ‘never again’ in a world of ‘again and again.’”
“It also provides us with an opportunity to connect with the descendants of those affected by the Spanish Inquisition, in Israel and in the diaspora, based on our shared history and values,” she added.
David Hatchwell, President of the Fundación Hispanojudía (Hispanic-Jewish Foundation), which promotes ties between Jews and the Hispanic world, said, “The Spanish-speaking world, whether in Spain or in Latin America, is gaining a greater understanding of its common roots, culture, and traditions with the Jewish people.”
“The Inquisition was a dark chapter for humanity and in both of our peoples’ history,” he added. “It should be remembered as pure religious fanaticism and intolerance.”
“Nevertheless, we should also use these historic events to chart a more positive future between the Spanish-speaking world and the Jewish people based on respecting diversity emulating the modern State of Israel,” he said.
Ashley Perry, who leads the organization Reconectar and helped author the bill, commented, “There are tens, if not hundreds, of millions of people around the world who have both Jewish and Hispanic ancestry, and the Inquisition played a major role in the disconnection of our peoples.”
“This law is a vital recognition of a reign of terror which still has such a great effect on so many people even today, many without knowing,” he said. “This Day of Commemoration will hopefully not just be for Israelis, or even just for Jews, but for all those whose ancestors were hunted, tortured or prosecuted by the Inquisition.”
Jewry has been making a concerted effort to draw Hispanics into the Jewish fold — convincing a hundred million Latinos that they are sympathetic crypto-Jews would greatly benefit both Leftist and Zionist Jews.
When the Jews were expelled from Spain and Portugal, the vast majority of them migrated to the New World — many remained conversos or cryptos, and many have mistaken them for ethnic White Spanish.
And it was these cryto-Jews who created the Mestizo populations in Central and South America — by inter-breeding with the local native Indian populations — the Spanish conquistadors brought very few of their own women to the New World.
One survey claimed that 25% of Latinos had some Jewish ancestry, but the actual numbers are most likely far higher.
Another study showed that over 4,000 Spanish surnames were common among those with some Jewish ancestry.
This goes far to explain why Jews in America have been actively involved in helping Latinos apply for citizenship in Spain.
It also sheds new light on why the Jewish supremacist organization, the Anti-Defamation League, has been working with the Mexican government to aid and abet the flooding of the southern U.S. border with Mestizos from all over Latin America.
Of course, Jews are quick to point out that these Latinos are not hallachically Jewish — by rules of inheritance set down by the rabbinical courts — but they are certainly genetic Jews — as are the majority of Jews today because of the 50% out-marriage rates among Jews.
A famous example of one of these crypto-Latinos is the former C.I.A. chief, James Jesus Angleton, whose mother was Mexican — Angelton was instrumental in helping cover up the Israeli role in the assassination of JFK — for which the Israelis rewarded him with two memorials – outside Jerusalem and near the King David Hotel.
the holiday is a con. sephardic jews are 2nd class citizens / servant class in israel. that is ashkenazi jews’ real opinion of them.
John Kerry’s brother has responded to charges of anti-Semitism against the U.S. Secretary of State by some conservative Israelis — including a prominent minister — by writing publicly about the family’s Jewish roots.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/kerrys-brother-johns-not-anti-semitic-were-jewish-n30576
Are you suggesting that John Kerry is a Hispanic crypto-Jew? How is this related to the above article?
Lyndon B. Johnson was a jew of Mexican descent
The US has already had a jewish President who was of Mexican descent, and he was very much despised by nearly everyone. There were many and varied good reasons for people then to have felt, and for Americans to still feel that way about him and about the jews who assisted him and hid his background.
Most people are not aware that he was a jew – because he was a Crypto-jew from Texas, whose jewishness was covered up by top levels of Jewry, and by the lower level jews, too. His uncouth, loutish and abusive behavior was typically jewish, but was unfairly blamed on his Texas upbringing.
“According to Jewish law, if a person’s mother is Jewish, then that person is automatically Jewish, regardless of the father’s ethnicity or religion. The facts indicate that both of Lyndon Johnson’s great‑grandparents, on the maternal side, were Jewish.
