In our recent article — Corinthians 3:18 — How We Become Wise By First Becoming Foolish In Christ — we considered how we must all convince ourselves of our own foolishness in order that we may become wise. We proposed that if we consider ourselves only to be the wise man of the Proverbs — but never considering ourselves to be the fool of the Proverbs — then we implicitly make ourselves into the fool.
Now we’d like to consider a few case studies in the Proverbs in more depth. More specifically, we’d like to discuss the oft-used Proverbs 27:17 — “As iron sharpens iron, So one person sharpens another” — and consider what impact that should have on Christian fellowship. Furthermore, we’d like to consider yet more Scripture to help our understanding — and consider what impact that should have on the company we keep — and how we keep it.
THE UNBRIDLED TEMPER
First, let’s consider the following Proverbs,
- Like charcoal to hot embers and wood to fire, So is a contentious person to kindle strife. (Proverbs 26:21)
- An angry person stirs up strife, And a hot-tempered person abounds in wrongdoing. (Proverbs 29:22)
Here the Proverb tells us rather plainly that an angry person “stirs up strife” and “abounds in wrongdoing.” We should automatically conclude that if we show a pattern of losing our tempter — or have no control over our temper — then we are stirring up strife. The Proverbs tell us that the Lord hates it — and considers it an abomination (Proverbs 6:16) — when one “spreads strife among brothers.” (Proverbs 6:19)
Therefore, we can conclude that the Lord considers it an abomination when we have no control over our own temper. Losing one’s temper is sin — thus “a hot-tempered person abounds in wrongdoing.” Paul goes as far as to tell us that if we practice strife and outbursts of anger, then we will not inherit the kingdom of God (Galatians 5:20–21).
Let’s consider some Proverbs where the wise and the fool are juxtaposed in the context of tempers:
- A fool’s anger is known at once, but a prudent person conceals dishonor. (Proverbs 12:16)
- One who is slow to anger has great understanding; but one who is quick-tempered exalts foolishness. (Proverbs 14:29)
- A hot-tempered person stirs up strife, but the slow to anger calms a dispute. (Proverbs 15:18)
- A fool always loses his temper, but a wise person holds it back. (Proverbs 29:11)
According to Proverbs 12:16, if as soon as the feelings of anger rise within us, we immediately let that anger out, then we make ourselves a fool. We actively make our anger known to others through the way we choose to act toward them. If we are prudent, then rather than acting out in anger — even if we have been dishonored — we rather conceal it within ourselves than make our anger known. Proverbs 19:11 takes it even further by telling us that it is even “glory to overlook an offense.”
Proverbs 14:29 lays the matter out rather plainly for us that there really should be no doubt in our minds. If we find ourselves being quick-tempered, then we should consider that we ourselves exalt foolishness — that is, to lift foolishness up in praise for all to see.
Proverbs 15:18 tells us that if we are hot-tempered, then we stir up strife — which is sin. If we are rather slow to anger, then instead of stirring up strife, we do the exact opposite — we calm dispute. When strife arose between Abraham and Lot, Abraham composed himself and rather suffered to allow Lot to choose the best land — happily settling with what Lot considered worse (Genesis 13:9). When the men of Ephraim accused Gideon of taking glory for himself, instead of returning anger to them, he appeased them and “their anger toward him subsided” (Judges 8:3).
As Proverbs 15:1 says, “A gentle answer turns away wrath, but a harsh word stirs up anger” — and Proverbs 25:15, “Through patience a ruler may be persuaded, and a gentle tongue breaks bone.” Paul words it well when he says, “Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.” (Romans 12:21)
The Lord tells us, “Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will be called sons of God” (Matthew 5:9) Therefore, making peace and calming dispute makes us sons of God — it makes us live in accordance with the divine nature (2 Peter 1:4).
Proverbs 29:11 presumes that the temper has risen in both the fool and the wise person. While the fool loses it, the wise person holds it back. Some might consider that these Proverbs mean we should not feel our temper rising within our flesh — or perhaps if we feel our temper rising, that constitutes an excuse to lose it — feeling justified within ourselves in our actions. After all, “The way of a fool is right in his own eyes.” (Proverbs 12:15) But let us consider some more Proverbs in this regard:
- One who is slow to anger is better than the mighty, and one who rules his spirit, than one who captures a city. (Proverbs 16:32)
- Like a city that is broken into and without walls so is a person who has no self-control over his spirit. (Proverbs 25:28)
See how the person who has no self-control is like “a city that is broken into,” but the one who “rules his spirit” is better “than one who captures a city.” In other words, fools leave themselves open to capture when they lose their temper — and they become captured by the mighty — but the one who is slow to anger is even better than the mighty one who captures the fool.
If any of ourselves consider ourselves mighty because we have captured fools, then we should consider that the wise man who rules over his spirit to be yet mightier than ourselves. Moreover, if the fool allows himself to be captured by losing his tempter, the wise who are slow to anger will not be captured by the mighty.
Thus Proverbs 12:13 tells us, “An evil person is ensnared by the offense of his lips, but the righteous will escape from trouble” — and Proverbs 14:17 says, “A quick-tempered person acts foolishly.” In this way, the Proverbs tell us that ruling our spirit makes practical sense. If we are able to control ourselves, we might avoid a lot of trouble. Not only from a worldly and practical perspective, but the Lord also says in Matthew 5:22,
But I say to you that everyone who is angry with his brother shall be answerable to the court; and whoever says to his brother, ‘You good-for-nothing,’ shall be answerable to the supreme court; and whoever says, ‘You fool,’ shall be guilty enough to go into the fiery hell.
The Lord Jesus did not speak in vain — and we should treat the matter with the severity that He related to us. When we guard our tongues, we guard ourselves from the lake of fire.
Being slow to anger means ruling over our spirits. Ruling over our spirit means bending it to our own will. If we need to bend it to our own will, then we acknowledge that it first acted contrary to our own will. We must accept that our spirit will certainly act contrary to our own will — and the whims of our emotions should not be trusted when they bring us to anger. As Paul said, “Be angry, and yet do not sin.” (Ephesians 4:26) Being angry is not sin — but losing our temper and causing strife among our brethren certainly is.
