(Times Of Israel) A statue of prominent Jewish woman — Licoricia of Winchester — who lived during the 13th century and died just 20 years before Jews were expelled en masse from England for usury and ritual murder — was unveiled in the city last week:
The bronze, life-size statue depicts Licoricia, who ran a successful business and raised four children in Winchester until her murder in 1277. She is depicted with her youngest son, Asser, who is seen holding a dreidel. Licoricia “has real resonance for today,” acclaimed historian and best-selling author Simon Sebag Montefiore told The Jewish Chronicle.
“She was a woman in a man’s world, an ethnic minority at a time of great racism and prejudice and persecution. She was a very successful person,” he added. “She must have been a great character. She was also an outsider in a time ruled by aristocrats and kings so on so many levels she’s got real resonance especially since there’s a tendency now to deny antisemitism, to deny there was racism against Jewish people and the fact of the matter is she proves that.”
A moneylender, Licoricia had a roster of clients that included King Henry III and Queen Eleanor. Living in times of virulent antisemitism — her death preceded the 1290 total expulsion of Jews from England by only 13 years — she was jailed repeatedly before being murdered in a mysterious attack in Winchester. She was also widowed twice.
…But despite the unexpected change in plans, the unveiling event continued as planned, drawing an excited crowd and Christian, Muslim, Sikh and Buddhist community leaders, who came to show their support. Addressing the audience, Chief Rabbi of the UK Ephraim Mirvis spoke about the difficult conditions Licoricia must have experienced during her lifetime. He noted the “sustained horrific persecution of Jews in this country leading ultimately to the expulsion of the Jews from England in 1290.”
And yet, “within those exceptionally trying times there was an extraordinary lady committed to her faith who was determined to raise her family, built a successful enterprise and give a contribution of inestimable value to her country,” he said.
The biblical quote “Love thy neighbour as thyself” from the Book of Leviticus is engraved on one side of the statue, both in Hebrew and English….“The broader message is that we all benefit from letting women take an equal part in our society. It also holds up the fact that as she was Jewish she was persecuted in those times,” Rank-Broadley told JC.
Jews are often comically tone deaf — unveiling a statue to a usurer who was murdered mostly likely for her sharp business practices — next they’ll unveil a statue of a “martyred” rabbi who was “falsely” accused of ritual murder of a Christian child.
By the late 13th century, Jews had gained a notorious reputation for practicing ruinous usury — so much so that King Edward Longshanks ultimately decided to rid England of all Jews in order to save the nation.
Jews like to tell themselves that they practiced usury only because Christians weren’t allowed to practice moneylending at interest — so they had no “choice” — somebody “had” to do it.
Jews, however, weren’t forbidden from being tanners, tailors, blacksmiths or farmers, but for some reason they gravitated to the far more lucrative — and less labor intensive — usury.
When the inevitable violent reactions to these Jewish moneylenders occurred — after ruining many of the landed aristocracy — the Jews claimed to be “persecuted” — they never acknowledge how their participation in this unpopular profession made them targets.
Ironically, this statue of the usurer bears the inscription, “Love thy neighbour” — as if that applied to alien Jewish moneylenders who were robbing you blind — and completely ignoring the plethora of Bible verses prohibiting usury, such as Ezekiel 18:13
Lends at interest, and takes profit; shall he then live? He shall not live. He has done all these abominations; he shall surely die; his blood shall be upon himself.
God shall not be mocked — and in her violent death, this Jewish usurer fulfilled these prophetic words — words that today’s so-called “Jews” completely ignore — or explain away.
And the hypocrisy of the Jews in the U.K. once again rears its ugly head — as they worship mammon and extol this usurer for her “success” — yet at the same time scream bloody murder because England’s greatest writer — William Shakespeare — dared write “Merchant Of Venice” — a play about a Jewish moneylender, who was given the opportunity to redeem himself and change his ways — before he ended up like Licoricia of Winchester.
state of education in uk she is celebrating a jewish money lender that was doing illegal things as under constitutional laws usury is illegal so King Edward Longshanks was well within his legal rights doing what he did as if these jews cant behave in your country and abuse your hospitality then they do not deserve to be in your country they play victim card but these jews create a lot of victims in countries they go to also the claim oppression but the oppress the native population of those countries they go to.
