Due to the high numbers of African and Muslim migrants dependent on public welfare, Norway has announced a new plan to force them to learn the Norwegian language or risk losing benefits:
Norway’s Conservative Prime Minister Erna Solberg has announced stricter requirements for eligibility for social assistance, the newspaper Nettavisen reported.
In 2017, the Norwegian state paid out NOK 6.6 billion ($770 million) in social assistance, with half of the recipients being immigrants. Of them, 86 percent were immigrants from Africa and the Middle East.
“Immigrants are over-represented in social assistance. Often, their command of the Norwegian language is too poor to get by in the workplace”, Solberg told Nettavisen, arguing that failing to teach the Norwegian language is an “old sin”.
Solberg stressed that today an “activity requirement” is in place to incentivise people under the age of 30 to seek employment. According to her, the “language requirement” serves a similar goal. Solberg also warned of the detrimental effects of inaction.
“You must remember the mechanism that get triggered when you spend a long time on social assistance. You lose confidence and inspiration to do something about your life”, Solberg stressed. According to her, mastering Norwegian is a crucial way of getting back on track to enter the labour force.
Solberg stressed that the demands on people to participate in learning Norwegian will be implemented some time in 2020. At the same time, she stressed that the authorities will provide assistance with child rearing and other problems that may deter people from mastering the language.
“One must work on integration from day one. Teaching Norwegian is actually the top priority”, Solberg said, stressing that Norway has placed higher demands on new arrivals in the past 15 years, while also providing a better offer.
Earlier this month, Solberg’s party colleague and Labour and Social Affairs Minister Anniken Hauglie voiced her concern over the number of unemployed immigrants.
“I am worried that too many immigrants are out of work and are passive welfare recipients. This cannot be good either for the individual or for society”, Hauglie said, as quoted by the Aftenposten daily newspaper.
However, the step announced Norway’s centre-right government was met with criticism from the opposition. Socialist Left Party immigration spokesman Karin Andersen called this measure “embarrassing” for a government “that cuts the Norwegian classes” and “reduces women’s social assistance”. Andersen ventured that Solberg was “wagging her finger” at the most disadvantaged and using threats rather than providing opportunities. According to her, offering high-quality courses in Norwegian would be a preferred way to go.
The Socialist Left politician blasted Norway’s current introduction scheme for refugees as “poor” and called the government responsible.
“Social assistance is emergency aid. They can’t deprive people who don’t have money of food help. Does [Solberg] believe that those who cannot speak Norwegian and are old and sick should rather starve?” Andersen asked rhetorically, suggesting that Solberg’s government has crossed “yet another limits of rule of law and decency”.
Previously, Norway’s fellow Scandinavian country Denmark tested a similar approach, as Danish Integration Minister Inger Støjberg pledged to make immigrants pay for their own interpreter in order to incentivise them to learn the language.
According to Statistics Norway, there are over 130,000 recipients of social assistance in a country of 5.2 million. In 2017, there were over 880,000 people of foreign background in Norway, constituting about 17 percent of its population.
The average social benefit is NOK 9,252 ($1,073) per month.
There’s nothing “conservative” about forcing Arabs and Africans to integrate into a White society, no matter how this plan is characterized. A true conservative would kick them all out of the country and ban any of them from re-entering. A true conservative would understand that non-Whites are vastly over-represented on the welfare roles of every White country, regardless of whether or not they can speak the host language. Blacks in America, for example, all speak English, but that hasn’t deterred them from choosing a life of generational welfare.
And do Norwegians really believe that any migrant who refuses to learn Norwegian is going to be kicked off welfare? All of Norway’s jewish “human rights attorneys” will be slapping the government with hundreds of lawsuits to stop such “racist” and “discriminatory” policies. Even in America, it has become politically-incorrect to demand that refugees “speak English,” so how does ultra-liberal Norway expect to get away with this nonsense? And why would they want Muslims to “integrate” in the first place?
Racial integration is merely a euphemism for race mixing, which will undermine and destroy any White society, as the Jews well know.
To claim to be a “conservative” one must first, and foremost, conserve one’s bloodline, because all values and traditions follow from that. Once you lose the bloodline, you’ll quickly lose everything worth saving created by the people of that bloodline.
Chesterton says: “Racial integration is merely a euphemism for race mixing, which will undermine and destroy any White society, as the Jews well know.”
Yes, Jewry knows that very well, Chesterson. The destruction of the genetic and spiritual DNA of all White people is a primary goal in a great many of the strategies employed by international (the white, black, and yellow skinned, and blooded, mongrel’s who are known as) Jewry.
Norwegian Jewry, “needs help from abroad” because of all the ‘anti-semitism’ in Norway, the Harvard professor of law, Alan Dershowitz, had said, “When it comes to its record on Israel and the Jews, Norway is the worst country in the world”, he said. It is “on the wrong side of history, morality and democratic values” – (((Alan Dershowitz))), March 2011
Jewry perhaps, merely needs to give the White people in Norway a “painless” history lesson, in order that the Norwegians’ understand just “how beneficial those migrants of other colors and nations are to them”. They can begin by showing them, “Mary Queen of Scots”.
Problem is, most of our people today are so dumbed down and culturally and historically ignorant that they have no idea what they are to be conserving while considering themselves “conservatives”.
Yep, anyone who even knows that there is a U.S. Constitution qualifies as a “conservative” today. And the reason the Constitution has been gutted and rendered almost useless is that we allowed non-Whites, especially Jews, have any opinion about how the Constitution should be interpreted and applied.
Almost the entirety of Europe can thank the jewed “US” for undermining them. They are not alone because the American people have themselves been undermined, too, by the actions of those same traitors.
Most of the leftist policies imported into Europe were done by the “US” State Department under the guise of “fighting communism” during the “Cold War”. That was the excuse which was being given to the American people for all of the foreign aid which was being sent abroad. The taxpayer’s money was actually being used by the jews and other of their communist “comrades” who were packed into the State Dept. [extending back to FDR’s times] in order to set up the leftist communications, support, instruction and training for the future “leaders” within European society. Now those same leftist policies are being directed back in order to mount attacks against us, the true American people so that America’s economy and military can be utilized as the vehicles for jewish militancy to be mounted against the rest of the world.
Many of us are aware about George Soros’ activities today, but don’t realize that he and his subversive activities are merely a continuation of pre-existing models, and that both the previous State Dept. assisted groups and Soros were extentions of the “US” State Department activities.
[See the link below re: “…The Parasite” at the Norway site]: “Felton argues persuasively that 3 groups have converged and come to dominate American policy for the benefit of Israel. Those 3 groups are: the neo-conservatives; the Republican evangelicals (Christian Zionists); and Jewish Zionists. He backs up his analysis with over 800 footnoted references to government, scholarly and media sources.
Felton refutes the traditional progressive view that Israel is merely a client state of America. If this is so, he asks, how has America come to pursue policies that are so utterly contrary to America’s own national interest while being so highly beneficial to its junior partner?” – “The Host and The Parasite: How Israel’s Fifth Column Consumed America”