Here we present Bertrand Comparet’s sermon, The Great Masquerade, in which he tears the mask off Jewry and exposes them for who they truly are — and are not — and by doing so, he also reveals the deception behind identifying the Anglo-Saxon and kindred peoples of European descent as so-called “Gentiles”.
The audio can be found here, starting at 8:25 to 18:50.
Bertrand Comparet:
“The whole Bible is the history of the conflict between our God and the rebel Satan carried on between their children also. Didn’t you know that they both had children? Yes, I do mean children, not merely followers. If you don’t know this, you should read your Bible more carefully.
Luke 3:38 tells us that Adam was the son of God — and surely you know that Adam had children and descendants down through our own generations — right on down to ourselves. In many other places God refers to his own children. For just a few of these consider First Deuteronomy 32, verse 19,
And when the Lord saw it, He abhorred them, because of the provoking of His sons and of His daughters.
Again, Isaiah 43, verse 6,
I will say to the north, Give up; and to the south, Keep not back: bring My sons from afar and my daughters from the ends of the earth.
In Isaiah 45, verse 11 we read,
Thus says the Lord, the Holy One of Israel and his maker, ask me of things to come concerning my sons and concerning the work of my hands command ye me.
In Psalm 82, verse 6, God says,
I have said, Ye are Gods; and all of you are children of the Most High.
In the New Testament, we read in John 11, verses 51 and 52,
He prophesied that Jesus should die for that nation; and not for that nation only, but that also that He should gather together the children of God that were scattered abroad.
And Paul in Romans 8, verse 14 and16 says,
For as many as are led by the spirit they are the sons of God. The Spirit itself bears witness with our spirit, that we are the children of God.
As to the children of Satan, this also is affirmed in the Bible from beginning to end. First in Genesis 3, verse 15, where God tells Satan,
I will put enmity between thee and the woman and between thy seed and her seed.
The same Hebrew word for seed or descendants is used in both instances. So Satan is to have just as literal seed — or children — as the woman — Eve. Jesus Christ himself affirmed this several times.
For example, in Matthew 13, verses 38 and 39 where he said, “The field is the world; the good seed are the children of the kingdom: but the tares are the children of the wicked one.” Note that they are not just wicked or followers of the Wicked One, he says they are the children of the Wicked One. The enemy that sowed them is the devil.
In John 6, in verses 70 and 71, Jesus said to His twelve disciples,”Have not I chosen you twelve and one of you is a devil? And he spoke of Judas Iscariot,” — and Judas was the only Jew among the disciples.
Again, very carefully read the eighth chapter of John, beginning with verse 31 where Jesus said to these Jews,
I speak that which I have seen with My Father: and ye do that which ye have seen with your father. They answered and said unto Him, Abraham is our father. Jesus said unto them, If ye were Abraham’s children, ye should do the works of Abraham. But now ye seek to kill Me, a man that hath told you the truth, which I have heard of God: Ye do the deeds of your father.
They tried to masquerade as God’s children, but they couldn’t deceive Him. They said,
We have one father, even God. But Jesus said unto them, If God were your Father, ye would love Me: for I proceeded forth and came from God; ye — now he’s speaking to these Jews — ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. It is My Father that honors Me: of whom ye say that he is your God: Yet ye have not known Him.
Now Jesus was not just using vulgarly abusive language to them — he was stating a biological fact, with scientific accuracy, just as if he had said to a Chinaman, ‘Your ancestors were Mongolians.’
The Apostle Paul also doesn’t hesitate to identify Jews as the children of the devil. Meeting one in Acts 13, verses 6 to 10, Paul plainly called him “thou child of the devil.”
In the thousands of years of this conflict whenever we’ve remembered that we are the children of God, and we’ve remained loyal to Him and remembered that God himself put enmity between His children and Satan’s children, then we’ve had prosperity and high civilization, with very little crime. And the wars which the wicked started against us ended quickly with tremendous victories in our favor.
Satan’s tactics have always been the same down through the ages. First he tries to crush us by force, as the Bible records many times and as we saw a few years ago in Japan’s treacherous attack upon us. These attacks always fail when we remember who we are and who they are and act accordingly.
Then Satan tries another method. Since God has given us the victory whenever we remember that we are His children and will have nothing to do with the children of the ways of Satan, then Satan realizes the only way to conquer and enslave or destroy us is to make us forget this division between the children of God and the children of Satan, and get us all mixed together so that our ways will be corrupted by theirs.
Our children will learn their evil because they are integrated with their children. Our government will be controlled by their power and thereby they will make us enemies of God like themselves. Only when we are in rebellion against God — and therefore do not receive His help —only then can Satan and his children hope to destroy us.
