(Jerusalem Post) A local Italian politician said that he felt offended because a Holocaust survivor and senator for life noted that Jesus was Jewish, Italian media reported:
Fabio Tuiach, a member of the municipal council of Trieste, made the comment ahead of a council vote on a motion proposing to award Auschwitz survivor Liliana Segre the city’s honorary citizenship.
As can be seen in a video of a November-18 meeting published by Italian daily La Repubblica, Tuiach called Segre a “nice little granny” and said that he would be willing to invite her over for tea “like [right-wing League leader Matteo] Salvini did.” He added that he had the highest admiration for her considering that she witnessed one of the ugliest pages in history.
“As a devout Catholic, I was confused and also a little offended by the fact that she said that Jesus was Jewish,” he then said, slightly mumbling as he added that “he was the son of God, he was God for me; therefore I will abstain.”
In the video, it is possible to hear other council members roaring in the background.
According to the Italian online magazine Open, Tuiach, 39, is a professional boxer, and he was elected with the League, before moving to the neo-fascist party Forza Nuova, and subsequently expelled after justifying the murder of a detainee on drug charges by the Italian police forces. In the past, he also called Islam’s prophet Mohammed “a pedophile.”
His words about Jesus sparked widespread outrage and criticism, with many pointing out how, as a devout Catholic, Tuiach could have simply found out about Jesus’ Jewishness by reading the Bible.
Jews have been playing a racial shell game for thousands of years now — by their own admission, in their own books, they completely fabricated their identity as Israelites — and the Christian world bought it.
Jesus was a Judahite — not a “Jew” — which is a relatively modern term which describes a completely different people of dubious origins with admixture from many different races and cultures.
To suggest that Jesus Christ was a blood relation to Marty Feldman, Barbara Streisand, Jerry Seinfeld or Mel Brooks is so preposterous that should be utterly rejected without a second thought.
Today’s Jews have been pretending to be Judahites for the last 2,000 years — and unfortunately even the Catholic Church has granted them this undeserved racial identity which has been an unmitigated disaster for Christians who have fallen for this bait and switch con game.
But the message here is clear: when the evil “Nazis” killed 6 million “Jews”, it was the equivalent of crucifying 6 million Christs. And if you disagree, you’re an antisemite.
Christian identity is true apostolic Christianity. The Bible itself confirms what Josephus wrote and is accepted as secular history. He was an Essene, Which means that he was a pure blooded Israelite of the tribe of Judah who came out of the Roman province of Judea which was controlled by Edomites as noted in the book of Maccabees which is the last book of the old testament. Anybody saying anything different is a liar or an idiot
Christian Identity movement is struggling as it is the work of Judiazers. Go ye therefore unto all nations. Great commission is clear all nation. The Jews lost there nation and were cursed to wander among the nations as a hissing. The bible says all men were mad from one blood. Acts 17:26 From one man he created all the nations throughout the whole earth. He decided beforehand when they should rise and fall, and he determined their boundaries.
The Jews lost there nation and boundaries 2000yrs ago. Many Jews in Israel do not fight for they say that God never commanded them to return. There is no national salvation for any nation just individuals who turn and repent that are added to the commonwealth of Israel. These the residue church are a nation among all nations see 1 Peter 2 you are a hly nation who were formally not a people….
….said the Judaizer….
You fail to mention A) That the “All nations” of the bible = the nations descended from Adam listed in Genesis 10 and their offshoots, B) That the children of Israel had been scattered and driven into those all nations long before Jesus’ ministry, and C) That the New Covenant, the purpose of sending the apostles to those nations, was made exclusively with the children of Israel. The 12 tribes. It makes perfect sense for the apostles to take the gospel to all nations since that’s where the Israelites were/are.
“But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.” Mat 15:24
“For I am with thee, saith the LORD, to save thee: though I make a full end of all nations whither I have scattered thee, yet will I not make a full end of thee: but I will correct thee in measure, and will not leave thee altogether unpunished.” Jer 30:11
“Hear the word of the LORD, O ye nations, and declare it in the isles afar off, and say, He that scattered Israel will gather him, and keep him, as a shepherd doth his flock.” Jer 31:10
“Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel (10 northern tribes), and with the house of Judah (2 southern tribes).” Jer 31:31
“And other sheep I have (the Israelites scattered among the nations), which are not of this fold (the remnant Israelites in Judaea, Galilee, and Samaria): them also I must bring, and they shall hear my voice; and there shall be one fold, and one shepherd.” Jn 10:16
The phrase “of one blood” was inserted into the text, but even so the passage is about Adam and the nations descended from him, the rest of the bible make it clear that there are non Adamic peoples on earth, beginning in Genesis 3, and confirmed numerous times by Jesus Christ, especially in the Mat 13 parable of the wheat and tares, and the discourse in John 8 where he tells Idumeans living in Judaea that they’re not from God, like Adam and his descendants are, but are from the serpent and Cain. (ye are from beneath)
God never gave anyone called “Jews” any territory in Palestine, it was given to the 12 tribes of Israel, and a nation is a people not a land or country. Since Jews descend primarily from the Idumeans who moved en masse into Judaea circa the 1st century BC (Josephus, Antiquities 13.9.1, The Jewish Encyclopedia Edox/Idumea) the only thing they lost was their illegitimate residence in the land, and their usurped control over the remnant Israelites’ institutions. Which is why Paul refers to the destruction of Jerusalem in AD70 as “bruising Satan” under the Romans’ feet in Romans 16:20.
