On September 7, 1902 an article entitled “The Saxon Heptarchy — The Lost Tribes” appeared in The Times of Richmond, Virginia, newspaper — explaining the historical evidence that the people of Wales, England, descended from the Lost Tribes of Israel.
We have written previously on this subject in our article, How The ‘Lost’ Israelite Khumry of the Assyrian Captivity Migrated To Wales & Britain — however, we found this 1902 article to include additional important evidence that’s worth noting.
Between the 6th and 8th centuries, Anglo-Saxon England was divided into The Heptarchy — the seven kingdoms of East Anglia, Essex, Kent, Mercia, Northumbria, Sussex, and Wessex — and Wales was west of Mercia and Wessex:
This 1902 article explains the relationship between and influence of the Welsh Cymbri to these kingdoms of the Anglo-Saxon kingdoms.
Not surprisingly, this Israelitish history of the Welsh — and native British people — is not only ignored by mainstream British historians, it is unofficially censored and suppressed for what should be obvious reasons.
If the Welsh are indeed true Israelites, then who are the so-called “Jews” — the de facto cryptocracy that now rules of England?
Welsh secular historians Alan Wilson and Baram Blackett have written extensively on this subject — and for their efforts they have had their lives threatened and home set on fire.
After being expelled from England in 1290 by King Edward I for crimes against the people and the Crown, 300 years later they were readmitted to by the Puritan leader, Oliver Cromwell, under the pretense that Jews were true Israelites whose restoration in England would somehow hasten the Second Coming of Jesus Christ.
Instead of the Second Coming, the British people have become racial minorities in most of the land their ancestors settled, built, and died for.
Most Christians are taught to believe that the lost tribes of Israel literally disappeared into the mists of time — but if that were the case, then Christ’s explicit purpose — that He came to regather all of the Israelite tribes (Matthew 15:24) was a lost cause.
This 1902 article proves that Christ’s mission was not in vain — that He and His disciples succeed in bringing the Gospel to His lost sheep — even those in a remote corner of the British Isles.
[As an aside, a video containing a copy of this original 1902 article was posted on YouTube, but was removed — and the account that posted it was “terminated” for unspecified reasons — no doubt for “hateful” or “racist” smears.]
The Times of Richmond, Virginia:
“The Saxon Heptarchy — The Lost Tribes”
“On the map of Britain facing St. George’s channel, is a group of counties called Wales. Inhabited by a people distinct from and very little understood by those who surround them.
Their neighbors call them Welshmen. Walsh or Welsh is not a proper name, but a Teutonic term signifying strangers, and was applied to all persons who are not of that family; but the proper name of these people is Kymri. They are the last remnant of the Kimmeroi of Homer.
From the Combric Chersonesus (or Jubland), a portion of these [people] landed on the shores of Northumberland and gave their name to the county of Cumberland, and in process of time followed the seaside to their present resting place, where they still call themselves Kymri, and give their country a similar name.
Their history clear, concise, and authentic ascends to a higher antiquity. Their language was embodied in verse (see samples of the Welsh Triads, in Sharon Turner, History of the Anglo-Saxons, Vol. III) “long before the languages now spoken rose into notice, and their literature, cultivated and abundant, lays claim to being the most ancient in modern Europe” [from Thomas Stephens’ Literature of the Kymri).
“The identity of the Cymri of Wales” (says Professor George Rawlinson), “with the Cimbri of the Romans, seems worthy of being accepted as an historical fact upon the grounds stated by Nieburh and Arnold. They were known to their neighbors as Cimmerii, Gimmerii, or Gommerii (see Genesis 10), and attained considerable power in Western Asia and Eastern Europe about 800 B.C.” (see Bible date of the captivity of Ten Tribes, 721 B.C.) “…is a fact that can scarcely admit of doubt.”
Herodotus calls these people Cimmerian (Kumri) — a people whose antiquity is above twenty-five hundred years, and “has spread from the Steppes of the Ukraine in to the mountains of Wales” (see Professor George Rawlinson’s Ancient Monarchies).
“Gomer” (see Genesis 10) was the progenitor of the Cimmerians, Cimbri and other branches of the Celtic family, as well as of the modern Chael and Cymri. Cymri is the original name, with slight variations” (see Young’s Concordance under “Gomer”. Also see the original Cimmerian in Zephaniah 1:4, occurs here only in the Bible.
The Hebrews suffixed the name of God, El(ail), to their personal names. See Hebrew nouns ending in El, such as Emmanuel, Gabriel, Samuel, Israel & c., and compare the etymology of An-Gael-ish — English.
But to return to Sharon Turner, who witnesses for us, never against us.
“The Kimmerians may be regarded as our first ancestors. The Cimmerian tongue is in the farthest part of the West, in the British Islands. That the Kimmeroi of the Greeks were the Cimbri of the Latin writers was the opinion of the Greeks themselves.”
–Sharon Turner, History of the Anglo-Saxons
At some early period, after they reached the shores of the German Ocean (in their overland route from Asia), they crossed it in their rude vessels to Great Britain. It is agreed by the British antiquaries that the most ancient inhabitants of our land were called Cymbri (Kimri): they are so named in all that remains of ancient British literature.
The Welsh, who are their descendants, have given the same name to the earliest colonies of our island. That a district in the north of England was inhabited by a part of the ancient British nation, and called Cumbria, when the present Cumberland, is favorable to this presumption. It is a safe inference that the Camry of Britain originated from the continental Kimmerians.
The Welsh historians state that the Cymri were the first inhabitants of Britain. They first obtained it, and that before their advent “nothing else but bears, wolves and oxen roamed its trackless forests” (see Sharon Turner’s Anglo-Saxon History)
Not only have we the testimony of these historians and others, but chiseled upon the imperishable stone — the hoary monuments of Babylon and of Nineveh, we read the same truth.
On an obelisk found by Austen Henry Layard, now in the British Museum, the name “Khumrie” and “Beth Khumrie” is found, referring to Omri, father of Ahab. Omri was the renowned king of the Ten Tribes (1 Kings 16). The Assyrians called him and the house of Omri, Khumri and Beth (house), Khumrie (of Khumri).
“Upon the Babylonian monuments the term Gimmerie, Gimeri, means ‘the tribes’ — and is the Semitic equivalent of the Aryan Sacae.”
–George Rawlinson’s Ancient Monarchies
The House of Rhumri (Beth Rhumri) was, therefore, [simply] the Assyrian designation of the House of Omri (1 Kings 16).
Thus, these disinterested witnesses trace the Welsh of Britain to their ancestors — the Cymri; the Cymri to the Roman Cimbri; the Cimbri to the Greek Kimmeroi; the Kimmeroi to the Gimeri (Gomer in Genesis 10), who are identified by Professor Rawlinson with the Assyrian Rhumri, which was the Assyrian name for the Israelites (Ten Lost Tribes).