This jewish money lender brought ruin to many they have a cheek to claim persecution for crimes they commit , gordon bowden knew only too well the schemes cons these jews commit via fraud and money laundering setting up fake companies to rob uk tax payer blind, perhaps that person Katie Marshall should learn some real history and the crimes jews commit as someone who supported her music she blocked me when i told the truth about the eu that its not benefited uk people it has led to loss of jobs decline in farming , she celebrated prince charles becoming king due to how ill educated many people due to jews corrupting history creating fiction and also the jewstream media putting out lies and propaganda.
She should know the fake king charles is buddies with klaus schwab who likes dressing up in womens undies bra the full works also that charles was best freinds with peado satanist jimmy saville that abused dead bodies of young people in hospital morgues using his charity front to do so and that jimmy saville abused young females like katie and would traffic them to peado networks. so the fake king charles she looks up to is involved with vile people and serves jewish interests like the kalergi plan.
People like katie should listen to people like me as its sad that white people listen more to jewish lies than their fellow white that have their best interests at heart , i sometimes pray for the absolute destruction of the jewstream media peddling their poison lies like they peddle their poison vaccines and poison ideology
https://twitter.com/KatieHistory/status/1544715110228393986?s=20&t=9hkPAgAIWQhBa2ARRctCGQ
Weird how they made the mother and son look European.
Falls in line with all the surgeries they do I suppose.
Could easily just erase the text, perhaps alter a few things, and replace it with something along the lines of “In memory of Simon of Trent and all victims of World Jewry”
“They” might be granted “interesting times” – we are obviously in the middle of this process.
https://ia601702.us.archive.org/11/items/weisman-charles-a.-who-is-esau-edom/Weisman%20Charles%20A.%20-%20Who%20is%20Esau-Edom.pdf
Forget the nazis! The real anti-semites are the English – who kicked us out for nothing more than sacrificing fresh caught Christian kids in bizarre occultic rites ; as well as debasing the currency through counterfeiting and coin clipping. Ach! My people!
Thou shalt not make unto thyself a graven or molten image. Thou shalt not bow down to it. The picture shows them violating both!
Yes, that photograph was staged intentionally to show the rabbi bowing to the “graven image”.
Judaism is occult, they worship the golden calf, mammon.
Jews who stay in the cult are promised the world, riches, connections, material success.
The rabbi praises this usurer for her “success”, praising her wealth.
This is what Jews admire and respect.
Sure it’s typical jew agitprop, but really… Not every statue or picture is a “graven image” with a biblical prohibition attached. I mean, really, stop worshiping the graven images of your mom and dad.
