Justice Minister Zbigniew Ziobro said the aim of the bill was to give internet users the feeling that their rights are protected and that their posts cannot be arbitrarily removed from online platforms:
The full name of the bill is the law on freedom of expressing one’s own views and searching and disseminating information on the internet.
Under its provisions, social media services will not be allowed to remove content or block accounts if the content on them does not break Polish law. In the event of removal or blockage, a complaint can be sent to the platform, which will have 24 hours to consider it. Within 48 hours of the decision, the user will be able to file a petition to the court for the return of access. The court will consider complaints within seven days of receipt and the entire process is to be electronic.
“Often, the victims of tendencies for ideological censorship are also representatives of various groups operating in Poland, whose content is removed or blocked, just because they express views and refer to values that are unacceptable from the point of view of communities… with an ever-stronger influence on the functioning of social media,” Mr Ziobro said.
“We realise that it is not an easy topic, we realise that on the internet there should also be a sphere of guarantees for everybody who feels slandered, a sphere of limitation of various content which may carry with it a negative impact on the sphere of other people’s freedom,” he said. “But we would like to propose such tools that will enable both one side and the other to call for the decision of a body that will be able to adjudicate whether content appearing on such and such a social media account really violates personal rights, whether it can be eliminated, or whether there is censorship.”
If a special court rules in favour of the plaintiff and the internet service does not obey the ruling it can subject the internet service to a fine of up to PLN 8 million (EUR 1.8 million) imposed by the Office of Electronic Communications.
One would have to be in a coma not to be aware that all major social media platforms are owned and operated by the Usual Suspects™ of the Radical Left — and anyone to the Right of Karl Marx and Chairman Mao will find themselves in violation of their “community standards” — including the former President of the United States.
And up until now, these powerful corporate ideologues have gotten away with this outright and cynical censorship — without recourse — legal or financial.
For all intents and purposes, these media platforms have become the modern-day Soviet Cheka — with the ability to not only censor any “counter-revolutionary” voices but literally destroy people’s lives — even drive them to suicide for expressing “incorrect” and “unapproved” viewpoints.
And of all Europeans, the Poles are all too familiar with life under the iron-fisted intolerance of the Radical Left — and they appear to have no intention of allowing themselves to revisit the Dark Ages of communism, which western Europe appears intent upon embracing.
But any such freedoms that Poland defends must be to ensure that the nation remains Christian — and any Poles who naively use their freedom of speech to denounce Christ — and promote the Radical Left — will ultimately find themselves enslaved under atheistic communists once again.
As an interesting side note, in 2016 Justice Minister Zbigniew Ziobro — who is introducing this new legislation — called for the extradition of convicted child rapist and serial sexual predator, Roman Polanski, to the U.S. to face justice after fleeing to Europe to avoid prison.
Since Jews use US law to sue other nations, can use Goyim use Polish law to sue Twitter?
Money doesn’t matter to the MOTUS. It is no object. The object is control. The MOTUS are clandestinely sanctioned. No doubt about it. They do what the govt would prefer to do overtly but can’t because it’s illegal. The MOTUS are placation private sector actors for the govt. They don’t need
money. They work for those who print it to create the new system of control, more control, total control. Big figure fines make the goy think “ha ha take that”. Money is not an object to them. They print the money. Don’t be blown away by big money figures and fines. It’s a placation technique.
A nice step in the right direction.
Now remove the brothels!!
…. many kudos to Poland, … !, good job, … !, … may many other countries follow their example, … !
Simple solution: Fake buk and jootube will just block service to Poland.
problem solved. Like when Iceland kicked the bankers out and locked up a few. When they were released, they emigrated to the Israeli state. Nothing on the news in the USSA about that.
Poland and Ukraine are well aware of who is who. The west has turned their backs on Jesus and he has turned his back on us.
Revelation 9:20 And the rest of the men which were not killed by these plagues yet repented not of the works of their hands, that they should not worship devils, and idols of gold, and silver, and brass, and stone, and of wood: which neither can see, nor hear, nor walk:
Revelation 9:21 Neither repented they of their murders, nor of their sorceries, nor of their fornication, nor of their thefts.
Revelation 16:9 And men were scorched with great heat, and blasphemed the name of God, which hath power over these plagues: and they repented not to give him glory.
Revelation 16:11 And blasphemed the God of heaven because of their pains and their sores, and repented not of their deeds.
All censorship is “justified” by falsely equating free speech with violence.
If only one person in 100 million says something “hateful” or “racist” and commits a violent act, then the other 999,999,999 non violent people need to have their freedom of speech curtailed.
They use the same logic to justify taking away gun ownership rights.
Yip, you’re dead right! Like Tarrant in New Zealand. Tarrant shoots up a couple of mosks and kills 50 moslems or so, and next thing all the legal gun owners in the whole country have to hand over their guns that were banned overnight. Why should the whole country pay the price for one blokes actions? Very bizarre stuff!
I saw that Tarrant video, and it looked more like a poorly created video GAME than anything resembling reality. Based on that, I don’t believe anybody was harmed. In my opinion, it was entirely fake from beginning to end.