We were warned of this as of all other dangers. In Deuteronomy 7, verses 2 to 4, we got the first warning.
Thou shalt smite them and utterly destroy them; thou shalt make no covenant with them, nor show mercy unto them: neither shalt thou make marriages with them: thy daughter thou shalt not give unto his son, nor his daughter shalt thou take unto thy son. For they will turn thy son away from following Me, that they may serve other gods: so will the anger of the Lord be kindled against you and destroy thee suddenly.
But we have allowed these Jews to enter our land in vast numbers — multitudes of them were admitted illegally under the Roosevelt administration. We have allowed them to take control over our commerce, our government, our schools — and now these Jews who hate our God are even laying vile hands on our churches.
God warned us not to allow them in the land, saying, “For they will turn away thy son from following Me.”
They have done this. Jewish organizations have made such a bitter fight against any mention of the name of Jesus Christ in our schools that many schools boards have yielded to their pressure. They sometimes have been able to put some of their own Jewish people into public office where they have ruled officially that we cannot even read one verse from the Bible in our schools because it offends these enemies of God.
Our children are not allowed to hear the name of God in our schools, and now even our churches are being infiltrated and corrupted in the same way. Under the guise of “inter-faith” movements, supposedly-Christian ministers have been induced to bring into their pulpits rabbis whose official doctrine calls our Savior, Jesus Christ, a liar and a fraud.
To avoid offending these people, supposedly-Christian ministers now carefully avoid preaching anything from the gospel of John. They practically deny their Savior to please His enemies. So our children — who cannot hear the name of our God in school — often cannot hear it in their churches either. The evil of which God warned us has come upon us.
How are Satan’s Jewish children able to do this? By a great masquerade in which they pretended to be God’s children — and they’ve corrupted most of our clergymen until they no longer tell us who we are. We received warning of this also, if we would only heed it. In Second Corinthians 11, verses 13 to 15 says,
Such men are sham apostles, dishonest workmen, masquerading as apostles of Christ. And no wonder, as even Satan himself masquerades as a shining angel. So it is nothing strange if his servants also masquerade as servants of righteousness.
But their doom will fit their actions. So we are told by these corrupted clergymen that these Jews are “God’s chosen” — that they must be helped to invade and steal other people’s land — that our own institutions must be changed so as not to offend them. And our churches must abandon Jesus Christ because these Jews hate his name. And we must abandon our Savior in order to have fellowship with them. But God warned us not to have fellowship with devils.
All masquerades must reach an end — and this one is almost finished. Meantime it has nearly succeeded in bringing us to destruction. But God will save us because we are His children. Though most of us have forgotten our identity, He has not forgotten. Masks will be removed, and our true identity revealed.
In Isaiah 51, verses 1 and 2, God has told us,
Hearken to Me, ye that follow after righteousness, ye that seek the Lord: look unto the rock from whence ye are hewn and to the hole of the pit from whence ye are digged. Look unto Abraham your father and unto Sarah that bore you.
That is, look to your ancestry — recognize that you are Israel, God’s children. Stop masquerading as “Gentiles”. And tear the mask off Satan’s Jewish children who masquerade as you.
Mass immigration/ the great whore.
Yes, the current flooding of every (and only) white nation by the hand of the Jew was foretold as an end times sign.
YOU ARE HERE>>>>>>Revelation 12:15
And the serpent cast out of his mouth water as a flood after the woman, that he might cause her to be carried away of the flood.
Who is the woman? Its universally agreed by bible scholars, that whenever God refers to his people, he uses the term woman in some way, to show he is married to his people. Most know this as the bride of Christ. But there is a less flattering term for some…As when Gods people are being unfaithful, they are referred to as prostitutes.
When those white people who were the bride of Christ turn against and divorce God and instead serve those of the Babylonian Talmud, and ride the Beast to prosper (ZOG and white Liberals)and remember, the whore is described as being cloaked in red (Communism Marxism) then these leftist whites are no longer of God and become the WHORE of BABYLON. These white elites/Liberals who divorced themselves from God, and married them selves to the Babylonians (There is a reason its called the BABYLONIAN Talmud!) are the great whore on the beast in Revelation 17.
As for the prophecy of the flood used to destroy Gods people being mass immigration, thats not “Just an interpretation” as the bible clarifies this concerns mass immigration…
Revelation 17:15
And he saith unto me, The waters which thou sawest, where the whore sitteth, are peoples, and multitudes, and nations, and tongues.
When asked who the anti-Christ really was, Christ said “He who denies father and son are anti-Christ. Even now, there are many anti-Christs”
VERY revealing once it dawns on you that in his lifetime, only “Jews” denied him.
