(Times of Israel) More than 200 hundred entertainment leaders and stars — many of whom are Jewish — have put enormous pressure on Amazon and Barnes & Noble to stop selling a film whose content portrays Jews in a way that threatens their grip of control over many aspects of society:
“Hebrews to Negroes,” a book and film, has recently seen a surge of purchases after it was promoted on social media by NBA star Kyrie Irving, boosting it to bestseller lists on Amazon and drawing pressure from Jewish groups to remove the titles.
In an open letter to Jeff Bezos, James Daunt, and other leaders at Amazon and Barnes & Noble, the signatories noted that despite “private messages and public calls to take the fallacious book and movie” off their sites, “you have so far refused to act.”
“Your companies are profiting from hate,” accused the letter published by the nonprofit entertainment industry organization Creative Community For Peace.
It warned that the titles were “causing tremendous harm to the Jewish community while spreading dangerous misinformation to an impressionable public that may be susceptible to its propaganda.”
“These works promote numerous antisemitic tropes and conspiracy theories that have no basis in fact, including manufactured Hitler quotes, false claims of Jewish power and control, that the Jewish people fabricated the Holocaust, and that the Jewish people are fake Jews,” it said.
“The claims made in these works have led to the persecution and murder of millions of Jews throughout the centuries.”
Noting that in the US “there are more per capita hate crimes against Jews than any other minority, overwhelmingly more religious-based hate crimes against the Jewish people than any other religion,” it declared it was “unacceptable to allow this type of hate to foment on your platforms.”
As of Thursday, the titles no longer appeared to be available on the Barnes & Noble website.
In a statement, Creative Community For Peace said those who signed the letter “are among the first in the entertainment industry to publicly and collectively call for the removal of the film, hoping to eliminate future radicalization and indoctrination.”
…Ari Ingel, director of Creative Community for Peace, said in the statement that the companies can “either continue to profit off of hatred and antisemitism, while turning a blind eye to the fears of the Jewish community, or they can choose to be an ally, and stand on the right side of history.”
“Corporations don’t need to help facilitate the spread of dangerous conspiracy theories that threaten the Jewish community,” he said. “We implore them to take the prudent, responsible steps needed to remove this content.”
Pressure has been mounting on Amazon to stop selling “Hebrews to Negroes,” which focuses on the idea that the true descendants of the ancient Israelites are modern-day African Americans and that today’s Jews fraudulently claim that ancestry. It also contains a series of other antisemitic claims, including Holocaust denial and the false allegation that Jews controlled the American slave trade.
On Monday, the American Jewish Committee asked Amazon to address the issue by removing the book and film.
Last week the Anti-Defamation League sent a letter to Amazon on behalf of itself and Irving’s team, the Brooklyn Nets, calling on the company to either remove the “virulently antisemitic book and related video” or to label them with a note about their offensive content.
A little over a week ago, Irving posted a link to the Amazon page for “Hebrews to Negroes: Wake Up Black America,” a documentary based on the book by the same name.
The film has since become a bestseller, topping all documentaries on Amazon Video. On IMDb, the Amazon-owned popular movie database, the film now has 370 reviews. A snapshot of the title’s page from February shows it had only eight reviews at the time….
Amazon’s guidelines for filmmakers distributing films on the company’s platform say that “all titles undergo manual and automated reviews,” which are meant to catch copyright violations or sexually explicit content as well as “derogatory comments, hate speech, or threats specifically targeting any group or individuals.”
The company’s policy for booksellers says Amazon can remove “offensive” content. It also says that it will allow a broad range of views to be aired. “As a bookseller, we believe that providing access to the written word is important, including content that may be considered objectionable,” the policy says…
Jews are masters at “radicalization and indoctrination” — but they don’t like a level playing field or have any of their radical and nation-wrecking ideas challenged.
They were all for free speech until the moment that they established a stranglehold on the media and publishing — and the entire country in general — and from then on, any view that challenged their power was deemed “hate speech” or “incitement” to violence.
A major study conducted by the Federal government found that online “hate speech” did not translate to real world violence — but the Jews used their power and influence to have this study suppressed because it contradicts the false narrative they use to justify censorship of anything that threatens their power.
In fact, Jews have been pushing legislation that would forbid anyone convicted of even minor “hate crimes” from owning a firearm — that is why they want to criminalize “hate speech.”