In other words, the Welsh called themselves Cymri — in the mouth of the Romans they became “Cimbri” — in the mouth of the Greeks “Kimmeroi” — in the mouth of the Assyrians “Rhumri” — and in the mouth of the Hebrews “Omri” (1 Kings 16).
Now the Simonii (tribe of Simeon) was but a branch of the Cymri who settled in Wales, and joining the Saxon Confederacy, made the ninth tribe — the tribe of Simeon. Dan had already settled in Ireland, and made the tenth.
Here then the regathering of the Ten Lost Tribes.”
i found this video on the Kim Iverson channel Israeli Prime Minister Admits Jews Didn’t Originally Come From Israel so the israeli pm is admitting that jews are not true israelites as the true israelite tribes did come from the land now called israel https://youtu.be/RuqLB_8HcRk
Isnt it funny how (((luther))) removed the books of Maccabees from the canon, hmmm, the one book that taught that the europeans and israelites were of one stock was removed by jewther….
now it makes sense that he wrote the book “That Jesus Christ Was Born a Jew”.
anybody with a cursory knowledge of history knows that “on the jews and their lies” was a little temper tantrum that (((jewther))) threw when (((they))) refused to join his movement. (((luther))) was mentored under a proto rosicurian. (((luther’s))) goal was the same as that of albert pike and the ((((freemasons))) – https://web.archive.org/web/20200514172927/http://www.therabbith0le.com/DevilInThe19thCentury/DevilInThe19thCentury.html
Read this.
https://thereversion.co/p/kabbalah-and-the-protestant-revolution
Jews are of Esau; Jewish Encyclopedia 1925; Volume 5 page 41. Josephus, Esau Edom became part of Judea in 125 BC became circumcised and became Jews. Also, the Ashkenazie Jews of Genesis 10:3 are 95% of all Jews today and they are descendants of Japheth, not Shem.
The Thirteenth Tribe by Koestler
Judah’s Sceptre and Joseph’s Birthright by Allen 1902. He is the one that will make the curtain go away. And O yea, Dorthy ain’t in Kansas any more.
Something interesting i found on you tube these days if you see interesting video best to download it , THE ANCIENT COELBREN ALPHABET IS THE LANGUAGE OF THE KHUMRY IT IS 4000 YEARS OLD
Those wanting to know who the Khumry are they are ancient welsh its the ancient name for the welsh people who are one of the Israelite tribes of scripture , up to a certain time in wales true british history was taught including the 2 king arthurs , established academic historians paid liars would have you believe coelbren is a fraud but julius ceasar talked about it , ceasar remarked how the greek and british language was similar linked in the biblical israelite coelbren language , ceasar also said how ancient britain was a center of learning he described how britain was a land of cities and roads it was an advanced country not at all what false history tells you , so here is true history https://youtu.be/Xf4hUcTZ3sM
I believe the Gospel accurately preserves the decrees, claims and teachings of Yahshua. I believe the Gospel He preached was not one of personal salvation but rather one concerning the coming Kingdom.
I believe Yahshua taught using parables as he did not want non-Israelites (the majority of the Judean population in his day) to understand the Gospel of the coming Kingdom (he did explain them in private to his Benjamite disciples as needed).
I believe you cannot chose Yahshua.
I believe you must be chosen by Yahshua and, to be chosen by Him, must be (at minimum) a pureblood lineal descendent of Jacob-Israel.
I believe Yahshua and Yahweh (YHVH or YHWH) are one and the same – Yahshua being the projection of Yahweh into our physical realm. I believe Yahshua when he clearly conveyed that He was sent only to the lost sheep of the House of Israel and interpret this to mean the pureblood lineal descendants of Jacob-Israel.
I do not believe in a “spiritual Israel” or that one could distinguish between a “spiritual Judahite” and a “spiritual Benjamite” even if the one in question believed in a “spiritual Israel.”
I believe the relevant portion of Cain’s progeny were consolidated within the tribe known as the Kenites. I believe Jewry is composed of an inner core and a thick outer shell. The inner core being composed of the progeny of the ancient Edomites (who, in turn, were the byproduct of the racial intermarriage of Esau/Edom with Hittite and Ishmaelite women) and specific Canaanites who resulted from the intermarriage of Kenites and pre-Kenite Canaanite tribes. The outer shell would be composed of anyone of any race or subrace who converted to the religious system known as Judaism (a converted Israelite would most certainly be twice as much the child of hell than the Edomite-Kenite Jew [hereafter E-K Jew] as they could have entered into the Kingdom/Congregation whereas the racial Jew cannot under any circumstances).
I believe every generation until relatively recently preserved a substantial pureblood remnant of the seed of Jacob-Israel. I believe at this point the E-K Jews have infiltrated and control the governments (or ruling bodies) of every Caucasian nation as well as most of the non-Caucasian nations. I believe the non-E-K Jews that most populations consider the government officials that run their respective nations are nothing more than (for lack of a better term known to me) “Shabbos goy/goyim” servants or puppets of the E-K Jews (“puppeticians” rather than politicians perhaps) who do their bidding even as the E-K Jews do the bidding of their father the devil.
I believe pureblood Israelites are now disappearing at a greatly accelerated rate due to the machinations of the E-K Jews and their Shabbos goys, who are flooding Caucasian nations with non-Caucasians from every part of the world (usually the Third World). I believe that when the dust settles and the finishing Mark of the Beast touches are placed upon the Brave Jew World Order (as I like to call it), the pureblood Israelite remanant may well be reduced to the 144,000 described in holy scripture (I do not believe the world population numbers that are always reported/cited – I believe it is significantly less).
I believe a large portion of the racial Jews of today lineally descend from the Pharisees of the first century and slightly before and they, in turn, descend from Edomites and Kenite Canaanites. I do not believe it is an accident that the holy book of today’s racial Jews (known as the Babylonian Talmud) derives from the religious teachings of the Pharisaic rabbis (starting originally as verbal teachings and ultimately being compiled into written form).
I believe the Church of Rome (or Romish Church) was founded by the Pharisees (racial Jews) a few centuries after they crucified Yahshua. I find support for this in the claims of Jews who are professors of Kabbalah in the university system. They openly admit the first Bishop of Rome (i.e., the Pope) was a Jew Rabbi. I believe the racial Jews that run the Papacy were successful at hijacking Christianity (for lack of a better term) until the great reformers rose to prominence and exposed the wicked evil of the Romish Church.
