(The Guardian) Archaeologists have struggled in vain to find conclusive proof that King Solomon actually existed — and with no inscriptions or remnants of the magnificent palace and temple he is supposed to have built in Jerusalem 3,000 years ago, the Israelite king has sunk into the realm of myth:
Now British marine archaeologist Dr Sean Kingsley has amassed evidence showing that Solomon was not only a flesh-and-blood monarch but also the world’s first shipping magnate, who funded voyages carried out by his Phoenician allies in “history’s first special relationship”.
Over 10 years, Kingsley has carried out a maritime audit of “the Solomon question”. By extending the search beyond the Holy Land, across the Mediterranean to Spain and Sardinia, he found that archaeological evidence supports biblical descriptions of a partnership between Solomon, who “excelled all the kings of the earth in riches and in wisdom”, and the Phoenician king Hiram, who “supplied Solomon with cedar timber and gold, as much as he desired”.
Kingsley told the Observer: “I’ve spread a very wide net. That kind of maritime study has never been done before.”
He said: “For 100 years, archaeologists have scrutinised Jerusalem’s holy soils, the most excavated city in the world. Nothing definitive fits the book of Kings’ and Chronicles’ epic accounts of Solomon’s palace and temple. By exploring traces of ports, warehouses, industry and shipwrecks, new evidence shakes up the quest for truth.”
He explored Andalusian port towns from Mezquitilla to Málaga and found that the archaeological evidence reveals “a Phoenician coast”. He visited the site of the great mine of the ancient world, Rio Tinto – 70km inland from Huelva – which produced gold, silver, lead, copper and zinc – and where, crucially, he realised that old maps and historical accounts referred to a particular spot as Cerro Solomon or Solomon’s Hill.
One 17th-century account notes that Solomon’s Hill was previously called Solomon’s Castle, and another describes people being “sent there by King Solomon for gold and silver”.
At the site, archaeologists have found ancient mining tools, such as granite pestles and stone mortars used to crush minerals, and remnants of lead slag that held a high proportion of silver. Kingsley said that lead isotope analysis has shown that silver hoards excavated in Israel originally came from Iberia.
Recent digs in nearby Huelva have found evidence of the Israelites and Phoenicians, including elephant tusks, merchants’ shekel weights and pottery. The Near Eastern link can be dated as far back as 930BC, the end of Solomon’s reign, and Kingsley has concluded that Huelva is “the best fit for the capital of the biblical Tarshish”, the ancient source of imported metals, which archaeologists have “signposted wildly”, everywhere from southern Israel to the Red Sea, Ethiopia to Tunisia.
He was struck by texts and ruins that support a “far more conclusive candidate” in this area of the southern Iberian Peninsula, which was known in antiquity as Tartessos, a Greek derivation of Tarshish. A Phoenician script on a ninth-century BC stele found in Sardinia refers to the land of Tarshish, also proving its historical reality.
Kingsley, who has explored more than 350 shipwrecks in the past 30 years, will publish his research in the forthcoming spring issue of Wreckwatch magazine, the free journal for maritime archaeology, which he also edits.
Solomon is believed to have built the First Temple of Jerusalem on the Temple Mount. Kingsley writes that everything historians know about it comes from the Bible, including details such as its inner sanctum lined with pure gold: “Building cities, palaces and a flagship temple didn’t come cheap. Long-distance voyages to the lands of Ophir and Tarshish brought a river of gold, silver, precious stones and marble to the royal court.
“Neither Israel nor Lebanon could tap into local gold and silver resources. The biblical entrepreneurs were forced to look to the horizon. The land of Tarshish was a vital source for Solomon’s silver. As the Book of Ezekiel recorded: ‘Tarshish did business with you because of your great wealth of goods.’”
Kingsley added: “What turned up in southern Spain is undeniable. Phoenician signature finds, richly strewn from Rio Tinto to Málaga, leave no doubt that Near Eastern ships voyaged to what must have seemed the far side of the moon by 900BC.