Paul tells us in Ephesians 4:31-32,
31 All bitterness, wrath, anger, clamor, and slander must be removed from you, along with all malice. 32 Be kind to one another, compassionate, forgiving each other, just as God in Christ also has forgiven you.
Then in Colossians 3:8,
But now you also, rid yourselves of all of them: anger, wrath, malice, slander, and obscene speech from your mouth.
Paul tells us twice that we must remove these things from our lives. If we are to remove them, then we should not find them laying about in our lives and our actions.
No Christian may be subject to an unbridled temper.
ON KINGDOM COMPANY
Working for the kingdom of God certainly can be frustrating at times. On a very subjective level within ourselves, we consider that the course of action we take is correct — just as Proverbs 21:2 tells us, “Every person’s way is right in his own eye.” Then when we meet some kind of opposition, we are surprised that anyone could possibly disagree with us — that is, they do not accept the proof we ourselves had readily accepted. Oftentimes that surprise is what really gets our backs up. Before we know it, the anger rises within.
The Lord tells us in Matthew 10:25,
It is enough for the disciple that he may become like his teacher, and the slave like his master. If they have called the head of the house Beelzebul, how much more will they insult the members of his household!
Similarly, He tells us in John 15:20,
Remember the word that I said to you, ‘A slave is not greater than his master.’ If they persecuted Me, they will persecute you as well; if they followed My word, they will follow yours also.
Really then, we must contentedly conclude that abuse comes with the territory. It was the Lord’s good will toward all who would follow Him to tell them in advance that they ought to prepare themselves for abuse. If we take it upon ourselves to work for the Kingdom, then we must expect abuse to come our way. Not only did He forewarn us, but He tells us in Matthew 5:11-12,
11 “Blessed are you when people insult you and persecute you, and falsely say all kinds of evil against you because of Me. 12 Rejoice and be glad, for your reward in heaven is great; for in this same way they persecuted the prophets who were before you.
Not only does abuse come with the territory, but when we are abused for the sake of the Lord Jesus, we should consider ourselves blessed. Therefore, the Lord has given us ample reason to endure abuse for His sake without losing our temper. Peter says in 1 Peter 3:15-16,
15 but sanctify Christ as Lord in your hearts, always being ready to make a defense to everyone who asks you to give an account for the hope that is in you, but with gentleness and respect; 16 and keep a good conscience so that in the thing in which you are slandered, those who disparage your good behavior in Christ will be put to shame. 17 For it is better, if God should will it so, that you suffer for doing what is right rather than for doing what is wrong.
Note how Peter implicitly accepts that slander and disparagement will surely come to the one who sanctifies Christ as Lord. Yet we must keep a good conscience in the face of that slander — not reviling in return — that those who condemn good behavior might be put to shame. That is, we are not to take it upon ourselves to make them experience shame by our own actions, but rather to let that shame come upon them by some other means — trusting judgment to the Lord Jesus.
Then Peter gives us a rather critical distinction when he says, “suffer for doing what is right rather than for doing what is wrong.” Earlier in 1 Peter 2:19-20 he tells us,
19 For this finds favor, if for the sake of conscience toward God a person endures grief when suffering unjustly. 20 For what credit is there if, when you sin and are harshly treated, you endure it with patience? But if when you do what is right and suffer for it you patiently endure it, this finds favor with God.
Generally speaking, if we do wrong and we suffer for it — then why should it find favor with God? In this case, if we lose our tempter and suffer harsh treatment over it, then we should not consider we have earned favor with God. Remember, losing one’s temper is always wrong — therefore, whatever ill-treatment one may incur over a lost temper is merely one’s due — not favor from God.
If we truly have done what’s right in God’s sight — not in a fit of anger — and we suffer unjustly for it as a result, then we incur favor from God. Therefore, we must conclude that it’s far better to simply never react to anyone with anger ever. If we have done wrong, we receive our due — but if we have done right, we receive favor from God. Either way, justice will be done without us having to do it.
And so Proverbs 17:28 tells us that “Even a fool, when he keeps silent, is considered wise; When he closes his lips, he is considered prudent.” Why? Because not reviling in return is always the correct course of action, whether we feel justified within ourselves or not. Even a fool shows wisdom when he closes his lips.
Moreover, when we do not revile another in anger as payment for their ill-treatment of ourselves, we express mercy towards them. Who knows, perhaps we are the mighty ready to capture the city of a fool? Yet the amount of mercy we afford others constitutes the same mercy we are afforded from the Lord Jesus — just as He tells us in Matthew 6:14, “For if you forgive other people for their offenses, your heavenly Father will also forgive you.”
Let us be better than the mighty who capture fools. Let us be wise men who ourselves are never captured, because one day the Lord Jesus — the mightiest of all — will capture all fools in their foolishness.
Now that attitude comes hand-in-hand with the Lord’s words in Matthew 10:16-17,
16 “Behold, I am sending you out as sheep in the midst of wolves; so be as wary as serpents, and as innocent as doves. 17 But be on guard against people, for they will hand you over to the courts and flog you in their synagogues;
Never taking out our own anger on others — leaving room for the wrath of God (Romans 12:19) — gladly suffering shame in the name of Christ Jesus (1 Peter 2:20) — constitutes being “innocent as doves.” That is all good and well, but in our innocence we are to be wary as serpents, because we are “as sheep in the midst of wolves.” We do not needlessly place ourselves in harms way of the whims of men. We must be wise in our work for the Kingdom.
To some degree, we have all been the wolf in someone else’s life. We should not consider ourselves to have always been the sheep in this narrative. Rather, just like we consider ourselves the fool to become wise — we also consider ourselves the wolves that we may become sheep. After all, when a group of people all strive to be sheep — then ultimately they become a flock of sheep.
