Two Democratic legislators introduced the “Disarm Hate Act” this week, which calls for the permanent revocation of Second Amendment rights for any misdemeanor offense deemed to be a so-called “hate crime”:
The bill was brought to both chambers, via Rep. David Cicilline (D-RI) in the House and Sen. Bob Casey (D-PA) in the Senate.
Sponsors believe the bill closes the “Hate Crimes Loophole” by banning the sale and possession of firearms for anyone convicted of committing a crime on the basis of race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability.
“Over and over again we have seen what happens when a convicted white supremacist, white nationalist, or neo-Nazi is able to purchase a gun,” said Cicilline, who serves as Vice Chair of the House Gun Violence Prevention Task Force, in a statement obtained by GunsAmerica.
“This bill closes the Hate Crimes Loophole and makes it much harder for someone to give voice to their hatred in a volley of gunfire. It’s just common sense. If you’ve been convicted of a hate crime, you don’t get to buy a gun. Full stop,” he added.
(((John Feinblatt))), the president of Bloomberg-funded Everytown for Gun Safety, cheered the measure.
“When hate comes armed, it can be deadly,” said Feinblatt. “But right now, there is no federal law that prevents people convicted of misdemeanor hate crimes from owning or buying guns — a situation that defies both common sense and common decency.”
“We applaud Rep. Cicilline and Sen. Casey for honoring the victims of shootings at the Chabad of Poway, Tree of Life Synagogue and thousands of other preventable tragedies for introducing legislation to disarm hate,” he added.
How much more obvious can our overlords be? Only White people can commit so-called ‘hate crimes”, and White people comprise the vast majority of legal gun owners in America. They’ve even conducted bogus studies to “prove” a connection between gun ownership and racism among Whites, not surprisingly. You literally committed your first “hate crime” when you were born White.
When scores of White people are mowed down at a mass shooting in Las Vegas, do they demand stricter gun control? No, of course not. But when a few Jews get shot in synagogues, their answer is draconian “hate crime” laws that will not only muzzle any opposition to them, they also want to make our constitutionally guaranteed right to gun ownership contingent upon how politically-correct we are.
This proposed legislation has all the hallmarks of Anti-Defamation League treachery, and it should shock no one to find out that attorneys working for the ADL wrote up this legislation and handed it to these two congressional lackeys to introduce for consideration. Since the Jews will decide what “legally” constitutes “hate”, they will essentially be in a position to also decide who can own a gun, and if you trust them with that much power, you don’t deserve any constitutional rights, and you might as well give up your guns right now. Ask the Russians what happened to them when the Bolshevik Jews were the only ones who could legally own guns.
But every other hate crime is fine.
But “hate crimes” AGAINST Whites are okay ………….
“they” wish to destroy Christianity because with no “Loving God” of Slaves, Poor, and Downtrodden, there are no GOD given RIGHTS. That removes the basis of the entire Constitution.That is why Bolsheviks rabidly attack religion.
We are the only country in the world that has a Second Amendment, which is included in our BILL(list) of RIGHTS.
Find one government in all of history that banned it’s own ARMED FORCES from “Keeping and Bearing” ARMS.
Find one government in the history of humanity that felt a need to document a “RIGHT” for it’s ARMED FORCES to possess ARMS.
Oppressive Governments ALWAYS ban the People’S RIGHT to arms.
The claim that the Founding Fathers wrote the 2nd Amendment to give Our ARMED FORCES a “right” to keep and carry ARMS is S-T-U-P-I-D.
The only reason for the Second Amendment is to clearly spell-out the GOD GIVEN RIGHT of INDIVIDUALS to keep & bear ARMS.
The only reason for the BILL(list) of RIGHTS was to codify INDIVIDUALS’ GOD GIVEN RIGHTS.
Has there ever been a government that was not chock full of it’s “rights” up to and including declaring itself to be the Lord God Almighty?! (Rome, Egypt, Israel,etc)
Does the 1st Amendment mean the GOVERNMENT is allowed to give speeches? Try shutting up any Politician. But THEY would LOVE to shut YOU up, hence the FIRST Amendment.