At that point I believe the racial Jews called forth the uber-Jews to begin the Counter Reformation in an effort to recapture the Protestants, which they lost. I believe these uber-Jews to be the Society of Jesus or the Jesuit Order. I find support for this in the fact the Jesuits, like the Jews, have been kicked out of so many European nations. Moreover, like the Romish Prelates, Jew Rabbis are known for their penchant for Pederasty and the sexual abuse of children. I believe Ignatius de Loyola was a Crypto-Jew who congregated with Converso and Marrano Jews to form the Jesuit order. I believe the Superior General of the Jesuit Order to reside at the apex of the racial Jew hierarchy that runs the one world government. I believe the one world government or Brave Jew World Order has existed for a few centuries now and will be overtly unveiled at the time of “The Externalisation of the Hierarchy” as Alice A. Bailey called it.
I believe the most effective element of the Counter Reformation was the creation of the Futurism/Rapture paradigm that was implemented about the beginning of the twentieth century and at this point appears to have virtually eliminated the Historicism paradigm that existed for about the first 1,800 years of the Common Era (I do not use the abbreviation “A.D.” as it is a stand in for the Romish term “Anno Domini,” meaning “in the year of the Lord,” the English word “Lord” translating from the Hebrew word for the pagan god “Ba’al.”) I would never offer up a prayer to Ba’al (Baal-Zebub/Satan) or use his name to describe anything that should be ascribed to Yahweh.
I believe the paternal haplogroup of Abraham and Isaac was the Middle Eastern haplogroup “IJ.” I believe a mutation or split occurred with the birth of Jacob and Esau. I believe the “I” haplogroup was incorporated into Jacob-Israel and the “J” haplogroup (Cohen haplogroup) into Esau. I believe the unusual physical appearance of Esau (red and hairy) was the outward expression of this haplogroup mutation/split. I believe the haplogroup of the Seed of Japheth is “R.” I believe the reason why the R haplogroup is more prevalent in Western Europe than the I haplogroup is that the Israelites were late arrivals to Europe as opposed to the Seed of Japheth who settled in Europe millennia earlier (see Genesis table of nations) and were far more numerous by the time of the Israelite arrival. I believe the migration of the Israelite tribes (Germanic tribes after crossing through the Caucasian Mountains) fulfilled Noah’s prophecy that Yahweh would enlarge Japheth’s progeny and they would dwell in the tents of Shem (i.e., Shem’s progeny the Israelites).
For the record, my earliest ancestor in the New World migrated from Wales to New Jersey about 350 years ago. My autosomal DNA is 83% English, Scottish and Welsh. The remaining 17% is Scandinavian. There are no DNA inputs from Ireland or Finland. My paternal haplogroup is downstream from I-M253. My STR (Short Tandem Repeats) grouping as defined by Dr. Ken Nordtvedt’s classification system is Anglo-Saxon.
Hello John Doe,
That’s a good post and I agree with most.
However:
“I believe the paternal haplogroup of Abraham and Isaac was the Middle Eastern haplogroup “IJ.” I believe a mutation or split occurred with the birth of Jacob and Esau. I believe the “I” haplogroup was incorporated into Jacob-Israel and the “J” haplogroup (Cohen haplogroup) into Esau. I believe the unusual physical appearance of Esau (red and hairy) was the outward expression of this haplogroup mutation/split.”
How would that be possible?
If we take Adam and Eve as the progenitors of the white peoples, then WHERE would all the other blood groups come from? Adam’s progeny would all have the same blood type as he (with Eve also having his blood type). This concept of ‘mutation’ is modern science mumbo-jumbo. They believe, for example blue eyes are a mutation. Yes, they really do believe that. The non white races all have brown eyes and black hair. The whites have a multitude of colours and anyone who knows art, knows that if you mix all the primary colours together you get mud colour – brown, but you cannot get any of the primary colour from brown.
Noah and his progeny would also have the same blood type as Adam. Ham, Shem and Japheth and all of their line. There are two conclusions – either modern science is lying about all the blood groups, or there actually are different blood types, but just not as many with ‘other’ peoples on this earth mixing with one another and the Adamic line.
There wouldn’t be any mutation between Esau and Jacob from birth. They would both be of the same blood type. However, when Esau married the Hittite woman, then he mixed the Adamic blood. He adulterated the bloodline.
“I believe that when the dust settles and the finishing Mark of the Beast touches are placed upon the Brave Jew World Order (as I like to call it), the pureblood Israelite remanant may well be reduced to the 144,000 described in holy scripture”
We’re already there and what I believe, very few of the 144,000 are actually alive to this day; very probably under 1,000 or far, far less. If there are so many different blood types then it proves, already, that the overwhelming majority are all mixed with peoples, most likely, from those YHWH commanded the Israelites to destroy in Deuteronomy 20:17. The majority of the world’s peoples, are the result of the Israelites, not fulfilling YHWH’s command.
However, to look at this logically, the bible specifically forbids incest. Canaan was cursed for what is clearly the incestuous marriage copulation between Ham and his mother. Then there is Deuteronomy 23:3:
“An Ammonite or Moabite shall not enter into the congregation of the LORD; even to their tenth generation shall they not enter into the congregation of the LORD forever.”
Moab and Ben-Ammi were the offspring of an incestuous relationship (Genesis 19:30-38) and regardless after ten generations of backcrossing are still not allowed to enter heaven. This is important, because it tells us that after 10 generations of backcrossing, the bloodline is purified and those of incestuous relationships, regardless how many generations after, are still deemed as impure and not worthy of heaven.
The trees in the Garden of Eden were other races, who lived in the Biblical world and who Adamites will have mixed with, but through backcrossing their lineage became pure after 10 generations of only pure Adamic breeding.
Seth and his progeny will have married first cousins, which was not incest (Leviticus 18:6-17) and therefore allowed, due to population size. Noah was ‘perfect in his generations’ unlike the line of Cain, who clearly mixed with the other, non Adamic peoples. Who were they? Indian sub continent peoples? Asian peoples?
I’m still trying to piece all of this together, but all the different blood types, among the white peoples, clearly show deviation from the Adamic bloodline.
God bless
Marcus – many thanks for the insights. You may want to help your “piecing together” by viewing a set of writings that you can find at the site of Dustin Nemos at Serapeum.com;
https://theserapeum.com/?utm_source=email-header-image&umt_medium=email&inf_contact_key=6d6023317d1857824d424ae52074cce2b7af0999dac2af6212784c39e05d2aef
You may also perhaps be familiar with the books of Rob Skiba who mysteriously died in the late Covid scamdemic era. He wrote a series of books – well researched – on Genesis 6 and the Nephilim.
Finally, there is The Omega Conspiracy Dr IDEThomas – one of my favourite Welshmen !