See the examples of Noah, Moses, Beseleel, and King Solomon
In Exodus 20:4-5 God condemned the carving of statues for the sake of worshiping them as idols. Recall that God Himself ordered the construction of other statues to serve His purposes. Exodus 25:16-20, 37:6-9; Numbers 21:6-9; 3 Kings (1 Kings) 6:23, 7:23-29; 1 Paralipomenon (1 Chronicles) 28:18-19; 2 Paralipomenon (2 Chronicles) 3:10
Noah commanded by God to make statues of cherubim for his Ark:
“And thou shalt put in the ark the testimony which I will give thee. Thou shalt make also a propitiatory of the purest gold: the length thereof shall be two cubits and a half, and the breadth a cubit and a half. Thou shalt make also two cherubims of beaten gold, on the two sides of the oracle. Let one cherub be on the one side, and the other on the other. Let them cover both sides of the propitiatory, spreading their wings, and covering the oracle, and let them look one towards the other, their faces being turned towards the propitiatory wherewith the ark is to be covered.” Exodus 25:16-20
Moses commanded by God to make a brazen serpent to heal the punished Israelites:
“Wherefore the Lord sent among the people fiery serpents, which bit them and killed many of them. Upon which they came to Moses, and said: We have sinned, because we have spoken against the Lord and thee: pray that he may take away these serpents from us. And Moses prayed for the people. And the Lord said to him: Make a brazen serpent, and set it up for a sign: whosoever being struck shall look on it, shall live. Moses therefore made a brazen serpent, and set it up for a sign: which when they that were bitten looked upon, they were healed.” Numbers 21:6-9
Beseleel commanded by God to make statues of cherubim for the Ark and Tabernacle:
He made also the propitiatory, that is, the oracle, of the purest gold, two cubits and a half in length, and a cubit and a half in breadth. Two cherubims also of beaten gold, which he set on the two sides of the propitiatory: One cherub in the top of one side, and the other cherub in the top of the other side: two cherubims at the two ends of the propitiatory, Spreading their wings, and covering the propitiatory, and looking one towards the other, and towards it. Exodus 37:6-9
King Solomon made statues of cherubim, lions, and oxen for the temple:
“And he made in the oracle two cherubims of olive tree, of ten cubits in height.”
3 Kings (1 Kings) 6:23
“…And between the little crowns and the ledges were lions, and oxen, and cherubims…”
3 Kings (1 Kings) 7:23-29
“And for the altar of incense, he gave the purest gold: and to make the likeness of the chariot of the cherubims spreading their wings, and covering the ark of the covenant of the Lord. All these things, said he, came to me written by the hand of the Lord that I might understand all the works of the pattern.”
1 Paralipomenon (1 Chronicles) 28:18-19
“He made also in the house of the holy of holies two cherubims of image work: and he overlaid them with gold.” 2 Paralipomenon (2 Chronicles) 3:10
About their insider’s joke about “neighbors”. Jews make a great pretense of “kindness to neighbors,” but that is a lie. Judaism defines a hierarchy with Jews as the only “humans” (adam) and a variety of lesser status Gentiles as non-humans due no decent treatment:
• ger tzedek (Hebrew: גר צדק, “righteous alien” ), a full convert to Judaism who can never have the same status as someone born of a Jew
• ger toshav (Hebrew: גר תושב, ger: “foreigner” or “alien” + toshav: “resident,” lit. “resident alien,” conquered people, a Noahide
• nokri (Hebrew: נָכְרִי, “stranger”)
• sakir (Hebrew: שָׂכִיר, “hireling”)
• amalek (Hebrew: עֲמָלֵק) originally a biblical tribe destroyed completely by the Israelites, but in contemporary usage refers to anyone the Jews want to exterminate now.
The indignities suffered—including not just usury, theft, deceit, but even murder and total extermination of gentiles—condoned and/or unpunished by Judaism is white-washed and rationalized in many sources.
http://judaism.is/chabad.html
Judaism has nothing to do with the Old Testament. The command to “love thy neighbor” applied only to Israelites, no one else. Even in the New Testament, “love thy neighbor” is not a universal command to love anyone who happens to be near you in proximity. That’s a laughable idea, and no one in Christ’s time would have taken it to mean to embrace all races as thyself. No way.
About their insider’s joke about “neighbors”. TALMUDIC Jews make a great pretense of “kindness to neighbors,” but that is a lie. Judaism defines a hierarchy with Jews as the only “humans” (adam) and a variety of lesser status Gentiles as non-humans due no decent treatment:
• ger tzedek (Hebrew: גר צדק, “righteous alien” ), a full convert to TALMUDIC Judaism who can never have the same status as someone born of a Jew
• ger toshav (Hebrew: גר תושב, ger: “foreigner” or “alien” + toshav: “resident,” lit. “resident alien,” conquered people, a Noahide
• nokri (Hebrew: נָכְרִי, “stranger”)
• sakir (Hebrew: שָׂכִיר, “hireling”)
• amalek (Hebrew: עֲמָלֵק) originally a biblical tribe destroyed completely by the Israelites, but in contemporary usage refers to anyone the TALMUDIC Jews want to exterminate now.