“The line of Jewish mothers can be traced back three generations in Lyndon Johnson’s family tree.”
https://christiansfortruth.com/remembering-the-uss-liberty-attack-june-8-1967/?unapproved=36615&moderation-hash=829ff361fa4a688cae9a9c3b6bd4e617#comment-36615
Sounds like the beginning of another holoHOAX type of extortion racket.
I’d not go so far to say that the Edomites, Canaanites and kindred peoples are LITERALLY the descendants of Cain or of the Devil himself.
However, if we’re at it, then Adam was not the literal descendant of God, either.
He was only created in His image.
Now, fornication and/or race mixing, being a *sin* – which means any action abhorrent to God and inspired by the Devil – results in an offspring who’s in Devil’s image, not God’s.
In other words, it gives birth to a tree not planted by the Father but by the Devil.
And hence, members of that tree can indeed be called the ((( children of the Devil))).
Yes, “But he answered and said, Every plant, which my heavenly Father hath not planted, shall be rooted up. ” (Matt 15:13)
Mamzers, Mestizos, children of fornication, thus beasts, will be rooted up. Even the Edomite Jews understood this when the pleaded that they were not the product of fornication–race mixing (John 8:41).
In Jesus name you are told
Soon such as the pope, Kissinger, Kerry will announce to the world that JFK is physically alive on earth and in miraculously good health.
Look among the nations, and watch — wonder and be amazed! For I am doing a work in your days that you would not believe, though it were told you. Habakkuk 1:5
“……. when the enemy shall come in like a flood, the Spirit of the LORD shall lift up a standard against him. Isaiah 59:19
As per Revelation 19, Jesus returns on the LAST DAY of the reign of the BEAST.
BEAST shows up YEARS before Jesus returns.
JFK will reappear and is the BEAST
https://i.imgur.com/LT3lSi2.png
http://www.mosquitonet.com/~prewett/
Clearly, the great whore of Revelation is the Catholic Church–even the Catholics figured this out, which is why they created such lunacy as preterism to try to obscure the obvious fact.
But then you go off the rails. You use the Inquisition as an example of the persecution of the saints. This cannot be true for the simple reason that the Inquisition involved crypto-jews like Torquemada persecuting other crypto-Jews pretending to be Christians. No Jew, converso or not, can be considered a “saint”. The saints according to the NT are Israelites, and Jews are NOT Israelites.
The Beast of Revelation is clearly international Jewry and its monetary system of slavery and debt. More likely the wound that the Beast received was the fake Holocaust where we are told 6 million died, but somehow they “miraculously” recovered and now rule the world within 80 short years. And the suffering of Christ on the cross has been replaced by the suffering of the Jews in their fake Holocaust. We now worship the Jews, the Beast.
Don’t engage in Gematria–a Jewish-Babylonian occult practice where you assign numbers to names like Kissinger. You will never find the truth there. No, JFK is not coming back for a fake return. No one would believe it. The anti-Christ is not a single person. As John said, there were MANY anti-Christs even in his day. The anti-Christ is a collective entity. The anti-Christ is Jewry.
Seems we share some views, Polk, so I thought I’d join in. Give your thoughts if it seems good to you to do so. I suggest two things regarding the Catholic church:
1. They are not the whore of Babylon, though they may be a part of it. The prophetic precedent of “whoredom” is Israel, and there is even explicit mention of the Revelation 17 whore in Jeremiah 4:30 (Revelation 17:4,16). Though she is likened to Babylon (Jeremiah 51:7) and to Tyre (compare Revelation 18 to Ezekiel 27 and 28). It is a system after all, which Israel is a part of.
2. The Catholics did persecute many true Christians (possibly Israelites), like the Waldenses for example. Maybe you agree here and are referring to a specific inquisition.
As for the beast being jewry, I believe this to be true. Or I believe jewry to be one head of the beast (see Daniel 7 and compare with Revelation 13). Also compare the humbling of three horns with the Six Day War (Daniel 7:24) where it even says on the Wikipedia “Six-Day War” article, “Its victory humiliated Egypt, Jordan and Syria…” I’m not set on this one, but it sure is an amazing coincidence. One would then have to identify the other seven horns. This all could indicate that beast with ten horns is the Muslims and their invasions, which we know jewry has ties with and enjoyed special privileges under. Also any resistance to jewry results in death and persecution (WW2 Germany), while resistance to the beast/animal generally results in international trade sanctions (Apartheid South Africa).
