(The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences) A new 2023 study entitled “All human social groups are human, but some are more human than others: A comprehensive investigation of the implicit association of ‘Human’ to US racial/ethnic groups” concludes that while all peoples are “human”, a certain group of Whites more strongly identifies as human than other non-White groups:
“All humans belong to the species Homo sapiens. Yet, throughout history, humans have breathed life into the Orwellian adage that “All [humans] are equal, but some [humans] are more equal than others.”
Here, participants staunchly rejected this adage, with the overwhelming majority of over 61,000 participants reporting that all humans are equally human. However, across 13 experiments, US White participants (and White participants abroad) showed robust evidence of an implicit Human=Own Group association. Conversely, Black, Latinx, and Asian participants in the United States did not demonstrate this bias.
These results highlight the tendency among socially dominant groups to reserve the quality Human for their own kind, producing, even in the 21st century, the age-old error of pseudospeciation.
Abstract
All human groups are equally human, but are they automatically represented as such? Harnessing data from 61,377 participants across 13 experiments (six primary and seven supplemental), a sharp dissociation between implicit and explicit measures emerged.Despite explicitly affirming the equal humanity of all racial/ethnic groups, White participants consistently associated Human (relative to Animal) more with White than Black, Hispanic, and Asian groups on Implicit Association Tests (IATs; experiments 1–4).
This effect emerged across diverse representations of Animal that varied in valence (pets, farm animals, wild animals, and vermin; experiments 1–2). Non-White participants showed no such Human=Own Group bias (e.g., Black participants on a White–Black/Human–Animal IAT).
However, when the test included two outgroups (e.g., Asian participants on a White–Black/Human–Animal IAT), non-White participants displayed Human=White associations.
The overall effect was largely invariant across demographic variations in age, religion, and education but did vary by political ideology and gender, with self-identified conservatives and men displaying stronger Human=White associations (experiment 3).
Using a variance decomposition method, experiment 4 showed that the Human=White effect cannot be attributed to valence alone; the semantic meaning of Human and Animal accounted for a unique proportion of variance. Similarly, the effect persisted even when Human was contrasted with positive attributes (e.g., God, Gods, and Dessert; experiment 5a).
Experiments 5a-b clarified the primacy of Human=White rather than Animal=Black associations. Together, these experiments document a factually erroneous but robust Human=Own Group implicit stereotype among US White participants (and globally), with suggestive evidence of its presence in other socially dominant groups.”
What this study appears to suggest is that while many White people may give lip service to the notion that all peoples are “human”, their lived experience and understanding of world history contradicts that social conditioning and political indoctrination.
And since all respondents in this study have been socially conditioned to concede that all peoples are “human” for fear of being stigmatized as “racist,” they appear to unconsciously try to disagree with that premise in a roundabout, socially acceptable fashion.
The term “human” has been erroneously conflated with the “scientific” term “homo sapiens” — Swedish taxonomist, Carl Linnaeus, coined the term “homo sapiens” in 1735 many centuries after a variant of the term “human” was derived from the Latin “humanus” which means:
“…of man, human,” also “humane, philanthropic, kind, gentle, polite; learned, refined, civilized.”
As we can see from this definition, the term “human” could hardly encompass all people grouped under the later term “homo sapiens” — in fact, it best describes those who built and occupied the Greco-Roman “world” — who coined the term “humanus” to describe themselves, not all hominoid peoples.
And when Carl Linnaeus defined the term “homo sapiens,” it was met with public outcry because he had classified humans generically as part of the animal kingdom — and worse, arbitrarily grouped them as a kind of ape — merely based on physiological similarities.
In response to this criticism, Linnaeus would eventually introduce four sub-varieties of “homo sapiens” — with the “Europeanus” variety which demonstrated the highest culture, which he erroneously attributed to environment rather than biology — as the field of genetics had yet to be discovered.
This idea that cultural differences can lead to divergence in species or kinds is called “pseudospeciation” — and even Christians have engaged in this fallacy when they attempt to account for the vastly different human groups by claiming that language differences in Babel and separation caused the readily perceived racial characteristics in the races.
These early practitioners of the fledgling field of Taxonomy were largely White Christian men who mistakenly believed that all of those who fell under the category of “homo sapiens” must somehow be descendants of Adam from the Bible — such as the Anglo-Irish naturalist, Robert Boyle.
However, the Scottish philosopher, Henry Homes, Lord Kames (1695-1782) took the most reasonable approach to this conundrum by asserting,
“…God had created different races on Earth in separate regions. In his 1734 book ‘Sketches on the History of Man,’ Home claimed that the environment, climate, or state of society could not account for racial differences, so the races must have come from distinct, separate stocks.”
The English word “man” derives from the Germanic term “mann,” which likely derived from the name of the pre-Christian, Germanic pagan god, Mannus, the progenitor of the Germanic tribes, as described by the Roman historian Tacitus in his work, Germania.
And for these Germanic tribes a “mann” was not a universalist term — it specifically related only to their own or related tribes — and only later did the term “man” become universal — most likely because of the false dictates of Christian universalist doctrines.
However, during the Christian Era, “man” originally referred to a member of the Adamic creation — or Adamkind — from the Book of Genesis in the Bible — and the Hebrew word “Adam” was translated as “man” in English — both terms deriving from similar unique and divine creation accounts.
The specific tribes who were the legitimate descendants of Adam are identified in the Bible as the Genesis 10 nations — and it is impossible to trace all known races back to those tribes.
Charles Darwin would pick up on the work of Carl Linnaeus — by positing the spurious idea that lower life forms “evolved” spontaneously into higher life forms — most controversially that man evolved from apes — thus “scientifically” showing that all “homo sapiens” have a common ape-like ancestor — legitimizing the concept of “racial universalism”.
But many scientists and natural philosophers refused to accept this universalist “human” notion — and set about to prove that not only were racial differences real — but that they accounted for the vast disparity in cultural and civilizational development among the different races.
Those who studied hierarchical race differences were smeared for advocating for “scientific racism” — but it persisted as a legitimate field of inquiry until the end of World War II when the bogus accusations of the Holocaust™ were laid at the feet of the vanquished Germans who were staunch advocates of these racial ideas.
