[Original article has been updated and republished.]
(Jewish Telegraphic Agency) Jewish supremacists have apparently wielded their power once again to force the director of a British educational website to apologize for posting an offline homework assignment in which Jews were blamed in the killing of Jesus:
Chris Spolton, who runs the Topmarks site, removed the assignment earlier this week following a complaint by a mother, Joanne Bell. Her 7-year-old son had been instructed by his religious studies teacher at school to complete the assignment before Bell saw it and flagged it on social media, the Daily Mail reported Thursday.
“What harm has it ever done to portray Jews as bloodthirsty and solely responsible for the death of the believed son of G-d, Jesus,” she tweeted sarcastically.
The school whose teacher gave the assignment also apologized to Bell.
The assignment included a slide titled “The Trial of Jesus” saying that “the Jewish leaders wanted Jesus to be guilty” and “paid people to lie about him” and had him taken to Pontius Pilate, the Roman governor, on charges of insulting God. A second slide describes Pilate as bowing to the will of the Jewish masses and their “chief priests, who wanted Jesus to die,” before agreeing to have Jesus crucified.
The Catholic Church in a 1965 document titled Nostra Aetate asserted that “the Jewish authorities and those who followed their lead pressed for the death of Christ” but that this cannot be “charged” against Jews today or all the Jews who were alive during the Crucifixion.
Spolton made the slides 20 years ago when he was “young and naive,” he wrote to Bell, and “based on books found in the local library.”
The crucifixion creates quite a quandary for today’s Jews –the vast majority of whom are Ashkenazi Jews whose ancestors can be traced back to the Khazar Empire rather than the land of ancient Israel — according to Jewish professor Shlomo Sand in his book The Invention Of The Jewish People.
That’s not to say that Sephardic Jews are any more legitimate Israelites than the Khazars are — they, too, are comprised of a itinerant, mixed multitude whose claim to Israel identity is equally spurious.
When the Khazars converted to Babylonian Judaism in around 900 AD — and took on the identity of the biblical “Jews” — they also tacitly — and perhaps unwittingly — agreed to take the heat for the murder of Christ.
Before their conversion to Judaism, the Khazars were a mixed Turkic-Mongol race of people who have no direct connection to the Israelites of Judea in the time of Christ.
The Times Of Israel published an article admitting that DNA tests prove the Khazar identity of today’s Ashkenazim.
We know from John 1:11 that Christ was indeed rejected by some of “His own“ — and His “own” being Israelites from the tribes of Judah, Benjamin, and Levi — collectively known as “Jews” in the New Testament — which the Khazar converted “Jews” of today falsely claim to be.
In fact, there are numerous verses (see graphic below) in the New Testament that clearly demonstrate that there were Israelites living in Judea who stubbornly refused to accept Christ as the promised Messiah of Israel — while the majority of Israelites in Judea did accept Him.
So in a sense, the Catholic Church was technically correct in stating that today’s “Jews” should not be blamed for the murder of Christ — simply because they are not the same people — they are not legitimate descendants of the Israelites from Judea at the time of Christ.
But today’s “Jews” cannot openly admit they are not the same Jews from the time of Christ — because that would expose their fraud of assuming the identity of the real Israelites — God’s chosen people — and all the power that identity affords them, especially in the eyes of Christians.
Yet despite not being racial Israelites, today’s Khazar Jews — both “religious” and secular — never the less have a burning hatred for Christ and His followers — their “holy” book the Talmud claims He was the son of a whore and is burning in hell in his own excrement.
As such, they have voluntarily taken on the role of Anti-Christ in the world today — and with it both the power and condemnation of the eternal adversary of God.
They literally want their cake and eat it too — they want us to accept them as true Israelites — as God’s chosen people — but don’t want to be blamed for what those true “men of Israel” did — calling for the death of their own Messiah.
And the way they are going to solve this dilemma is to do what Jews always do — demand that those “offensive” passages from the New Testament be censored or removed — and then pass laws that will make it illegal — upon the pain of death — to make any claims of deicide against the so-called “Jews.”