The indignities suffered—including not just usury, theft, deceit, but even murder and total extermination of gentiles—condoned and/or unpunished by Judaism is white-washed and rationalized in many sources.
http://judaism.is/chabad.html
Happy now, George?
Talmudic Jews got something right, and that is only “Adamics” are human according to the Bible. Ironically, Jews are not Adamic, and those they call “gentiles” or “goyim” — or Amalek or Edom — the White Europeans — are Adamic. Understand this irony, you understand what is really going on in this world.
I’m interested to see Old and _NEW_ Testament supportive of non-Adamics are non-humans as you apply the claim.
Who is human? Who is not? What do (((they))) say? https://judaism.is/who-is-human.html
Al Liguori, are you suggesting that any creature which hasn’t descended only from Adam and Eve might be a candidate for the salvation of Christ Jesus?
Only one people could have been created out of Adam and Eve. Flesh of flesh. Same flesh. “Aw dawm”, to show blood in the face, ruddy, pinkish. Their descendants are all Adamic.
‘Human” is a later word but is comparable to Adam, but is NOT Biblical. Adamkind morphed into “humankind”, and falsely universalized the concept, but they are not the same. Kind after kind. Adamkind after Adamkind.
Adam is Adam, and no one else. Adamkind is the Genesis 10 nations. Genesis 5:1, “This is the book of the generations of Adam.” No other people. You cannot account for all the “races” we see in the world from one couple of the same flesh. Leviticus 18:23 prohibits laying with non-Adamics.
“World”, comes from Germanic “Wer” meaning “Man” and “alt” meaning “time”, or the “time of man” or “time of Adam”. The “world” is the “cosmos” or “adornment” created by Adamkind, the Genesis 10 nations.
“Man” in English is often translated from “Adam” in the OT. This changes to the Greek “anthropos” in the hellenized NT, but it is based on the same concept — a common birth, a common people, descendant from Adam, (1 Corinthians 15:45), connecting the first Adam to the last Adam. (1 Corinthians 15:22) refers to Adamkind. Luke’s genealogy shows Christ’s legitimacy tracing him back to Adam, unbroken bloodline.
@Malta
The only thing I am “suggesting” is Galatians 3:28.
DNA and/or blushing has never saved anybody and never will save anybody.
The Mosaic Covenant is DEAD. There is a New Covenant, promised to be unlike the Old Covenant (Jeremias 31:31-32), so why debate racial conceits like a bunch of damned TALMUDIC Jews? https://judaism.is/covenants.html
@Al Liguori
I affirm Galatians 3:28. I also affirm that “DNA and/or blushing has never saved anybody and never will save anybody.” We are wholly in agreement.
Back to my original question however, do you think that anything not a descendant of Adam and Eve could be a candidate for the salvation of Christ Jesus?
Galatians 3:28, like all verses, has a context, and that context is always ignored by those who push a universalist doctrine. The verse compares Judeans, that is Israelites, to Greeks who are all Adamic peoples, but from different sons of Noah. Judeans and Greeks come from the same root, Noah. It doesn’t say “Judeans or Africans” or “Judeans and Chinese”. Its says “Judeans and Greeks” for a reason.
No, Adamic flesh doesn’t save you, but does make you eligible for salvation as one of the Genesis 10 nations. “Nations” or “gentiles”. That’s who the “gentiles” are. Not Africans or Chinese. Adamic Genesis 10 nations-gentiles.
Nowhere in the New Testament is one-single non-Adamic, non-White person converted. Nowhere. And no, the Ethiopian whom Philip encountered was clearly a white, hellenized Adamic person. Ethiopia was originally settled by Adamic descendants of Kush, and was later “given up” (Isaiah 43:3) to aliens, but a remnant remained until the time of Christ.