After World War II, Jews began to dominate all academic disciples, especially anthropology — and anyone who even believed that race was anything but a “social construct” — or challenged the unscientific theory of evolution — had no chance to get a job in academia — after all, that kind of thinking was “pseudo-scientific” and will inevitably lead to “another” Holocaust™.
Thus, the original concept of a “human” — referring specifically to Western Man — has become politicized — to the point that small differences in animals are accepted as evidence of separate species whereas in humans even more radical differences are ignored in order to maintain the idea of a universal “human” race.
As this above-mentioned study shows, non-Whites naturally do not strongly identify as “human” simply because it is a concept alien to them because it was conceived by White people to describe their own race — and beneath all the brainwashing and social stigmas, Whites intuitively understand to whom “human” refers — and to whom it does not.
And below are the people who think they can “pass” as White while telling us that race doesn’t exist — it’s all in your head, goyim:
The Dire Consequences of Race Mixing.
Consequently the average Negro IQ is 15 points lower than the average Caucasian IQ. This result is found regardless of geography and social status…..
In a mixed race individual who appears to be mainly Negro there is no way to predict whether all of his/her organs are Negro too. Negroes in general have a higher testosterone rates than Caucasians, are more aggressive and less emotionally balanced because of this but at least their organs are intended for that amount of testosterone. Hormone irregularities are also linked with depression and not surprisingly there is a very high rate of depression as well as other health problems among mixed race individuals when compared to non-mixed race men or women. There is also a much higher suicide rate among mixed raced children as they are five times more likely to commit suicide than someone of a singular race…
Children like to look like their parents. Little girls in particular like to look like their mother. It must be very upsetting for mixed race children to see someone who looks nothing like him or her and also very upsetting to know that this was knowingly done to them by their own parents….
mixed race relationships are also more likely to split up but what really is even more alarmingly nowadays is the high rate of white women being murdered by their black husbands or boy friends. Statistics clearly show that a white woman is more likely to be killed by a black man in a relationship than with a white man or other, and white men are twenty one times more likely to be murdered by a black wife than by a woman of another race. As of this writing femicide i.e., the homicide of women, is the leading cause of death in the United States among black and white mix race relationships. Black males are 33% more likely to murder their spouse if she is white instead of black.
Even three month old babies know more about race than most adult Europeans and show a preference for the faces of their own race even when they are of people they have never seen before. They instinctively know what race they are. Which race face is it that a three month old mixed race babies find comforting? The natural state of babies and children is racist and this lasts until they are old enough to understand and succumb to the liberal programming that all whites are now being subjected to.
https://esau.today/the-dire-consequences-of-race-mixing/
Simple, easy litmus test to determine if someone is human or not:
https://media.gab.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=1136,quality=100,fit=scale-down/system/media_attachments/files/159/540/944/original/e8505c00e8154a5c.jpg
Dr. Know….
I got a good laugh at that one. But I believe it is true. Good one.
Well, honestly, you will find the same feeling of belonging to a separate species among Africans in Africa and Asians in Asia, which is why black Zimbabweans and South Africans chase away white farmers despite needing them, and why it is so hard for whites to get fully accepted into Japanese society despite often having rock star status.
I would say that roughly 30-40 percent of any human population tend to identify as their race rather than as human, and they will treat racial strangers accordingly. This is what is behind racial self segregation.
Now, if you are adopted into a country of a different race, or is born into a racial minority, it will be very hard for you to develop this exclusive racial identity, as you cannot afford to dismiss the racial majority, which would explain why the racial minorities in this study seemed less exclusive.
On the race side of things sure considering with all the decades of brainwashing, influencing, manipulating, distorting, skewing, twisting, spinning, muddying, hazy, unclear circumstance’s an or discussions controversy’s while at the same time bad mouthing, libeling, slandering, vilifying white people for who and what they are. not too mention Dilbert got canned which just proves my point even further so trust me their have been astronomically, monumental, magnitude’s of blacks that are saying white people are bad, evil when they actually are not considering this is not just fellow white’s that are doing this to their own kind.
America wouldn’t be in this state of condition if democrats will stop appeasing a certain race of losers non stop for years to come an further down the future I’m afraid. this is why you don’t see this happening in Asian, Russian countries & city’s always voting democrat otherwise China, South Korea, Japan, Moscow would end up like North America, Britain, Europe being infested with black people always transforming each country, state, continent into a ghetto, slumish, projecy, dilapidated, entropic, favela like what’s happening here in North America and what already happened in Rio De Janeiro South America, Sub Saharan Africa, Haiti
Why not identify as both your race and human instead of comprising one over the other.
Waltheof of Northumbria ……….
I hope you are checking the comment section here from time to time and notice this comment.
You wrote on a different forum about me — This West loves to do these long winded comments and talk forever. Almost as if he’s talking, and at the same time saying nothing of importance. Also something strange: because he does say he seems to believe in something close to DSCI, yet keeps saying it isn’t DSCI.
Well, I would appreciate if you could “point out” what you believe is “Long Winded”. I will admit that at times, my comment(s) can be long. But sometimes, depending on the subject matter and my audience, it does take time to “build” the point that I am trying to make. I don’t see anything wrong with “Conversation”. Not sure why this is so offensive to you.
In regards to this seeming contradiction you accuse me of —- YES, I do believe in a Dual Seedline. I’m just trying to separate myself from the “Serpent Seedline” narrative.
My Question to you is —– Why do you believe “Serpent Seedline” is absolutely necessary to believe in order to have a Saving relationship with God the Father through His Son Jesus Christ? And don’t you also believe in National Salvation of all White Peoples? So, why the animosity. I will be saved just as you.
I believe in Two Seedlines —- One Adamic, one not adamic. Isn’t this what you believe as well? We just come at it from different angles. You believe Eve had sex with the Serpent in the garden.
I believe Cain and Esau spread their Adamic seedline through non-adamics (non-whites) to create a Second seedline.
We both believe in TWO separate seedlines — and the non-adamic seedline line, is by nature, at war with the Adamic seedline.
What’s the problem? Who am I hurting by not agreeing with your version of Dual Seedline?