“When I spotted in ancient accounts the name of the hill where silver was mined at Rio Tinto – Solomon’s Hill – I was stunned. Biblical history, archaeology and myth merged to reveal the long-sought land of Tarshish celebrated in the Old Testament.
“It looks like Solomon was wise in his maritime planning. He bankrolled the voyages from Jerusalem and let salty Phoenician sailors take all the risks at sea.”
The great — but short-lived — Israelite Empire under King David and then his son Solomon is difficult to identify because historians have long misunderstood that the Phoenician Empire was distinct and independent of it.
As Steven Collins, in his book The ‘Lost’ Ten Tribes of Israel….Found! writes, “When historians refer to the Phoenician Empire and its international power and influence around 1,000 to 700BC, they are actually identifying the empire of Israel to which Tyre and Sidon were allied” (p. 76).
Given the great value of the gold and silver used to build King Solomon’s temple, it’s no surprise that not even a trace of it is left in Jerusalem for archeologists to find — in the ancient world plunder was the name of the game.
In the Psalms, King David makes it abundantly clear that he wished to exalt not himself but rather the God of Israel — while archeologists have not discovered any large monuments dedicated to David, they have discovered a number of stone inscriptions referring to him — leading them to question whether he was nothing more than an Israelite myth.
But in the ancient world, new rulers often ordered evidence of previous rulers completely destroyed — this was the rule, not the exception — so it’s shouldn’t be surprising in the least how little is actually left for archeologists to study.
Stone was valuable and difficult to quarry and carve — so recycling old materials from former kingdoms was the name of the game.
Surely, Spain must have been one of the sources for Solomon’s wealth, but it’s doubtful that there was enough gold and other metals there to meet the enormous demand — as Sir Edward Creasy in his History Of England wrote,
“The British tin mines mainly supplied the glorious adornment of King Solomon’s Temple.”
And there is plenty of evidence that the Phoenicians traveled far beyond the Straits of Gibraltar — syro-phoenician and “syro-egyptian” inscriptions have indeed been found in North America.
According to archeologist and epigraphist, Dr. Barry Fell, there simply wasn’t enough copper in the Near East or Europe to have met the demand for it — but there was enough in North America — and over 5,000 ancient copper mines have been located — none of which were used by the “native” Indians.
The historian George Rawlinson in his book Phoenicia claimed that the name of Málaga — the Phoenician port in Spain mentioned in this article — was derived from the Hebrew word “malakh” — which means “angel” or divine messenger — while the Spanish city of Cadiz is named after the Israelite tribe of Gad.
And, of course, Phoenician Spain is located on the Iberian Penninsula — and “Iberian” is derived from the Hebrew word “eber” from which the word “Hebrew” itself is derived.
Paul Michael O'Donohoe
Cornwall, as I read years ago, was trading hub due to large amounts of metal ore via tin mines. Cornwall is one of the most heavily mined areas of Britain. There was trade between Britain and Egypt when metal objects found in Egypt were examined the metal used was traced to Cornish tin mines. I can’t go back to that article as years ago my village suffered a power outage, and it caused corruption to the hard drive, so it’s possible Solomon traded with Britain also.
Nathan
Interesting. i’d always gone along with King Solomon’s mines were actually just robbing the Pharaoh’s of Egypt’s tombs
Protestant
This is a staggering discovery by Dr. Kingsley. It explains the odd name of the River Ebor, the longest river in Spain, called “Ebre” in Catalan, etymologically derived from “Hiberus”, “Iberia”, “Hebrew”, just as Dr. Kingsley has described.
It also shows the awkwardly close links between Hebrews and Phonecians, who sacrificed their children to Moloch, as has been verified by archaeologists excavating at Carthage.
Protestant
I don’t understand why you deleted half of my comment, especially on this website named “Christians for Truth”. How is truth to be discussed if freedom of speech is denied?
Christians For Truth
We deleted the part of your comment where you are using this article as an excuse to promote your version of the Bible. It’s simple as that. This is not a “free speech” website….we moderate all comments.