Yet they pushed c r t propogandas and a book about the jws were prosecuted by European Christians in mid evil times while claiming they didn’t have money returned to them and couldn’t own land. Everyone should find out about what lies children are reading in schools its pure propogandas aimed against Christian Europeans. The books and authors are despicable. They are against antisemitism also hate on colored minorities but what about hateful discrimination and lies towards Christianity Europeans. Like falsley claiming many of the Christian ones prosecuted and were cruel towards Jws and or Islam ones in Mid evil times while the schools ignore the cruel crimes from those who weren’t Christian Europeans against Christianity Europeans! Pure psychological manipulation and brainwashing propogandas they are involved with in the schools. Thats wrong also I noticed more Arab islamlcs in schools now then before.
A Report by Benjamin Freedman: Jesus was NOT a Jew – an excerpt from a letter
Benjamin H. Freedman, Jewish Historian – Researcher – Scholar.
From “Common Sense”, p. 2-1-53 and 5-1-59
http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/jesusjew.htm
“Christians have been duped by the unholiest hoax in all history, by so-called Jews. This is considered their most effective weapon.”
“This ‘big lie’ technique is brainwashing United States Christians into believing that Jesus Christ was “King of the Jews”, in the sense that so-called ‘Jews’ today call themselves ‘Jews’. This reference was first made in English translations of the Old and New Testaments, centuries before the so-called Jews highjacked the word ‘Jew’ in the 18th century A.D. to palm themselves off on the Christian world as having a kinship with Jesus Christ. This alleged kinship comes from the myth of their common ancestry with the so-called ‘Jews’ of the Holy Land in the Old Testament history, a fiction based on fable.” …
https://www.educate-yourself.org/cn/Jesusnotajew24apr10.shtml
INRI …
Was Jesus a Jew?
“jews” are Edomites. Messiah was of Ephraim-Jacob.
Yes, as in from the tribe of Judah, one of the 12 Israelite tribes. There were also Edomites/cainenites back then and today that falsely claim that they were/are Jews but are not, they were from their father the devil and the synagogue of Satan as Christ told us.
About the treachery, “Cardinal Bea, the Jews, and Nostra Aetatae”
by Dr. E. Michael Jones, Culture Wars, July/August 2006.
download here http://judaism.is/assets/cardinal-bea%2c-the-jews%2c-and-nostra-aetate.pdf
big lies • “the Romans did it” http://judaism.is/the-romans-did-it.html
The New Testament describes the plotting and fixes blame upon the Pharisees (John 11:47-53, John 18:14). See also:
They plotted to have Him delivered to the chief priest and condemned to death (Mark 10:33, Matthew 20:18-19, Luke 18:31-33).
They plotted together to seize Jesus by stealth and to kill him (Matthew 26:4, Luke 22:2, John 7:1).
“And the chief priests and the whole council sought false witness against Jesus, that they might put him to death” (Matthew 26:59).
Jesus openly asked them, “Why seek you to kill me?” (John 7:20).
It was obvious also to the people, who asked, “Is not this he whom they seek to kill?” (John 7:25).
The “chief priests and elders took counsel against Jesus to put him to death” and “delivered him to Pilate” (Matthew 27:1-2, Mark 15:1, Luke 23:1).
“Pilate knew that because of envy they had delivered him up” (Matthew 27:18, Mark 15:10).
“seeking to destroy him” (Mark 11:18, Luke 19:47).
Pilate asked them, “What are you willing to give to me to deliver him up to you?” The “chief priests and elders persuaded the multitudes to ask for Barabbas and put Jesus to death” (Matthew 27:20, Mark 15:11, Luke 23:18, John 18:40).
“…And they shouted, ‘crucify him!’ and ‘he ought to die’” (Matthew 27:22-23, Mark 15:13-14, Luke 23:21-23, John 19:6-7).
Pilate “delivered Jesus to their will” (Matthew 27:26, Mark 15:15, Luke 23:24-25).
The Jews acknowledged their responsibility: “His blood be upon us and upon our children” (Matthew 27:25).
Jesus confirmed to Pilate that the sin of the Jewish leaders was greater than that of Pilate in buckling to Jewish pressure. Jesus said, “For this reason he who delivered me up to you has the greater sin” (John 19:11-12).
“… the chief priests and rulers delivered him up to the sentence of death and crucified Him” (Luke 24:20).
St. Peter spoke to them of the death of Jesus whom “ye have taken and by wicked hands have crucified and slain” (Acts 2:23), Jesus, “whom ye have crucified” (Acts 2:36).