Hope you have love in your heart for your White brethren and will engage in civil discourse.
I had white, yellow, brown, red, grey canaries, but they all were just CANARIES !
Place where appropriate.
This might be old hat here…but I just found it in response to a discussion with a very nice, lucid 93 year old mormon woman who is completely taken in by them. The Utah gov just banned the bible in schools and I got around to the star of Remphan/David thing being on the front of the tabernacle in
Salt Lake City. Long story short…a google came up with something I never knew…..hope it helps.
(we are in Revelations and I think God or Jesus really tapped me on the shoulder with this).
https://www.google.com/search?client=opera&q=what+passage+says+star+of+david%3F&sourceid=opera&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8#imgrc=d6F5ARz99vXlqM&ip=1
Jesus IS God friend.
Thank you for the share.
Jew has relegated the victims of his lies to classes. Most white are of the hated yet essential mittle class . What are the others ?
Above is the unseen ethereal of plutocrats and then the government upper class ; beneath is the lower class , most once in honest service , parvenu of predatory aliens all subsidized ad infinitum by the largess of the mittel or working class . Fear not. There is no race , no borders , no law, no creed, no God and no discrimination.
The Mittel is really the living class . The others are parasites . One is its suzeraine , the other the unique debt of thier alleged sin, which appreciates the more they pay.. $$ is the God all worship.
The jew brings in alien races , the oppressed , weary the hungry . all seek refuge from thier places of origin. They are subsidized by the upper class. But by virtue of thier natural intelligence since they are neither with soul nor perception of a fourth dimension are misperceived as more intelligent like the Chink or relative jud , who are busy accumulating wealth and becoming advisors about war and money because they are so smart. And both so lucrative.
No gratitude or sense of shame . Parasites have no dimension of grace or sacrifice But they are “smart” ; and know how to exploit their insensate host. They all have the same thing in common .
The white mittle class is thier victim that , loves to be devoured alive believing it is Christian or some perverted virtue . They love feeding those , who are thier importunate guests as thier Christian obligation. . Everything is to be consumed . Until it is with improvidence digested into thier bank or ledger , like thier last “home.” Or famine and waste, and pollution becomes the new strophe in , AMerica America , God lent his Grace to Thee .
This white mittle class is repudiating its unique quality , which disassociates itself from the others , its soul or fifth dimension , the ability to discern another , which is divine and therefore denied by the others as impossible . But they know to exploit the WHite sentimentality.
It can not continue and the end must be imminent. WHat ever the WHite race is , it has been deceived to repudiate its inheritance from Heaven and become part of the sub natural earth . It has married itself to the unconverted ” natural man” and his three dimensional world. He is now a corpse for the others to devour. All are accumulating and making haste attracted to its demise.
The Lord was asked when the end come s , where will these things be? His most cogent reply : Above the decaying beast , gather the vultures.
We’ve added a new meme about Christian universalism:
https://christiansfortruth.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/non-white-christians.jpg
I was looking at the “references” of the links they gave me in my previous comments to see to find out if there is a basis to support this strange anthropological theory that predominates in this forum, I found nothing … either they confuse philosophical/religious categories such as salvation and universalism or it is nothing more than a vain attempt to attribute a form of selective Christianity, only for the white race, the rest …
The meme they just posted here is more than clear.
They do not adduce anything scriptural to support their extravagant thesis. It is like a brainwashing, a constant repetition of sentences without biblical basis, a pseudo-Christian propaganda.
The fact that you maintain that there was no holocaust, which is very true, and that you accuse Judeo-Masonry for its violation and constant attacks against Christian values, also very objective, does not make you Christians, it does not give you the right to deform the doctrine of Christ by bringing such twisted ideas that seem to be guided and motivated by a feeling of pride and hatred rather drawn from the Talmud …
And you ask me what is a Jew?
The one who follows the Talmud.
In other words, you didn’t read the articles and the comment sections that we provided for you. And yes, both are filled with biblical reference in support of those ideas.
So are far as we are concerned, you are not honest in your willingness to read the material and consider the scriptural evidence. All you’re interested in is smearing us as some sort of fake Christians.
You have wasted enough of everyone’s time.
Please do not submit any more comments. They will not be published.
CFT ……………..
Thank you for taking this action. I support it.
Question — how do most people find CFT unless recommended by someone?
Do you have any tracking DATA where these random people come from?
“Nonex” is just one of maybe 20 that I have seen since my time here began a few years ago. They just magically appear and it seems to me that they never actually READ the article they are commenting on.
I have to believe they are plants. Not real people who consider themselves “christian” and they just happen to find this website.
it is ALWAYS the same MO. They rebuke, shame, condemn without EVER providing a Scriptural basis for their argument. Only Ad Hominem and Emotional appeal.
A person would be hard pressed to find CFT through a search engine like google.
Anything you can share would be interesting. I mean I don’t think you guys promote your site anywhere. So, how do people find you? I found CFT through a conversation on a different forum and someone said …… christiansfortruth ……….. so I checked it out.
Just curious where these people come from.
Thank you for weighing in with Nonex. I think he got too far before he caught your interest, but I understand that you guys have “lives” outside of CFT and you can’t sit there and scrutinize every comment that comes through.
Peace and Good Will to you all.
West, to answer your question, no, we do not and cannot track where individual readers or commenters come from. We do have referral sites that show up, but not ones which specific individuals come from.
Either way, we don’t track any of our readers or keep any information.
As far as Nonex, and those like him, we allow them to post as a test of their spirit. Most show themselves to be disingenuous, as you pointed out.
However, it’s important that our readers can see how they conduct themselves and how they respond to being challenged. We were all there at one point.
We don’t censor anyone at first as long as they are civil and appear to have genuine questions, but if they refuse to address the evidence or challenges, then we pull the plug.
Good one. Typical Judeo-Christian liberal image on the left.
Thanks!
https://youtu.be/WlT5dsG2WMc
Killing The Witches Papua New Guinea
https://youtu.be/PeNn_Kh7Qmc
Papua New Guinea: A War On Witches
**After introducing Christianity over one hundred years ago … This superstition/magic is stronger than ever. It never leaves a so called black Christian anywhere, even in America. The black is not capable of enlightenment period…esp Christ Jesus. They can not be filled with the Holy Spirit…for with discernment it is a demonic spirit. This is the area where jews and blacks have common ground.