Once they’ve disarmed the American public, they can impose any draconian censorship they want — and free speech will become a relic of the past.
That’s why the Jews set up a nationwide “command center” to monitor antisemitism levels among the goyim — to tabulate data they hope will be used to justify laws making “hate speech” against them not only illegal — but a capital punishment — just like it was after their Bolshevik “revolution” in Russia.
And just how exactly did these Jews determine that this book and movie instilled widespread “fear” in the Jewish community? Did they take a poll?
No, because most Jews have probably never heard of this book or film — and the ones that do know about it only know about it because of all the Jewish whining about it in the media.
And if most Jews did hear about this film, their overall reaction would be “Meh, so what? Who cares what the schvartzes think?”
Do Jews really care that Blacks fantasize about being the “real” ancient Hebrews, despite the overwhelming evidence from the Bible that the Israelites were white?
Jews know how to handle blacks — or at least they think they do — but what they fear is that Whites will finally wake up and throw off their mental chains — and then it will be game over for them.
Reply to Elmer Pantry…
Hi Elmer Pantry.
Thanks for bringing to my attention the topic ‘white slaves’ and providing me with the link to to read: “They Were Whites and They Were Slaves”.
It’s appreciated and I will read it.
Regards.
Albert.
This article forewarns of criminalizing “hate speech .” Whether congress has a “pocket law” or the all powerful jew uses UN or lex non scripto . This is a fact for many years.
Jew prosecutor convicted a young police officer who performed her duty as a K-9 officer, Stefanie Mohr, St. Charles County, Maryland ——-15years with no reprieve nor commutation until 80% had been served. The Wabbit’s (George W Bush) drug dealers were not harmed . They were brought from El Salvador and Guatemala for her trial.
Her husband divorced her as a “racist” . The white race disowned her . Where were her Chief of Police or comrades? The white race ……….what more should be said to condemn it!!!
Paul … never heard of that case. Looks like Trump pardoned her.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2020/12/23/stephanie-mohr-officer-police-brutality-case-gets-trump-pardon/3904405001/
You never heard? Refer to the Teddy kennedy prophesy after Chappaquiddick . If you remember that?
He was not concerned, the media would have another scandal and it would be forgotten.
Partly true, it was ameliorated by the liberal , he was known as the “hero of Chappaquiddick .”
Her sentence was 10 years and she served 8 . Jews are merciful. The prosecutor was an ambitious jew . Her helper also ambitious consanquine guards in the Law Enforcement Legal Defense Fund. Qui custodiet ipsos custodes? It has probably been erased as another crime by law enforcement because too errant to be exploited. This was long before X President Trump .
Her prosecutor, who would have contested her reprieve for this “atrocious hate crime”, but was promoted in election of Attorney General of Ohio. Could it be the people of Maryland did not forget the Stephanie Mohr affair?
She was repatriated to her home in Maryland but her child was 8 years older and her life like others, (the young man from St. Lewis ) who killed another black martyr would be a story that should condemn the times.
I also should have mentioned the concerted efforts of TV, magazines, film, and the advertising agencies to portray women, ethnics and queers in preference to portraying normal white males. Look and take notice when you watch TV, read a magazine, watch a film or see an advert.
It’s social engineering on a massive scale.
It is amazing that some whites did not have the gift of foresight to see what a mistake it would be for certain events to happen. I specifically refer to the influx of blacks as slaves to work on the southern plantations during the centuries prior to abolition of the practice. Those whites were more concerned with profits than their country and fellow whites.
A little common sense would have warned them what would happen in allowing blacks in as slaves. Slavery could not go on ad finitem. The blacks were having offspring like rabbits. The wealthy landowners thought it was great to buy a pair of age breeding blacks and they would produce offspring for work on the plantations and save the landowners from further purchases of slaves. But when slavery ended and the control of the black populations on the plantations, there was this massive population of blacks who still bred like rabbits. Not only were they in the south but now spreading nationwide to the detriment of whites.
