In a censored speech that Mike Bloomberg gave at the Aspen Institute in 2015, he freely admitted that it is Blacks who are causing most of the gun violence in America, and insisted that the best way to get the guns off the streets is not restricting our 2A rights to own guns but rather using simple ‘stop and frisk’ programs in high-crime areas:
“95% of your murders — murderers and murder victims — fit one M.O. You can just take the description, Xerox it and pass it out to all the cops. The are male minorities, sixteen to twenty-five. That’s true in New York, that’s true in virtually every city.
And that’s where the real crime is. You’ve got to get the guns out of the hands of the people that are getting killed. You want to spend the money on a lot of cops in the streets. Put the cops where the crime is, which means in minority neighborhoods.
So one of the unintended consequences is people say, ‘Oh, my God, you are arresting kids for marijuana that are all minorities.’ Yes, that’s true. Why? Because we put all the cops in minority neighborhoods. Yes, that’s true. Why do we do it? Because that’s where all the crime is.
And the way you get the guns out of the kids’ hands is throw them up against the walls and frisk them. And then they start [saying], ‘Oh, I don’t want to get caught.’ So they don’t bring the gun. They still have a gun but they leave it at home.
And in case, Bloomberg claims his comments here were ‘taken out of context’, here he is on a WOR radio show in New York doubling down on this comments, and going so far as to assert that Whites are disproportionately stopped by police and minorities too little:
“They just keep saying, ‘Oh, it’s a disportionate [sic] percentage of a particular ethnic group. That may be, but it’s not a disportionate [sic] percentage of those who witnesses and victims describe as committing the murder. In that case, incidentally, I think we disportionally [sic] stop Whites too much and minorities too little.”
This is one of the great jewish dilemmas: how do you blame Black gun violence on White law-abiding gun owners to justify disarming the entire White population so that no one can object to their nation-wrecking agenda?
You do it by controlling the media, by not reporting the race of the people using guns in crimes unless they are White. You do not report the race of the victims if they are White and the killers are Black.
You under-report the extent of Black-on-White violence to mislead Whites into thinking that Blacks aren’t nearly are violent as they are.
You report all Latino, Arab, Jewish, and everything in between crime as “White”.
You convince White liberals they don’t need guns to defend themselves against violent Black (and Brown) crime, which accounts for well over 80% of all violent crime in America.
You never mention that the primary reason the Founding Fathers guaranteed the right to bear arms wasn’t for self-defense against criminals, or to hunt, but rather to make sure the government didn’t overstep their bounds and infringe upon your constitutionally-guaranteed inalienable rights.
Apparently, in Mike Bloomberg’s ideal America, only his body guards have the right to ‘bear arms’.
Which begs the question: why does Mike Bloomberg feel a need to have heavily-armed body guards, even when he’s not campaigning in high-crime areas?
Could it be that he’s afraid someone who doesn’t like his gun-grabbing, anti-American hypocritical rhetoric might take offense?
Kindly refrain from using their terminology – there is no such thing as ‘gun crime’; a firearm is inanimate and cannot and does not commit crime.
Saying so legitimizes (((their))) term and points away from the actual problem / perpetrators. Which…are usually black btw.
Remember this post – this is the ONLY time you are likely to hear bloomberg ever tell the truth…
Exactly! They are defeating us by using their invented nomenclature like “gun crime.” They also use terms like “holocaust denial”, in attempts to eliminate any argument at all by just calling you a name (“denier”).
Other terms these jews love to use on the weak minded are “hate” or “hate speech”, “homophobia”, and my all-time favorite “anti-semite.”
They cannot win through argumentation or persuade through reasoning, so they must create a big negative stigma around these words which triggers people into fear of being “thought of” as one of the above said terms.
I’m so sick of these jews. To destroy them utterly would be SELF DEFENSE! Payback is coming to the jews, and there’s a hell of a lot to pay back for. They owe the world for:
~ What they did to the Russians.
~ What they did to the Germans.
~ All wars including WWI & II
~ Creating the whole holocaust lie and robbing Germans in the form of “reparations”
~ Murder and genocide of countless Palestinians
~ Numerous terrorist attacks like King David Hotel bombing, Lavon Affair, and THE USS LIBERTY
~ 9-11
~ London’s 7/7
~ All the killed “goyim” who were deceived into fighting the jew’s wars
This is but a fraction of the deeds of the evil jews. I hope the world collectively pounces on these rats just as they have done to the goyim for centuries.
If a White candidate made these comments, their career would be over, but Bloomberg does indeed have jewish privilege and the media will spin everything in his favor, and the outraged Blacks, like Al Sharpton, even know better than to push it too far with this powerful Jew.
Henry Ford warned us 100 years ago that jewish financiers, like Michael Bloomberg, produce nothing real — no tangible wealth, only paper wealth. A 100 years have past and nothing has changed. Wealthy Jews are still at it, speculating, producing nothing, trading paper debt, charging for dubious transactions, etc., all of which impoverishes us as a nation.
The “evil Nazis” outlawed these kind of jewish financial shenanigans, and their economy boomed unlike anything the world had ever seen. America would be much better off had Michael Bloomberg been a kosher butcher instead of a Wall Street hustler.
America is not ready for a fast-talking New York Jew, like Mike Bloomberg, to be President. It will never be ready.
Who needs a jew when the POTUS we have is totally controlled by them in every aspect of his life? Heck, he MAY be an Orange jew named Drumpf.
It may never be ‘ready’, but it will get shoved down our throats if we don’t change. Shoot, in reality, we’ve had nothing BUT jewish controlled presidents since the war criminal Lincoln.