“Christ is our King, and Christianity is our race, which you once called Israel”- Justin Martyr, from Paragraphs of rypho chapter 135.”
“Most Jew would never admit this, but our God is Lucifer, and we are his children. So when we tell those stupid Goy we are “Gods chosen people”, we are not really lying to them. We just dont mention WHICH God it was that chose us”- Harold Wallace Rosenthal, former advisor to NY senator Jake Javitts, and white house consultant, 3 months before he was killed (officially in a plane crash) and had his tongue cut out. Recorded in an interview with Christian Author and Journalist, W. White 1976.
R.Ahrens and to anyone else who cites this quote by Martyr……..
What is the exact quote? Because I can’t seem to find this exact quote by Martyr.
I hate to be a stickler here. But I have been called out too many times for quoting things that are simply not historically accurate.
Here is what I think the above quote was re-worded from —
“…As, therefore, Christ is the Israel and the Jacob, even so we, who have been quarried out from the bowels of Christ, are the true Israelitic race…..” Justin Martyr – Dialogue with Trypho; chapter 135.
I would be grateful if someone could find the quote cited by Ahrens — word for word — in some historical document.
Thanks.
Two paths of thought here.
1. They were chosen by fallen divine, disobedient angels who inSEMinated women, making the SEMitic offspring with higher intelligence and capable of being their preists, doctors, lawyers, architects, etc…
2. It’s all bs and religion and race and drugs and “schooling” and viruses are mind control.
Either way. Do you have a nice house, car, food, clothes, a decent or even good life like the rich jews have? It’s all about money and quality of life for the few jews and their death sworn secret oath takers, and those who are not. We outnumber them. We are armed. They are cowards and have tech and mind control but it’s not enough if we don’t give up our guns and continue to meet, work, and agree on how to resist and restore our republic. 2a is not a permission to be given. It is a right. The govt does not have the right to permit you to carry. As a legal US citizen, you have the right. Rights cannot be monetized by law. Permits are illegal. Do you have to pay for a permit for free speech?
MAGA regardless of who is POTUS. Carry because we have the COTUS. Rock on!
No US citizen has any rights only privileges. MAGA is the highest level of leadership in the church of of Satan.
http://www.usa-the-republic.com/revenue/true_history/AffTruth.html
http://www.criminalgovernment.com/docs/emer.html
Registered Member (no degree)
Active Member—Satanist (First Degree)
Witch/Warlock (Second Degree)
Priestess/Priest (Third Degree)
Magistra/Magister (Fourth Degree)
Maga/Magus (Fifth Degree
The Book of Isaiah (especially), the one that points directly to Christ Jesus, is the VERY REASON the unChosen made their own talmud…a book of satan, magic and death. These so-called ‘jews for Jesus’ is another masquerade, another infiltration, simply because:
Colossians 3:11-13
New American Standard Bible
11 a renewal in which there is no distinction between Greek and Jew, circumcised and uncircumcised, [a]barbarian, [b]Scythian, slave, and free, but Christ is all, and in all.
12 So, as those who have been chosen of God, holy and beloved, put on a heart of compassion, kindness, humility, gentleness, and [c]patience; 13 bearing with one another, and forgiving each other, whoever has a complaint against anyone; just as the Lord forgave you, so must you do also. (**Note the fruit of the ‘chosen’**) The jews do not possess this fruit.
Romans 10:11-13
11For the Scripture says, “WHOEVER BELIEVES IN HIM WILL NOT BE DISAPPOINTED.” 12For there is no distinction between Jew and Greek; for the same Lord is Lord of all, abounding in riches for all who call on Him; 13for “WHOEVER WILL CALL ON THE NAME OF THE LORD WILL BE SAVED.
The secret to the masqueraders is that they will NEVER renounce their ‘jewishness’ which is complete idolatry and antiChrist behavior.
Sparrow, those verses you quoted from the NT apply only to Israelites/Adamites (aka “the nations”), not just anyone. For example, it should be understood that among Israelites/Adamites there is no distinction between Greek or Judean (not “Jew”), circumcised and uncircumcised, barbarian (people who do not speak Greek), Scythian, slave and free”. This is NOT a universalist verse that applies to everyone in the world, as most denominational churches claim.
Thus, in Romans 10, whoever (among the Israelites/Adamites) who call on Christ will be saved. Nor is it true that you are saved eternally simply because you profess to believe in Christ–you can lose that status if you are unrepentant.
Ernstly
+10!
