Racially diverse people have a much better chance of peacefully coexisting if they are separated by strong borders or natural boundaries, according to a 2011 study by the New England Complex Systems Institute entitled, “Good Fences: The Importance of Setting Boundaries for Peaceful Coexistence”:
We consider the conditions of peace and violence among ethnic groups, testing a theory designed to predict the locations of violence and interventions that can promote peace. Characterizing the model’s success in predicting peace requires examples where peace prevails despite diversity.
Switzerland is recognized as a country of peace, stability and prosperity. This is surprising because of its linguistic and religious diversity that in other parts of the world lead to conflict and violence. Here we analyze how peaceful stability is maintained.
Our analysis shows that peace does not depend on integrated coexistence, but rather on well defined topographical and political boundaries separating groups. Mountains and lakes are an important part of the boundaries between sharply defined linguistic areas. Political canton and circle (sub-canton) boundaries often separate religious groups.
Where such boundaries do not appear to be sufficient, we find that specific aspects of the population distribution either guarantee sufficient separation or sufficient mixing to inhibit intergroup violence according to the quantitative theory of conflict.
In exactly one region, a porous mountain range does not adequately separate linguistic groups and violent conflict has led to the recent creation of the canton of Jura. Our analysis supports the hypothesis that violence between groups can be inhibited by physical and political boundaries.
A similar analysis of the area of the former Yugoslavia shows that during widespread ethnic violence existing political boundaries did not coincide with the boundaries of distinct groups, but peace prevailed in specific areas where they did coincide. The success of peace in Switzerland may serve as a model to resolve conflict in other ethnically diverse countries and regions of the world.
Basically, everything that the radical Left is trying to establish — a world without borders — is a recipe for violence and conflict, according to this common sense study. A cursory look at any city in America confirms the wisdom of this study. Homogeneous White neighborhoods separated by highways or rivers have very low violent crime rates, and the more “diverse” a neighborhood becomes, the more dangerous it is. And the more diverse a neighborhood, the less people interact with each other.
Most obvious of all is the fact that the only countries that really require strong borders are White countries because they are the only countries that have lifestyles that are the envy of the non-Whites. There are no Third World non-White countries that are worried about being invaded by innovative, hard-working prosperous White people. Every White country that lacks strong border control also experiences high levels of violent crime committed by non-White migrants. Good fences make good neighbors, and the browner the neighbors, the higher the fences.
28 Don’t stealthily move back the boundary lines staked out long ago by your ancestors.
Proverbs 22:28
We hardly need a study because God has spoken. Yet thanks for this insight more and more we are returning to a scriptural view of this Judaized world. God help them in their ALLiah as it becomes clear they hated God Law.
Nobody ever seems to mention the fact that the reason White birth rates are declining is that wages have been reduced to the point that both prospective parents are forced to work in order to keep a roof over their heads.
White People don’t have children they can’t support financially, and White Mothers don’t want to farm their children out to indoctrination centres during the early years when those children really need to be with their mothers.
Some argue that we’re selfish in wanting “toys” like mobile ‘phones, cars, washing machines and the electric jew (tv), but even if we were to adopt a stone-age lifestyle, there still wouldn’t be enough money to go round with only one parent working – – – and why SHOULDN’T we have the benefits of the modern civilisation WE created?
The other races don’t care. They just feed and breed with no thought for tomorrow. We’re not like that. We’re better.
I did a study similar to this in college. The essay was entitled “Why Diversity is Problematic”.
The basic premise was that homogeneous communities are more open and productive as opposed diverse communities. The reason being is because diverse communities result in people withdrawing themselves and staying locked away in their homes. They lacked a common ground with their neighbors.
I went on to expound upon how the diverse Nations are European in origin. Couple this with the fact that white birth rates are plummeting and you have a recipe for the most desirable Nations to live in being on the brink of extinction..
Believe it or not, I got an A+ on the essay which was followed by a 2.5 hour private conversation with my professor on my beliefs where we walked away agreeing to disagree.
I have a feeling this study was swept under the proverbial rug right after it’s release. I wouldn’t be surprised if the institute responsible for the paper isn’t on the gubment’s ‘hate watch’ list.
Correction: I WOULD be surprised 😉
Good fences do make good neighbours; the problem is that even when we/White people have good fences, ‘they’ keep trying to come across and suck up our welfare, enjoy our standard of living and take our women. Fences need to be very high indeed, with land mines and swift prosecution for violating the border.
The example the author gives of Switzerland is weak BS tho ; there may be different people and different languages, but all the people [until the recent invasion of that last bastion of European paradise] were / are of the same racial stock. i.e. all White folk, be they German, Italian, French, whatever. And, the religion is similar too; last I looked, Lutherans werent murdering Episcopalians who coexisted peacefully with catholics who even get along with Odinists, etc etc. Even with fences, NO ONE can exist alongside muslims…