As for “anti-Christ”, WestWins (who comments here) sent me some reading material on 1 John which I found very interesting, connecting the whole book to a refutation of gnostic theology. I suspect that given the whole of 1 John refers to an anti-Christ system, then the gnostic originated belief that knowledge of Christ brings righteousness in itself (typical judeo-Christian salvation theology, or “OSAS” as WestWins calls it), is the anti-Christ (or replacement Christ) system. John refutes this saying one must do righteousness in order to be righteous (1 John 3).
Yes, Johan, I agree with you that the “woman” in Revelation described as “the whore” can indeed be the Israelite people. We need look no further than Hosea to confirm this–God has Hosea intentionally marry a whore so that he can understand what it’s like for God to be married to Israel.
But keep in mind that the Catholic Church usurped the identity of Israel and the bride of Christ. That clearly makes the Catholic Church a whore in a sense — the whore disguised as the bride — while encouraging true Israel to commit whoredoms on its behalf.
The Revelation 17 beast is not the same beast as Revelation 13. Rather, it is a system.
Revelation 17:8, “The beast that you saw was, and is not, and is about to come up out of the abyss and go to destruction”. This is easily identified in Revelation 20:3, “and he threw him into the abyss and shut it and sealed it over him”, then Revelation 20:10, “And the devil who deceived them was thrown into the lake of fire and brimstone”.
Also Gog and Magog is fought in Revelation 20:8, but they have been fought already in Revelation 19:18 (compare with Ezekiel 39:17-18, which is prophecy over Gog and Magog).
The pit to where the beast descends, as is the common New Testament theme, is a place reserved for angels only (2 Peter 2:4, Luke 8:31). Therefore this beast entity must be an angel.
Connecting the dots, the eighth head, which is a part of the seven, is Satan himself. Not only that, but it is the sixth head of Satan, the former five of which had already fallen. The sixth head is Magog, or the arch-angel charged with Magog, as it says in Deuteronomy 32:8 (taken from LXX, as the Masoretic reading doesn’t make sense), “When the Most High divided the nations, when he separated the sons of Adam, he set the bounds of the nations according to the number of the angels of God”. This is repeated in the heavenly dramas of Daniel 8-12, where the prince of Persia (third head – Daniel 10:13) and the prince of Greece (fourth head – Daniel 10:20) rebel. We know these princes are archangels, because it says in Daniel 10:13, “Michael, one of the chief princes”. Then Daniel 10:21, “Michael your prince.” Then Daniel 12:1, “Michael, the great prince… of your people”. Michael is the prince of Israel, or its arch-angel (Jude 9).
Interestingly, the Huns came from the region of Magog (Western side of the Eurasian Steppe), which sought to destroy Christianity, but disappeared because their nomadic nature made their defeat final (Revelation 12:15-16). The Khazars also come from that region. Imagine that.
Ultimately then, Scripture interpreting Scripture, at the very least, this beast cannot be JFK.
David Hatchwell is a friend of Sheldon Adelson. Both colaborated when Adelson tried to build a Las Vegas in Madrid, Spain. Luckily, Adelson had to cancel the project.
“Another study showed that over 4,000 Spanish surnames were common among those with some Jewish ancestry.”
Jews change their names just to pass as Caucasians/Europeans. Who can guarantee me they haven’t been doing it for centuries?
And from somewhere deep within the bowels of Hell we hear the sound of Emanuel Celler rubbing his hooves together as he says, “Excellent.”
Again Clifton Emahiser was 100% correct.
https://emahiser.christogenea.org/mexicans-traced-cain-son-satan
Genesis 10:15-18 clearly states who the descendants of Canaan were, but Emahiser claims, “At Genesis 15:19-21 are listed ten Canaanite nations”. Therefore, Emahiser has contradicted the Scripture.
He says that in the Genesis 15:19-21 nations are the Kenites (Genesis 15:19), who are supposedly descendants of Cain. Are they descendants of Canaan (as in the second to last paragraph), or are they descendants of Cain (as in the second paragraph from the top)? Emahiser has contradicted himself.