This study shows just how superstitious Whites have become, acting like if they come out and say the other races are not “human”, that God will strike them down with a lightning bolt or they won’t be saved.
“Human” is not a concept from the Bible, though most Christians foolishly believe that it is. “All are from Adam. All are human. All are equal in God’s eyes”. If that’s so, you should read the Old Testament, which completely contradicts all those ideas.
“Human” was a Roman concept. It described their ideal of civilized (white) Roman citizens.
What it means today has become completely removed from that original idea.
Now a “human” is anyone who is not an animal, which is absurd because they will turn around and claim that we are all animals. We can’t be both.
Stop being superstitious about the word “human”. It’s just a word.
When people see videos of blacks mercilessly beating a White person, the commenters will call those blacks “animals”, or even say “they aren’t human”. They know, but then they will hedge their bets and say, “but not all blacks….” Superstition, pure and simple. Get over it.
It’s apparent from the scripture that Lucifer was in charge of the earth project for a while. Is it possible that he took an early form of Adamic man and fused him with animal or insect DNA to create Asians and Negroes? Lucifer needed to create something that would obey and worship him. The Adamic man was not a good candidate for this. It had to be corrupted.
“Lucifer” is mentioned only once in the Bible, and refers to the King of Tyre (Isaiah 14:12) who is compared to the Morning Star which is bound to fall. The Hebrew doesn’t use the word “Lucifer” in this verse, but rather the “shining one” from “helel”, which refers to Venus.
How do you get from this one verse to the idea that the Morning Star of Venus or the King of Tyre interbred man with animals to get negroes?
One verse?? Who said I was quoting one verse? He was Heylel (shining star of the morning) before he became Satan (adversary). He was in charge of the earth project and failed. He was the “king” of Tyre and Babylon and all the other kingdoms which he offered to Jesus in Matthew 4. Could a human being sit in the “sides of the north” (God’s throne in the third heaven)?
Where does it say in scripture there are three heavens?
That sounds more like Catholicism.
2 Corinthians 12:2
john wrote, “He [Lucifer] He was Heylel (shining star of the morning) before he became Satan (adversary).”
“Satan” is mentioned in the Book of Job which predates Isaiah and the King of Tyre, no?
Many biblical scholars still debate what “satan” actually is, and from the perspective of the ancient Hebrews, they did not believe that there was a supernatural being such as “Satan” who was in opposition to God. That idea entered the culture only much later, some say when Judah was exiled in Babylon.
There is a scholarly consensus that “satan” in the Book of Job was not a supernatural being. Please read this article on the subject:
https://bibleq.net/answer/4423/
It does not matter if the book of Job was written before Isaiah. The angelic being who took a third of the angels with him and was an anointed guardian cherub (Ezek. 28:14) predated all of the books. Isaiah is allowed to refer to him by his earlier name. He started out as the light bringer, he became the adversary. He has both spiritual and physical minions on this earth.
I do not know if I understand this matter very well.
Race or species … it doesn’t matter much the deviation of the type, anthropologically there are great differences, it can’t be denied, but didn’t God create man, or should we think then that God created only a white man and therefore the other ‘species or races’, as you prefer to call them, are not human?. Is that the conclusion?.
The conditioning of cultures governs even the minds of the scientists, what for the Middle Ages or even just a hundred years or less ago was something inconceivable, today is beginning to be appreciated differently … the cultural conditioning, almost always imposed in history by the dominant elite, today Judeo-Masonic it is the factor …
How do you think these children will think tomorrow…?:
https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/socal-teacher-caught-on-video-instructing-children-how-to-pleasure-the-booty-hole/
No, I keep thinking that regardless of the definitions that may be made by those who call themselves ‘men of science’, the word of God surpasses all of them, and HIS definition was that he create man, HE did not qualify us neither as species nor as races.
The mixtures between groups, the adaptation to the environment/conditions, etc, made the difference that we can see today — the opposite would be then to admit that those who are not white are not man; and in case you doubt, I am white, I do not defend any position, there are no ulterior motives in my commentary.
If someone still believes that whites are a superior race for what has been achieved civilizatorily is because they do not know the achievements that the Asian man had in his historical past, China created the printing press, gunpowder, sophisticated forms of martial arts, etc, before their civilization declined, and if the present world is not destroyed … they are destined to surpass our present “white civilization”, the amount of scientific papers they are producing is exponentially breaking all imaginable limits …
According to this philosophy then I would also have to think that the Asians are a superior race, no, the superior man is not the one who manufactures, it is the religious man who surpasses *man*.
Nonex, God created Adam as a unique creation. Only his genealogy of descendants is given in the Bible. Cain’s genealogy is not given, obviously because he took wives who were not part of the Adamic creation.
The Bible defines “man” as “the generations of Adam” (Gen 5:1). The English “man” is translated from the Hebrew “Adam”. This is a bloodline of kindred peoples, aka a “race”.
Adaptation to environments does not create different races that we see, that’s pseudo-Darwinism.
God created the non-Adamic peoples and put them in separate places on Earth for a reason. So we wouldn’t mix with them. Mixing does not create new races, it creates hybrids, like Arabs.
Just because the Chinese allegedly invented gunpower (this is disputed, btw), doesn’t mean they therefore descended from Adam, and therefore are counted among “man” in the Bible. The Chinese aren’t mentioned at all.
Recall Cain and descendants built cities. So non-Adamics were capable of creating a sort of civilization.
The Greeks called non-Greeks “barbarians”, which is the equivalent of “non-humans”. Does that offend you? I’m not offended even though I would have been a barbarian in their eyes. That’s life.
Would you please clarify the subject for me?.
“Nonex, God created Adam as a unique creation. Only his genealogy of descendants is given in the Bible. Cain’s genealogy is not given, obviously because he took wives who were not part of the Adamic creation.”
“The Chinese aren’t mentioned at all…”
Etc, etc … in other words, if i understand, what you are saying here is that people whom are different (spice or race, wherever), from white man are not human and salvation do not apply for them, is it no so?.
