Jacob Bacharach, a jewish author and sodomite, has attacked and mocked presidential candidate and fellow sodomite Pete Buttigieg for not being ‘gay enough’ to be America’s first un-closeted homosexual President:
In his essay, “Why Pete Buttigieg Is Bad For Gays,” Bacharach bemoaned Buttigieg for being the avatar of what is presently considered societally acceptable from the homosexual community.
“There is a certain kind of gay guy. He is very likely white. He would say that he is in his “mid-thirties,” although he is much closer to the end than to the beginning of his last credibly young decade,” Bacharach wrote.
…Bacharach resents “Mayor Pete” as he calls him for peddling the “type of unthreatening, socially acceptable, vaguely conservative gay identity” that he feels holds the LGBT movement back.
“I have increasingly come to believe that, though perhaps not intentionally, they do so to the detriment of many other gay folk and queer folk and trans folk and folks who just do not — when you put yourself in the mind of a voter with an NPR mug and maybe even an equality sticker on the back of the Volvo — quite look the part,” Bacharach wrote.
With transgenders and gay people throughout the world undergoing so much real and imagined hardship, Bacharach is “suspicious of the neat schema of [Buttigieg’s] biographical tale.”
“The struggles of trans people, queer people of color, LGBTQ people who are rural, LGBTQ people who are poor, belie this neat onward-and-upward narrative, which is a story about a very particular kind of scrubbed, upwardly mobile, largely white, well-dressed, unutterably corny gay,” Bacharach wrote.
Jews have a well-deserved reputation for never being satisfied with anything, even when it’s something they’ve been working tirelessly for. Harry Truman, who survived an assassination attempt at the hands of disgruntled Jews who felt he wasn’t moving fast enough to recognize their new nation of Israel, once observed that it was impossible to satisfy them not matter what you did for them. So now that the jewish-dominated LGBT “movement” has their first “viable” candidate for President, they attack him for basically not being flamboyant and degenerate enough.
But this is how the Left always subverts and undermines itself. Liberalism is based solely on identity politics, and since there are an infinite variety of conflicting “identities”, none of them can ever agree on anything except the one bond that somewhat holds them together: their common hatred of White people, especially Christians, whose insistence on a moral basis of society is in itself “morally repugnant” to the Left. Perhaps if Buttigieg were HIV positive, he’d be deemed a more qualified President. Which begs the question: what qualifies someone to be a “gay” president in the first place?
It seems Mr. Buttplug has now officially entered the U.S. Presidential race. This nation will get what it deserves if it votes in this faggot. I pray enough white Christians have enough self respect and love for their God to NOT see this butt pirate into office…
Since I am not permitted to reply to your pointless raving below, I will say only this, and then not waste any more time on you: Christianity begins with Christ & the New Testament, Christ & the New Covenant, and the compassionate Heavenly Father of whom Christ teaches. Now carry on spewing out crudities, tearing your hair, and gnashing your little teeth.
Pointless ravings indeed. Repeating the same lies over and over again (Christianity begins and ends with Christ, ad nauseum) doesn’t make it the truth. Where are your references NOT from the mouth of a jew? I quoted Scripture relevant to our ‘debate’. Did you even address it? I guess Scripture must be pointless ravings unless it is being explained by a jew. Then why don’t you find out what a jew says about John 8:32-47? I addressed your regurgitation of jewish references, and addressed why they weren’t acceptable. Why get into a debate with someone when you don’t know how? If you cannot defend your position with relevant facts and references, you have no argument, your claim to truth holds no weight. Besides, if you are not even an Israelite, then 1) my point is immediately proven, and 2) this discussion is not even relevant to you and this dialogue is just a waste of time from here on out.
It comes from the Jew’s innate character, not his upbringing. “Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do.”
John 8:44 😉
They’re all sick bastards, and a very small minority of the population. Why white Christianity gives these obviously moral degenerates anything but a pile of ashes to represent their capitol cities of Sodom and Gomorrah, is completely beyond me. Throw in the obvious fact that jews are completely behind the proliferation of faggotry, it should leave every complicit ‘judeo-xtian’ with an indelible “L” on their forehead…
White ‘Christians’ voted for Obongo to prove they aren’t racist. They will vote for this Buttplug embarrassment to prove they aren’t homophobic. Only when they truly cast their votes for Christ will they prove they are not stupid!