Then he contradicts himself again saying, “every Canaanite nation had absorbed the Kenites”. This also contradicts the Scripture, because the Kenites are alive and well as a separate people later in Judges and 1 Samuel. Not only are they alive and well, but Saul says to them in 1 Samuel 15:6, “Go, get away, go down from among the Amalekites, so that I do not destroy you along with them; for you showed kindness to all the sons of Israel when they went up from Egypt.” This connects the latter Kenites with the early ones explicitly, proving they were on good terms with Israel (also Judges 1:16) and that they had not been absorbed into the Canaanites.
How does Emahiser separate the “good Kenites” from the “bad Kenites”? An honest review of the topic would require some concrete explanation, but the truth is, the only way to separate them is by wishful thinking. He might talk about one being Cain’s descendants and the other being smiths of some kind, but there was in fact a city called “Cain/Kain”, which was in Canaan, in Joshua 15:57.
These are the kind of errors and problems which give the anti-mongrelization message of the Scripture a bad name. The mestizos are mixed man/beast hybrids, but this dual-seedline theology has far too many holes in it.
Chris, Emahiser had many useful insights, but he wasn’t infallible, and his insistence on dual seedline at all costs shows this. Dual seedline is NOT necessary to understand the world today, and one of its downsides is that it reduces everything to race.
There are some out there who falsely teach that the Bible is all about race, and they interpret the entire Bible verse by verse as a confirmation of race, but that is false and misleading. At one time I too was also persuaded by it until I scrutinized it and found it wanting. More than race, the Bible is about sin and redemption for the Adamic race. As Johan says, there are Men and there are beasts. Nothing more needs to be said.
Sheldon Emry does a good job explaining that the idea that Eve was literally seduced by Satan or the Serpent and created Cain comes out of Babylon, and all occult religions that believe in this seduction can be traced back to that same source. Israel identity is true, but Dual Seedline doctrine is Babylonian. This may come as a shock to you, but take the time to consider that you’ve been misled. Find Sheldon Emry’s four part series on Eve here:
https://sheldonemrylibrary.famguardian.org/CassetteTapedMessages/1977/emry1977.htm
“So with this background, we shall continue with Weisman:
Some Bible authorities say the Kenites were one of the ten tribes of Canaan at the time of Abraham. Others point out that the Kenites of the time of Moses were Midianites, being descended from a man of Midian named Cain, and have nothing in common with the Kenites who dwelt in Canaan. [Citing John D. Davis, A Dictionary of the Bible]
Here Weisman purposely confuses the issue. We know of no one who claims that “the Kenites of the time of Moses were Midianites”, and the Bible only speaks of one Midianite, Heber, whom it says was a Kenite, or smith. So his argument here is ridiculous. Furthermore, there is no claim of Heber being descended “from a man of Midian named Cain”, yet it is clear that Heber was a kenite, or smith, by trade and that has nothing to do with his race. Weisman will try anything in order to deny a connection between the Kenites and Cain. But where he says “the Kenites of the time of Moses were Midianites” he makes absolutely no sense. Weisman cited a Bible dictionary here, where he said “the Kenites were one of the ten tribes of Canaan”, but that is unnecessary because that is clearly what the Bible says, in Genesis chapter 15. But his other statements are not cited, and they are straw man arguments because we know of no one who says those things.
There is no Scripture associating any Kenites with Israel at the time of Moses. In his own books, Moses lived during the period of Exodus, Numbers, Leviticus and Deuteronomy. In those books, the only time that Kenites are mentioned, under the singular form of the name, as Cain in Hebrew, is in the words of Balaam, the wayward prophet of Numbers chapter 24 who was attempting to prophesy against Israel and said “ 19 Out of Jacob shall come he that shall have dominion, and shall destroy him that remaineth of the city. 20 And when he looked on Amalek, he took up his parable, and said, Amalek was the first of the nations; but his latter end shall be that he perish for ever. 21 And he looked on the Kenites, and took up his parable, and said, Strong is thy dwellingplace, and thou puttest thy nest in a rock. 22 Nevertheless the Kenite shall be wasted, until Asshur shall carry thee away captive.”