Nonex ………………
You are obviously new here. Which is great.
Question — How did you find CFT?
Here are some articles to Study. Hope you stick around —
https://christiansfortruth.com/?s=universalism
No one here seems to want to answer my question, now you refer me again to certain articles that talk about ‘universalism’ (this term is used in relation to a spiritual category, the salvation of man, which some profess to be ‘for all’ and others deny it because they consider it to be for God’s elect …) — the latter is also my opinion but this is not the issue under discussion here, a strange anthropological theory prevails in your comments.
What I am inferring, from what you say, is that God considers only one type of individual: the white man is the only human, and the rest are not human, or maybe ‘humanoids’, and therefore salvation is not possible for them.
The white man, it seems from your thesis here exposed, is a superior being and the only one who can be saved.
If so … there is nothing biblical in this interpretation, if that is your opinion, you should reconsider your positions.
Nonex, let’s start with actual scripture as you haven’t cited any to support your position.
Give us a few examples from scripture that you believe support your universalist ideas.
You can’t say, “Well, that’s just what I believe”. That’s the equivalent of saying, “I don’t care what the Bible says. This is what I think it should say or mean”.
So, go ahead….what verses do you think support your ideas?
*I will answer here because the answer box does not appear below (?).
I have not made any quotes, right, because I am asking … and you are still not answering (?).
For the last time.
Basically, summarizing I understand that you consider that only the white man is human/saved and the others are hominids …
I return the question to you: can you quote what part of scripture supports your position?.
And the more you refuse to answer me the more I am amazed!
Nonex ………………..
You wrote — ……No one here seems to want to answer my question….”
Years ago, maybe 30 years or so, someone boldly said to me — “The Holocaust was a hoax; a total fabrication.”
That was a lot for me to swallow at one given time. Maybe had he said something like, ” ….. there are parts of the holocaust narrative that are simply Untrue and Half-truths ….” …… and then he went on to explain what was true and what was not and what was exaggerated and what was omitted etc., etc. I may have stuck around and asked questions and would be very curious about what was being said.
Obviously ………. this is the FIRST time that you have come to CFT and encountered some interesting and often difficult questions.
What is your opinion of the Jew? As an example. Who are they?
What is your first impression when you hear that the White People of the world are the Israelites of the Scriptures? What is your first thought/reaction?
100 Proofs, the Israelites were White
https://www.bitchute.com/video/JEVj87bvcKAj/
You want to hear an answer that you you can then dismiss as being impossible, or illogical or even non-Scriptural. You want the Milk but not the Meat.
Something brought you hear. Don’t waste that “prompting” of the Spirit.
Stick around. Study. Ask Questions.
I hope you do.
Nonex, no one is avoiding your question. The issue is that you don’t seem to understand what this website is about. We have written numerous essays on this subject, none of which you have bothered to read.
We will not repeat all of the content of those essays in this thread just for your edification, but if you are truly willing to read and consider the evidence with an open mind, we will ask that you read our following essays, and you can respond to them in the comment section of those essays (after you’ve read the comment section too).
This is not a subject that can be answered in just a few paragraphs. The subject has many aspects to it, and you will need to consider them all. The following essays will provide you with just the basics.
Start here:
https://christiansfortruth.com/will-all-israel-be-saved-or-just-a-remnant/
https://christiansfortruth.com/the-great-commission-did-jesus-christ-intend-the-gospel-to-reach-everyone-on-earth/
https://christiansfortruth.com/a-closer-look-at-the-meaning-of-gentiles-in-the-old-and-new-testaments/
https://christiansfortruth.com/who-are-the-nations-in-scripture-and-who-they-are-not-and-why-it-matters/
only a fool and a Jew would promote race because only a jew believes a genealogy saves him.
no one asked a question why are we different. easy answer
because when we come together we think that we can reach the firmament we think that we can come like God. we destroy ourselves.
this story has nothing to do with us it has everything to do with his son Jesus.
God who created Adam which means taken from the dirt. said let us create him in our image. the image of the invisible God. now God who sees the end from the beginning knew that Adam and eve would fail. and he would send his son Jesus the Messiah to be the perfect representation of the invisible God and that all his invisible attributes would be seen through him Jesus.
so please leave your Jewish beliefs at the door you are not saved through genealogies or traditions of men.
God created man so that he would glorify God. we failed as he knew because he sees the end from the beginning.
therefore in conclusion the Bible all of creation all points to Jesus in the story is All about HIM.
ANYONE THAT PREACHES ANY OTHER MESSAGE IN THIS IS A FALSE TEACHER AND A LIAR.
Douglas Lindsey…….
WHO are you replying to???
Are you also saying that the black, yellow and red peoples all come from the Loins of Adam and Eve???
Is this your first time here?
If I assumed falsely that you believe the races (White, black, yellow and red) all descend from Adam and Eve please forgive me.
I just grow tired of people who come here and insist blindly that all races come from Adam and Eve. But they can never prove it with Scripture nor observational Science.
Douglas:
No one is saying that your genealogy or bloodline will “save” you. You made that up. Strawman agrument.
Christ came for only one bloodline however, the lost sheep of the House of Israel (Matthew 15:24). I bet that’s a verse that your judeo-Christian pastors rarely if ever quote to you.
The Great Commission was given to Israelites, to go among the nations and find lost Israelites to bring salvation to through Christ.
Paul said his Israelite bloodline would not save him without Christ. So that means the gospel was intended for all 12 tribes of Israel, not just the ones in Judea (“the Jews”). Read James 1:1.
An Israelite must be “born again” into Christ (John 3:3). But he must also be “born from above”, that is from Adam down through Jacob-Israel (see Young’s Literal Translation, https://biblehub.com/john/3-3.htm.)
The rest of what you are claiming is dispensationalist misdirection. Christ came for Israel only, and He told his disciples to do the same.
The Galatians, Colossians, Philippians, Ephesians, etc. were all lost Israel dispersed among the nations. These lost 10 tribes were also known as “gentiles”, which includes the 10 northern tribes of Israel.