I do not disagree, but I am left wondering then why Churchianity spends so much on missionary efforts abroad if these non-Adamites/Israelites are not granted entry into the Kingdom of Heaven?
Is it a fool’s errand? I suppose that some Asians might be very, very miscegenated Israelites though I’m not sure how that would be processed (Matthem 8:11?), but the negroids from Darkest Africa cannot be our Israelite kin.
“……but I am left wondering then why Churchianity spends so much on missionary efforts abroad….”
Why are you confused Boomer? Do you not believe the Scriptures — “for many are called and few are chosen.”
The road to Eternal life is Narrow and only a few will find it.
I suspect all of this “missionary work” of history was all political and economical and today — Virtue Signaling.
The Good News of Christ reached all the people it was meant to reach about 1,000 years ago when Europe, by and large, turned Christian. There wasn’t any proselytizing of the non-White races until about 1,500 AD when Europeans started expanding/exploring the globe. Most of those peoples lived like animals, and they thought that believing in Jesus would raise them out of their darkness. Then proselytizing the dark races became a way of enriching the churches, as Christians in White nations felt sorry for the savages and wanted to score points with God by donating money to “save” them. It failed most but helped a few, while enriching a lot of Judeo pastors.
Miscegenation is an abomination. Not fit for the congregation of the Lord.
Nehemiah 13:3
Numbers 25
Deuteronomy.7
Deuteronomy23
Ezra 9+10
Joshua 23:12-13
Hello Reforming Boomer,
Please read:
Act 21:37 And as Paul was to be led into the castle, he said unto the chief captain, May I speak unto thee? Who said, Canst thou speak Greek?
Act 21:38 Art not thou that Egyptian, which before these days madest an uproar, and leddest out into the wilderness four thousand men that were murderers?
Act 21:39 But Paul said, I am a man which am a Jew of Tarsus, a city in Cilicia, a citizen of no mean city: and, I beseech thee, suffer me to speak unto the people.
The chief captain saw Paul, and thought he was Egyptian. Now answer this question. What color is an biblical Egyptian?
Lets look at Joseph:
Gen 42:23 And they knew not that Joseph understood them; for he spake unto them by an interpreter.
Gen 42:24 And he turned himself about from them, and wept; and returned to them again, and communed with them, and took from them Simeon, and bound him before their eyes.
Now if the Egyptians are a different color, then why did his brothers not recognize him?
Joseph wife was an Egyptian:
Gen 41:45 And Pharaoh called Joseph’s name Zaphnathpaaneah; and he gave him to wife Asenath the daughter of Potipherah priest of On. And Joseph went out over all the land of Egypt.
Two of the tribes are from Joseph line, who were born with an Egyptian:
Gen 48:5 And now thy two sons, Ephraim and Manasseh, which were born unto thee in the land of Egypt before I came unto thee into Egypt, are mine; as Reuben and Simeon, they shall be mine.
The daughters of Ruel, saw Moses as an Egyptian, do you see the pattern here?
Exo 2:16 Now the priest of Midian had seven daughters: and they came and drew water, and filled the troughs to water their father’s flock.
Exo 2:17 And the shepherds came and drove them away: but Moses stood up and helped them, and watered their flock.
Exo 2:18 And when they came to Reuel their father, he said, How is it that ye are come so soon to day?
Exo 2:19 And they said, An Egyptian delivered us out of the hand of the shepherds, and also drew water enough for us, and watered the flock.
Exo 2:20 And he said unto his daughters, And where is he? why is it that ye have left the man? call him, that he may eat bread.
Moses was married to an Ethiopian women:
Num 12:1 And Miriam and Aaron spake against Moses because of the Ethiopian woman whom he had married: for he had married an Ethiopian woman.
You may want to rethink your statement “but the negroids from Darkest Africa cannot be our Israelite kin.”
Chris, a little knowledge is a dangerous thing. The original Mizraim Egyptians were White, but over time the black Nubians overran Egypt, race mixing the Whites out of existence. Today’s “Egyptians” are not real Egyptians, they are Arab/Black/White mongrels who live on top of the ruins of an ancient White civilization — and try to take credit for it. DNA test on King Tut showed him to have the same DNA profile as white Europeans. Cleopatra was a white Macedonian.
Same is true for the original Ethiopians — they, too, were White descendants of Cush, who was White. They, too, were overrun by black Nubians.
Ironically, they are good points regarding the similarity between Hamites (Egyptians) and Shemites (Israelites). Especially the one between Joseph and his brothers. Yes, because they were all white…
“One of the finest things ever done by the mob was the Crucifixion of Christ. Intellectually it was a splendid gesture. But trust the mob to bungle the job. If I’d had charge of executing Christ, I’d have handled it differently. You see, what I’d have done was had him shipped to Rome and fed him to the lions. They could never have made a savior out of mincemeat!”