Hello Huw,
Yes, I came across Rob Skiba in my journeys but did not know of his passing. I will certainly look into his books as well as Dustin Nemos at Serapeum.com and The Omega Conspiracy Dr IDEThomas. Thank you for your recommendations.
God bless
The best book on Genesis 6:4 is Genesis 6 Conspiracy by Gary Wayne. He is amazing in his knowledge of how the giants are the forefathers of the ruling people of the earth today.
Michael
—– John Doe —–
Interesting Comment. You should start a blog/website, if you do not have one already.
Could you elaborate when you say — “…..I believe you cannot chose Yahshua……”
This could bring up an entire Theological Discussion — Predestination/Foreknowledge etc., etc.
I really do not want to go down that road for now.
But if you could elaborate by explaining “why” in MANY passages, Jesus speaks to the idea of our own Free Will in this Relationship. Why would He say those things if “Salvation” is not a personal endeavor. I mean John 3:16 is popular in Evangelical Universal Churches because it is not confusing. How do you get around that?
“…… he who keeps My commands, is he who loves Me…..” — Jesus
So, as an example —- Is this not OUR actions i.e., “keeping His commands” (decisions, choices, actions etc.) ? I will be the first to say that we or I cannot “keep” His commands without the Indwelling Holy Spirit — i.e., being Saved/Born Again/Born from Above — in the first place. But I’m pretty sure when I specifically choose not to commit fornication, this is a cooperation of the Spirit and my direct thoughts and actions.
Or are we Robots in the sense that God’s Divine Will/Spirit —- somehow runs through us after He has chosen us — and we just do what is right all the time —- OR ……. it really doesn’t matter what actions we take in life because if we are “Chosen” as you say —- we could Sin i.e., Fornicate or Commit Adultery —- and in the end, because He chose us, we will find Eternal Life regardless — even in the very act of Adultery.
This “idea” of yours is very Calvinistic. But I’m pretty sure you would say that you reject all aspects of Calvinism.
If you don’t mind — please elaborate as best as possible.
Those “chosen” by God ……………….. “why” did God chose that particular person over someone else; and what about that particular person’s “actions” as he lives life — Does he have any free will in his actions? How do you explain that phenomena. Surely you do not believe of yourself as a Robot. And by the way — how do you know He chose YOU??? You won’t really know until the day you die; would you agree? According to that statement you made.
I’ve never understood how someone can believe WE have no choice in Salvation. Contrary to the hundreds of passages which suggest otherwise. Isaiah 18:21-24. I mean … pretty much the entire Bible.
Thanks.
@John Doe Why do you suppose the Book of Deuteronomy does not include Canaanites, Edomites, Hittites, or Kenites as groups that are not allowed into the Kingdom of God even in the 10th generation? The Ammonites and Moabites are in there.
“I believe the paternal haplogroup of Abraham and Isaac was the Middle Eastern haplogroup “IJ.” I believe a mutation or split occurred with the birth of Jacob and Esau. I believe the “I” haplogroup was incorporated into Jacob-Israel and the “J” haplogroup (Cohen haplogroup) into Esau. I believe the unusual physical appearance of Esau (red and hairy) was the outward expression of this haplogroup mutation/split. I believe the haplogroup of the Seed of Japheth is “R.”
I can’t agree with any of this part. First, the people who push the study of haplogroups say each of those haplogroups are no less than 20,000 years old, which creates problems with the Biblical timeline. They’d also say haplogroup I has been in Europe longer than R has.
Second, haplogroup J has no correlation with red hair.
Third, hirsutism and the random appearance of a recessive trait such as red hair are not sufficient to suggest that a major mutation has occurred.
The science behind haplogroups is not sound at all. Evolutionists want people to believe everyone with a certain haplogroup has a common ancestor (which ultimately goes back to Africa; a politically driven theory), but it doesn’t work that way since you don’t inherit all of the DNA of your ancestors. For that reason, people are not going to have the same haplogroup as their parents 100% of the time.
They couldn’t get that lost.
—- Ian —-
Who are you and what do you believe about the teachings of Christian Identity/Israelite Identity?
Are you White/Caucasian/European?
No offense — but your comment(s) are pointless in that you are not “elaborating” on whatever point you are trying to make.
I don’t understand. Who are you trying to reach? And for what purpose?
Makes no sense.
Hello CFT,
“Now the Simonii (tribe of Simeon) was but a branch of the Cymri who settled in Wales, and joining the Saxon Confederacy, made the ninth tribe — the tribe of Simeon. Dan had already settled in Ireland, and made the tenth.”
In Irish folklore the Fir Bolg were the indigenous peoples of Ireland who fought a battle and lost to the Tuatha Dé Danann in the Battle of Mag Tuired, also known as the First Battle of Mag Tuired. Despite the Fir Bolg being of greater numbers, they agreed to a single combat to determine the victor, which was proposed by King Nuada of the Tuatha Dé Danann. Sreng, a Fir Bolg warrior, challenged Lugh, a prominent Tuatha Dé Danann warrior, to a one-on-one combat, showcasing their bravery and determination.
After their defeat, the Fir Bolg were given Connacht as their territory and were mentioned very little in subsequent myths, indicating a significant decline in their prominence. The Tuatha Dé Danann then established the High Kingship and divided Ireland into five provinces.
What is interesting, is who the Firbolg were. Were they of the Israelites who arrived earlier or of Shem and/or Japheth’s descendants? The same can also be said about the Picts in Scotland? Clearly the same question can be asked of them.
In Irish folklore they were said to have arrived in Ireland and denied habitat, but told to inhabit the land to the Northwest on the condition that the people would come their new land in the future and marry their daughters.
I believe you’d find the early successive waves of whites moving to the Isle to all be of Israelite decent, or their earlier precursors. It’s not that any one nation is all one tribe or another, but that many refuges of tribes live together. Look at all the deer heraldry in UK for example. That’s Naphtali. And it’s all over Europe also. Just like the Unicorn is Manasseh and or Ephraim (not many black bulls used anymore, both moved to a more distinct system. Joseph’s old tribe symbol was a sheaf of wheat. Some of Dan’s went to eagles as that was a symbol in the side by the tabernacle where they camped. Heck, there are more obscure symbols as well. The red dragon of Wales is an archery flag from Asher. Prior to that Wales used 3 red lions on top of each other, which was a Trojan flag, mostly likely of the Lacedaemonians. That group claimed kinship with the Judeans in letters we have while that kingdom stood.
Hello Creat,
I’ve come to that conclusion as well. It would appear that the lost tribes are mixed throughout all the western civilisation. No one country can really be called this or that, as through mixing, we’re all back together as one family.