Christ tells the Pharisees that just because they are sons of Abraham that doesn’t mean they will be saved (Matthew 3:9). So also said Paul. But you do have to be an Israelite to be eligible for salvation, according to the Great Commission.
Is there a historical reason why those Pharisees emphasized Abraham as their patriarch, and not a closer/younger one like Jacob, Aaron, etc?
King David was a ~thousand years past by the time of Christ, so the Pharisees must have been, oh, about six gorillion generations removed from Abraham.
Because they came from Abraham through Esau, not Jacob.
RB asked “Is there a historical reason why those Pharisees emphasized Abraham as their patriarch, and not a closer/younger one like Jacob, Aaron, etc?”
I would assume that claiming Abraham as their father was a standard for identifying Israelites and their bloodline at the time of Christ, even though Abraham was not a “Jew” or an Israelite, but the promises handed down to Israel originated with Abraham.
It’s interesting to see that the Woman at the Well, who is a Samaritan and not a Judean, claims that Jacob was their father, more along the lines of what you are asking. The “Jews” in Judea rejected the Samaritans as not legitimate Israelites simply because they did not practice the Law and rituals.
So maybe this is a cultural tradition that those who kept the Hebrew faith identified themselves through Abraham, while those “lost” Israelites who didn’t practice the faith identified their bloodline through Jacob-Israel.
I’m all about the exchange of ideas but why the slurrs and derogatory comments to me. I’m glorifying Jesus and His work. not mans terms like dispensationalism or straw man or a “church pastor. why would you argue in such worldly ways. do I speak like the world. no I speak like my savior taught me. to glorify Him and Him alone.
believing in race doctrine is like believing in the rapture doctrine. If I’m talking about the return of the King rapture is not in my vocabulary.
no one is arguing with your worldly terms.
believe what you want. my comment is for those who might of stumble upon this false teaching and would be lead a stray by violence to the scriptures.
the Corporate Christi and those found in it are for the children of promise. all you have to do is read Hebrews or the bible to understand that. Jews believe genealogies save you.
the story not about you or your family or your”people”.
only Jesus.
my only question to you would be.
what your Gospel message?
Douglas, you’ve merely repeated yourself and ignored what I wrote, which completely disputed your contention that “genealogies can save you”.
You ignored and didn’t address any of the verses that I cited to support what I said. You offered NO scriptural evidence to support your position, except make some general allusion to Hebrews. How about some specifics?
By the way, Hebrews was written to Israelites, not anyone else, yet you’ve decided to universalize it and make it apply to anyone. Give some scriptural support that Hebrews has a larger scope than the Israelites it’s addressed to.
Besides that, please show how you universalize Matthew 15:24, which I cited.
If you’re not willing to do what I ask, I’ll assume you are here just to lecture and smear those who don’t agree with your take on the Bible.
Douglas writes “the Corporate Christi and those found in it are for the children of promise”
The Bible defines the “children of the promise” only as Israelites. God’s “promises” to Abraham were passed down to Issac, then Jacob, then to his twelve sons, The House of Israel.
To suggest that anyone else can be “children of the promise” is anti-scriptural and a mistake of modern dispensationalism. Those promises were defined by God and they never changed or were given to any other people.
Douglas, You think you are so smart hey? As if any of us here haven’t heard these arguments before. You didn’t address any of Mark’s points but only reiterated what you said before. No one here said your “Geneologies save you”. It is clear however that the only group of people who even have a chance at Salvation through Jesus Christ is White Adamic Israelites. You are the one preaching a false Gospel, your Universalism is your downfall. Christ wont recognize and non-Adamite.
Nonex
“they are destined to surpass our present “white civilization”, the amount of scientific papers they are producing is exponentially breaking all imaginable limits …”
Destined? Is that why they love to enslave and be enslaved? Their god is the very same as the Jews…mammon, and self made gods.
While I read your comment I couldn’t help relate it to the grand so called Christian E. Michael Jones, the one in a million deceiver’s all doing the Servitude of jew god Satan and he also happens to be white. All science is the AntiChrist.
Are there Israelites in this unfortunate mix?…Yes. This would explain the warnings given by Jesus the Christ and then Apostle Paul who was CHANGED by Him. This is the same path we as the lost sheep of Israel are to take but many won’t. Sadly there are many who have chosen the world and it’s leader, it’s wealth, fame, name ways and so on. There is no ‘other’ Salvation.
Here is another white Israelite who is hell bent on entrapping with his paganism onto naive sheep by blaspheming Christ, His message, His death, His Spirit, His earthly mother and ultimately His Father ALL THE WHILE HATING JEWS!!! How do you define OXY MORON? So in this context this is why Jesus exclaimed…
Matthew 12:46-50
46 While He was still speaking to the crowds, behold, His mother and brothers were standing outside, seeking to speak to Him. 47 Someone said to Him, “Look, Your mother and Your brothers are standing outside, seeking to speak to You.”] 48 But Jesus replied to the one who was telling Him and said, “Who is My mother, and who are My brothers?” 49 And extending His hand toward His disciples, He said, “Behold: My mother and My brothers! 50 For whoever does the will of My Father who is in heaven, he is My brother, and sister, and mother.”
‘Religion’ is void of The Spirit who is The Witness to the Spoken Word. Religion is as the Pharasies how much worse paganism, satanism, budism, atheism etc…the list is looong.
This is what defines a remnant of Israel, of Christ, of Salvation. Seek the Truth while it can be found.
https://nationalvanguard.org/2023/05/jesus-the-jew/
There is no forgiveness for this blasphemous activity to elevate an UNVERIFIABLE pagan god of paradise over Christ Jesus. So Be It.
Nonex…
“And the more you refuse to answer me the more I am amazed!”
You need to be humble first off to get answers from God according to HIS WORD JESUS CHRIST…not the Jew satanic Talmud.
God hates self will and silence will be your answers. It’s funny how you sound just like authoritative jews who have NO COVENANT with the one true God of Israel. Your aggressive attitude won’t work here.