Here we have four names, and each of them represents a tribe of people. In each case we see the mention of a singular individual where each term is actually being used to describe the descendants of each individual, except that the name Cain was translated into Kenites in the King James Version. If three of the groups are tribes of people descended from a patriarch, as in the cases of Israel, Amalek and Asshur in reference to Israelites, Amalekites and Assyrians, then the term Cain does indeed reference the Kenites, the descendants of Cain, as it is translated here in the King James Version.
The last two verses are enigmatic, and it is not necessary to take the words “thou puttest thy nest in a rock” literally, as it may refer to a strong kingdom and not a geographic feature. But once it is realized that Israel is still the primary subject, the reference to captivity is a prophecy of the then-future Assyrian captivity of Israel, and Balaam is saying that the Kenite shall be wasted, consumed or diminished, until that time when Israel is taken into captivity. Therefore here in the writings of Moses, in the words of Balaam, we also have a prophecy of the Assyrian captivity.
After this passage, the term Kenite does not appear again until the Book of Judges, where it is descriptive of Heber the Kenite, the smith who was friendly to Israel at the time of Deborah and Barak, and as we have shown, he was a Midianite by race. After that, the word does not appear again for another 400 years, where it once again describes a tribe living in the days of Saul. Weisman clearly lied, as he has no basis upon which to establish his claim that Kenites were friendly to Israel in the days of Saul.
Next Weisman claims that these Kenites came from a particular city, a city which very probably had never existed, and we will pick that up as we complete our criticism of this chapter of Weisman’s book in our next presentation.”
https://christogenea.org/podcasts/addressing-charles-weisman%E2%80%99s-what-about-seedline-doctrine-part-18-children-cain
Almost identical argument.
No one’s making the assumption Clifton was infallible. It’s ludicrous to suggest. Emry , Swift and Comparet were certainly less fallible.
Dual Seedline doctrine is Babylonian when you listen to Joseph November”Eli James”, Dan Kersey’s and marranos like Charles Weisman trying to sneak in their bastard grandchildren. They are the one’s misleading people.
— “Weisman cited a Bible dictionary here, where he said “the Kenites were one of the ten tribes of Canaan”, but that is unnecessary because that is clearly what the Bible says, in Genesis chapter 15” —
Where does Genesis 15 say that Kenites are one of the tribes of Canaan? “To your descendants I have given this land, From the river of Egypt as far as the great river, the river Euphrates: the land of the Kenite, the Kenizzite, the Kadmonite, the Hittite, the Perizzite, the Rephaim, the Amorite, the Canaanite, the Girgashite, and the Jebusite.” This is a simple matter of reading comprehension. It is the LAND of those peoples, not the tribes by physical descent of Canaan, which is explicitly given in Genesis 10:15-16. How could the Kenites be of the tribe of Canaan even by Finck’s own view? Are they descendants of Cain or Canaan? The view contradicts itself.
— “There is no Scripture associating any Kenites with Israel at the time of Moses.” —
1 Samuel 15:6 says, “Go, get away, go down from among the Amalekites, so that I do not destroy you along with them; for you showed kindness to all the sons of Israel WHEN THEY WENT UP FROM EGYPT.”
Genesis 15:8 explicitly says, “From the river of Egypt as far as the great river, the river Euphrates”. That is a really big area and is an East to West designation, making no mention of North to South geographically. It could only possibly include the land of the Kenites, of whom it says in Judges 1:16, “Now the descendants of the Kenite, Moses’ father-in-law, went up from the city of palms with the sons of Judah”. Where was the city of palms? It was in the land of Canaan! (Judges 3:13, Deuteronomy 34:3) The Kenites were people who lived in the land of Canaan, who were friendly with Israel.
— “After that, the word does not appear again for another 400 years, where it once again describes a tribe living in the days of Saul. Weisman clearly lied, as he has no basis upon which to establish his claim that Kenites were friendly to Israel in the days of Saul.” —
Again, 1 Samuel 15:6 says, “Go, get away, go down from among the Amalekites, so that I do not destroy you along with them; for you showed kindness to all the sons of Israel WHEN THEY WENT UP FROM EGYPT.” Bill flippantly disassociates the former and latter Kenites with an arbitrary “400 years”, but the writer literally connects the two in Saul’s own words, and I have already shown that those friendly Kenites were a people in the land of Canaan.