Ironically, it is this common misunderstanding of Galatians 3:28 which was originally used to justify allowing non-Israelite crypto-Jews into the Church, and ultimately led to its undoing. No one can argue that allowing non-Israelite “Jews” of spurious flesh (Sephardi) into the Church has been anything but an unmitigated disaster.
Justin Martyr explained the connection between “race” and Christianity very well, “Christ is our King, and Christianity is our race which you knew once as Israel.”
In other words, our “race”, that is, Adamkind, became Christians. That is why “Christian” and “white man” were synonymous for literally almost 2,000 years.
By about 1,100 AD, the “Great Commission” seemed to be fulfilled, as the “gospel” had reached all the “nations”, that is, all of Europe had been converted. The problem, though, is that the “gospel” that reached the “nations” wasn’t the true gospel, but rather the “gospel” according to the Catholic Church, and therefore not the true gospel. That is why Christ did not return in 1,100 when the “gospel” was heard by all who were meant to hear it. They weren’t hearing the true gospel. It isn’t about getting the gospel to all the pygmies and bushmen; rather it’s about getting the true gospel to the people it was meant for in the first place.
@Malta
Only humans have eternal souls that can be saved (by belief, behavior, and baptism as Jesus taught).
@monkeywrench
Your digression clouds, not clarifies, the context of Galatians 3:28.
The context is the full sentence and the surrounding text:
[Galatians 3:24] For you are all the children of God by faith, in Christ Jesus. [27] For as many of you as have been baptized in Christ, have put on Christ. [28] There is neither Jew nor Greek: there is neither bond nor free: there is neither male nor female. For you are all one in Christ Jesus. [29] And if you be Christ’s, then are you the seed of Abraham, heirs according to the promise.
So, the context is the clear teaching that no person is excluded from the Salvation earned on Calvary. The passage is not an invitation to rationalize an esoteric ethno-supremacist creed.
Neither is this any universalist rubbish. Quite the contrary, it is the individual person’s free-will choice to be “in” Jesus Christ by belief, behavior, and baptism as Jesus taught (and, of course, this includes belonging to his ONE and only VISIBLE Church and submitting to His ONE designated central authority). Neither nation, sex, nor position exclude any person from making that free-will choice to be “in” Jesus Christ.
@Al Liguori
I’m afraid if you substituted my wording for “human” then you haven’t answered the question. Please excuse me, as I must insist. Our conversation should be based on a common understanding of one another and as yet I do not understand your position. Would you agree with this statement:
“Only descendants of Adam and Eve have eternal souls that can be saved (by belief, behavior, and baptism as Jesus taught).”
I hope you will feel free to simply say “yes” or “no”.
Al wrote, “Neither nation, sex, nor position exclude any person from making that free-will choice to be “in” Jesus Christ.”
Said the guy who believes that if you are not Catholic, you will be eternally damned, burn in hell. LOL. Nothing you say has any credibility when it comes to Scripture. You, as all Catholics, believe that church doctrine takes precedence over the actual words of Scripture, which you claim has to be interpreted only by the Church. You are in a cult. No one is interested in your cultish pontifications. Ask Mary for help getting out of this cult.
@ parson @ Henry
“spurious flesh”—Where is that in the New Testament?
Why is there nothing extant from Jesus, the Apostles, Disciples, Fathers, Doctors, or Saints correcting our “misunderstanding” of the Gospel contra “the Gospel of the Catholic Church”?
Jesus taught nothing in secret, so why did your risible “correct understanding” remain secret for millennia? Had the Jesuits already been founded by the time of the Messiah? Or did Constantine do some Babylon whore clean-up job to expunge Jesus’ “no wogs allowed in Heaven” sermon? Or was there some other bogeyman you blame? Why were Jesus, the Apostles, Disciples, Fathers, Doctors, and Saints fierce on every controversial matter, risking death, sacrificing their lives, but silent about your “other gospel”?