God bless
>” The sons of Japheth; Gomer, and Magog, and Madai, and Javan, and Tubal, and Meshech, and Tiras.” Genesis 10:2
Europeans come from Noah’s son Japheth and his seven sons, including Gomer (identified with the Welsh). The exiled Israelites were a small minority that assimilated out in every direction but they especially formed an admixture with White Europeans via nomadic Sythians etc. So the Israelites, of course, didn’t maintain their identity as such (which had long been apostate anyhow since the days of King Jeroboam, Omri, Jehu, etc.), they were prophesied to be destroyed under the law and that’s what happened. But they became “destroyed” this way of assimilation into the gentiles so that they could be reclaimed in a much better and more enduring way by the grace of the gospel of Christ centuries later. Finding out who is an “Israelite” now is something discovered not by a genetic test, but by the test of who responds to the gospel message and gets born again (see, Deuteronomy 30).
Did you get all the knowledge from white house or your local synagogue of satan.
YHWH God promise Isaac:”Your descendants will be called by your name”. SAXON – SAC SONS- Isaac sons. Even the Slaves – Slovans have call them self SAKA – SAKAE means fro Isaac. You can trace the 12 tribes of Jacob from Jerusalem and holly land all the way to Europe. They call us Caucasian, because our ancestors cross to Europe KAUKASIAN- CAUCASIAN mountains. Caucasian mountains are between Caspian and black sea once place of ancient Assyria. Assyrians took around 725 BC all the northern 11 tribe of Jacob and large part of Yudah to Assyrian captivity and from there they find the way to Kievian Russ Scytia to Europe. Even the Russian are the tribe of Benjamin, Genesis 45:21 descendants of Rosh. The Polaks- large part, may have some blood of Yahpet, because they are the only one who accepted ashkenazi so call jewish rats live among them in large numbers.
Half of European men share King Tut’s DNA.
https://odysee.com/@louismarschalko:2/Half-of-European-men-share-King-Tut's-DNA:4
70% of British men share King Tut’s DNA.
King Tut’s DNA Results.
https://old.bitchute.com/video/hP56tXyejqnw/
Tut was a White man just like the Europeans. This is a part of history the “jew” doesn’t want known.
This is where people refuse to read scripture and listen only to the modern jew lies of jew re-written history books, and the jew lie of “evolution”. BOTH pervert truth and take away from scripture. Scripture is the “real” history book.
At the time of the FLOOD there was but one great land mass. Noah’s three sons were eventually “sectioned” off on the land mass due to, as humans do, squabbling. The Semites were given what is now know as (pay attention) the middle east/ n Africa / Europe / Eurasia. The Japhethitic were given what is NOW known as modern Asia. The Hamites were assigned to the other third which is predominately Africa – below the modern Sahara.
Mixing between the descendants created numerous ethnic groups. Especially within what is now known as the Middle East, now controlled by Japhethitics or Japhethites.
After the flood (again pls pay attention) GOD split the world during the days of Peleg creating the continent we now know. Along with His separating the people at the tower of Babel with different languages.
What we here in this modern age call the Mediterranean and the Middle East was once controlled by the descendants of Shem, NOT the people who now hold possession. Furthermore, this is why DNA test have shown European DNA among the “natives” of eastern N Amer. No, look at a map and how the “continents” actually fit together.
Christ was born of Shem. This is why the White race is so predominately hated by the other two races. GOD had intended for us to work together, but satanic impulses prevent that.
This is why the “deception” spoken of in the New Testament has been a long ever growing issue — to blind the true Hebrew descendants. Then comes the greatest tribulation.
People want to hear the truth rather than study and search out the truth. Such is why deceptions have taken over the world of “Christianity”.
—– Joshua —–
Please pay attention — You just gave us your “Opinion”.
Are you a First Time Visitor?
If YES …….. Here is where I would start i.e., STUDY the position of Christian Identity, also known as Israelite Identity. Which, btw, is backed by Scripture, Hermeneutics, Archaeology, Linguistics, and History in general.
First —- Who is the Modern Jew — https://christiansfortruth.com/who-are-jews/
Second — The Case Against Racial Universalism (We all are of One Blood) — https://christiansfortruth.com/?s=universalism
You most likely will call us ‘racist’ so please read this article — https://christiansfortruth.com/a-christian-response-to-10-reasons-why-racism-is-a-sin-by-the-gospel-coalition/
This would be a good start.
Hope you come back. I have a feeling you won’t.
Hello West,
I don’t think you assumed too much at all but you made your point very clear from what Joshua clearly implied that the white races are of Shem, while the black and Asian from, I’m assuming, Ham and Japheth respectively.
“Christ was born of Shem. This is why the White race is so predominately hated by the other two races. GOD had intended for us to work together, but satanic impulses prevent that.”
Joshua also states that we are supposed to have worked together with the other races, when they aren’t mentioned in the bible at all (other than ‘beasts of the field’).
Joshua doesn’t see that Adam & Eve were both white, therefore impossible to create other races from them UNLESS something ‘else’ was added to the mix (as I’ve explained in other comments). When it comes to the earth we live on and Christianity, it’s really straight forward. It’s common sense.
—- Marcus —-
Thank you for the support. I tend to “hear” trigger words that I continuously hear from Evangelicals and presume exactly what they mean — without saying specifically.
Ex: Tower of Babel – God changed the races. Or … after the flood, Noah’s sons contained all the DNA to create (micro-evolution) all the races — White, black, yellow and red. Or … Adam and Eve contained all the DNA to cause micro-evolution and magically we get black, yellow and red peoples. Funny how that “micro-evolution” doesn’t happen anymore. At one point in History, it was VERY clear that 4 races existed on the Earth. Each living in completely separate places on the Earth. You’d think if their theology were correct, we would still be seeing micro-evolution.
It happened 4000 years ago. But not now. Why isn’t central Africa turning out white, yellow and red peoples? (rhetorical)
Joshua wasn’t specific, but Yes, you caught the same implication as I.
“…This is why the White race is so predominately hated by the other two races…”
What?!!!
He did speak of Jew Perfidy, so I kind of felt like maybe I jumped the gun. I admit, I’m tired and have lost a bit of patience.
But … considering Joshua has not returned to face criticism — I think our intuition is correct. Let us hope we are wrong.
Joshua — if you are reading this, we would sure like to know what you mean specifically.
I like how he says, “… People want to hear the truth rather than study and search out the truth. Such is why deceptions have taken over the world of “Christianity”…”
Appreciate you Marcus. Peace
Hello West,
You simply called it out for what it was; the implication, of course, the universalist belief that, somehow, contrary to all biological and anthropological knowledge, two more races, magically popped out of nowhere from a white couple’s copulation, most notably, Noah’s three offspring. Universalists fail to underst
and the passage of Noah being perfect in his generations.