We find this an especially fitting lesson, because many Christians assume the truth of their message has been confirmed merely because they have been persecuted over it. Ironically, given that we assume the truth of our message through our persecution, we revile the ones who persecute us.
Or perhaps we weren’t truly persecuted, but someone else didn’t treat us quite exactly how we expect them to treat us. Or perhaps they didn’t accept our message in the way we wanted them to — so we revile them in turn. Somehow we become hyper-sensitive, just waiting for any opportunity to persecute our persecutor.
It’s important that we do not become like Jews who welcome persecution on themselves because they believe it strengthens their cause. In other words, we should not look to use persecution as a weapon against others — welcoming it upon ourselves with a victim mentality and then throwing it in everyone’s faces.
We judge rightly that this behavior makes Jews all the more intolerable — so we provide witness against ourselves whenever we try to do the same thing against other Christians. Let us rather reflect on our own selves and first exhibit true Christianity in our own behavior — rather than always trying to get others to treat us how we want them to treat us for the sake of our own agendas.
When we use persecution to our advantage — as opposed to trusting in God’s blessing and ultimate justice — then we merely make ourselves wolves. If any wolves remain among the sheep, the sheep may carefully and wisely remove themselves. This is any sheep’s duty, as Proverbs 22:24-25 says,
24 Do not make friends with a person given to anger, Or go with a hot-tempered person, 25 Or you will learn his ways And find a snare for yourself.
The Scripture tells us rather plainly to avoid those who are given to anger — the wolves. It does not give any conditions attached — as if we could judge for ourselves that it’s somehow “worth it” to be with an angry person because they provide some perceived benefit to us — whether a Kingdom or material benefit according to our own judgment.
No, if we judge that we should be with an angry person over some Kingdom benefit — as if we consider them a teacher or even just a “good friend” — then we have merely judged incorrectly. Yet we have seen many Christians make excuses for their so-called “brethren” for their unrestrained rage against others — becoming accessories to their sin.
Paul tells us in 1 Corinthians 15:33-34,
33 Do not be deceived: “Bad company corrupts good morals.” 34 Sober up morally and stop sinning, for some have no knowledge of God. I say this to your shame.
Not only do we become accessories to that sin, but Paul tells us that they may corrupt our good morals — just as Proverbs tells us that we will learn the ways of one given to anger. The Scripture also says that “one sinner destroys much good.” (Ecclesiastes 9:18)
Moreover, Paul tells us in this matter not to be deceived — as if he perceived a propensity to deception — that many might consider themselves impervious to corruption from sinners around them. As if one might say, “Perhaps I could be around one given to anger without learning his ways.”
Paul implies that one who sins — just as we have shown a hot-temper to be sin — merely has no knowledge of God. Yet when we justify someone’s hot temper, we might rationalize that their so-called “knowledge of God” excuses their temper. We should rather have known that a hot temper necessarily means they do indeed have no knowledge of God — and that our own perception of their knowledge of God was wrong in the first place.
Thus Paul says, “I say this to your shame.” Yes, if we cannot even perceive that a hot tempered person has no knowledge of God, then we should be ashamed according to the words of Paul. If we cannot even consider ourselves to have knowledge of God because of our own temper — then how much worse a condition do we find ourselves in that we cannot even see it? So we find the Lord’s words manifest when He said, “if a person who is blind guides another who is blind, both will fall into a pit.” (Matthew 15:14).
CREDITING OTHERS
Then Proverbs 20:25 says,
It is a trap for a person to say carelessly, “It is holy!” And after the vows to make inquiry.
Also Proverbs 27:14,
One who blesses his friend with a loud voice early in the morning, It will be considered a curse to him.
We are not to credit other people overly quickly merely because they are “nice” to us or agree with one of our pet doctrines. The Kingdom of God is found in what we do — not merely what we agree with. Too often we praise others merely because they agree with us, only to be horrified at how poorly we judged the intention of their hearts — as much as we evil men can — thanks to our own partiality.
The moment we disagree with someone we once praised and credited, we see just how their “niceness” was a surface-level veneer — easily scratched off with the slightest abrasion. Rather, we should know others more intimately before we seek to credit them. Doesn’t even common sense tell us to make careful inquiry before judging a matter? How much more the hearts of other men?
How could we call a person “holy” without ever having made inquiry into that person’s life? Truly, when we credit them too quickly, it will become a curse for us — especially when we in misbegotten pride are loathe to relinquish that credit — because to do so would prove our own foolishness and error. Then when we speak good of someone who we do not truly know, we merely bear false witness on their behalf.
We find a good description of this phenomenon in Ecclesiasticus 6:6-7 — an apocryphal book,
6 Be in peace with many: nevertheless have but one counsellor of a thousand. 7 If thou wouldest get a friend, prove him first and be not hasty to credit him.
We believe this lesson is what Proverbs 20:25 and 27:14 are teaching us — be not hasty to credit anyone, but prove them first. If the Lord weighs the hearts (Proverbs 21:2), then shouldn’t that also be our own goal when we consider others?
We are sinful men — yet the Lord demands a more exacting and perfect standard of judgment from us. Somehow we must come to a better standard of judgment befitting a priest of the Lord Jesus in the Kingdom of God. Somehow we need to retain a disposition of peace within ourselves that we may give another the time of day enough that we are to see the intentions of their heart — whether they agree with us on pet doctrines or not.
Sometimes we may quickly and readily be able to see they do not keep the words of the Lord Jesus — distorting the Scripture to their own destruction. Yet no matter what another man believes, we will never quickly and readily be able to see whether or not they do keep the words of the Lord Jesus in spirit and truth. Such a judgment will come only with time and careful consideration.
Paul tells us in 1 Corinthians 6:3,
Do you not know that we will judge angels? How much more matters of this life?
Paul words this in such a way that he shows our resurrection and glorified bodies will not do much to help our skills in judgment. If we cannot show right judgment in this life, how will we be able to judge the angels in the next? Verily, let us show astute and careful judgment in the company we keep toward our endeavors for the Kingdom of God.