“… but ye denied the Holy One and the Just, and desired a murderer to be granted unto you and killed the Prince of Life.” (Acts 3:14)
St. Peter tells the high priest and rulers that they are guilty for the spilling of the blood “of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, whom ye crucified” (Acts 4:10).
“The God of our fathers raised up Jesus whom ye slew and hanged on a tree” (Acts 5:30).
St. Stephen told the Jews they were Jesus’ “betrayers and murderers” (Acts 7:52).
St. Paul testified, “And finding no cause of death in him, they desired of Pilate, that they might kill him” (Acts 13:28) and that the Jews “…both killed the Lord Jesus, and the prophets, and have persecuted us, and please not God, and are adversaries to all men” (1 Thessalonians 2:14-16).
Even the parable of the vineyard and the husbandmen (Matthew 21:38 , Mark 12:7) makes it clear.
“But the husbandmen seeing the son, said among themselves: This is the heir: come, let us kill him, and we shall have his inheritance.”
Hear ye another parable. There was a man, an householder, who planted a vineyard, and made a hedge round about it, and dug in it a press, and built a tower, and let it out to husbandmen; and went into a strange country. And when the time of the fruits drew nigh, he sent his servants to the husbandmen that they might receive the fruits thereof. And the husbandmen laying hands on his servants, beat one, and killed another, and stoned another. Again he sent other servants more than the former; and they did to them in like manner. And last of all he sent to them his son, saying: They will reverence my son. But the husbandmen seeing the son, said among themselves: This is the heir: come, let us kill him, and we shall have his inheritance. And taking him, they cast him forth out of the vineyard, and killed him. When therefore the lord of the vineyard shall come, what will he do to those husbandmen? Mathew 21:33-39
NOTE TWO KEY ELEMENTS OF THE PARABLE:
the murderers knew he was the Son — “This is the heir.”
they plotted to kill Him “to have his inheritance.”
Think about that. What will He do to those husbandmen?
Mark 12:9 answers:
“He will come and destroy those husbandmen; and will give the vineyard to others.”
Occam’s razor:
What are the chances of an unrelated people unerringly adopting every last detail, every last jot and tittle, of racial and cultural characteristics of an ancient people with whom they never had any connection, more than a millennium after the fact? Furthermore, what are the chances this would happen merely because a king commanded it of his people? Look at other religions adopted by other races. How many have remained completely intact with no deviation from the original? Since the time of Saul/Paul, Christianity has evolved into some 3000 different sects, Judaism has but one with minor variations.
More to the point, what are the chances that a race of pathological liars made up the story to confuse the gullible goyim, obfuscating and distancing themselves, not only from the murder of Jesus, but from all the murderous Biblical characters?
Arch, that’s just it. The “Jewish religion”, contrary to what you seem to claim is NOT the religion of the Hebrews in the Bible. Judaism is a refutation or antithesis of the Torah or Old Testament. That’s what you are missing here. Judaism is Talmudism, which arose after the death of Christ, and is a refutation and denial of Christ. Talmudism is babylonian, not Israelite.
They pretend to be Israelites while refuting Israelitism. And because they reject the Old Testament, they do not follow God at all, but their own traditions, not unlike the Catholics, who, by the way, use your very same argument to claim Jews are the Israelites. Why? Catholics make similar claims to legitimacy, tracing their apostolic succession back to Peter and then Christ. They claim unbroken tradition for the last 2,000 years; therefore, they claim, we are the only legitimate Christian faith. That’s not a valid argument for either the Catholics or the Jews.
Exactly. If you read Obadiah, for example, it will become clear that when Judah was taken into captivity, Esau moved in and populated Judah, who was sold after slavery to Greece (Joel 3.6).
Ezekiel declares that Esau wanted THOSE TWO NATIONS – both Israel and Judah, to put his claim falsely, that they belonged to him. Herod, an Edomite, who ruled over Israel and Judah, had Messiah murdered. So clear and yet we do not learn the truth in “church”.
This is correct, and accurately stated.
Ezekiel points out also that the false shepherds of his time were also mainly of Edomite lineage. The history of them infiltrating Jerusalem and taking upon themselves the power of the ministry of the sanctuary replayed itself after the 70 years of dispersion of the southern kingdoms and the partial return of Judah, Benjamin and Levi to Jerusalem.
John, what verses specifically mention Edomite infiltrators in Ezekiel?