Anyone who tells you the 2nd Amendment applies to the Army or State Militia, is telling you they think you are STUPID.
There has NEVER been a government that felt it had to codify it’s army’s/soldier’s “RIGHT” to “Keep and BEAR ARMS” because there has NEVER been a government that refused to allow It’s own soldiers to KEEP and BEAR ARMS!
The Second Amendment was written for the People, like the other 9 Amendments in the Bill of Rights. This was confirmed by the SCOTUS in the DC vs Heller decision, where they stated that the “People” in the Second Amendment were the same “People” that are mentioned in the First and Fourth Amendment.
The 2nd Amendment clearly codifies the “right of the PEOPLE to keep and bear arms”, and certainly not “the Militia”.
Why would “the Militia”, a type of army manned by citizen-soldiers as opposed to full-time “regulars”, need a constitutional amendment to guarantee they have the right “to keep and bear arms”?
Is there any specific statement anywhere in the Constitution that the army Congress is empowered to raise has the “right to keep and bear arms”? Of course not. …………. That is assumed.
the 2nd amendment,, specifies that the RIGHT to bear arms is the right of the people,, NOT the militia,,,, it is the people who will make up the militia,, but the right is not the right of a “well regulated militia” it is the right of the people, We the people were BORN WITH UNALIENABLE RIGHTS, meaning they come from GOD.
… the Bolshevik-Left insists there is NO GOD so they can deny all your GOD given RIGHTS.
Your Rights do not come from the Constitution. Your Rights come from Our Creator, and the Constitution was written to SUPERVISE, REGULATE, and CONTROL government actors. As it relates to firearms, the Heller “decision” was completely unnecessary, and likely a smokescreen to make it APPEAR that the USG retained some rights to regulate some firearms. Check out the relevant part of US v. Cruikshank:
“[The Right to Keep and Bear Arms] is not a right granted by the Constitution. Neither is it in any manner dependent upon that instrument for its existence. The second amendment declares that it shall not be infringed;… This is one of the amendments that has no other effect than to restrict the powers of the national government,…”.
U.S. v. Cruikshank Et Al. 92 U.S. 542 (1875).
Res adjudicata – “the thing has already been decided.”
The 9th and 10th Amendments help make it ABUNDANTLY clear to even the DENSEST of intellects that we truly have NO “Constitutional rights.” What we have(at the risk of being redundant) is Constitutionally-SECURED rights, but these rights are ONLY as secure as:
a) the honor and integrity of those taking the oath, and
b) the ability of the People to COMPEL obedience on pain of perjury charges and removal from office.
Yet another example why “hate crime” laws should be abolished.
“Hate Crime” laws violate Section 1 of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution.
“All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”
https://imgur.com/KiO3h4K
It’s a really *REALLY* remarkably simple thing to examine.
It says right there, black and white, plain as day it is illegal, under the constitution to “deny to any person within it’s (USA) jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”
“Hate Crime” laws provide legal protections to some people, as a group, which are denied to other people, as a group.
“Hate Crime” laws are not “arguably” a violation, but a blatant, abject, unabashed violation. There’s no ambiguity to be found in the topic: “Hate Crime” laws are absolutely, top to bottom, back to front, an utter abnegation of the 14th Amendment.
By the way, maybe it means something and maybe it doesn’t: but this bill was proposed by….. a Jew and a Jesuit. I’m not saying that indicates any kind of pattern of behavior or a predictable result… I’m just making a note. The two people trying to write an unconstitutional law which would permanently disarm any whites who are accused of a misdemeanor offense, if can be labeled a hate crime, are a Jew and a Jesuit. Make of that what you will, I postulate nothing and I offer no conspiracy theory – I’m only observing.