—Rabbi Ben Hecht
Matthew 26:3 Then assembled together the chief priests, and the scribes, and the elders of the people, unto the palace of the high priest, who was called Caiaphas, 4 And consulted that they might take Jesus by subtilty, and kill [him].
Please elaborate! What is the point you want to make here.
Satan’s spawn conspired to murder the Christ Messiah.
the zionist n.w.o. is based on judaism’s “chosen people” delusion. in the talmud or torah, it says something to the effect of “all of the gentiles’ possessions will be in the hands of jews”. and a zionist rabbi said something to the effect of “gentiles will work like beasts of burden for jews”. and that’s exactly what happened / happens in communist countries. communism is how zionists rule their slaves.
agenda 21 and agenda 2030 are about confiscating private property, and fulfilling the delusion of “all of the gentiles’ possessions will be in the hands of jews”. agenda 21 and agenda 2030 are united nations’ schemes. the u.n. is the “government” of zionists’ n.w.o. zionists say the capital of the n.w.o will be jersusalem.
It is sermons like that that really hammer home just how lost in la-la land todays mainstream Christianity is; anyone who says that Mr. Comparet is wrong here is either a devil, a liar, one not of the flock, or a sheep with scales on their eyes and a hardened heart.
I like this website (CFT) because it is scholarly and tells the truth.
Seriously, how do the rest of our fellow sheepies not connect the dots on these important biblical matters? Without sounding high and mighty and pompous, most people are pretty dense between the ears and care only about their little world and material things… but really, can they not see that something is wrong with “hippie Jesus is a jew that was killed by Romans and then came back to life to save everyone if they only believe”? Let he who hath ears to hear, hear, I s’pose.
Keep it up CFT! God bless you all!
You’ve stated it very well, CHRIST IS KING, and it hasn’t taken all that long for the infiltrators to make America sick.
“Creating the phrase “Judeo Christian” gave the Jews an inroad into Christianity without them having to adopt such a contemptable religion. By telling all Christianity that the foundation of their religion was Judaism, and that they had a Judeo Christian heritage, Christians began to idolize the Jews and believe the lie that the Jews were god’s chosen people Israel, and that their savior was a Jew. Some poor blind wretches even began saying that god was a Jew. This message, “The Judeo Christian Con Job”, will identify the sinister force that is perverting all things which were held sacred, and were the foundation stones upon which the United States of America was built.
—
The term “Judeo Christian” first appeared in the mid 20th Century. George Orwell, the pen name for Eric Arthur Blair an English novelist and essayist, first used the term “Judeo Christian” in 1939 and it was no coincidence that the Round Table Conference of Christians and Jews was held in London on February 7th, 1939. It was in 1945 that Orwell wrote “Animal Farm” which was the precursor to his last novel “1984” written in 1949. It should be noted that this man who continually struck out against totalitarianism was the first to give name, “Judeo Christian”, to the most sinister of all threats to freedom, and did it in the place of Knights and a Roundtable. However this “Roundtable conference” while pretending to be a noble thing was quite the contrary. Its very purpose was to infiltrate, adulterate and gain control of the very organization that was supposed to proclaim the truth of the scriptures, Christianity. No matter how impregnable a structure may seem, termites, decay, and corrosion always destroy from within. Parasites bury themselves so far down into the host that their work is never seen from without until the time of complete dissolution. Nothing is seen in the beginning, but after time an inexplicable sickness becomes apparent.”
http://www.truthfromgod.com/now_articles/the_judeo_christian_con_job.html
I think the term you are searching for is Corruption from within.
John 10:14 “I am the good shepherd, and know My [sheep], and am known of Mine.
15 As the Father knoweth Me, even so know I the Father: and I lay down My life for the sheep.
16 And other sheep I have, which are not of this fold: them also I must bring, and they shall hear My voice; and there shall be one fold, [and] one shepherd.”
Jeremiah 31: 34 “And they shall teach no more every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the LORD: for they shall all know Me”
I am enjoying these articles about the truth of the Israelites, as it never made sense to me the official “Churchianity” stance that we who are Christendom are but second class citizens in it as we are lowly “Gentiles”.
So I’d like your help with a follow up question: just who are the Gentiles?
Also, there was another article on here about the Kingdoms of Daniel and it seemed to imply that the Roman Empire was not an empire of ethnic Israelites (ie: Whites); Were the Ancient Romans israelites?
