On a recent morning talk show, Avri Gilad, a high-profile Israeli television personality, claimed Islamists deliberately set Notre Dame cathedral ablaze and alleged that French investigators were “lying” about the cause:
Addressing the wave of bombings in Sri Lanka that killed nearly 300 people, Avri Gilad claimed on his Channel 13 morning show, “HaOlam HaBoker,” on Monday: “We see Muslim pressure on Christians around the world, [including] a wave of church fires in France.”
He was interrupted by reporter Emmanuelle Elbaz-Phelps, a dual Israeli-French citizen, who noted French investigators have found no evidence of foul play in last week’s blaze that ravaged Notre Dame.
French police believe the fire was likely started by an electrical short circuit at the site, which had been undergoing restoration.
“They’re liars,” said Gilad.
“The French. All the Europeans are liars,” he continued.”They deny cases of rape. You cannot publicize anything. Anything that can be interpreted as a hate crime is swept under the rug.”
“That is unequivocally untrue,” replied Elbaz-Phelps. “Right now there is an investigation into Notre Dame that says there is no reason to think it’s terror-related.”
“I don’t believe a single word they say,” said Gilad. “They’re scared of their own shadow and are even more afraid of Muslims.”
Conspiracy theories following the fire, which gutted the 12th century cathedral and elicited an outpouring of support from across the world, had alleged that the fire was the work of Islamists and tied to Holy Week ahead of Easter.
Gilad’s comments were widely criticized on social media, including by fellow Channel 13 journalists.
“Much respect to the awesome Emmanuelle Elbaz-Phelps who was not silent in the face of the lies and conspiracy theories spread on the morning show of Reshet TV and who put things right,” tweeted the network’s Barak Ravid.
Every attack against churches in France over the last year has been carried out by Muslims except Notre Dame, or so we are told. Of course, Notre Dame was equipped with a state-of-the-art security system which had to have either been disabled or circumvented in order for the incendiary devices to be placed and detonated, which automatically precludes the idea that this was the work of amateur disgruntled Muslims. Why wasn’t any of the video from security cameras investigated prior to making a definitive conclusion about the cause of the fire?
As Gilad says, all of it smacks of a poorly executed cover-up, but the question arises: if Muslims actually did it, why didn’t any groups claim responsibility? The jewish-controlled media surely has a motivation to convince the public that it wasn’t a Muslim hate crime, but they also have a motivation to also blame Muslims, like Gilad has done, so as to deflect any investigation that might implicate the Mossad. After all, French intelligence sources have admitted that Paris is literally a “playground” for the Mossad’s international activity. Either way, don’t expect any “smoking gun” evidence to prove who was ultimately responsible.
This cathedral had an updated security and fire alarm system. Why weren’t the two security guards alerted to this fire by the fire alarm system? I have only been able to find one article that describes what the alarm system did that evening. https://www.abc57.com/news/notre-dame-fire-started-at-the-center-of-the-cathedrals-roof-says-police-source Note that the two security guards were alerted at 6:15. They went to the area indicated and found nothing. Then no alarm went off until 6:43, in a different part of the roof. When the security guards went to investigate, the flames were already 10′ high. So did the alarm system fail, just coincidentally, at the exact time that the fire started? Too much coincidence for me. Ask any long time airline stewardess or steward. They will tell you stories about how desperate smokers have tried to circumvent fire alarms before they lit up. Notice that the news reports do not say there was evidence of a short circuit. The official report is that there was no evidence found that indicated the fire was deliberately set. You can’t find what has been destroyed and you rarely find what you don’t want to find. I think that the way this fire alarm behaved is the way that it would have behaved if someone had tried to set a fire. First, a sensor in a different part of the roof would have been intentionally triggered. This would ensure that the security guards were in a different part of the roof when the fire was being prepared elsewhere. It would also ensure that the security guards would treat the next triggers with less alacrity. After all, they would believe that the system was malfunctioning and would believe that following triggers might also be false indicators. The sensors in the part of the roof where the fire was being prepared would have been disabled, giving the fire time to gain heat. After the fire had been ignited, it would have spread to nearby areas of the roof where the sensors had not been disabled. I am not an expert in fires, but I have a lot of experience with how criminals work. They always know the layout and the system in place before they go in, and they use their knowledge to predict, and circumvent, the actions of anyone who might try to stop them. It looks like that is what might have been happening here.
Interesting facts and insight. Also, the heat required to quickly incinerate those oak beams which were as hard as iron cannot be generated by a simple electrical spark. That’s a fairy tale for four year olds.
Typical jewish deflection tactic. Feed the ‘conspiracy theorists’ with yet another rabbit hole to help ensure jews are not overwhelmingly fingered for the crime.
As the former Chief Architect of Notre Dame pointed out, 800 year old oak beams will not burn rapidly the way the the media “experts” is claiming. Here’s a short video showing how a blow torch cannot effectively burn even a 300 year old oak beam….