Protestant
It was important to point out the link between the Phonecian & Hebrew practices of real or symbolic child sacrifice, as is still practiced by Jewish parents to this day.
Christians For Truth
The problem with your theory is that today’s Jews are not the same people as the ancient Hebrews or Israelites. Today’s Jews are imposters, pretending to be Israelites from the tribe of Judah.
The occult practices of today’s Jews come from Babylon and are not part of the rites of the true Israelites who strictly forbid such practices. That some lawless Israelites engaged in these child sacrifices does not mean that they were legitimate or condoned — they were not, as the OT makes clear.
After the destruction of the temple in 70 AD, these Judeans (aka “Jews”) fell into apostasy, and embraced the “traditions of the elders” from Babylon, which became the basis for the Talmud. Part of their rebellion was to condone mixing with non-Israelite peoples, thereby severing any legitimate claim they may have had to Israelite identity.
Central to the Talmud is the denial of Christ, whom they rejected, as the promised messiah — and the Gnostic claim that John the Baptist was the real messiah has been passed down by these Kabalistic, apostate Jews, and is a central tenet of Judeo-Masonry.
westwins
CFT, Praise our Lord! I’m so glad you did what you did. You have my support.
If some commenters fail to address the MAIN point of this Website — and refuse to address simple questions — Who are the Jews and who they are not —
.. they have no business spreading their poison here in our home. 🙂
Thank you!
Ps …. wish there was a feature where a first time commenter was forced to read the article — https://christiansfortruth.com/who-are-jews/ — before making any comment. 🙂
Pss…… any chance you can pin that article at the top of the “Core Topics”. Just a thought.
CFT
westwins, we’ve contemplated posting a list of rules for commenters, but we would expect people to ignore the rules anyway.
Generally, people use the articles as an excuse to talk about what they want to talk about — to promote their own pet agendas — and no “rules” will change that.
In order to post an article at the top of the page, it needs to be reposted to keep it there, and that’s too much work for us to continually do that to keep any article featured at the top.
We would like to have a “Recent Comments” side bar, like many sites do, but this software doesn’t allow for that — unfortunately.
CHRIST IS KING
This is just fantastic news! Seriously, presuming that the bloke has acctualy found it, of course, this would, in my opinion, be the discovery of the century! This should go along way to showing the world at large that the Israelites and Phoenicians were white! Hopefully!
I wonder why he has decided to declare his discovery at this moment in time? Why not last year, or after coronavirus goes away? Just my musing.
I am fascinated that people think King David and King Solomon are mythical! I’ve never heard that before… even when I was an atheist I thought they were historical figures.
Dan
They largely say that Israelites did not exist as a nation, only Judea did. Solomon is just another apart of that.
Chesterton
Dan wrote, “They largely say that Israelites did not exist as a nation, only Judea did.”
Who is this “they” you are talking about? “Judea” is a geographic region not a people. And “Judeans” were anybody who lived in Judea, regardless of ethnicity, including non-Israelites.
If the Israelites did not exist as a nation, then Christ was a liar because He said He came only for the lost sheep of the House of Israel (Matt 15:24). Christ’s mission was to regather all of Israel — all the tribes, not just the Judahites — and then gather the legitimate Genesis 10 Adamic people.
And that would also make James a liar because he said in the very first sentence of his epistle that he was addressing the news of Christ to “the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad.”
Dan wrote, “Solomon is just another part of that.”
Part of what? The nation of Israel that no longer exists? I just don’t follow what you are saying here….
Castaway
In Dan’s defense, as a Catholic who was very involved in the Church and went to Catholic school, that is the impression I was left with concerning the Old Testament in general – that it was filled with myths and fantastical tales, and that there really was no evidence as to who the Israelites were.
I believe much of denominational churchianity teaches similarly so that all these ‘New Testament’ Christians never read, or take seriously, the importance and veracity of the OT.
Christ Is King
Yip, my catholic family members all believe that the OT is all fables. They concern themselves with nothing that isn’t in the catholic doctrine from the current pope. Jesus takes a back seat, the pope drives. It’s a sin to question the clergy, they say.