Yes, the original but not all Romans were Israelites, after all Paul wrote an important epistle to the Romans, and he wrote his epistles only to Israelites to be regathered.
However, as the Roman Empire expanded, it began to incorporate non-Israelite, non-White peoples, and that is what Comparet was alluding to in his sermon on Daniel’s Kingdoms. Rome collapsed because it incorporated racial diversity, just as America is today, and look at the results–it’s falling apart.
Who are the “Gentiles”? The word does not appear in the original Bible, and was added 400 years after Christ by Jerome as a translation for the Greek word “ethnos” which means nation, or tribe of related people. It does NOT mean non-Jew. Usually, in the New Testament “gentile” refers to the lost northern 10 tribes of Israel who were scattered over the centuries and had mostly lost their identity as Israelites–whom Christ came to regather.
That’s why there are certain verses where translating “ethnos” into “gentile” doesn’t make sense, like John 11, 51,:
“He prophesied that Jesus should die for that nation; and not for that nation only, but that also that He should gather together the children of God that were scattered abroad.”
There is a definite reference to Rome in Daniel 11:30 where it says, “For ships of Kittim will come against him; therefore he will withdraw in fear…”. This is referring to Gaius Popillius Laenas who came out against Antiochus IV Epiphanes, where the Romans demanded that Antiochus and the Seleucid Empire not attack Ptolemaic Egypt (and Cyprus). This was a Roman fleet, which Daniel calls the “ships of Kittim”. Directly after that, Antiochus went to attack Judea as we know, which is exactly what it relates in Daniel 11:30 onwards.
Kittim is found in Genesis 10:4, “The sons of Javan were Elishah, Tarshish, Kittim…” Javan seems to be the Ionian Greeks, as it links Javan to the Bronze kingdom (starting with Alexander the Great) in Daniel 10:20 and 11:2. We can conclude then that the Romans were not Israelites and neither were the Ionian Greeks.
Also we can conclude that the nations (“Gentiles”) are not referring to the lost tribes of Israel most of the time, but rather, they are mostly referring to the nations of Genesis 10:32 where it says, “These are the families of the sons of Noah, according to their descendants, by their nations; and out of these the nations were separated on the earth after the flood.” Those very same nations who are white men as we understand it today, the descendants of Noah and Adam. Non-white bipedal beasts we see today are not nations, as we can see with the Rephaim who were one such bipedal beast in the early land of Canaan.
The letter of Romans was written to both Judeans/Judahites and Romans, as he speaks to those who know the law as well as those who don’t. We can see that Christ would have given the Roman centurion the same treatment as the Canaanite woman in Luke 7:4-5, “When they came to Jesus, they strongly urged Him, saying, “He is worthy for You to grant this to him; for he loves our nation, and it was he who built us our synagogue.”” Christ confirms that the Roman was not an Israelite when He says in Matthew 8:11, “And I say to you that many will come from east and west, and recline at the table with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob in the kingdom of heaven”. Abraham, Isaac and Jacob encompasses all of Israel, whether scattered or not. Therefore, the Roman was not an Israelite.
Why would Paul write an epistle to non-Israelite people in Rome? It was my understanding that the “people of the Prince” that Daniel refers to (9:26) who would destroy Jerusalem in 70 AD were clearly the Romans. And the “Prince” was clearly Christ, and therefore “the people of the Prince” would be Israelites, meaning Romans, at least many of them, were indeed Israelites.
And Rome was founded by Israelite Trojans–as was London. And Romans 1:24 states that God gave up the Romans for their sin–which implies that they were His at one point. Same with Romans 2:26, which suggested Romans were “uncircumcized” Israelites rather than merely “uncircumcized” Adamites. But I’m open to another interpretation if compelling enough.
I’m not sure the why is relevant given that Paul did, but in any case, I suppose the answer can be summarized in Romans 10:18-21.
Daniel 10:21 and 12:1 emphatically state that Michael is the prince of Israel. Therefore already it is impossible in this context to say that the Lord Jesus is the prince of Israel, or of Rome. Rather, He is the anointed Prince, the Prince of Princes and Prince of the Armies (Daniel 8).
We can see in Daniel 10 that heavenly powers are contending with the prince of Persia. Then afterward the prince of Greece would come. Now if we follow the order of the vision of Daniel 2, who is the next logical prince after that? The prince of Rome. That same prince said to Lord Jesus in Luke 4:6, “I will give You all this domain and its glory, for it has been handed over to me, and I give it to whomever I want.” Therefore, the prince of the people to come and the prince of Rome is Satan.