I have analyzed the Tarrant’s video very closely, frame by frame…
All the victims were already dead, when he came first. In first entrance, he had fake guns, and there were 5 alive actors, who were not among dead bodies later…
Then he returned to the car and picked up a real gun, and shot into few bodies on the ground, but the actors were not there any more, and their bodies did not lay on the ground either, and counting bodies on ground, the actors were not counted in official victim count…
And in the second shooting, the brains were spurting from victims when shot, so there were probably real bodies…
So even if there were real victims, but ultimately shot by someone else BEFORE Tarrant came to play the game of “easy shooting”…
Which together with the obstinate hysterical censorship of his video means, that NZ government was complicit in that, in order to disarm it’s citizens…
“Germany: Secretary Charged With Killing Trillions of Jews”
“In Germany, prosecutors have charged a 95-year-old woman for killing trillions of Jews because she was a secretary in a World War II era concentration camp.”
https://forum.infostormer.com/t/germany-secretary-charged-with-killing-trillions-of-jews/10856
Interesting events. I assume thier (Poland) cabinet are writing laws(bill) like the American senate. Why not thier parliament , unless it be as corrupt as America or BRD? The Polish people may resist jew domination as few in western countries.
In BRD violators end up in Landsberg. In America also internet is a game preserve for FBI , MOSSAD to capture the rogues who dare to go beyond the fence of monitor , oversight and censorship. Communications is a jew weapon , an artificial colloquy for platitudes , obscenity, adulation and holycost tribute.
Poland becomes more interesting if not suspicious. There are many conditions in this bill that any jew door guard will find vulnerable. Such a law in America or BRD still depends on law already written or interpreted by jews’ stooges . Unconstitutional law itself is the violator of liberty and not the communication channel , another jew monopoly.
Mr. Ziobro may cast a penny into the fountain . It is interesting to learn if his wish will become true.
This is a fantastic development: de-clawing the censors, at last.
This attempt in Poland to force the jew-controlled internet platforms to allow content to remain online is better than nothing, but still misguided. Why is the only solution anyone can think of to continue to validate those jew-controlled platforms, to try to mold them into something decent? It is doomed to fail, ultimately.
The answer is for the Polish government, and others, including ours, to institute government-run alternatives to these platforms that many have come to consider indispensable, so a government owned Twitter alternative, YouTube alternative, Google alternative that all would have access to and which is prohibited by law (varying according to countries and constitutions) from restricting legal activity of the users. These services would be funded by reasonable monthly fees by each user, just like our other utilities are. (The “free” jew platforms are not really free when we are being data-mined to be advertised to and sold stuff).
For Americans indoctrinated in the jewish spirit of anti-government (per the “Protocols”), they need to realize that’s part of how jews keep them on the plantation. A government-run Facebook for example would be accountable to you in a way that jew billionaire Mark Zuckerburg is not accountable to you, not one iota. Some readers here may be old enough to remember when we used to have only one phone company in the United States. As a tightly-regulated monopoly, it was basically quasi-government run. It couldn’t deny phone service to users whose politics a congressman didn’t like. It couldn’t prohibit you from saying certain things on your phone calls, and it couldn’t arbitrarily tap your phone calls either.
Jews prevent this kind of healthy, collective solution by saying it violates the holy principle of the Almighty Shekel, that the government, which represents we the people, should not be allowed to do something that would eat into the earnings of those privately-owned jew companies…a fallacy that too many of our people have bought into and support them in.
Right, but they need to be able to control people through Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, etc., and if they shutdown those platforms in Poland, they would lose even more control of the narrative there. Most people are so lazy they get all their news from those venues, and without their influence, Poles would be much better off….
So is questioning the holohoax or all things jewish, their stranglehold on the world and their hatred and racist ways against all non Jews thru their control of the monetary system allowed in Poland or is that forbidden by unconstitutional supremacist “hate” speech fake laws like in most European countries? They are the virus and the parasites
We already HAVE government run sources – who do you think started/funded facebook? What is twitter if not a govt sponsored/enabled psy-op? No, government owned and operated anything is never the answer, especially communications/media. Polands answer is a step in the right direction at least.
I agree Luke. It’s impossible to differentiate between “government” and “big business” nowadays, which is exactly what Mussolini referred to as “corporatism”. Big business is so powerful that it can dictate government policy (as in the present “covid” scamdemic), and once a business reaches a certain size it’s “adopted” as part of government.
As just one example, Bill Gates, the software thief, would never have established a worldwide near monopoly on “his” stolen computer operating system without government collusion, and now he’s set himself up as the world’s “medical expert” due to his financial holdings in the WHO, various governments via direct bribery, and organisations like the “British” (actually jewish) BBC.
Monopoly is the problem, and monopolies are from government.
The Matrix is simply the sum total of Federal Regulation. Abolish regulation and the Matrix is gone!
Example- founding of the FCC [Federal Communications Commission]- see Communications Act of 1934- ABC to Goldenson, NBC to Sarnoff, and CBS to Paley. All Jewish of course!
Regulation was sold as being pro-public- that was/is the cover story. We now know that the Progressive era was used primarily FOR business- the legislation did not come from Ralph Nader types!