I was compelled to reply because I just think it’s an important point simply because I loathe deception and this is yet more, amongst the quagmire of Jewish science which indoctrinates and brainwashes people into believing that which is completely unnatural and logical.
I hope Joshua comes back. This site is full of excellent articles and knowledgeable commenters and he could learn. It won’t be the first time universalists have drastically changed their beliefs when they see the gospel in a new light.
God bless
—— Joshua —–
Forgive me. I “assumed” too much in my first reply.
Help me understand your position more clearly …..
Simple Question — Where do the black, yellow and red races come from?
This will help me understand your comment.
Again, I apologize for reading too much into your comment without asking qualifying questions.
Thanks.
Cymroglyphics.com with Ross Broadstock and Alan Wilson (Hieroglyphs are written in Welsh-Khumryi)
Author Ross Broadstock demonstrates how the key to deciphering Egyptian hieroglyphs is not the Coptic language – it’s Welsh! This amazing discovery allows the ancient pictograms to be studied as never before, revealing more of the historical background of the Old Testament.
This book is a powerful tool for tracking the patriarchs in scripture. Moses, Joseph, Solomon, the Queen of Sheba and others apear in the hieroglyphs. This discovery confirms they were tru historical figures, which is critical in light of modern attempts to explain them as myths.
https://odysee.com/@louismarschalko:2/cymru-Hieroglyphs:4
Many original Brits came from Syria and Troy in ancient times.
True British history told by historian & author Alan Wilson.
Professor Lee Pennington & Dr Joy Pennington interviewed Alan Wilson in their house in 1994 when he was doing his lecture tour. Its old footage but the content needs to be heard. This area of research is not being done by anyone else, even though its of vital importance.
King Arthur and Khumric British History
King Arthur I son of Magnus Maximus of the late 4th Century AD and King Arthur II of the late 6th Century AD, can both trace their family lines back to the British Emperor Constantine the Great, and continue on back to the Holy Family itself which entered Britain in AD 37. Both King Arthur’s continue tracing their bloodline all the way back to King Brutus, himself a great grandson of Aeneas of Troy.
Brutus came to the Island of Britain around 500BC which was 150 years after Agamemnon and his Achaeans took the Kingdom of Troy (1200BC is the official date and is out by several hundred years).
The Khumry were a part of this major migration into Britain. The Khumry (Cymry-Welsh) were the original “lost” Ten Tribes who migrated North after the murder of Sennacherib (King of Assyria) in the early 7th Century BC. This huge migration of people ploughed their way through Asia Minor (modern day Turkey) and they are noted in Assyrian texts as the “Khumry”, whereas the Greeks called them “Cimmeroi”. They took with them the Ark of the Covenant which the authors prove in their book “The Discovery of the Ark of the Covenant” published in 2007.
This Khumric people were originally in Egypt before Moses led them out in the middle of the 14th Century BC, and their ancient Khumric language (Welsh Cymry) can still be used today with remarkable accuracy in translating the Egyptian Hieroglyphs, as the authors have already shown in their book “Moses in the Hieroglyphs” published in 2006.
Alan Wilson and Baram Blackett have been researching these Authentic British Histories for well over 35 years, and unfortunately have met with nothing but extreme opposition from the academic community. Surprisingly their major opposition is from the Church of Rome because of what their researches have unearthed regarding Jesus Christ and Christianity. This will be dealt with in a major forthcoming book.
When Augustine came to Britain in AD 597 he was astonished to find the British had their very own churches as well as priests and abbots etc. In fact the British Apostolic Christian religion was even more advanced than that of Rome. This all stems from a man called Jesus the Nazarene who arrived in Britain in AD 37.
Christianity was NOT introduced into Britain from Rome, but was actually taken TO Rome FROM Britain. This happened in AD 51 with King Caradoc who was forced to stay in Rome for seven years.
The fact is British History is the best recorded history in all of Europe and were it not for the Holy Family coming to Britain in AD 37 non of this would be a problem.
Since the beginning of the 18th Century AD there has been a major suppression of British History. To the academic community there is only the tunnel vision mentality of Roman Britain, or Saxon Britain, or Viking Britain, and if any major finds are made by archaeologists they inevitably end up in one of the three mentioned categories, heaven forbid they be Khumric-British – of which there are VAST amounts.
Alan Wilson and his life-long fellow researcher Baram Blackett have written and published nine books.
Their books published to date (oldest first) are as follows:
1 – Arthur, King of Glamorgan and Gwent.
2 – Arthur and the Charter of Kings.
3 – Arthur the War King
4 – Artorius Rex Discovered
5 – The Holy Kingdom
6 – The King Arthur Conspiracy
7 – Moses in the Hieroglyphs
8 – The Discovery of the Ark of the Covenant
9 – The Trojan War of 650 BC
https://odysee.com/@louismarschalko:2/Ancient-British-Troy:d
Hello Normant,
“The Khumry were a part of this major migration into Britain. The Khumry (Cymry-Welsh) were the original “lost” Ten Tribes”
If so, who then are the Irish, Scots, Germanic peoples, Norse and other Europeans? Are they a mix of Japhethites, Hamites and Shemites? To me ‘Saxons’ (Isaac’s sons) is self explanatory. And of course Paul telling the Greeks they’re Israelites. Would it not be more appropriate to say that the Khumry are one of the original lost ten tribes?
The above referenced video containing a copy of this original 1902 article can be found here at this link below:
https://odysee.com/@louismarschalko:2/1902-article-discusses-that-the-Welsh-are-part-of-the-Ten-Lost-Tribes-of-Israel:3
Without being a historian but a History reader, one of the early English historian, Hume omits
any relevant inclusion of Jews in England, perhaps due to the Anglican rule and Jews returning
from Portuguese, Netherlands and the Rothschild Banking interference in British politics.
Whenever placing a magnifying glass on Jewish-Britain relations, it’s worth a comment on Bernard
Lazare’s “Antisemitism and it’s Causes” warning about Jews loosing Britain’s support, indeed not
because of political convenience but from parting ways from a symbiotic connivance resulting from
Freemasonry, brought from and growing from the 1st Century of the Roman conquest that mixed
with already dwelling 27 tribes according to Tacitus and Ptolomeic History. More tractable path can be find
between the Sages of Israel and the Druids (Wales), considered the 10th tribe of Judah. In Coincidence,
were persecuted by roman Legions about the same time of 1st Century.