REBUKING OTHERS
Leviticus 19:17-18 says,
17 You shall not hate your fellow countryman in your heart; you may certainly rebuke your neighbor, but you are not to incur sin because of him. 18 You shall not take vengeance, nor hold any grudge against the sons of your people, but you shall love your neighbor as yourself; I am the Lord.
Note how the Scripture commands us to rebuke our neighbor — just as the Lord says, “Be on your guard! If your brother sins, rebuke him; and if he repents, forgive him.” (Luke 17:3) We see exhortation to rebuke others all throughout the New Testament — while James 5:19-20 goes as far as to say,
19 My brothers and sisters, if anyone among you strays from the truth and someone turns him back, 20 let him know that the one who has turned a sinner from the error of his way will save his soul from death and cover a multitude of sins.
Paul also tells us in Galatians 6:1,
Brothers and sisters, even if a person is caught in any wrongdoing, you who are spiritual are to restore such a person in a spirit of gentleness; each one looking to yourself, so that you are not tempted as well.
Exhorting and rebuking others is a key part of the Christian journey — it is part of the glue which holds us together in righteousness. If we find ourselves overlooking other’s sins instead of rebuking them, then we are merely exercising partiality towards them because we are afraid to lose whatever benefit we perceive ourselves to be gaining from their company. If we are afraid to exhort someone because we are afraid to lose them, then that doesn’t say much for the relationship itself — even by worldly standards.
We are not here to affirm loyalty to one another — but rather loyalty toward the Lord Jesus and His commands.
Simultaneously, we should take special care for the spirit in which we rebuke others. The Scripture tells us not to hate our fellow countrymen in our heart (Leviticus 19:17) — and to love our neighbor as ourselves (Leviticus 19:18). Our motivation for rebuking someone must always come from our desire for their own good — as opposed to rebuking someone to appease the welling anger within us — which merely incurs sin upon ourselves (Leviticus 19:17).
Paul tells us that if we do not restore and rebuke with gentleness, then we enter ourselves into temptation for sin. Indeed, our intention should be for others’ restoration to a life of purity — not to angrily condemn them in the position they may find themselves in. If another becomes angry at our rebuke — assuming we truly do have the correct motivations in the Lord Jesus’ sight — then as we have already covered, the best course of action would be to rather suffer for doing good than take our own vengeance.
It doesn’t matter what others do to us — and nothing is personal — at least for our own sakes. We offer ourselves to abuse for the service of the Kingdom.
James 1:19-20 says,
19 You know this, my beloved brothers and sisters. Now everyone must be quick to hear, slow to speak, and slow to anger; 20 for a man’s anger does not bring about the righteousness of God.
There again, we cannot “bring about the righteousness of God” in anger. If we have become angry — thinking our anger would “bring about the righteousness of God” — then we have merely become fools. If we become angry, then rather let us slow down — and remain silent for a time. We know that “one who hurries his footsteps errs” (Proverbs 19:2) — and Proverbs 29:20 says,
Do you see a person who is hasty with his words? There is more hope for a fool than for him.
James 1:21-25 continues,
21 Therefore, ridding yourselves of all filthiness and all that remains of wickedness, in humility receive the word implanted, which is able to save your souls. 22 But prove yourselves doers of the word, and not just hearers who deceive themselves. 23 For if anyone is a hearer of the word and not a doer, he is like a man who looks at his natural face in a mirror; 24 for once he has looked at himself and gone away, he has immediately forgotten what kind of person he was. 25 But one who has looked intently at the perfect law, the law of freedom, and has continued in it, not having become a forgetful hearer but an active doer, this person will be blessed in what he does.
James considers a ridding of anger to be a ridding of “filthiness and all that remains of wickedness.” He considers that in order to accept such a message, that we would have to receive it with humility. Indeed, anger — and self-justification within that anger — is antithetical to humility. We should rather receive the word implanted that it may save our souls. It is remarkable that James would be so dramatic in the matter of anger to exhort us to have our souls saved.
James continues to explain that if we rid ourselves of anger, then we may become doers of the word indeed. Verily, he said that “a man’s anger does not bring about the righteousness of God.” (James 1:20) Thus we are scarcely able to exhort anyone ever if we are unable to do so with peace and calm. We must be rid of anger if we are to become doers of the word — because part of doing the word is exhorting others out of desire for their good.
The Lord tells us that “the one who is the greatest among you must become like the youngest, and the leader like the servant.” (Luke 22:26) Everything the Christian does must be done in service to others. Venting anger at others certainly does not constitute a serve toward them — but rather, a service toward our own fleshly desires.
Often we read the very many times in the Scripture where we are exhorted not to be angry — and to treat our brethren without malice. Yet as often as we see these things, we also go our way without ever applying them to our own lives. James tells us that when we act in this manner, we do not practice “the perfect law, the law of freedom.” We will not be blessed in what we do.
How useless then has the Scripture become for us that we forget it as soon as we turn away from it? We become like Paul’s words in 2 Timothy 3:2-5,
2 For people will be lovers of self, lovers of money, boastful, arrogant, slanderers, disobedient to parents, ungrateful, unholy, 3 unloving, irreconcilable, malicious gossips, without self-control, brutal, haters of good, 4 treacherous, reckless, conceited, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, 5 holding to a form of godliness although they have denied its power; avoid such people as these.
When we do not act in accordance with the word of God, we deny the power of the word of God. Note that the power of the word of God manifests itself in our ability to actually act in a Christian manner. The power of the word of God is not some esoteric truth hidden somewhere in Scripture which we hold to in our minds without having any effect on the way we live.
When we think this way, we become like Paul’s words in 2 Timothy 3:7, “always learning and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth.” When we act in any of the manner of verses 2-5, then we certainly have not come to a knowledge of the truth — no matter how truthful we consider the knowledge we hold within our own minds.
Thus James gives his profound conclusion in James 1:26,
If anyone thinks himself to be religious, yet does not bridle his tongue but deceives his own heart, this person’s religion is worthless.