Malachi 1:1-4, Ezekiel 35 & 36 prophecy the illegitimate return of Edom/Idumea to the old territory of the Israelites. ie Palestine.
Salvation was literally promised to Israel asa nation, hence the New Covenant made with Israel as a nation, an nobody can be “added to the commonwealth of Israel” – First of all because the commonwealth of Israel was the remnant children of Israel from the tribes of Judah and Benjamin living in their sanctioned territory until they left during the first century, and because it’s impossible to transform someone into. a descendant of someone they didn’t actually descend from. Paul was clearly referring to the Israelites in dispersion being reunited with their Israelite brethren in the land, prior to the destruction of Jerusalem.
it’s absolutely hysterical that you cite 1 Peter 2 as evidence that anyone can become an Israelite (a ridiculous concept that isn’t possible) considering he’s quoting Exodus 19:5 & 6 regarding the children of Israel, and Hosea 1:8-11 regarding the children of Israel:
1Pe 2:9-10:
“But ye are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar people; that ye should shew forth the praises of him who hath called you out of darkness into his marvellous light:
Which in time past were not a people, but are now the people of God: which had not obtained mercy, but now have obtained mercy.”
Exo 19:5-6:
“Now therefore, if ye will obey my voice indeed, and keep my covenant, then ye shall be a peculiar treasure unto me above all people: for all the earth is mine:
And ye shall be unto me a kingdom of priests, and an holy nation. These are the words which thou shalt speak unto the children of Israel.”
Hosea 1:8-11
“Now when she had weaned Loruhamah, she conceived, and bare a son.
Then said God, Call his name Loammi: for ye are not my people, and I will not be your God.
YET THE NUMBER OF THE CHILDREN OF ISRAEL SHALL BE AS THE SAND OF THE SEA, which cannot be measured nor numbered; AND IT SHALL COME TO PASS, THAT IN THE PLACE WHERE IT WAS SAID UNTO THEM, YE ARE NOT MY PEOPLE, THERE IT SHALL BE SAID UNTO THEM, YE ARE THE SONS OF THE LIVING GOD.
Then shall the children of Judah and the children of Israel be gathered together (REUNITED), and appoint themselves one head, and they shall come up out of the land: for great shall be the day of Jezreel.”
I’m sure you thought those verses from 1Pe 2 were real zingers. lol
This is the problem with so called “New Testament Christians” who don’t know the old testament scriptures, you’re easily fooled by false teachings.
Dox, Russ is a stubborn judeo-Christian dispensationalist and will not listen to reason. Everything you’ve said here has been pointed out to him repeatedly, but he won’t budge. He disappeared after he realized that no one would listen to his judeo-shtick. Most readers here would agree with what you’ve said.
You should be careful about relying on anything cited by Josephus. He was not a “Roman”. He was a jew who had been given Roman citizenship.
This statement is incorrect. Josephus was NOT a racial Jew who had been given Roman citizenship like Herod and most Edomites living in Judea at that time. Josephus was racially a White Israelite but also a practicing Pharisee, which confuses most people into thinking he was a racial Jew, which is patently false. The apostle Paul was also a racial Israelite and an early Pharisee, but that didn’t make him a racial Jew, as most people mistakenly still believe.
And now add Ashkenazim to the mix of people pretending to be Judahites as most of them now are of Ashkenaz who was of Japheth
Ashkenaz is also the deception of the Jews they are a race all on their own.
the Jews were never part of the 12 tribes of Israel they where infiltrators like they are doing now.
Equating the modern jew with any Biblical Adamic bloodline is completely contradictory to the message of Scripture, and does a complete disservice to your God and your brethren. Jews, from their very inception, are bastards – period. They have no claim to any Adamic bloodline, as these bloodlines are ONLY recognized according to God’s law.
Christ made this perfectly clear when these Edomite jews dared make the claim to Him that they were Abraham’s seed and that they were not born of fornication (the exact same claim being made today by these same jews, but bringing in all hominids under the tents of Shem – “we’re all human”). He told them in no uncertain terms, “If you were children of Abraham, you would have performed the works of Abraham. I can raise up children of Abraham from these rocks!”
Attributing anything Biblical to these hated parasites other than identifying them as GOD’S ENEMIES plays right into their grubby little hands…
Being a former Catholic, I can honestly say the best thing about other Catholics is that they are usually very proud to be Catholic. Catholicism also does NOT teach Jesus was a jew. If anything, they avoid discussing the jew, but in no way equate themselves with jews.
The best thing about Catholics is that they are far more likely to be race realists and antisemites than Protestants. No doubt this was a light-hearted and well-deserved antisemitic jab at this jewish fraudster.
Hey! I resemble that remark! lmwao
GOOD ON HIM for telling the TRUTH!
NOWHERE does the Bible say Jesus was a jew. Obviously, Jesus was not a jew, if for nothing else, ‘By their fruits ye shall know them’. Jesus tells the pharisees that they are NOT ‘of Abraham’ [hence also Isaac and Jacob], therefore they are NOT Israelites. Its a no brainer.
Being ‘catholic’ , this ol boy may have made the statement out of ignorance as the antiChrist system of catholicism teaches its adherents virtually nothing, and what it does teach is usually wrong. BUT….maybe this will start the guy – and others- to actually look into it and find the Truth. One can hope – and I pray – so.
Let’s try not to fight amongst our Christian selves too much.
It ruined us historically… cui bono ?