The anglos are from HAM – CHAM. There was large population of people in english isles BEFORE EXODUS. So how they Amglos can be any of the twelve tribes. The SAXON came much later to english isles. The SAXON are fro 12 tribes. The word HAM – CHAM is all over the england.-NotingHAM – Hamsted – WestHam – Tottenham – BirmingHAM………
The word HAM – CHAM means cruel as the anglos are and their father CHAM who “seen nakedness of his father”. The SAXON have nothing to do with SAXON. I see the anglos as liars and heartless beast, when they starved two million Irish and thousands sold to slavery. They starve 25 thousend White Boers children in South Africa on behalf the jewish rats who owned the english isles from 1694 and call it “Brishit empire”, yes for jewish rats in London.
Adolf,
We aren’t sure where you got this information, but it is incorrect. There is no indication that the descendants of Ham settled England or Europe.
There were earlier tribes, such as the Japethites, that settled in Europe before the Israelites, but that doesn’t prove that the Israelites did not arrive in later waves of migration.
The word “ham” found in many British place-names has nothing to do with Ham of the Bible.
In Old English, the word “ham” means “village” or “home”. The English word “home” has Germanic origins — from the word “heim” — similar to the German towns and cities that end in “heim” — common in Germany, Denmark, and Norway:
home. Proto-Germanic *haimaz “home” (source also of Old Frisian hem “home, village,” Old Norse heimr “residence, world,” heima “home,” Danish hjem, Middle Dutch heem, German heim “home,” Gothic haims “village”). This is reconstructed to be from a suffixed form of PIE root *tkei- “to settle, dwell, be home.”
https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=home
You will find many German towns and cities with the “heim” suffix:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cities_and_towns_in_Germany
Of course, just like English, the German word “heim” has nothing to do with Ham of the Bible.
The descendants of HAM – CHAM came to england isles long before Jacob and his sons settle in Egypt. Before exodus was large population, hundred of thousands if not millions of White people in english isles. So how they can’t be of twelve tribes when is a Biblical record of Jacob descendants how many they came to Egypt and how many came out in Exodus.
The whole north Africa was White, so they find their way to so call english isles. They HAMITES from Cham came from north Africa and took right ANGLE north to enlish isles. I read that somewhere long time a go in my 35 years study, I don’t remember what book. I think that was some book in German or Russian language. When I find out I let you know. HAM – CHAM means CRUEL as the english are, they kill millions of their White Brothers from Jacob and never feel sorry about that. Mentality of the anglos are much different than European from JACOB twelve tribes. Brishit empire was for few rotten jews in London who own the Brishit central bank on england.
PROOF me wrong.
Adolf,
You’re simply repeating yourself, and haven’t offered any new evidence or proof to support your claim.
Since you have made a positive claim — that the English people descend from Ham — it is your obligation to prove it, and not our obligation to disprove it.
Above, we most certainly disproved your claim that English town names derive from the name of “Ham” in the Bible — and showed that both English and German towns have this same Germanic word in common.
We also made it clear that the Isralites came into Europe in waves, not all at one time, so it’s irrelevant to claim which people got here first. Different tribes from the Near East mixed with each other over thousands of years — they do not have one single ancestry.
What is true, as this article points out, is that the Welsh speak a language that comes from the Near East from a people who are Israelite in origins. You have not disproven that.
The ancient Aryans from Persia were descended from different Adamic peoples — whether Cushites, Japhethites, and/or Shemites — but they are but one of many tribes that would eventually comprise the Germanic people of Europe.
For example, the Goths — a Germanic people — mostly likely descended from the Parthians and Scythians — who were mixed with Israelites, Medes, and others from former Assyria. But all the Goths didn’t settle just in Germany — many moved west into France (Gaul), Spain, and Portugal.
It’s way too simple to claim that either the English or German people descend from single tribes mentioned in the Bible or ancient history. Germany is in the heart of Europe — so many different tribes moved into and through Germany to the west as it was settled, mixing many different tribes.
The archeological evidence across Europe proves that migration happened in waves at different times, and yes, the Israelites were among the later waves, but still around 500 BC isn’t exactly early….
Read Stephen Collins’ book on the subject in our library:
The Lost Ten Tribes of Israel…Found
https://christiansfortruth.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/The-Lost-Ten-Tribes-Of-Israel…Found_.pdf
—– Adolf Richtar —–
No offense — but please just say what you believe is your Theory. Nothing wrong with speculating/postulating/theorizing.
When we go so far back in time — you really better have concrete Proofs of your Objective Statements.
I think Cain must have encountered the Yellow peoples first — so his wife was most likely yellow. Can I prove that? NO. But it makes the most sense to me, based on where the other non-adamics were most likely originated. Can’t prove any of it. But I can theorize the most likely scenario.
The blacks were most likely in Central Africa and they didn’t have the IQ nor the skills to travel outside of Central Africa. I highly doubt Cain made his way into central Africa. Most likely he went East and encountered the yellow peoples who are probably the oldest hominins. Again …. all Theory.
There is a man who believes the Garden of Eden was Britain. He always speaks “Matter of Fact” but offers no proof. So, it’s just his theory. Interesting nonetheless.
Your “Theory” is interesting. But I think CFT has thrown at you plenty of reasons to doubt your theory. “Ham” is a mystery. What did that curse actually mean for the future generations of Ham??? Who knows.
This entire subject just seems silly to take such an Objective stand.
I think your motivation is ‘hate’ for the British. That would be my guess. I certainly can understand that. The British seem to be the first real Traitors of our People in the modern world. Going back to Cromwell.
Anyway ……………. just “speculate”. No big deal. Call it your Theory.
Cheers.
Here English men talking about the 5 million Irish starved by the Anglos.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Nsjipn4KHPbs/
—– Adolf ——
“…Here English men talking about the 5 million Irish starved by the Anglos….”
Yea, what about it?
This thread is about the Welsh though. The Welsh, much like the Irish, are not Anglo-Saxon (though I don’t dispute that they have may traces of Anglo-Saxon DNA). I think the Welsh might have the closest phenotype to the ancient Israelites.
—– James Smith —–
Clarification — Who are you replying to? “… this thread is about the Welsh though…”
If you notice — at some point in the comment thread, WHO is being replied to is not direct. Once the thread grows, it is very hard to tell WHO is being replied to.
Curious though — Would you not say that when we are talking about Adamic Man — once we get into, for a lack of a better term — Tribes of Adamic Peoples — what we are really talking about is “Ethnicity”. Right?
Not Race i.e., Kind.
The Israelites were of Hebrew Ethnicity — BUT — were Pure Adamic Man.
The French, the Spanish, the Germans, the Danes, the Welsh …. et., al., at one point in time were PURE Adamic Man — most likely from one or a mix of the Tribes of Israel. With the possibility of Japeth seed being mixed in as well.
