The “incitement” trial of Economic Freedom Fighters’ (EFF) leader Julius Malema is expected to resume in the Newcastle Magistrate’s Court on Friday when Malema will appear on common law charges of incitement to commit a crime:
The charge sheet indicates that the Malema is accused of trespassing in contravention of “Section 1(1) Read as Section 2(1) of Trespass Act 6 of 1959 as amended by Criminal Law Amendment Act 59 of 1983”.
In June 2016, Malema told supporters in Newcastle to occupy land because it belonged to blacks; saying whites could not claim ownership of land.
After his brief appearing at the Newcastle Magistrate’s Court in November 2016, under the Riotous Assemblies Act was postponed — he was released on a warning — Malema stepped outside the court and told his supporters to “occupy the land because they have failed to give you the land”.
“If it means going to prison for telling you to take the land, so be it. I am not scared of prison because of the land question, but I am scared of prison if I go to prison for corruption. I don’t want to go to prison for corruption, but I want to go to prison for the land,” he told supporters.
“We are not calling for the slaughter of white people – at least for now.”
In 2014, at the EFF elective conference in Bloemfontein, Malema told members they should occupy the land, which led to him being charged for the first time under the Riotous Assemblies Act.
White South African political commentator, Wilhem Petzer has provided an in-depth analysis of Malema’s incitement of violence against Whites in the video below, showing that Malema is cleverly doing so but with “plausible deniability” from a legal point of view. In reality, Malema is being protected behind the scenes by very powerful forces who are intent upon moving forward with the removal of Whites from South Africa.
like everything else in USA the judges are jewish and their
freemasonry servants .
I’d be willing to bet that the prison system in SA is similar to that of the USA, so I have no doubt that blacks in SA have no problem going to jail just like the Amerikan blacks. 3 hots and a cot. Electricity and running water. TVs and exercise equipment. I have witnessed in jail (yes, I have been there) that it is a veritable family reunion every time a ‘person of color’ steps into the facility. Hugs, high fives, “yo, dog! You back again? (But I dindu nuffin!)” I did NOT witness that from ANY white person in the 2 1/2 months I spent behind bars…
Prison obviously isn’t much of a deterrent of crime for most Blacks, even in America where over 70% of the prison population is Black. They know the judicial system will bend over backwards for them to give them any break possible, and the death penalty takes so long to carry out that it’s not real to them. And once Malema and his commie followers are in power, they’ll empty the prisons anyway….
Why do you call so-called black people black, that is the question. Are Chinese people the same as Japanese people and should they be treated the same if one group was more racist than the other, are Asians called yellow ???? Are East Indians the same as Chinese or Japanese or are they considered black too, are the black skinned native amer… considered black too ????, are the first dark skinned Hawaiians considered black, are the first dark skinned Chinese living up in the mountains considered black, are the original Filipinos black. aren’t the original Mexicans black as in Olmacs.
Is it really black or brown like the dust of the ground because bunching all so called black people in the same category confuses people by making them think they’re all the same, ohh and what about the ancient moors in spain, egypt, england, irland, etc. what so called race where they. Black is not a race, black people are the entire world and they are the first and the last.
It’s a term of convenience, no? Asians used to all be referred to as the “yellow man”, and Indians were called the “red man”, and Indians were also called “black”. Whites were called white. Obviously, none of this is a literal description. Blacks can’t decide what they want to be called. Every term offends them. African isn’t even acceptable because many who live in Africa are not black. All the north coast of Africa was white at one time in the ancient world. So you tell us…what should we call blacks that makes sense to everyone?
Perhaps this will help to understand. The black police in South Africa always report on their dockets listing crimes. As White, Black, Coloured or Indian an perhaps even Muslim, Hindu or other ethnic and religious profiling. Ethnicity involves colour for identification and is entirely logical. You see, this is only an issue in multi cultural divergent societies. When blacks in society want affirmative action and empowerment – they say Black lives matter. No problem for them to separate based upon ethnic colouration. Group think based upon colour and race suits their cause and it’s logical.
Methinks you dost protest too much. A man is black, coloured or white it is on your passport or identity even if you do not know it. Banks are lending easier to Whites as the repayments and risk is not as high. Even insurance companies are well aware of diseases and life expectancy in differing ethnic groups. How would they calculate the risks with no means to identify the ethnicity? I allow a white man into my house as I have a natural affinity and customary understanding of his demeanor.