In the 21st century lessons of the past have not been learned. Whites are still being pacified and controlled to accept the influx of the ethnic groups from Asia, South And Central America, and of course Africa. Many of these ethnic groups have more offspring per family than a white family. You don’t need a Phd in mathematics to work out the ratio of whites to non-whites regarding the situation in one hundred years time. Not only in the USA, but in other white countries. The ethnics are invading in enormous and worrying numbers to all white nations. This is a wake up call that might be too late now for the white race. I am sorry to say that until the jelly spined and apologists that pass for the leaders of these white nations who won’t show backbone and true grit are removed and replaced with politicians who do have backbone and true grit, the situation will only worsen. The other problem of course is, where will we get the politicians from with backbone and true grit, when the yids and the politically correct and bleeding heart bastards make laws detrimental to the white race.
Albert ………….
You wrote re: Slavery — “…Those whites were more concerned with profits than their country and fellow whites….”
I have a friend from the South who is a History buff for that period of time.
He has a collection of Pro-Slavery books at — https://archive.org/details/fav-southernsovereign
I think he would say that many of those slave holders or at least those who approved of the keeping of Slaves thought it “christian” to do so. They recognized that blacks could not provide for themselves and the best way, or altruistic way of dealing with them was to keep them in slavery. Sadly, History has proven that this is our nature. We run to the rescue of endangered animals all over the world.
I remember when I was waking up to the JQ and the race issue, I visited a Plantation in South Carolina and my eyes were opened wide! I learned how well the White owners tooks care of their slaves. From their living quarters to the “hospital” on site to care for sick and injured slaves etc., etc.
So, I’m not completely convinced it was all about greed.
It’s a fascinating debate/conversation. I, like you, simply wished we never allowed them to arrive on our shores in the first place. But that is a whole different discussion. And I suspect if there wasn’t such a thing as “the jew”, I don’t believe Slavery would have ever existed in White Nations in the first place.
You and I probably ask the same question —- “Why did those “christian” White people allowed it in the first place? I use little “c” here to suggest that during that time, 99% of White people thought with christian values. They might not have all been followers of Jesus Christ (saved), but most every White person from that time period at least had “christian values”.
Anyway …………………… there are some interesting books on that archive if you are interested.
You then wrote — “….It is amazing that some whites did not have the gift of foresight to see what a mistake it would be for certain events to happen…..”
My question would be to ask —- “how would they have known?”
I think “Haiti” happened right around the same time, so what Historical event would have provided that information in your opinion?
It seems to me like “blacks” coming into contact with White Nations happened not literally, but like “all at once”. In other words ……………. prior to Western Slavery, White people didn’t know too much about African peoples.
But I don’t know …………… I’m no expert when it comes to this topic of History.
Anything you could add ………………….
Hi West.
In answer to your “foresight question”. Perhaps I’m thinking on a different level, but I look at it like this: Common sense tells a person that if one race is expanding far more than the host race, a time will come when the host race will have problems of controlling that race. Then what does the host race do? There was no attitude from whites of blacks being on the same level as the whites. No equality, just dominance of one race over another. This in turn breeds hostility and resentment against the dominant race. This hostility against white people is still shown in modern America and emancipation was over 150 years ago. Many still harbour grudges of their forebears being in slavery. I’m sure you are intelligent enough to see anger shown by blacks towards whites occurring in 2022 and the language and attitude used by blacks against whites. Segregation that continued well into the 20th century just fed that resentment.
You say there were hospitals for the slaves and they were well looked after. I’m unable to say if that occurred or not on any large scale. But assuming there were hospitals , I don’t share your view of it stemming from any altruistic behaviour from the whites. Perhaps a few isolated instances but not on a widespread scale. Providing any “health care”, isn’t that just good business practice of protecting your investment and not through any altruistic motive. Farmers give their animals medical attention too when needed. It is just good business practice for them too.
Plantation owners could have got their labour force from Europe. Ireland had a great famine in the 1840s and many poor Irish came to the US at this time. There were also very poor whites from other European countries that were available for menial work who could have picked cotton etc. These poor whites were available also in the 1700s but the plantation owners didn’t take advantage of this -why? Because these poor whites would have to be paid a lot more than any black was being paid, if they were paid at all.
I’m unable to answer your Haiti question because I don’t know the answer to it. Regards. Albert.
Black slaves were treated a lot better than white slaves in America because black slaves were a much bigger investment and cost a lot more. White slaves were almost free, as indentured servants, and there were a lot more of them, especially early on.
And black slaves in America had a much better life than they ever had in Africa even as free men. It was only social agitators in America who convinced blacks they were getting a raw deal as slaves.
Hi Elmer Pantry….
