Antisemitic claims and comments have begun to appear online on the planning application to Westminster City Council for the National Holocaust Memorial and Learning Centre in Victoria Tower Gardens, next to the Houses of Parliament:
Ian Austin MP and Bob Blackman MP, Co-Chairs of the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Holocaust Memorial told the JC they were “shocked” to read “antisemitic remarks about Jewish people and the Holocaust.”
The former Labour MP, now sitting as an independent, and the Conservative member for Harrow East both called for the Council “to monitor these posts and ensure this type of language is removed straight away.”
One response to the plans from a public of the public says: “Evidence suggests that the service appears to be discriminatory, unlawful and racist , because it would appear that money and assets per capita are being given disproportionately to jew memorial services.”
The same message continues: “Jews only make up 0.5% of the population of the UK and one would expect any memorial to Genocide built in Victoria Tower Gardens to reflect that figure.
“Any memorial must largely reflect white British victims of genocide.”
Another comment says:”The well-funded holocaust industry could buy a plot of land anywhere in London to erect a memorial centre.”
Another submission said: “I am concerned by the ethnic and religious makeup of the UK Holocaust Memorial Foundation. There appears to be a grossly disproportionate number of Jews both on the board and Jury of the UKHMF relative to the jew population of 0.5% of the UK population, which appears to be discriminatory, unlawful and racist.”
Another response read: “If jews want a memorial why can’t jews build a memorial in the new Jewish Cemetery at Bushey, safe and secure for jews and everyone else and the country saves £100million…
Mr Austin and Mr Blackman added: “Ignorance and hate have led to horrific crimes throughout history and these posts highlight just how much a new Holocaust Memorial and Learning Centre is needed.
“This Memorial and Learning Centre, next to Parliament, will stand as a lasting reminder of the need for each one of us to stand up and tackle prejudice and intolerance wherever and whenever it is found.”
To be clear, there was no “Holocaust” in England, unless you consider the Jews’ 300-year long expulsion ordered by King Edward in 1290 a “Holocaust”. And since the English army came to the rescue of the Jews in WWII, it can hardly be claimed that the British people need to be lectured on “tolerance” and “diversity”. Do the British people really need to be constantly scolded about antisemtism when they have been the most Jew-friendly country in Europe ever since Oliver Cromwell allowed them back into England and let them open the Bank of England, ensuring the jewish control of the country ever since?
It is remarkable that the Jews don’t seem to (or refuse to) understand why building these Holocaust museums might create some backlash or resentment among the goyim who have bent over backward to make them feel welcome. With these museums, the Jews send a clear message to the goyim: “We don’t trust you to not eventually blame us for all your problems, round us up and throw us in gas chambers. If we constantly remind you of how evil you are for criticizing us, we can hopefully make antisemtism illegal, and hopefully one day it will just disappear.”
Those comments are quite apt. Why are public funds being spent on memorializing an event that the British people did not cause? Why not a memorial to all the men who died to take Palestine from the Ottomans/Arabs so the Jews could have their wretched ethno-state? Why not a memorial to the men who fought against the third reich?
Because Jews are, at heart, narcissistic to the extreme. Only Jewish lives matter, and the world itself is nothing but a backdrop for the story of the Jewish people.
Actually the above comment is a little bit misplaced because there are CWGC sites at Ramleh and Haifa.
But your point is not entirely off the mark. Why a memorial to something not caused by British people? There are much more relevant events for us to memorialise outside our parliament.
For instance there’s no memorial that commemorates those who died (500k or more of a much smaller population) in the Civil War of the 1640s. Why not put this right by having one in Victoria Gardens to remember how we as a nation tore ourselves apart rather than a memorial to events that happened mostly far away in Poland?
The memorial could have Sir William Waller’s letter to Sir Ralph Hopton upon on it:
‘That great God who is the searcher of my heart knows with what a sad sense I go upon this service, and with what a perfect hatred I detest this war without an enemy;… We are both upon the stage and must act such parts as are assigned us in this tragedy, let us do it in a way of honour, and without personal animosities’
Of course this wont happen because reflecting on British historical tragedy doesn’t fit the New Britannia zeitgeist.
Always the same. Jewish apologists will NEVER address the substance of any criticism of them. Just point and splutter “anti-semitism”. Totally fed up of it.
Well, since the ROTR staff pointed out that there was no “Holocaust” in England, just as there was no “Holodomor” in England, it seems only fair to place a “Holodomor Memorial and Learning Centre” right next to the Holocaust one, to strike a balance.
And since the British people suffered horrific death & destruction to save the Jews from Hitler, I think the Jews should fund a “Gratitude Memorial”, listing the ways in which they have shown their gratitude to the British people; for example, by flooding Britain with Third World Invaders and demonising all protests against it.
Those comments were fantastic. I’m actually surprised those are the ones they chose to highlight. Where’s the lie?
I still can’t comprehend where any part of any comment offered as evidence was ignorant, hateful, or anti-semitic – other than the obvious truth they each expressed, since truth is hate to those who hate the truth…