@ foxworthy keno
NO person, excepting Jesus Christ, has of their free will chosen their DNA. NO person, excepting Jesus Christ, has ever made a free-will choice to “blush” or to not “blush.”
EVERY person makes the CULPABLE free-will choice to belong to Jesus’ one Church or to the Synagogue of Satan.
“You, as all Catholics, believe that church doctrine takes precedence over the actual words of Scripture, which you claim has to be interpreted only by the Church. ”
P-r-o-j-e-c-t-i-o-n!
Show me “sola scriptura” in the New Testament. Show me “do it yourself Christianity.” Show me “no wogs allowed in Heaven” in the New Testament. Show me Jesus’ 1½ Coming in the New Testament. . Show me divorce in the New Testament.
Show me:
”Amen, Amen, I say to you, you guys can believe the Apostles’ preaching and
traditions, BUT only until 397 A.D, THEN you can only believe a Book that the
Catholic Church will publish, BUT in 1500 years you can take out any books
inconvenient to your private interpretations.”
It’s in the Book of Luther! [laughing]
http://judaism.is/images/book%20of%20luther.jpg?crc=106090619
LOL, said the guy who prays to a dead woman in a “Church” now comprised mostly of African blacks and meztisos, run by a bunch of pedophile crypto-Jews who now bend over backward to do the bidding of world Jewry. What could go wrong? Sure, you have “the one true faith.” You’ll not find many takers of this circus you’re promoting except among the non-Whites you so love and hold as equals in your “church”.
Multiculturalism has destroyed the church, but you insist it is legitimate, that it’s “scriptural” because Galatians “says so”. You personally pick the Popes that are “legitimate” and reject the ones you disagree with like any schismatic. You decide what your version of Catholicism is “real”, just like the Protestants whom you deride. Your hypocrisy is nauseating because you can’t even see it.
You call blacks “wogs” and then turn around and say they are equal to the white man in God’s eyes. You troll a website that appeals to your “racism” but turn around and castigate “racists” who believe only the legitimate descendants of Adam and Eve are eligible for salvation but refuse to show where that position is non-Scriptural. You are the worst of hypocrites.
You summarily dismiss any evidence that contradicts your position, and then expect us to blindly accept the arbitrary rulings of a cabal of pedophile crypto-Jews when it comes to the actual meaning of the Scripture.
Seriously, this cult has destroyed your ability to think for yourself, which, we know, is not allowed by your priests. You pray for the “conversion of the Jews” then weep and moan when they destroy your church from within.
The Church fed off the white European race for over a thousand years, like all Jewish parasites, and when we got wise to your game, you called us “heretics” (your equivalent of “anti-semite”) and ex-communicated them, the best thing that could ever happen to them.
The Church is hemorrhaging whites at an exponential rate, and they will never come back, leaving the Church to be “lord of the flies” over the non-Adamic third-worlders who still fall for your voodoo, mother worship, incense, sacred crackers, and fancy costumes.
Only whites can sustain civilization, and only whites will be able to sustain the true faith of Christianity. They go hand-in-hand. Anyone with eyes to see knows this is true. You deride “racism” as if it is a sin, though it’s never mentioned once in Exodus 20. Just like the Jews within your church have programmed you to do. Well done.
Multiracial societies and congregations are the work of the satanic Jew, and your multicult church is a reflection of the Jewish plan to destroy the remnant Adamkind. It was the crypto-Jews in the Church who railed against the “purity of blood” doctrine of early Christians, and yet you defend the defiler, the Jew. Convert them, and in a generation or two, they will be in your daughter’s bed, and the faith dies. That is what your church is bringing about because it is indistinguishable from a synagogue at this point. You are defending the work of Satan, whose guile is far greater than you will ever imagine.
“spurious flesh”—Where is that in the New Testament?”