— “Dual Seedline doctrine is Babylonian when you listen to Joseph November”Eli James”, Dan Kersey’s and marranos like Charles Weisman trying to sneak in their bastard grandchildren. They are the one’s misleading people.” —
This is nothing more than Finck’s own petty wars and has nothing to do with anything. It’s typical of him to go on emotionally incontinent rants against others, showing none of the fruits of the Spirit, as if this legitimizes his claims as opposed to detracting from them.
+10!
Self reproach— when one thinks the nice jewisch people have a limit. Their usual gloating over another enemy’s misfortune has sublimed into celebration of a new victim’s destruction. Mexicans (mongrel) have invaded America since Eisenhower with not the slightest objection of Government of a border state nor central authority. The American people can be neutralized with “education”. No borders in UN.
The explanation with this CFT news is plausible. Though multitudes of “minorities” are used despite their consanguinity with the chosen race. And Angleton appears far more sinister than the “objective” biography of him. Like his patron saints he is at the right place at the right time and always declares his innocence. But he appears compelled by a spirit that is neither cultivated nor redeemable.
It was related by a Skype friend in Russia that Meztizo are proliferating in Moscow. Poor people, who are carried with the wind to far corners of the earth. Hat, disease and grievances with a dialect, the Castilian Queen herself would deplore and ironically have no place for them.
The more people take in trust in learning about jews the better, and latins don’t know much about jews like that’s who runs their media . Costa rica has an area that claims to be apx 3000 jews from the past and are still there but there are a lot of jews buying properties, and the politics are being pushed left, and one jew tried to run for president named fishman about 10 years ago, I remember from traveling there many times.
Spanish people need to be warned and helped to know of the jews’ true history and how bad they are to all other peoples. And would the jews that came from Spain be bred out by now–how many generations does it take? To be a citizen of is re hell you have to have 25 percent jew DNA, and they say 10 generations to be a pure jew.
I think uniting the peoples of the world to know the common enemy would be more useful than if others are not white or good enough for some folks . The white folks have to look at how to over come the jews that seem to have us divided. Like me, i look at white dems as God-less devil worshipers, baby killers, and infected of jews disease .
I think we white people need to clean up our own people, same as other people need too . Sorry but too much tough thinking about any other people is a waste of time if we can’t get past the jew problem. It looks like we need some help ?
Jews use Latinos as weapons to destroy White nations. Whites need to understand this, and so do Latinos, but that problem is most Latinos are selfish–they don’t care if they destroy White nations by migrating into them–for them, living in a White nation is like going to heaven compared to where they come from.
In that sense, Latinos are parasites, just like Jews. Instead of staying home and trying to make their own countries better — which they obviously are not capable of — they come here and live off of us. And Jews are the middlemen making it easy for them.
That said, you’re right–Whites have a lot of problems of our own that we need to address, especially getting right with God, and as long as we turn away from God, the Jews and their Third World armies with continue to flood our nations…..
Is there any problem or bad will that the talmud says is not ok to do to all other peoples . And what problems do we have that they dont have A hand in . They even founded the American Nazi organization headed by a jew and nobody knew . No other people matter .
That explains why some Latin American countries have moved their embassies to Jerusalem, and why there are so many evangelical zionists in those countries.
Sephardic jews are a secret weapon of internationally jewry because they present as the vague and useless term “Hispanic”, while also having the cover of a Catholic family history (due to ancestral conversion). Most of these in positions of power know they are actually jews as it’s a secret that gets passed down in their families, and thus they have fealty to the international jew crime syndicate.
Some of these include Senator Marco Rubio, Justice Sotomayor, former U.S Attorney Alex Acosta (who let off Jeffrey Epstein). Virtually all of the high-profile mestizo agitators (protest leaders, journalists) in the United States are too…being true to their jew genetic roots as revolutionaries and rabble-rousers, while claiming to be “Mexican” or “Hispanic”. True mestizos are rarely competent enough (or naturally hostile enough) to perform competently in such roles.
Interesting. This answers some “questions”.