Yes, if we cannot even bridle our tongues, then nothing we believe matters in the slightest. Our religion — no matter how truthful or sacred we hold it in our own minds — becomes as useless to us as salt which has lost its saltiness. Interesting that the Lord would conclude His teaching on gentleness, purity and mercy with the words in Matthew 5:13,
You are the salt of the earth; but if the salt has become tasteless, how can it be made salty again? It is no longer good for anything, except to be thrown out and trampled underfoot by people.
If we cannot be gentle, merciful, pure in heart, peacemakers and hunger and thirst for righteousness (Matthew 5:5-9), then we are worthy only “to be thrown out and trampled underfoot by people.” Indeed, our “religion is worthless.” That is a hard pill to swallow for all of us who hold our own religion high within our own minds — there to be exalted — when in fact we merely exalt foolishness by our deeds (Proverbs 14:29).
Moreover, if a religion which cannot produce self-control is worthless, then how much more worthless is a religion which does not even call for self control in the first place?
IRON SHARPENS IRON
Now we have come a long, roundabout way to reach this point. What does Proverbs 27:17 really mean for us? So far we have covered the following:
- Unrestrained anger is always sin, no matter how we may justify it
- We will face persecution for the Kingdom’s sake
- Facing persecution for the Kingdom’s sake incurs blessing upon ourselves
- We must not revile others in return for persecuting us
- We must actively remove ourselves from those who exhibit unbridled anger
- We must actively remove ourselves from those who engage in willful sin after rebuking them
- We must not be hasty to credit anyone, that our credit does not become a curse for us
- We must show an exacting and right judgment toward the character of others
- We must exhort and rebuke our Christian brethren with gentleness and a desire for their own good
- We cannot exhort and rebuke in anger because it does not achieve the purposes of the Kingdom
Simultaneous to all of these points, none of us live in perfect conformance to all of them. We all find ourselves in different stages of our Christian walk. Even when we hold these principles as true within our minds, somehow we may still fail to keep them when our emotions rise up within our flesh. In other words, knowing something does not necessarily even guarantee that we are able to live in accordance with our own knowledge.
Yet we should also note how when we put all of the above points together, we create the perfect environment for Christians to grow and learn among one another — despite one-another’s faults. When we keep these points, we place our lives in service to the Christian growth of others.
Each of us takes it upon ourselves never to be angry. We all accept that when we are persecuted, we do not revile others and we even consider it a blessing upon ourselves — thus never having the excuse to vent our anger. We keep from those who do not live in accordance with our own religion — that they do not influence us to our own destruction. We do not credit others in haste merely because we agree with them — or consider they may benefit us somehow — that we are not burdened by partiality toward them when we must remove ourselves from them. We must exhort one another with a desire for good toward them — never to appease our own anger.
If we all adopted this attitude, we do not begrudge the friction we create with one another. We have mercy on one another when falling into sin and temptation causes another to be angry toward us. We freely speak exhortation to one another. We hold one another’s good as our own good.
Nothing we do toward one another is some kind of personal grudge — we accept another’s exhortation as their own best effort to follow the Word of God. However, we may accept their intention as a best effort only when they do it free of anger. When they do it with anger, we do not revile them but exhort them, showing true love and gentleness. If they continue in anger, we merely remove ourselves from them.
As an important stipulation, we do not accept other forms of sin in one another for the sake of peace. Some of us expect a kind of mutual loyalty or partiality where no matter how we live our lives, so long as we are “nice” to one another we may overlook one another’s sins. No, we are commanded to exhort others for their sin — not overlook it for the sake of “peace.”
We also do not use commands for peace as an excuse to manipulate others in treating us how we want them to treat us for our own benefit. When we exhort another to peace, we do so for their own benefit — not our own. When we exhort someone merely because we don’t like how they make us feel, we exhibit only a self-love — not a love for others.
When we understand this, we understand that it doesn’t actually matter how anyone else ever treats us because it is our glory to overlook the dishonor they incur against us (Proverbs 19:11). Our exhortation for others never has anything to do how they make us feel, but rather how they ought to act within the Kingdom of God that they themselves — by our service to them — might stand before the Lord Jesus spotless and blameless in peace (2 Peter 3:14).
When others exhort us — whether in anger or peace — we consider their words objectively, weighing up if we may learn something or not — regardless of the tone. That is the free gift we have within ourselves when we truly follow the Word of God in peace and righteousness — we may objectively consider all information set before us, keeping the good and throwing out the bad.
When we keep to the principles of Christian fellowship — knowing full well we are all imperfect and learning — and we will cause friction with one another — but being single-minded in our desire toward the good of the Lord Jesus and the good of the Kingdom — then we offer our lives up as iron for other Christians to sharpen themselves against. We scrape and scour with one another, not begrudging the friction, but trusting that each of us will become sharp implements for the Lord Jesus’ purposes and not our own.
If we keep the Lord Jesus and His teaching firmly within our sight, then we will ultimately come to be with others who do the same. If we rub against a piece of iron which does not show a desire to be sharp for the Kingdom, then we no longer offer ourselves to rub against it. If that iron later repents of its anger — or lack of desire for the Lord Jesus foremost — then we may continue to sharpen one another.
The principles of Christian fellowship we have lain out here can benefit only those who mutually keep to its precepts. So long as we can put our fleshly whims aside and fellowship with one another in Spirit and in truth. Psalm 37:7-11 tells us,
7 Rest in the Lord and wait patiently for Him;
Do not get upset because of one who is successful in his way,
Because of the person who carries out wicked schemes.
8 Cease from anger and abandon wrath;
Do not get upset; it leads only to evildoing.
9 For evildoers will be eliminated,
But those who wait for the Lord, they will inherit the land.
10 Yet a little while and the wicked person will be no more;
And you will look carefully for his place and he will not be there.
11 But the humble will inherit the land
And will delight themselves in abundant prosperity.