Don’t even start that ‘asian man’ garbage. Pure propaganda. They have never ‘created’ a thing, and all their ‘scientific papers’ are riding on the backs of European discoveries and ideas. They even write them on European inventions…
As far as your question ‘are they even human’ etc ; that is open to question and open to definition of ‘human’. Are they bipedal hominids? Obviously. Do they have a ‘soul’? CERTAINLY open to question. But even if they are, God most likely has a plan for them, but is NOT the same as His will for us.
Jesus was very clear that He came only for the Lost Sheep of the House of Israel. Sorry if you don’t like that, but God said it, not me. Plus, His Word – the Bible – is written about, to and for those folk, the True Israelites of the Bible. These people today are known as the AngloSaxon, Celtic, Germanic, Scandinavian and kindred peoples of this world.
God said that His creation ‘was good’ , so obviously He had a reason for the other races. Great. His call. Me? I am concerned with my kinsmen. Sue me.
Good comment brother. Nonex also doesn’t want to humble self to seek God for answers or even read scripture.
Jews compulsively try to control the language and meaning of words. That’s a huge part of how their tiny population can control a much larger population in which they live.
Jews routinely use shame and ridicule to silence those who do not accept the Jewish definition of words, especially those concerning race.
Just look at how they’ve recently manipulated the meaning of “gender”. A great con.
When we allow Jews to control the meaning of words, we become complicit in our own enslavement to them.
We give the Jews power to imprison us in their false reality by agreeing to their self-serving definitions of words and manipulations of our languages.
Whenever a Jew speaks, he is playing word games to control you and manipulate the playing field.
Kellar ………….
Wise words. And I believe that Power shifted right around the time of Charles Lindbergh. Clearly, we could talk about the Jewish Question pre–ww2. Lindbergh was riding that fence.
Post ww2 —- openly discussing the Jewish Problem became taboo. Just as you say — they shamed us and it worked.
It is fascinating to watch our Peoples when the Jewish Question is brought up in a public forum. It’s like a Pavlovian Response now. They just cannot critically think. It’s all emotional response.
It’s all Supernatural. And honestly I don’t see it changing. The only thing that will change is a Spiritual Revolution and I don’t see that happening — Luke 18:8.
The Great Falling Away is complete. In my observations.
Jews are Khazars, a warmongering group of psychopathic Turks & Mongoloids related to the Huns, who traded slaves & were phallic worshipers (men – gay/women – whores).
Judaism gave the Khazars religious leeway to their psychopathic slavery & phallic worship & pedophilia, and the gift of dissembling & reassembling language and of changing money (as Christ said of the Pharisees).
Jews are the modern day Huns. Drive them from the temple.
I enjoyed article. Reading multiple authors on any subject boosts my knowledge.
Whites built this civilization, and that means there’s something to it.
https://livingintheprivate.blogspot.com/p/a-person-has-no-body.html?m=0
In a legal sense, don’t get conned into declaring yourself as a human.
Human Being. Monster. A human being by birth, but in some part resembling a lower animal. A monster hath no inheritable blood and cannot be heir to any land.
Ballentine’s Law Dictionary, 1930.
U.N. declaration of “Human Rights”……give me a break!
The words of our God to his people Israel, of whom (as Israelites only) we are descendants :
Ezekiel 34:31
And ye my flock, the flock of my pasture, are men, and I am your God, saith the Lord GOD.
Ezekiel 36:38
As the holy flock, as the flock of Jerusalem in her solemn feasts; so shall the waste cities be filled with flocks of men: and they shall know that I am the LORD.
Psalms 95:7
For he is our God; and we are the people of his pasture, and the sheep of his hand. To day if ye will hear his voice,
Psalms 100:3
Know ye that the LORD he is God: it is he that hath made us, and not we ourselves; we are his people, and the sheep of his pasture.
Luke 12:32
Fear not, little flock; for it is your Father’s good pleasure to give you the kingdom.
1 Peter 5:2-3
Feed the flock of God which is among you, taking the oversight thereof, not by constraint, but willingly; not for filthy lucre, but of a ready mind; Neither as being lords over God’s heritage, but being ensamples to the flock.
What’s your point? I already know all of that.
I was just trying to point out to others under this current Maritime Admiralty System that we’re all living in, if they identify themselves in a legal capacity as a human being, that’s what it means.
Every society has a name and a society can assign any meaning to any word it wants within that society. The society that we have consented to be governed by, unwittingly to most, is the Law Society. A Law Society dictionary has the same words as an English language dictionary but they have different meanings. They’re speaking a different language. You’re enslaved with words whether you know it or not. That’s what I was trying to point out.
“None are more hopelessly enslaved are those that falsely believe that they’re free.”
– Johann Wolfgang Von Goethe
Two very important Maxims from Roman Law:
– Those who have not claimed their rights have none.
and
– Let those who wish to be fooled be fooled.
That Bible that you quoted from, is it copyrighted?
There was no better point or bigger picture being presented to your point/opinion/statement. I was actually following up on your post…
living man of flesh and blood…posted :
“In a legal sense, don’t get conned into declaring yourself as a human.”
By simply showing God’s flock and the men/man (Human) occupying both said connected position and stature are one and the same… only Israelites.
I identify as bene elohim. Again thank you liberal/Jewish word games.
And if you question me, your an anti-Israelite bigot just like those fake Jews who clearly discriminate against ethnic Israelite exiles of Europe.
Especially since Judeans are responsible for the cultural destruction of Israel and its exile via Assyria, those monsters. Because, you know Jews say they are descended from Judeans. Because all those precious pro-jew laws apply to tragic exiles who just want a homeland.
CFT and Regular Readers ……………
I am fascinated by the first image. I believe it is a Poster created by Anthropologist Johann Friedrich Blumenbach (1752-1840).
Does anyone know any more about this Poster/Drawing? Where did it originate? In a book?
I would love to be able to read it. It’s hard to tell, but I’m curious about one thing in particular — It appears there are two different shades of “White/Yellow”. Clearly, we know Europe is White in this Poster. But then the Eastern Coast of North America appears to be a different “shade” of White. But again, it’s hard to tell and then the question needs to be asked — “When” was this Chart created? If it was before European Settlement unto North America, then it would make sense that he is portraying the Red Indian. But weren’t Red Indians also scattered throughout North America and even into what we call Canada today?
