Jews In Luxembourg Shut Down Scheduled Public Debate On Definition Of Antisemitism

Caving to pressure from a powerful jewish interest group, a Holocaust museum in Luxembourg was forced to cancel a scheduled public debate about whether or not criticism of Israel is a form of ‘antisemitism’:

The event, titled “Is Criticism of Israel Anti-Semitism?” was scheduled to take place on Nov. 14 at Luxembourg’s National Museum of Resistance, the RTL broadcaster reported Tuesday. But the museum, which belongs to a local municipality, on Tuesday cancelled the event over concerns “of impartiality,” which the museum said were unfounded. Fränk Schroeder, the museum’s director, said he decided to cancel nonetheless to avoid “polarizing the debate.”

(((Critics))) of the event feared the event was framed to discredit the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s definition of anti-Semitism, according to RTL.

The debate was set to include the Committee for a Just Peace in the Middle East, or CPJPO, which has been vocal opponent of the definition, which it said stifled critical debate about Israel. Critics of the pro-“Palestinian” group say it is anti-Israel because it supports numerous initiatives to boycott the Jewish state.

CPJPO in a statement accused Bernard Gottlieb, a leader of Luxembourg’s Jewish community, of forcing the museum to cancel the event.

Gottlieb and CPJPO have clashed over the definition in the past.

The 2016 definition, which has been adopted by the European Union, the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom and many other countries and government bodies, lists some forms of vitriol against Israel, including its comparison to Nazi Germany, as examples of anti-Semitism.

Who knew that idyllic Luxembourg of all places was becoming another ‘hotbed’ of antisemitism?

Jews have made it clear that only they are in the position to know what ‘antisemtism’ is, and the goyim should just ‘trust’ them that they know what they are talking about.  They simply know a “Jew hater” when they see one.

Of course, the more vague, nebulous, and amorphous the ‘definition’ is the better it suits jewish power.  Just like they don’t want to commit to any particular definition of what a “Jew” is, it only follows that without knowing what a Jew exactly is, you’ll never know what antisemitism exactly is or isn’t, until you’re accused of it.

Their end game is to make disliking Jews for any reason illegal, and they especially want to make it illegal for disliking Jews for making it illegal for disliking Jews.  And, no, there will be no debate about the legality of such laws, because only an ‘antisemite’ would want to retain their legal right to criticize Jews.