If we stay humble, we will inherit the land together with the Lord Jesus as king. Let us wait for Him and His perfect justice — judging rightly by not judging punitive action against another.
We demonstrate a true love for one another and desire another’s good in the Kingdom — but we do so according to the Lord Jesus’ rules, that we know a man more intimately and test him before crediting him — and if so, that credit comes from the following of the Lord Jesus. If our intentions are pure toward the Lord Jesus first, and then to one another, then the iron will sharpen the iron, and we will all be sharper tools for the Kingdom.
Edward I
I, for one, am ashamed to admit that I showed partiality to other Christians who simply shared my (former) DSLCI beliefs at one time. In fact, the group I followed tacitly required that we all show partiality to others in the group just as long as they espoused this doctrine. And the moment anyone questioned the doctrine, we completely abandoned that partiality and merciless attacked the former “friend” until they either atoned for questioning it, and if they didn’t atone, we drove them out of the fellowship.
But the doctrine encouraged that kind of partiality, because there were no consequences for hating your brother. It is a doctrine that did not engender fear of God or His judgment because we were all going to be saved anyway, so what did our behavior matter? When you fear the judgment of your pastor more than God, the first casualty will be anyone within a stone’s throw who dares to question your idols — your leader and his doctrine.
I now choose friends based only on their zeal for God, not their zeal for certain pet doctrines that may tickle my ears and justify my racism or antisemitism. I’ve found more important things to do with my life, and better Christians to allow in it.
Fish
I can relate Edward. We became like rookie cops nabbing normal folk for a corrupt system. I am still digging inside and finding more reasons to weep for it.
But all the same, we were also deceived by men, which is also a shame to repent of. And also to learn from. The lengths some will go in lying and manipulating to feed the flesh is eye opening. And now I can see a little clearer how to identify a brother. We should hope to find a spirit at war with the flesh, and if we dont we should steer clear of such people.
I think – and i pray not too hastily – that you are a brother. This should hit us hard and we should lament for it or we arent really His.
Chris
While I agree with the sentiment the reality is that if the truth isn’t guarded and upheld, we will end up full circle. Accepting bastards into the household, worshiping Edomite Jews and building churches in Sierra Leone.
Let God be true and every man a liar. Christian Zionists are the most zealous as far as I’m concerned. Like manners, zeal masks the iceberg of true intention imo.
Edward I
Christian Zionists are zealous about Jews but not about God. I am talking about a zeal for the true Christ, not some fabrication, some false Christ invented by Cyrus Scofield. We are warned about false Christs, and false teachers who come in His name, and unfortunately many, myself included, have been duped by them, into following a false Christ. No one thinks that their teacher or pastor is one of the ravenous wolves (Matthew 715). I didn’t, to my own detriment.
As I said, I was duped into believing that just because I was born white, I didn’t need to believe in Christ or repent of my sins to enter the Kingdom of God. I was no different from any other Christians who believed the false Christ of Christian Zionism, or evangelicals in Africa. I had become a Pharisee who idolized white flesh above the spirit, despite Paul’s clear words (Philippians 3:8).
Clear
Chris, just got three points on what you said:
1. The truth definitely needs to be guarded and upheld. In some way, DSCI adherents truly believe they have found the truth. I think all criticism of DSCI accepts that. Unfortunately, they defend their “truth” in a cultish manner with slander and strife.
2. In the end, truth needs to be defended out of the Bible. I’m sad to see DSCI adherents fail to defend what they believe, yet rationalize that it must still be true despite their failure to defend it. I see people rationalizing that “Well, if someone more knowledgeable in DSCI believes it, then it’s okay if I believe it, even though I wasn’t able to defend it myself.” That mentality is incredibly cultish and places one’s faith in men, not Christ.
3. DSCI insists that all doctrines except DSCI somehow want to bring bastards into the household. I believe in the case of CFT, that is an unfounded slander. It hasn’t been proven. Again, cultish.
So we agree on two points: the truth must be upheld and the truth does not involve bringing bastards into the congregation.
Chris
To be clear Ed, CZ’s are no different from the “most zealous” who worked for 400 years to subvert the church of Rome including evangelicals. Up to and including subverting CI which is plain to see everywhere. No one is making the case you don’t need to repent of your transgression and having Christ as a central figure. I would claim that’s not an honest argument.
Paul’s Message was to the Philippians right?
“For I could wish that myself were accursed from Christ for my brethren, my kinsmen according to the flesh:”
Romans Chapter 9
Clear, 2 out of 3 it is then. It most definitely has. The songs of Solomon tell us what happened in the garden and consistency is the key to everything.
westwins
Chris …………
Help me understand something —
Is it the claim of you and others that there were no Adamites/non-Israelites during the time of Christ?
At the time God chose Abraham, you would agree that there were thousands of other Adamic men and women living on the planet.
Were there no Non-Israelite Adamic men and women alive 1st Century AD?
Just curious. Thank you.
Clear
It’s just that you don’t need to repent of your transgressions and have Christ as a central figure TO BE SAVED. According to DSCI, that is a fact. No dishonest argument there.
DSCI will say, “Oh no, but every knee shall bow. We will bow before Christ at some point, even if not in this life.” The point is, DSCI preaches a “gospel” where we do not need to bow to Christ in this life.
Without explicitly saying it, DSCI essentially believes in Catholic purgatory. Some place where we go in the next life to suffer until we bow to Christ. It doesn’t exist in the Bible and this life is all we have, so DSCI essentially condemns its own adherents to eternal death.
According to DSCI, Adam and Eve had an orgy in the garden (Gene 2:9). God also placed every tree pleasing to the sight and good for food, meaning that God created and placed the tree of knowledge of good and evil in the garden (Gen 2:9, Gen 3:6). When applying the principle of “consistency is the key to everything” (which I agree with), DSCI is not even consistent with itself.
The only thing DSCI does consistently is read the same interpretation into the text and twist the Bible in the same way. In the end, the Bible doesn’t actually explicitly state DSCI doctrine ever… Just like it never states that Eve slept with the serpent. Not even Paul mentioned it (2 Cor 11:3).