Romans 1 is addressed to Judeans who know the law, as it says in verse 32, “…and although they know the ordinance of God, that those who practice such things are worthy of death…” Therefore, those who knew the law were given up to their sin. How could the Romans know the ordinance of God, if Zerah left before the law was given?
Romans 2 again is obviously addressed to Judeans, especially verse 26. It starts in verse 17, “But if you call yourself a Judean and rely upon the Law and boast in God”.
As for Trojans being Israelites and the story of Zerah… I have never seen a convincing argument for this, especially given that we have the family of Zerah with the Israelites going into the promised land in Joshua 7. If you have one I’d like to see it, although it would have to deal with the Biblical sources of Romans not being Israelites already mentioned.
So in Romams 1:8, you are saying that the faith of these non-Israelites was known throughout the whole world? Are there other non-Israelites besides the Romans that Paul wrote epistles to?
Paul’s letter to the Romans goes to Israelites and non-Israelites, but suffice to say, “the report of [their] obedience [had] reached everyone” (Romans 16:19).
Ionian Greeks weren’t Israelites, so at a quick glance we could say that the Ephesians and Thessalonians weren’t Israelites. That is going very geographically of course.
Matthew 7:20 “Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.”
Ridgeway says the Ligurians were the Aborigines of Rome. Rome was many nations by the time they started creating an empire and killing people to do so. The term Israelites must have once meant keeping the laws of God. Rome wasn’t doing that, from day one. They pushed out the indigenous Ligurians to the north, and then followed them to burn down their Nemeton… followed them again to steal pearls and tin from Britain.
OtherSheeps….
Who is “Ridgeway”?
No, the term “Israelite” NEVER meant those who kept the laws of God–that’s what the Catholic Church teaches–that Catholics became the “New Israel” because they accepted Christ and the Jews rejected Him. That’s preposterous.
Israelite is a racial designation, the literal seed of Jacob-Israel, the 12 Tribes who arose from his loins. Those Israelites who kept the law were the small remnant of Judahites, Benjamites, and Levites in Judea at the time of Christ, while those that did not keep the law and had lost their identity as Israelites after the Assyrian captivity–the 10 Northern Tribes–were the “lost sheep”, aka, the “gentiles” of the New Testament.
So were the Pharisees indeed Israelites?
I’m confused as John 8 has been suggested here as establishing that they were not, though some translations of John 8:37 and John 8:56 suggest that they are, even though every translation of John 8:38 and John 8:42 that I’ve found suggests that they are not?
They were both. Paul was a Pharisee, but he was clearly an Israelite, while other Pharisees tried to claim they were Israelites, the children of Abraham through Jacob, but Christ rebuked them for making this false claim.
Understand that by the time of Christ’s ministry, many Edomites/Canaanites had infiltrated the Hebrew priesthood and controlled it–the Sadduces were Edomites, and many Pharisees were Edomites, but not all. This might help:
https://christiansfortruth.com/the-error-of-christian-dispensationalists-did-israel-reject-jesus/
Matthew 7:20 is probably one of the most abused and misused scriptures out there. Properly, it refers to false prophets and possibly false teachers. That’s where it ends.
I remember in school we had to write “comprehension tests”, where one would have to read a piece of text and answer questions on that content in order to demonstrate one’s understanding and comprehension of it.
People read the Scripture with such powerful agendas, they fail the basic comprehension test.
Sometimes certain scriptures need time and meditation, but sometimes people fail so dismally on the easy ones, how can they hope to comprehend the Scripture together in its entirety? It must be so confusing to them.
Exactly! I get really frustrated when people look at Jacob’s blessings to his sons and can then with a straight face say that the (((jews))) are obviously the blessed! Preposterous! The blessed have ALL the blessings! The (((jews))) don’t even get a passed mark on even ONE of the blessings!
It’s an abomination and utter catastrophe of intellectual and spiritual failure of modern Christianity.
TEN seconds of investigating the promises and prophecies of God to Israel RULES OUT THE JEWS immediately. I am completely aghast that this is some kind of fringe idea. God have mercy.
Well we could try and be polite and make the slogan . Just say no to jews.
Where the Jews go genocide follows.
People forget that Paul’s a Jew.
You find out who owns a website by finding their sacred cow.
The term “Jew” did not exist at the time of Christ, so your statement is meaningless. You rely on a meaningless, later fabricated term to condemn Paul after the fact, which is intellectually anachronistic and dishonest. Paul was not a “Jew”. Paul was “Ioudaios” which was wrongly translated into “Jew”, but it did not mean that. Paul was a Israelite from the tribe of Benjamin.
