The results of a two year government-sponsored study allegedly show that people in the Netherlands “largely agree” about what it means to be Dutch, valuing the same traditions and symbols regardless of origin, age or level of education:
Dutch also agree on what they consider to be the biggest threats to the Dutch identity – polarization and Islam, the social and cultural planning office SCP found in a two year long study into the Dutch identity titled Dekend aan Nederland.
When asked about what is typically Dutch, respondents largely named the same traditions, symbols, and civil liberties as typical and connecting Dutch themes. The Dutch language is at the top of the list, followed by King’s Day, Sinterklaas, cycling, the Elfstedentocht, the Dutch flag and the Delta Works. When asked what connects Dutch people, the same traditions and symbols were often mentioned, along with Remembrance Day, Liberation Day, freedom and equality.
“Much has been written, said and debated about the Dutch and their identity in recent years, but we actually questioned them ourselves”, SCP director Kim Putters said to newspaper AD. “And it turns out that, despite the sometimes fierce discussions, there is a striking amount of consensus.” The SCP questioned thousands of Dutch about the national identity over the past two years.
There is also consensus on the threats to Dutch identity, the researchers found. The biggest concern among Dutch seems to be polarization, with 77 percent of respondents calling it a threat to the Dutch identity. Respondents said that the gap between left-wing and right-wing has increased, and their stances have hardened so much that it is difficult for them to find points to agree on. Islam came in second place with 62 percent of respondents calling it a threat to the Dutch identity, and bureaucratization in third with 58 percent. “Anglicization” is also often mentioned.
The social office noted that men were more likely to be negative about politics and politicians, while women were more often concerned about discrimination and intolerance. The researchers also found a clear difference along those same lines among people with different levels of education, with highly educated people being more concerned about intolerance and people with lower levels of education being more negative about politics.
According to the SCP, the Dutch can be divided into two orientation types when it comes to national identity: the ‘symbol-Dutch’ who attach great importance to traditions and old customs, and the Dutch who attach more value to civil liberties like the right to demonstrate and religious freedom. Though Putters emphasized that about 80 percent of Dutch do not belong exclusively in one of those groups. “The masses can not be placed in one box”, he said to AD.
So the new, “improved” and “approved” definition of ‘Dutch Identity’ means you believe in Santa Claus, like to ride bicycles, and speak the Dutch language instead of English, but no mention of a common history, a common belief in Christ, and a common bloodline, all of which are the very foundation of the Dutch people going back almost 2,000 years. And it’s hard not to notice that this “study” not so subtly implies that anyone who doesn’t go along with this bland civic identity is shamefully “uneducated” and working class.
And of course this study mentions the vague and undefined boogeyman of “polarization” as a particular enemy apparently even more ‘threatening’ than Islam, as if the introduction of hundreds of thousands of Muslims has nothing to do with the social polarization going on in this once-cohesive country. Marxist buzzwords like “intolerance” and “polarization” come right out of the communist handbook which stigmatizes “counter-revolutionary” thoughts. ‘Tolerant’ highly-educated women are the ideal role models in this multicultural utopia, where your fundamental right to believe in Santa Claus, not Jesus Christ, is the key to happiness and shall not be infringed upon.
And promoting sodomy is another source of national “pride” in Netherlands:
Tolerant, educated young women are just more tolerant of mongrelization.
Virtually any study funded by the govt has every intention of resulting in pro-govt propaganda. If there is no accompanying data of exactly who was ‘polled’ and exactly what questions were asked, then any blather can constitute ‘research and conclusion’.
What passes for research and informed conclusions today is so dreadfully pathetic…why else could there be so many shortsighted utopian slaves who fall hook line and sinker for the media and the obviously self-destructive jewish agenda?
And the opposition to–or distrust of–Islam is more important than embracing their traditional Christianity, without which the people are doomed.