At the end of the day, no New Testament writer taught anything even remotely close to DSCI. No one explicitly stated DSCI doctrine even once.
Chris
Well I beg to differ and making the statement that others are claiming Gene 2:9 is reference to an orgy is plain ridicules. Who makes that claim?. So how do you reconcile beguiled, forbidden fruit and the reference made in the song of Solomon?
Those evil trees I tell you..Literally and figuratively.
Clear
Right pfenig. No one in DSCI explicitly claims these things, but if we simply take their own interpretation to its logical conclusions, then we can see that they implicitly claim all manner of strange things. As another example, if Christ is the tree of life which DSCI believes, and if eating fruit from a tree means sex, then DSCI implies that Adam and Eve must have had sex with Him as well.
But Adam and Eve obviously did not have an orgy, and they did not sleep with anyone except each other, because they had already received the law of marriage (Gen 2:24,Mat 19:5). So the idea that trees are peoples and eating their fruit means having sex with them doesn’t work.
Also God Himself placed the tree of knowledge of good and evil in the garden (Gen 2:9, Gen 3:6). That alone renders DSCI invalid.
If we combine the LXX and the Masoretic text, we can see that Cain was Adam’s son (Gen 4:1). The Kenites (Gen 15:19) were demonstrably not descendants of Cain. Nothing says Canaanites were mixed bloods. The Edomites were not mixed bloods (Deu 23:7-8).
There’s no need to reconcile anything relating to DSCI, because DSCI just doesn’t work.
pfenig
DSCIers claim that “eating” the fruit of the tree of knowledge of good and evil in the Garden is a sexual act. But Genesis 2:9 says that God made every tree in the Garden “good for food”. Following the logic, then eating of other trees must also be a sexual act. Therefore, if all trees in the Garden are permitted to eat from, then God is permitting an orgy. That is ridiculous, but that’s where your interpretation of “eat” as a sexual act ultimately leads.
“And out of the ground made the LORD God to grow every tree that is pleasant to the sight, and good for food; the tree of life also in the midst of the garden, and the tree of knowledge of good and evil.” (Genesis 2:9)
Chris
Again I beg to differ and you are using emotion to drive your argument. If Gen 5:1 tells us “This is the book of the generations of Adam”, then why cant tree mean race or family. There are many other plants and tree metaphors in scripture which really refer to races of people. Fig trees, thistles and grafting of branches and vines. All in reference to people and tribes.
“Awake, O north wind, and come, thou south! Blow upon my garden, that the spices thereof may flow out. Let my beloved come into his garden and eat his pleasant fruits.”
“Such is the way of an adulterous woman; she eateth, and wipeth her mouth, and saith, I have done no wickedness.”
“Yet I had planted thee [Judah] a noble vine, wholly a right seed: how then art thou turned into the degenerate plant of a strange [hybrid] vine unto me?”
As for orgy’s, the Apostle Paul told us that “where there is no law there is no sin” so draw your own conclusions.
Clear
Cain was definitely Adam’s son, so the whole view comes crashing down by Genesis 4:1 already. Kenites weren’t descendants of Cain. Edomites weren’t race-mixed. DSCI doesn’t work. Verses about sexual allegories don’t matter.
Your interpretation somehow needs to move beyond cherry-picking verses you think agree with a sexual interpretation of the garden of Eden account. These cherry-picked verses are doubly irrelevant, because one cannot even consistently apply that interpretation to the Bible.
As I stated already, they had received the law of marriage (Gen 2:24, Mat 19:5). This is something DSCI seems to have missed along the way.
Regardless, Paul didn’t say that “where there is no law there is no sin.” He said, “for until the Law sin was in the world, but sin is not counted against anyone when there is no law.” (Rom 5:13) Then he continues to say, “nevertheless, death reigned” (Rom 5:14) because “12 For all who have sinned without the Law will also perish without the Law, and all who have sinned under the Law will be judged by the Law; 13 for it is not the hearers of the Law who are righteous before God, but the doers of the Law who will be justified.” (Rom 2:12-13).
Not having a law doesn’t excuse one from sinning. It doesn’t mean that sin isn’t sin. It only means there’s no law of punishment against them. But sinners are going to die whether they had a law of punishment against them during life or not, because in the end they didn’t actually keep the law.
Will you seriously hold that orgies and having sex with Christ (the tree of life, by eating its fruit) are okay (homosexually in Adam’s case)? Look at Revelation 22:14-15. Partaking of the tree of life could NEVER involve sexual immorality. But according to DSCI, sexual immorality was rife in the garden of Eden, including the “use” of the tree of life.
Fish
Chris,
The subject of Jeremiah 2 is Israel. When God refers to Israel as a “degenerate vine” he is speaking to their whoring after balaam, which had polluted them.
From your DSCI perspective, God is addressing a genetically mixed people, and not Israel, which is certainly not the case.
But Jeremiah 2 is speaking to Israel and Judah forsaking their God for idols, which is of a different vine that yields no fruit. It is blatantly obvious what Jeremiah 2 is about.
None of your examples prove that fruit in Genesis refers to race or sexual acts. Nor can you skirt around the fact that God planted the tree of the knowledge of good and evil in the garden Himself. The bible literally tells us that. It is amazing to watch you guys ignore a book you act so zealous for.
The only one driving home points born of emotion is the one who insists that their preconceived ideology must be true regardless of what the bible says.
Jas
Chris, just because trees can represent people doesn’t mean they always represent people, or that they represent people when it is convenient for you. This is simple.
Your doctrine claims “eating” is the sexual act, and trees are people. God says He put all the trees in the Garden to eat of. Therefore, Adam and Even can have sexual intercourse with all the other “trees”. You haven’t explained away this “logic” of your doctrine except to say it’s “emotional”, which is not. It’s logical. Your doctrine collapses under its own internal inconsistencies right from Genesis.
