Researchers at Uppsala University in Sweden have found that Muslims born and raised in the West are more likely to support extremist ideas than those who are born elsewhere and who later emigrate to the West:
[They concluded that] support among Western-born Muslims for extremism often comes from a feeling of being disadvantaged and marginalized in comparison to the majority of the population in those countries.
When you look at terror attacks that have occurred in Europe and the US, the researchers said, you find that a majority of them are “planned and implemented by people who are born and raised in the West.”
One of the major findings of the study was that Muslims born in the Western world identified themselves more with Muslims as a group and showed more anger over unfair treatment of them. They also admitted “a greater willingness to use force” to defend Muslims around the world.
The findings can be explained, the researchers said, by the fact that they have “a stronger experience of being disadvantaged” compared to the average person in their society which results in “frustration and anger.”
Researchers gave the example of Sweden, where Muslims who spend their entire upbringing in that country might expect to be seen as “real” Swedes by their peers, but find that they are not treated that way in reality and are still regarded more as “immigrants” and don’t enjoy as many opportunities.
The authors of the study were also careful to issue a word of caution about interpreting the results.
Marginalization in society is not the main or only cause of extremism or willingness to use violence, they said. It was one of a number of factors (for example, support for extremism can also be affected by circles of friendship).
It was also important to note, they said, that Muslims born in the West are not more violent than any other group in society and the research did not compare groups in that way.
Finally, the researchers said it was “ironic and tragic” that there is a “vicious circle” between how Muslims are treated in the West and the extremism which drives refugees from the Middle East to the West.
While it is a common assumption that the threat from extremist Islam comes from outside the West — which often leads to calls for lower immigration from places like the Middle East and North Africa — the new study has found that homegrown radicals could be a much bigger problem.
Researchers at Uppsala University in Sweden found that support among Western-born Muslims for extremism often comes from a feeling of being disadvantaged and marginalized in comparison to the majority of the population in those countries.
When you look at terror attacks that have occured in Europe and the US, the researchers said, you find that a majority of them are “planned and implemented by people who are born and raised in the West.”
One of the major findings of the study was that Muslims born in the Western world identified themselves more with Muslims as a group and showed more anger over unfair treatment of them. They also admitted “a greater willingness to use force” to defend Muslims around the world.
The findings can be explained, the researchers said, by the fact that they have “a stronger experience of being disadvantaged” compared to the average person in their society which results in “frustration and anger.”
Researchers gave the example of Sweden, where Muslims who spend their entire upbringing in that country might expect to be seen as “real” Swedes by their peers, but find that they are not treated that way in reality and are still regarded more as “immigrants” and don’t enjoy as many opportunities…
Marginalization in society is not the main or only cause of extremism or willingness to use violence, they said. It was one of a number of factors (for example, support for extremism can also be affected by circles of friendship).
It was also important to note, they said, that Muslims born in the West are not more violent than any other group in society and the research did not compare groups in that way.
It’s nice to be reassured that despite the obviously problematic findings of this study, White people are still to blame for all acts of extremism and violence committed by Muslims because, well, we made them that way. Without the influence of evil White people, all Muslims would live in peace and harmony, except, of course, the violence that Islam mandates among fellow Muslims who don’t toe the party line.
Not only that, this study implies that we shouldn’t worry about letting in even more Muslims because they aren’t the real problem–it’s the next generation which will be born here.
But the study merely confirms what we’ve already reported here: that Muslims don’t want to “integrate” into our Christian societies; rather, they want to conquer and transform them into an image of themselves. Not only is Muslim “integration” not a goal we should be striving for; it is clearly impossible and a waste of time. For everyone’s own good, Muslims should seriously consider renouncing their lucrative freeloading lives on welfare in the West, and move back to their homelands where they actually have to work for a living, and where they are not a protected and coddled political Trojan Horse of the Left.
The only conclusion meant to be made from this article, based on the twisting of the ‘findings’, is simply that Western (read: WHITE) racism is the cause of muslim ‘extremism’; that 1st generation rapefugees ‘accept’ the racism of their new host, but their anchor babies don’t.
The conclusion that SHOULD be arrived at, especially by ‘Westerners’, is that MUSLIM (or any non-white) INTEGRATION INTO WESTERN SOCIETY DOES NOT WORK!!!