I find it hard to believe that black slaves were treated better than white slaves as you’ve written. You said the “white slaves were almost free as indentured servants”
I’m not on one side or the other. However, all I can say is that the blacks who were whipped as a means of punishment and lynched as another means of punishment, then their punishment must pail into insignificance to what was the punishment for whites? If as you say they were treated better than white slaves.
If the blacks had a better life in America than in Africa, there is one thing they did not have better… freedom.
I pose this hyperthetical question to you: Would you exchange your freedom to go where you like, when you like and do what you like, within the realm of lawfulness and not answer to anyone, in exchange for more material things… in other words exchange being a free man for the life of so many restrictions placed on you.
I think not.
Regards, Albert.
Elmer Pantry…
Slavery is for life. Freedom comes at death. Indentured servitude has a time limit then freedom.
The choice is obvious which to choose given the opportunity.
Albert.
Albert
I think you’re at a disadvantage here because you haven’t read much, if anything, about white slavery in America. Please read this important book on the subject so that you’ll be up to speed on this issue. It’s a real eye-opener, and answers many of your questions and objections:
“They Were White and They Were Slaves”
https://christiansfortruth.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/They-Were-White-And-They-Were-Slaves.pdf
Hi Elmer Pantry..
I read “They Were Whites and They Were Slaves” as I said I would and you suggested I should.
Frankly, I wish I’d not read it as it is a very disturbing report on the subject. I wouldn’t have thought so much cruelty and depravity could be inflicted on others of all ages by so called civilised people.
In one of your posts you mentioned that blacks were treated better than whites because they cost more – you were right – as mentioned in that article.
There were other revelations in that article too I was unaware of.
I’m now more educated on the subject than I was previously but after reading that article I wish I wasn’t.
Regards,
Albert.
Albert,
“….Common sense tells a person that if one race is expanding far more than the host race, a time will come when the host race will have problems of controlling that race……”
Ok, but at that time, black slaves were a tiny minority in America. Tiny.
I’m trying to get into the minds of those White men circa 1600’s.
Look …………… I wish they would have had the instinct to turn them all around and ship them right back to Africa. I’m not in any way trying to defend Whites who purchased slaves. I’d like to go back in time and kick the cr@p out of them quite frankly. Knock some sense into their brains.
My Question is “How” would they have known #1. And point 2 — what had already happenend in History that could have educated them as to the ramifications of such actions?
Before my eyes were opened, I was fully believing the non-white races were simply “us” but with different skin. But I was incredibly naive; sheltered and BRAINWASHED by my religion — judeo-christianity.
I had a very similar thought process as you and I “hated” our White Ancestors for doing so. But now I have come to a point of forgiving them because I don’t believe they could have known the future. They certainly weren’t thinking of the “what ifs” at that time because they didn’t have to. Everything was under control as far as they could tell.
I also agree with you that “Slavery” was purely economic. I wouldn’t use the word “greed” however.
My friend tells me that one of the reasons why they didn’t use White slaves was because of the Climate. Whites couldn’t perform the same work-load in those conditions (humitidy/heat etc).
You said — “…There was no attitude from whites of blacks being on the same level as the whites. No equality, just dominance of one race over another. ..”
I absolutely agree and those “books” would be a testament to this fact. They did literally see them as “beasts of burden”.
You said — “….This in turn breeds hostility and resentment against the dominant race….”
I’m not sure this thought ever entered their conscience because they were Property at that time. They just couldn’t see the future. What “experience” would they have had to know this?
I think a great many of the slaves showed gratitude. Enough so to allow White owners to have them into their homes as servants etc., unguarded and unchained.
Look, you and I both know that if it wasn’t for the JQ, there would have never arisen any problems. Eventually “slavery” would have ended, but then I’m not sure what would have happened next. Maybe something similar to Reservations for the Red Indian.
You said — “….This hostility against white people is still shown in modern America and emancipation was over 150 years ago. Many still harbour grudges of their forebears being in slavery….”
Agreed. But again, I think this is a direct result of jewish perfidy.
You said — I’m sure you are intelligent enough to see anger shown by blacks towards whites occurring in 2022 and the language and attitude used by blacks against whites.
Of course. But again, if not for the jew ………………………
You said — “…Segregation that continued well into the 20th century just fed that resentment….”
I don’t know. If not for the jew, I think Segregation was working and could work today.