Rep. David Cicilline (D-RI) has a Jewish mother.
https://imgur.com/EGe1Zj7
Sen. Bob Casey (D-PA) is a Jesuit.
https://imgur.com/mcznP7I
You’ve just committed your first Orwellian “hate crime” Observing Libertarian by noticing that David Cicilline is jewish. Those who noticed that the Bolsheviks who took over Russia in 1917 were mostly Jews, were either sent to the gulags or summarily shot. And since we know that the Jesuits were infiltrated by crypto-Jews hundreds of years ago from their foundation, it should shock no one that these two are conspiring, yes conspiring, to destroy this once great country and its Constitution.
“If [the Jews] had the power to do to us what we are able to do to them, not one of us would live for an hour. But since they lack the power to do this publicly, they remain our daily murderers and bloodthirsty foes in their hearts.”
– Martin Luther (1483-1546): On The Jews and Their Lies: 9/11, p. 141
Make no mistake, disarming Christians directly contradicts the commandment of Christ to his followers, “Then said he unto them, But now, he that hath a purse, let him take it, and likewise his scrip: and he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one.”
Luke 22:36
Yes, America, it is our Christ-given right to be armed and protect ourselves, and the Second Amendment is based on Luke 22:36, and that’s why the nation wreckers want our Bible out of our schools.
Respectfully brother, I think it requires 2 or more witnesses to justify one verse, yes? Correct me if I am in err. Respect – John
I submit we are way past the point of boasting and building ourselves up over protecting ourselves from the army which Yahweh has brought against us, and… to resist that chastisement is a form of disobedience to Yahweh’s punishment, yes? There is no political solution, and thinking that ammo rounds are going to divert the things we should really be focusing on is merely a futile attempt at postponing the inevitable, yes? Death is not an option! The manner in which you are fighting now and every day, and what is in your heart when that moment comes… when you do die… is, IMHO, chief! Your father knows your heart and His spirit intercedes. Sometimes we don’t have to find the words.
White countries today do not recognize that they are being chastised for disobedience, so until they do, they are going to need to physically protect themselves, and they are going to search for every justification to do so, as the satanic Jews work ceaselessly to convince them they have no right to do so, that to do so is pure evil. Whites are still a long way off from understanding that they are “postponing the inevitable,” and until they wake up to that by opening their Bibles and their eyes to see, and their ears to hear, they will seek every justification to protect themselves and their families.
An ancient foreign religious concept from the Middle East called “LASHON HARA” is now being forcibly written into the laws of the Christian West as “hate crime”.
“LASHON HARA” condemns “hate speech”, forbidding members to talk about their own children being raped & sodomized by their “priests”. Originating with a desert tribe, it was introduced to Bolshevik Russia by that same tribe, who are now forcing it upon western democracies, destroying the concept of freedom of speech. It was also included in the Koran, written by Jewish Yemeni Slavetrader Khadija, first wife of Mohammed, based entirely upon the Talmud.
Can you guess which desert tribe it is?
Amazing information here, Protestant. Thank you!
You’re welcome, brother. It is important for people to reject the whole idea of “hate speech” and “hate crime” as an alien concept that violates democracy, just like Sharia Law.
Legal law is Jewish law #Talmud, ancient system of pledge, law of the sea
judge is captain, all are subject to the laws of the sinking ship, Babylon
Bush signed the 7 Noah hid laws to cull the population & Trump signed
the Noahidlaws 4/20/2018 read punishment & Earth has 4 corners
https://gab.com/hwt123/posts/TERQbEZ0UGVIZlg3UHVyWDFiQ2V1UT09
Come and take it.
ammo up my folk.
Who in the hell comes up with this s**t?
The ADL, SPLC, JDL, AIPAC, WJC, and every synagogue in the world.
“You literally committed your first ‘hate crime’ when you were born White.” So true, the real war is not in the Middle East. The real war is against White people everywhere.
….Just in case you’re White and you think you’ve done nothing ‘wrong’….
That Bob Casey is a liberal democrat POS from my state. Your quintessential career politician puppeted by the jews. His father was a Democratic Governor of PA who made the presidency of Jimmy Carter look good. This is absolutely a direct attack on gun owning whites – and most of them still don’t see it, and half of them would even be in favor, believing that they could never get pinned with any hate crime. After all, we’re supposed to love everyone, right?