All babylonian/pagan cults believe what you believe — that wisdom was given mankind through a sexual act with the woman, whether Eve or Astarte. The pagan god Bacchus was allegedly born, like your Cain, from a sexual act with Jupiter in the form of a serpent. All Jews in Babylon believed this sex cult “magik” that you believe. This sex act with the serpent to bring about wisdom is part of the “black mass” practiced by satanists today. You are in good company. Be very careful where you are unwittingly treading.
Like Eve, you have been beguiled and seduced into believing this “wisdom” born of a pagan sex cult masquerading as DSCI. The “knowledge” that’s been imparted to you as an acolyte is pure gnosticism, and has taken you away from the pure simplicity that is in Christ. Yet you defend it in the face of all the evidence against it out of pride. You cannot accept that you, like Eve, have been duped. We all were, Chris. You’re no different.
luke2236
Im not sure losing our temper is “always wrong”… methinks Jesus got plenty angry when he cleansed the temple with violence….
just sayin….
Clear
Just got a few questions…
1. Does being angry necessarily mean losing one’s temper?
2. Must a lost temper always precede violence?
3. Does the Bible say Christ lost His temper (or was even angry in the first place) when He drove the merchants out of the temple?
Rollins
It’s hard for me to imagine that Christ lost his temper the way I do. Yes, I can imagine “righteous anger”, but I doubt few of us ever truly experience it. Losing one’s temper is a hallmark of losing one’s patience, and Christ was incredibly patient will us, like a parent is with mere infants.
But if Christ lost him patience with us, then He would be losing His patience with His own creation, which would mean losing patience with Himself, and that’s unimaginable.
luke2236
Clear, I dont think He would not be angry – just not possible. One doesnt usually calmly use violence…I think His discourse to the ‘bankers’ shows fairly clearly that He was angry.
No, violence doesnt always follow losing of ones temper. But I do think that one must ‘lose ones temper’ before engaging in violence, unless you are a professional ‘violence-ist’ like mob thugs, soldiers or police. Maybe its just me…
And no, one can certainly be angry w/o losing ones temper; Im angry almost 100% of the time – and how anyone can keep from it when they look around I cant imagine – but I dont always lose my temper. All oranges are round but not all things are oranges…
jmnsho, ymmv.
Fish
Well, vengeance is God’s, so Christ “losing His temper” in the temple isn’t really the same as when one of us loses our temper.
Though when God called Israelites to battle in times past, suggesting that we pay back our enemies double, that should be taken into the same context right? Such times were always orchestrated by God through a leader (Gideon, Joshua fx) and heralded in with miraculous signs that told the world “this is from the ever living God, not man.”
But I agree that anger itself is something we must experience. I think CFT said as much in their article, but the crux of their message, i think, was that we master our spirit so that our flesh doesn’t tempt us to unsanctioned violence, haste, cruel or false speech etc.
That is something we all need help with. God can help us by taming us.
I think John the baptist was awarded righteous indignation (see matthew 3) but only after wailing in the wilderness for some time. Was he being purged and tamed (or tempered like fine silver)? I tend to think so.
God might just take a son into the wilderness and let the son vent and rail, weep and repent, over and over again till he has found a balance. God is great, and i believe there is a lot about what He does for us (in this context) that is barely hinted at in scripture.
If we imagine we are damned because we know we are angry, and we know we are too weak to overcome it all, then we should remember that the bible is the map, not the territory. God is a miracle worker and works in mysterious ways that cannot be wholly encapsulated in written words.
Fish
It is easy to feel hopeless when faced with these commandments. I think we all have blundered with our lips and released anger at others in the past.
Easy to feel hopeless because how can a man change himself? Luckily that is why we turn to Christ in the first. To purge us, refine is, cleanse us.
Psalm51:7 “Purge me with hyssop, and I shall be clean; wash me, and I shall be whiter than snow.” David is asking God to help him.
2 Peter 3:9 “The Lord is not slow to fulfill his promise as some count slowness, but is patient toward you, not wishing that any should perish, but that all should reach repentance.” If we feel shame or guilt for our deficiencies, then we must have faith that He will certainly help us.
Rollins
Anger blinds me when it hits me, and what I say when angry I often regret because it is rarely, if ever, what I really meant to say. The fact that we often find ourselves apologizing for something we said in anger says it all, and if we refuse to apologize for something we said in anger and try to justify it, we dig ourselves into an even deeper hole.
As Will Rogers once said (and it applies to anger), “If you find yourself in a hole, stop digging.”
Fish
I think we kid ourselves of ever think we dont sin. John said the man who thinks he has no sin is a liar.
There are no Christians who dont have a sinful nature. Even God’s chosen – like the apostles – were in constant fear of God.
And I think a child of the flesh abhors the spirit of God, because they wouldn’t want to die daily and live every day that way. It takes time I think for son to even get used to it, to appreciate a little grief on the regular.
Sheepdog
I’ve come to believe farming is an allegory or shadow for spiritual life. Adam used to eat freely of the tree of life without toil or labor. Then he was sent out of the garden where he now had to fight thorns and thistles to get his bread.
Proverbs 24 says,
30 I went by the field of the slothful, and by the vineyard of the man void of understanding;
31 And, lo, it was all grown over with thorns, and nettles had covered the face thereof, and the stone wall thereof was broken down.
32 Then I saw, and considered it well: I looked upon it, and received instruction.
33 Yet a little sleep, a little slumber, a little folding of the hands to sleep:
34 So shall thy poverty come as one that travelleth; and thy want as an armed man.
Keeping our lives from sin is like tending our property and growing our food. It requires constant dedication and progress. Leaving it as is just means the weeds and wildlife will come.
Then 1 John 1:8-10 is saying if a man thinks he doesn’t have something to tend to on his property, then he is a liar. We must tend to our sin constantly, or the weeds will come and life will fall into disrepair.
Also we’re all in different stages in our farms. When we truly come to Christ, we realize the whole thing is in shambles and we begin to make progress from there.