“Judeo-Christianity” doesn’t exist, as any honest rabbi will tell you. Only the New Testament has any relevance for Christians. And every Christian should be required to read the contents page of the translation of the Talmud by Elizabeth Dilling, here: http://www.come-and-hear.com/dilling/dcontents.html
Of course ‘judeo-xtianity ‘ exists – it is the deliberate deconstruction of the total Scriptural relevance of Christianity by satan, the jew. He has proven that it has worked on you. How can any self-proclaimed Christian say the Old Testament has no relevance to them, other than to have been completely duped by the jew? The jew has absolutely no claim to the Scriptures at all, Old and New, other than being the ones consistently pointed out as the enemies of our God! Did Christ not teach out of the Old Testament??? Christ said ” I come not to destroy the Law, but to fulfill it.” And the Old Testament has no relevance to Christianity??? OUCH…
1) Wrong. Rabbi Moshe M. Maggal, President, National Jewish Information Service, wrote: “. . . you will notice the great difference between the Jewish and Christian religions. But these are not all. We consider the two religions so different that one excludes the other. . . we emphasized that there is no such thing as a Judeo-Christian religion. . . . There is not any similarity between the two concepts” (Letter of August 21, 1961).
2) Rabbi Zagoria-Moffett said, “In the United States, it’s common to hear frequent and impassioned references to the concept of ‘Judeo-Christian’ culture, ethics, or values. Any cursory review of American media will demonstrate that the concept is used on both sides of the proverbial aisle – this nebulous Judeo-Christian ideal is evoked in defense of both liberal and conservative political agendas on a routine basis. Rarely does this conflation of Judaism and Christianity seem to be questioned. More often than not it is held up as representing the belief system of America’s founders (who, in fact, were quite idiosyncratic in their religious doctrines). Despite its omnipresence in political discourse, I believe that the concept of Judeo-Christian tradition is bizarre, imprecise, and most importantly – dangerous.”
3) Israeli Professor Israel Shahak wrote in “The Jewish Hatred Towards Christianity”: “Dishonoring Christian religious symbols is an old religious duty in Judaism. Spitting on the cross, and especially on the Crucifix, and spitting when a Jew passes a church, have been obligatory from around AD 200 for pious Jews. In the past, when the danger of anti-Semitic hostility was a real one, the pious Jews were commanded by their rabbis either to spit so that the reason for doing so would be unknown, or to spit onto their chests, not actually on the cross or openly before the church.”
4) Christianity begins with Christ & the New Testament, Christ & the New Covenant, and the compassionate Heavenly Father of whom Christ teaches. He brought GOD’S NEW MESSAGE TO HUMANITY, and Christians are FOOLS to cling to the OLD MESSAGE, which is OBSOLETE. You can see the reasons for this from 7:16 – 8:06 minutes here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpS_uq5eE5Q
Your entirely laughable clinging to the voice of the jew proves alone just how wrong and hypocritical your position is. If everything you dote on concerning Christianity comes from those OBVIOUSLY antithetical to the teachings of Christ (which come from the Old Testament…imagine that), and therefor ‘adversarial’, YOU are a judeo-xtian! That’s what modern denominationalism is – Christianity as taught by the jew. Wake up! When you are resourceful enough to discuss Christianity based on your own findings rather than that of the jew, we will always be here. Until then, I suggest you start reading the Bible as well as a lot more articles AND their comments here to start getting a better grasp of the Truth of Christ vs. the lies of the jew – AKA satan ( read John 8:32-47). The word “satan” means “adversary”. Have not your own regurgitations of jewish admissions proven them to be more than adversarial to Christ, and therefor his Father, the God of the entire Bible (which again makes you look foolish for claiming the Old Testament has nothing to do with Christianity)?
Unless, of course, you yourself are a jew and this all is self explanatory…
You really hit the nail on the head by saying Jews are never satisfied with anything! Some courageous Jews have said that this comes from their harsh upbringing in a typically Jewish home, where the children have to stand before their judgmental parents once a week, to present their achievements, only to be ruthlessly criticized and belittled for not doing more to show their superiority over the goyim. Jews spend their whole lives trying to stop their mothers from saying that dreaded word “Meh!” while shrugging their shoulders in contempt at every achievement of their children, large and small. One Jewish convert to Christianity said Jewish mothers’ only motive for this is to brag about their offspring to other Jewish mothers down at the synagogue, instead of achieving anything themselves.
Jewish millionaire Richard Branson said his mother once drove him miles from their country home, forced him out of the car, and told him to find his way back. Then she drove away. He was only 4 years old, but managed to get back eventually with the help of kind strangers, though he was probably greeted with the usual “Meh!” when he got home.
Another example of Jews never being satisfied is their treatment of St. James, son of Alphaeus, first Bishop of Jerusalem, who bent over backwards all his life to please the Jews. But it was never enough. When they finally demanded that he renounce Christ, he continued to refuse, even as they dragged him up to a parapet to throw him off the top. When he didn’t die from the fall, they beat him to death on the ground with fuller’s clubs.