Let’s start with 1 Corinthians 15:39, “All flesh is not the same flesh: but there is one kind of flesh of men, another flesh of beasts, another of fishes, and another of birds.”
In this verse, the term “men” comes from the Greek “anthropos” (Strong’s 444), which they explain, “#444 /ánthrōpos (“man”) answers to the Hebrew term, ̓adam – and 435 (anḗr) answers to the Hebrew term ̓ish.”
Therefore, only Adamics can be called “men” or “human”, according to Strongs. This is the equivalent of “Ish” in Hebrew. “Ish” is “Aw dawn”. Only. This is not “talmudic”. This is the NT.
Second NT witness:
Jude 1:7, “Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire.”
Clearly, Jude recognizes that going after “strange” or “different” flesh — different from Adam — was a destructive sin in the the Old Testament, and Jude confirms that sin still applies in his time, otherwise he wouldn’t have brought it up as an example, or he would have nullified it, telling us it no longer applies, as you attempt to claim.
@ [if the shoe fits…]
Adam was the first human male. Eve was the first human female.
Humans are therefore the lineage of Adam and Eve.
If you have a point to make, don’t be coy.
As for the rest of the contrived ANTI-Biblical/PSEUDO-Biblical creed some of you offer, generic absurdities do not warrant personal rebuttals.
Meanwhile… Isaias 5:20-21.
You are delusional. You share genetic DNA with Neanderthal/apes
>Who is human? Who is not?
Human comes from “Man” which means “Descendant of Mannus.”
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Mannus
“Tacitus relates that according to their ancient songs the Germans were descended from the three sons of Mannus, the son of the god Tuisto, the son of Earth. Hence they were divided into three groups—the Ingaevones, the Herminones, and the Istaevones”
Very similar to how “Hebrews” used “Adam.”
Wasn’t the crypto-jew “Tony” B LIAR, also known as “Miranda”, involved in the unveiling? I’m sure I read that somewhere.
This is outrageous.
Who authorised the erection of a statue of a ruthless money-lender?
Do these people have NO shame at all?
No, no they don’t. Zero self awareness and their insane compulsive behaviors have driven them to “punish” humiliate and genocide hundreds of millions of Whites throughout the centuries. This hive minded compulsion has driven them out of 109 counties countless times.
No shame, no Shem (tm, Mel gibstein).
Four kids but no mention of her hubby or husbands?
Over 700 years later & the same bunch of money-grubbing parasites are still leeching off the Gentiles with their fiat currency scheme, exploiting the masses for their own personal gain.
How bout a statue depicting a Mohel Rabbi hungrily slurping up the blood off a mutilated baby boys penis?
The article says she was “twice widowed”, which would suggest that most likely she inherited the usury business from her deceased husbands who were more than likely also usurers. A female moneylender could not on her own make the connections to lend money to the King of England, so those connections were probably made by her late husbands.
When a woman has more than one deceased husband, we shouldn’t ignore the possibility that she may have killed them both to inherit their money. Back then, she could have easily poisoned their matzo ball soup without attracting the attention of the police, who wouldn’t have taken much interest in the untimely death of a Jew or two. That she was murdered under “mysterious” circumstance suggests that perhaps she had crossed another moneylender who didn’t take kindly to her infringing on his “turf”.
Translated into French : http://frontnationalsuisse.hautetfort.com/archive/2022/02/16/les-juifs-du-royaume-uni-devoilent-une-statue-commemorant-l-6366408.html
Where is the tomb of a patriarch named “judah”, where is the body of sad man. Until that it is produced which never will be there can be no scientific proof that any alive today claiming to be “jew” are not liars.
If one claims of “jew” means religion, then they admit to being luciferians as their own mouths say they are.
I read merchant of Venice in secondary school. That was my first clear consciousness of Jewish persona apart from the biblical narrations. I found the book interesting and the Jewish merchant comical clown, clueless, vulnerable. In the end I think he made good choice for his daughter.