Israelites in Judea practicing the religion of the Hebrews were referred to as Ioudaios, but so were Edomite/Canaanite imposters. Not all Pharisees, however, were Israelites–many were racial Edomites/Canaanites who had infiltrated the priesthood. If you are accusing Paul of being an Edomite like today’s ethnic Jews, there is no proof in the Bible to support that. If Paul were not an true Israelite, Christ would not have attempted to convert him or come to him in a vision. Christ himself was also referred to as Ioudaios, just as Paul was.
Thank you J Polk!
The one thing consistent about Paul bashers; is they always only ‘name call’.
I haven’t seen any evidence so far for Paul being an imposter.
The only accusation I have heard is that Paul was antinomian. Far from it!
Paul absolutely demolishes the heresy of Once Saved Always Saved; or ‘all Israel will be saved’ — Galatians 6:7-9
“…Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap. For he that soweth to his flesh shall of the flesh reap corruption; but he that soweth to the Spirit shall of the Spirit reap life everlasting.”
Paul bashers are all in the service of Jews–if they can discredit and do away with Paul’s letters, that’s 30% of the New Testament. Then they can get rid of John whom they despise for this vehement “antisemitism”. Paul and John are the most overtly hostile to Jewry and its agenda–and those who promote Paul bashing are literally doing the bidding of Jewry–unwittingly or not.
Thank you AllenG
The righteousness of the letter is simple to live by, and those who drink the old wine have their consciences seared, not willing to let go of their righteousness resumé.
Paul’s calling to a higher and stricter righteousness in the new covenant of the Lord Jesus is a stumbling block for them, because Paul reveals the letter’s inability to bring about righteousness in and of itself. So the unshrunk cloth tears at the old garment, and the new wine bursts the old wineskin.
The sad irony is, when Paul practiced the letter, he was a more devout man than any of those who criticize him. He gave his whole life, whereas his critics keep only as much of the letter as they have to.
I am reminded of those who criticized our Master for healing on the Sabbath. If only they could heal in the first place, they might have grounds on which to criticize. Likewise, if only those who criticized Paul could demonstrate the fervour he did, they might have grounds to criticize him.
I look forward to the day when our Master places the crown of glory on Paul’s head for all to see.
And also we will need the same dna test they the jews use in israel to make sure they have no power over us . what can they say its anti bla bla its what they do .
38.8% of world Jewry reside in the U.S. No other country in the world is home to so many Jews except Israel. Is it any wonder the U.S. is on its last legs?
https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/jewish-population-by-country
“One of the oldest and most practiced religions around the world is Judaism. People that practice Judaism and originate from the Hebrews and the Israelites are known as Jewish. Jewish people – also known as Jews – are ethnoreligious, meaning that not only do members have the same ethnicity but they also share the same religion.
Jewish people first originated in the Middle East and has since grown to more than 14 million people around the world. The enlarged Jewish population – which includes people with full or partial ancestry – tops 20 million, based on estimates taken in 2017.
While you can find Jews in nearly every country around the world, some nations have significant Jewish populations. Based on data from sources including the Jewish Virtual Library and the American Jewish Year Book, the nation with the largest population of Jews is Israel. In 2017, an estimated 6.45 million Jews lived in Israel.
The United States of America also has a large population of Jews. Estimates show that about 5.7 million Jewish people live in the United States. These are the only two nations with Jewish populations that exceed 1 million”.
Even World Population Review can’t set the record straight on who the Jews really are and where they originated from. So much false information on the history of the Jews. I did make the effort to contact their webmaster and I am still waiting for a reply.
Jews do NOT originate from the Hebrews and the Israelites–that’s the greatest lie ever told, bigger lie than the Holocaust. If they have a “homeland” it is Edom at Mount Seir. God said that the Israelites would be a blessing to all nations–and yet the Jews have been a curse, not a blessing, which is what we would expect from Edomites, not Israelites.
Thank you John 3. Absolutely correct and glad you pounced on it!
Thanks for having this post with the audio–in the end he says we have to turn to God and stop helping God’s enemies that want to enslave us.
That only makes good sense, and if we were to succeed like the South, we would only need to fix one thing that Benjamin Franklin wanted to put in the Constitution–to exclude the jews from it–found in “What World Famous Men Said About Jews.”
Franklin was an Esquire (Title of Nobility), Temple Bar/Crown (City of London) agent.
http://www.civil-liberties.com/books/colony2.html
http://www.hiddenmysteries.org/themagazine/vol8/articles/colony.shtml
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=FXFJZ8JtjTY
https://www.google.com/amp/s/constitutioncenter.org/amp/blog/the-case-of-the-missing-13th-amendment-to-the-constitution
http://www.let.rug.nl/usa/essays/general/the-missing-13th-amendment/