It would be helpful to be able to “READ” the language as well. I can assume. But positive confirmation of what is being said on this Chart would be interesting.
He postulates a variety of Racial Types when men like Madison Grant divided them into 4 categories — White, yellow, black, red.
I notice the 3rd to the last image has 5 racial types. But one of them is the Red Indian which I believe is NOT an original creation. But the Australian Abo certainly seems to be distinct among other Aboriginals of other places i.e., south america as an example.
Thanks.
Wikipedia/Kikeapedia states that Scientific Realism or Racial Realism has been ‘debunked’ since the mid 20th Century, as this article confirms. It’s so typical of the jew to take science and law that has been established for thousands of years and unilaterally proclaim that it is ‘pseudo-science.’
It seems evident that the jews took practically ALL science, not just Scientific Realism, and declared them ALL to be Null and Void, so that they could replace them all with the (((new jew sciences))). And don’t we believe them, since they give each other (((awards))) and accolades and money ? A pencil eraser has more worth than a Nobel Peace Prize these days, imo.
Now, in the age of jew lawlessness that some call the 21st century, we have ((( climate science))) ((( jew Spaceballs))) ((( vaccine science))) (((viruses))) etc etc.
Hundreds of top European scientists in duping jew Einstein’s day signed a letter against his theoretical kike science stating that the unprovable nature of his (((findings))) would be detrimental to science and its reputation. Still, the kikes predictably promoted and awarded Einstein on an international level to JAM fake jew BS into the mainstream and exalt all the (((smart jews.))) Gee, where would we all be without the jewish ((( contributions)))?
Martin Luther states in the preface to ” On the jews and their LIES” that he would never go to the jew for its interpretation of scripture. This is sound advice and should be taken much further. Don’t go to the jew for its interpretation or views on ANYTHING. Like Luther smartly and wisely says, don’t even allow the jew to participate in ANY of the important areas of life !
White Adamites will be well advised to exclude the jew from everything, and NEVER ask it to weigh in or participate at all in the fields of Science, medicine, politics, education, government, food , economy ETC ETC.
The demonic jew cries ‘Science Denier,’ ” climate denier,” ” Election denier” and states on its Democrat yard signs ” Science is REAL.”
As a collective, only a remnant of the White Adamic Christian Race is able to discern that ALL of the jewish (((scientific claims))) are rubbish for the trash bin. People just don’t expect to be lied to about such important things, and they have greatly underestimated the jews’ desire to destroy reality and creation on every level.
Fake jews and fake jew (((science))) is glad just to make it to the end of each day, because deep inside they know that at any MOMENT the Door of God’s Reality is going to SLAM SHUT on them and God’s Will is going to rain down on their heads like fire and brimstone.
Well said Old Saxxon.
West said that the image came from Johann Friedrich Blumenbach. Blumenbach was the anthropologist who coined the term Caucasian.
The reason is that Noah’s Ark was believed to be located in the Caucasus Mountains, implying Caucasians were the first race.
Interestingly enough, Blumenbach was an egalitarian for his time. He didn’t believe that non-whites were non-Adamites. Therefore, the intent behind the term Caucasian was not to denote racial superiority.
That’s one reason “scientific racism” is a loaded, baseless term. Nevertheless, as far as the Bible is concerned, the only real “race” is the Adamic race.
The Chinese don’t matter in it, and if Nonex (currently the main complainant in this comment section) has a problem with it, they can take it up with Moses.
James Smith ………….
Fascinating information/research. Thank you for the contribution!
Interesting Note from Wiki — “….Blumenbach claimed that Adam and Eve were Caucasian inhabitants of Asia ……
He got that part right. But then says — “…..and that other races came about by degeneration from environmental factors such as the sun and poor diet.
Good grief. “Degeneration”??? How in the world does that happen? Nutz.
The other races came about by “degeneration from environmental factors such as the sun and poor diet”
That would describe many White people of the American South for many generations. Why didn’t they turn black over the last 500 years?
On the flip side, many White Nationalists believe a similar thing….that Whites “evolved” into having white skin in the dark, cold climate of Europe. It makes no sense, but it’s the same idea.
White people have remained White no matter what environment they have lived in. Did the original Egyptians turn black because they lived in North Africa, or the Whites in South Africa and Rhodesia, have they turned black?
This idea was very popular in the 19th century, that the environment could create inheritable changes in type. Lamarkianism. No scientist today takes it seriously, though it persists among the unwashed.
Gen Walker ………………
Yes, all great points. It truly is Supernatural. I believed it for most of my adult life! I mean I didn’t dwell on it or anything, and if someone may have actually CHALLENGED me with this idea —- I’d like to think that I would have given it a thought and maybe even read some research if it had been presented to me.
But I believed it because everyone around me believed it. At that time, I grew up and spent 30 years in Southern California in the 70’s/80’s. We had ONE black guy at my high school. And he acted very white. His dad was an executive at Pepsi. He played tennis and lived in an upper middle class White neighborhood. The guy was white, but with black skin. Dressed white etc., etc.
We had a few mexicans but they never presented any problem. My neighbors growing up were a hard working family who built their own home –in an all White upper middle class neighborhood. Land was cheap back then. The father was a longshoreman commuting 2 hours a day working all day and built his own home with his own hands. He was my baseball coach.
Rambling ……….. I’m into my mid-thirties and I HAVE to take a job in Atlanta of all places. Wow ……………………
Within a year my whole World View began to change! Short story — all of a sudden I was fearing for my life. Everyday — car jackings, home invasions, murder, robbery, drive-by shootings …………
It was like — my mind was blown. “Who are these people?!” They are not me …. that was clear.
10 years later, here I am on CFT. Left the Bricks and Mortars and never looked back.
IT IS NOW CRYSTAL CLEAR in my mind and soul. How I did not see it before can only be explained Spiritually. It is a Supernatural Deception why the rest of the White World can’t see it. Or maybe they “feel” it but can’t let it register in their mind and in their soul.
Thank you for the contribution. Cheers and Peace. Hang on …. the next 10 years are going to be bumpy.
Amen
Pin this article to the Top!!!
Flyer this article to every majority White Christian Church. LOL.