It’s all a mute point now anyway. Don’t get the idea that I am “ok” with blacks living on our soil. I just have come to a place of “forgiveness” for our Ancestors. I hated them once for it and it wasn’t helpful to my soul.
If this conversation upsets you, don’t feel obligated to respond. I’m on your side of this debate, btw.
I wish the smarter of us back in that day would have had the forsight to turn them around and ship them right back. But I just don’t see how they could have “predicted” that which was to happen.
We underestimated the jew. Period. End of story.
And I agree with you, “Slavery” was purely Economic. Just not sure I would use the word “greed”.
Thanks for the dialogue. Cheers.
Hi again West.
I didn’t respond to your statement:
“…slave holders… recognised that blacks could not provide for themselves and the best way… was to keep them in slavery.”
If the blacks had been left in Africa they would have been providing for themselves without any white help as they had been doing for centuries.
I still stand by my statement that money and profits motivated the plantation owners to engage in slavery and as a result to the detriment of whites today. Regards again. Albert
“….If the blacks had been left in Africa they would have been providing for themselves without any white help as they had been doing for centuries…..”
Agreed. You will get no argument from me on this point! 🙂
“…I still stand by my statement that money and profits motivated the plantation owners to engage in slavery…”
Agreed.
“….and as a result to the detriment of whites today….”
This is debatable. You seem to say that they did so knowing full well the ramifications for those who would come after them.
I don’t know. I tend to disagree. Surely they were thinking of their own “Posterity” for future generations. I just think they couldn’t have known at that time in History.
Those White people today who “bring them in” have no mercy from me.
Cheers.
Hi West.
Thanks for your posts. You made several good points. I appreciate your time and effort in sharing them with me.
We (the white race) are now facing an even greater threat, from the unbridled immigration from the Asian world. No doubt the yids have their fingerprints on this too.
Regards,
Albert.
Albert ….
Agreed. Only Jesus can save us now.
I pray sooner than latter.
Thanks for the dialogue.
Jews who were kicked out by the Catholics in Spain and Portugal but the Dutch Christians gave them the red carpet treatment as refugees, and enabled them to conduct the selling of African’s as cattle from the comfort of Amsterdam, the Netherlands and New York (New Netherlands) in the new world America.
When Oliver Cromwell noticed that the human-trafficking trade of the Jews made money for the Dutch Kingdom, Oliver brought the Jews back in. The Dutch and British keep fighting the Anglo wars and Jews kept getting rich. Christians believed the Jewish hokuspokus for ages that’s why they went along with everything the Jewish came up with, as they still do to this day. If Christians had not compromised their principle for material things the world would be different today…..everybody in their own back yard. Without Christian (or non-believing White people) Jews are nothing.
As @CFT said….”Jews know how to handle blacks — or at least they think they do — but what they fear is that Whites will finally wake up and throw off their mental chains — and then it will be game over for them.” I say it bluntly….White people have been and are still the enablers of Jewish crimes against humanity. Jewish supremacist advocate White genocide all over the place, but White people keep glorifying them as a light onto the nations and the world…..
There has always been “slavery.” The bonded servitude of the South gave freedoms that are only philosopher’s dilemma. Why do people search for this new messiah every 4 years? Whites in general do not want freedom. Slavery is as natural as sin.
Paul….
Thanks for bringing that story to our attention. Poor lady. Very sad. She seems so resilient from it all. When will we be rescued from this nightmare??? Rhetorical
Jew claims Dave Chappelle’s “dangerous” monologue on SNL could get Jews literally killed:
https://www.thejc.com/life-and-culture/all/saturday-night-live-tv-review-dave-chappelle's-comedy-is-deadly-dangerous-4X8BXNMaufuIrOM1TcDecm
If so, what if the public found out Jews were behind 9/11? JFK assassination? or lied about the Holocaust?
No wonder Jews are always looking over their shoulders and monitoring every word that comes out of everyone’s mouth or keyboard….
what a sad and pathetic way to spend your life….
berzerker
That’s not my dream, that’s the jews’ dream to use the blacks on their team against us…that’s what they have been doing always. We have to separate the too as what problems, blacks like the laws of the jungle, but get out of the way because nobody hates blacks more that blacks for what they do to each other. It is what it is for all to see. The jews are everyone’s problem. I would take the 7% ok blacks on our side, and lately they have put their money and jobs at risk more than public whites have, so they should get some credit, and it’s all a jew problem.
https://www.stormfront.org/jewish/antisemite.html
James…
I agree. That comment seemed rather tasteless. To use that kind of toilet language is inappropriate.