Agreed?
Ps. Pure Adamic Man = White/Caucasian/European.
@West
I was replying to Adolf Richtar in the post I made about the Welsh. I’ll try adding @ more often. I just didn’t think it would affect that post.
And yes, all Europeans have an Adamic origin. Northwestern Europeans are likely to be the closest to the Israelites though.
There were Japhethites in Spain, Greece, and the Slavic lands. I believe Israelites mixed with the Japhethites that were present in those nations. I question how Adamic those nations are now though.
And talking about another point you’ve made in this thread, do you think Cain’s descendants are still around? If so, what kind of nations?
—- James Smith —–
Thank you for your understanding.
You asked — “…. do you think Cain’s descendants are still around? If so, what kind of nations? ……”
Great Question. Thanks for asking.
I believe, or, in my opinion, when Cain was “driven away”, he wandered East and found the Yellow pre-adamites.
Is his DNA still around? I suppose it is possible. I am not a scientist who might understand DNA i.e., blood, as it may or may not be completely eradicated through continual procreation of a different “kind”. Question — can Adamic Blood be completely eradicated through continual procreation with a non-adamic? Dilution.
I think it is possible that maybe Cain himself, or his first progeny may have procreated “back into” Adamic Man. Which would have then extended the life of his blood. Maybe this is the first true “Jew”.
For me ….. a “Jew” would be an Adamic man or woman who mixes their seed with a non-adamic — thus the result, the mamzer, would be a “Jew” i.e., a broken vessel. More susceptible to the spirit of anti-christ. Odd definition, but it works in my mind. Sure …. an Adamic man can still open his spirit to the spirit of anti-christ, but I would say the mamzer to have the more likelihood of evil. Kind of like opening that portal to hell.
This is the only way that I can explain the peculiar evil of modern jewry. They just are so unique. Howard Stern comes to mind only because I am familiar with him. The guy just can’t help himself. I think his mom is a so called “gentile”. You can see this inner turmoil — he can be sweet and genuine for a minute, then a total vile disgusting creature the next. All jews tend to be like this. They just can’t help themselves, even though sometimes they seem good hearted.
I am very uncomfortable around mixed race peoples with White admixture. They just seem more unpredictable than a pure non-white. I’ve had a few non-white associations and I was more comfortable around them than any mixed race white person. If that makes any sense.
I have a theory that some of the dispersed Israelites went East — procreated with the Yellow and perhaps this is the Japanese. There is a small tribe of Japanese who study Judaism and I think claim to be Israelites. Can’t help to wonder if the Japanese have Israelite admixture. Especially the light or pale ones. The females are sometimes very beautiful.
Hope that wasn’t too confusing. 😉 Cheers.
Angles didn’t arrive in the British Isles until the 5th century AD, so people living in the British Isles doesn’t mean they aren’t from the 12 tribes. The population in Northern Europe was low before the Exodus.
The Bell Beaker were the first white group there. I have good reason to believe the Bell Beaker culture came from Shem’s son Lud.
The Celts were the second major group in the British Isles, then the Germanic tribes such as the Angles were third.
The only European groups that I can see plausibly having Ham as an ancestor are all in Southern Europe.
‘Ham’ means ‘Home’ as in the German ‘Heim’. But the Anglo-Saxons are a cruel golem
It’s amazing how this has been so suppressed. You’d think churches would be spreading this, but they all seem to have swallowed “the jews” propaganda from the Khazars. Thankfully, I think Magog’s time is almost up, and it’s going to be ugly when it comes.
You’d think….yes, and it would allow them to all get rid of their dispensational dog and pony show, and not fret how the “gentiles” will somehow get saved. It would make the gospels much easier to understand….the simplicity that is in Christ, as Paul said.
Maybe white Europeans just don’t want the responsibility of being literal Israelites….they’d have to change their ways. Who wants that?
What really gets me is that not only is there actual historical documentation that indicates these folks have one of the oldest churches around (a good indicator of being actual Israelites, as that’s who Jesus and the apostils targeted specifically).
The Bible is clear that Israel was commanded not to mix, even in exile. It’s obvious white westerns didn’t do that that I can see, they just married older waves of Israelites who had left in previous decades.
I remember seeing some folks from one of the founding orthodox churches in Asian that still spoke Aramaic, and they were as Caucasoid and white as they could be (blue eyes included).
So good to see you back brother ! I hope all is well again.
I myself suffered my 5th heart attack last week. Jesus definetly has our backs for sure.
Im currently reading “Christ the Healer” by F.F Bosworth. Pretty inspiring read.
I remember the Welsh historian Alan Wilson said in an interview that the Khumrie inscriptions on the obelisk found by Layard in Nineveh, if read aloud, could be understood by any Welsh speaker. Real smoking gun proof that this evidence is not just guess work.
Is there any group I can join to further discuss this?
Med:
If you’re asking if there is a specific group that discusses this part of Welsh history, we do not know of any, but that doesn’t mean they don’t exist.
Alan Wilson’s old website has now shut down after his death.
If you want to discuss the Israelite Identity of the European people, this website has a lot of knowledgeable people to help answer your questions.
@Med – Here you go:
https://www.youtube.com/@BritainsHiddenHistoryRoss
https://brithiddenhistory.boards.net/
More:
https://www.youtube.com/@calebhowells1116
https://www.youtube.com/@AncientHistoria
Excellent. Thank you.
For more on this, see writings by E Raymond Capt.
I was Protestant CI for many decades….WPGale….then remarkably I was introduced to traditional Catholicism….doubted it at first….did the research….amazing find.
CI is embedded in original Catholicism….’poor banished children of Eve’….look it up….now I got it all..
my website has further info in the forum..
I am currently fighting all the fake Catholic Churches….yes there are many..
St Ambrose of Milan–
Saint Ambrose (b. around 340), another prominent Church Father, described the Jews in 379 as,
“…the most worthless of all men. They are lecherous, greedy, rapacious. They are perfidious murderers of Christ. They worship the Devil. Their religion is a sickness. The Jews are the odious assassins of Christ and for killing God there is no expiation possible, no indulgence or pardon. Christians may never cease vengeance, and the Jew must live in servitude forever. God always hated the Jews. It is essential that all Christians hate them.”
In 388 Ambrose defended another bishop accused before the emperor of burning down a synagogue. The emperor ordered the offending bishop to rebuild the synagogue, to which Ambrose demanded of the emperor,
“Who cares if a synagogue – a home of unbelief, a house of impiety, a receptacle of folly, which God himself has condemned – is burned?”
“Coming down from the altar to face him, the bishop declared he would not continue the Eucharist until the emperor obeyed. The emperor bowed to this threat of excommunication.”