It would be our “Prayer” that we could live separate.
Let’s hope Berzerker is simply young and needs wisdom. I suspect he was goofing on us quite frankly.
Hey West Ya, a little over the top. I told a friend today I just don’t care about libs, gays, black crime, politics. It’s jews behind anything against us. All of it. Don’t be distracted.
And I know a lot of jews don’t know or in on the evil, but they are still on the jew side, or they would be for the truth being told about them. It’s all about jewish supremacy. The only thing about blacks is they should learn the truth about jews, like everyone needs to know about what jews are behind for the 110th time.
Could the Puerto Ricans or Irish have forced a multi-billion dollar company like Adidas to drop Kanye West, costing them billions in lost revenue, because he said something they didn’t like?
They must have, because the Jews certainly don’t have the power to do that.
The Puerto Ricans probably could, as they’re Jewish by and large.
Welcome Back, Kotter implied that “a Puerto Rican Jew” was a rarity, it seems like the opposite is the case.
As for the Irish, well, they couldn’t even stop a bunch of Italians from making a cosa nostra snorefest entitled The Irishman.
Head of the ADL, Jonathan Greenblatt admits that his organization would be wealthier and better off if everyone they accused of antisemitism donated hush money to the ADL — unfortunately no everyone accused can be shaken down for money:
https://gab.com/WhiteLivesMatterAlabama/posts/109350240244009197
Greenblatt fails to mention that the ADL has almost $100 million in its coffers, and despite that, they applied for COVID relief to further enrich themselves. How much of that $100 million came from shakedown payments would be interesting to find out….
The fact that there are Jews of all sorts of racial admixture is proof that they cannot possibly be true Israelites who were commanded to remain a separate and unmixed people who wrote the Bible.
Blacks cannot possibly be descendants of Israelites because they had no history of written language, and the Israelites were a very literate people, especially the priest class, just as the Christians have been.
The idea that blacks “forgot” their own written language is preposterous.
I think the “black Hebrew” movement is ultimately good for white people.
Because it allows blacks to let the cat out of the bag about Jews using “freedom of religion” as a defense.
And if white people really start looking into the “black Hebrews”, they will soon figure out who the real Israelites are, and who the Jews really are.
I’m all for “Wakanda Forever” and “Black Panther” movies too — if they puff up blacks and empower them to fight their Jewish masters, it will benefit whites in the long run.
More and more blacks are starting to figure out that whites were not their enslavers, and whites are not their oppressors.
Whites liberated blacks to our own detriment, instigated by the Jews. Many blacks have figured this dynamic out, and the more that do the better.
Yeah, figuring out the truth is good for everyone but the jews.
I like what West said in a comment the other day that if whites did not take in blacks, then they would be talked about as much as kangaroos.
Wakanda Forever might be too woke to be of use, it has no black male characters.
But I am all for the blacks deciding to go home to Liberia, and naming the Jew on their way out.
One day, Republicans will finally learn that Frederick Douglass put the kibosh on the 1840s effort to end slavery and repatriate the blacks. Until then, he runs a Cult of Personality on them from beyond the grave, prompting them to trip over themselves to worship blacks.
In my area, there’s a politician who lost (to fraud) but he says the silver lining was that he got a few Nigerians to vote for him. I kid you not.
I pray that Kanye West, Ice Cube, and these Black Panther flicks can wake white people up, because nothing else has.
White man’s wet dream: to see every black swim back to Africa with a Jew under each arm.
RB……
Could you elaborate on your statement — “…One day, Republicans will finally learn that Frederick Douglass put the kibosh on the 1840s effort to end slavery and repatriate the blacks. Until then, he runs a Cult of Personality on them from beyond the grave, prompting them to trip over themselves to worship blacks……”
I am a novice when it comes to this part of history. Was not Douglas instrumental in the Abolitionist movement — or are you saying that Douglas was instrumental in convincing Americans NOT to send blacks back to Africa.
What do you mean when you say —- he runs a cult of personality on them ……
The whole “Liberia” project is interesting to me. I’d like more information as to those who oppposed it etc., etc.
Thanks!