Decieving, murdering and taking the identities for their victims, was apparently the MOP of the Khazars.
PART 1 – THE SEQUEL TO THE FALL OF THE CABAL – THE BIRTH OF THE CABAL
https://rumble.com/v1rgay2-the-sequel-to-the-fall-of-the-cabal-part-1-the-birth-of-the-cabal.html
The Jew of today are Edom. They actually boast about this in several manuscript’s, meetings, books, ect.
One example is here-
“No one can deny that the Jews are a most unique and unusual people. That uniqueness exists because of their Edomite heritage. You cannot be English Jews. We are a race, and only as a race can we perpetuate. Our mentality is of Edomitish character, and differs from that of an Englishman. Enough subterfuges! Let us assert openly that we are International Jews.”
—Manifesto of the “World Jewish Federation,” January 1, 1935, through its spokesperson, Gerald Soman
There are also historical records that show Herod, who tried to kill our King as an infant, was also Edomite. And he had filled positions of leadership at that time with his own, including the priest hood.
There is a common misunderstanding, covered by Truthvids on his websight using comparative language examinations, that makes people believe that some of Israel rejected Christ when the original text can also be translated as “And the MEN OF THE COUNTRY received him not”. Christs people didnt reject him, the Edomites did. And at that time, these Edomites (and yes, Khazar and Edomite are one and the same) were already playing imposter.
This is confirmed in John 8:33 when these rejecters said to our LORD
“We are Abraham’s descendants,” they answered. “We have never been slaves to anyone. How can You say we will be set free?”
The Edomites are indeed descendants of Abraham, but unlike Israel, they were never slaves. This is also why Christ said they were of a different father, and could NEVER know him.
These are, indeed, the decendants of the murderers of Christ and they know it well. In fact they boast about the deed in thier Talmud.
As for holding thier whole race accountable for thier evils, yes….Christ our blessed and eternal King did indeed hold them ALL accountable. We know this because-
Luke 11:50-51
Therefore this generation will be held responsible for the blood of all the prophets that has been shed since the beginning of the world,
From the blood of Abel unto the blood of Zacharias, which perished between the altar and the temple: verily I say unto you, It shall be required of this generation.
The word “Generation” from Greek is “Genea” which means ethnic or racial.
So this Anti-Christ is the SAME serpent seed of the Genesis 3:15 war. The same serpent seed that tried to kill baby Christ, the same serpent seed that led Israel into Idle worship and Paganism. The same serpent seed that nailed our LORD to the cross, using the Romans to do so because thier Talmud (tradition) says if you use the hand of another in a crime you are guiltless. The same serpent seed that brought ruin to Germany. The same that now clings to and corrupts the west.
There is nothing new under the sun.
Dont get me wrong, readers. Though I dispute the claim in this article that Khazars and the murderers of Christ are two different ethnicities (when in fact its been this same Luciferian seed all through history) I support this website and 99.99 percent of thier excellent work. Its just that here, the writer of this article is mistaken. And people NEED to know the truth of what it is we have been up against this whole time. The children of the fallen one, and the sons of perdition! I am actually surprised that this article was posted, as I am sure some of the members of Christians for Truth know this as well, and probably just didnt read it yet.
God bless and protect you CFT for the great work you do for our LORD.
And may God bless and protect ALL our people.
R. Aherns wrote, ““We are Abraham’s descendants,” they answered. “We have never been slaves to anyone. How can You say we will be set free?”
The Pharisees here weren’t talking about Abraham’s descendants historically, but rather contemporarily. The Pharisees are claiming that they had never been in any bondage in their current lives. The point is that they completely misunderstood Christ because they were being literal minded while he was speaking of spiritual bondage. And you yourself have misunderstood Christ’s words because you are also taking them literally.
This verse is not about them being Esau’s descendants for another reason…
Esau’s descendants, the Edomites, were enslaved or dominated by the Israelites, the Nabateans, and the Romans. I used to believe what you believe until I read George Robinson’s book “The Sarcophagus Of An Ancient Civilization: Petra, Edom & The Edomites” (1930).
The Gerald Soman is often quoted, but the problem with it is that it has never been authenticated. Outside of that quote, there is no record of any such person as “Gerald Soman”. Also, there is or was no such organization as the “World Jewish Federation” or the “World Jewry Organization” which is sometimes used instead of the WJO in the Soman quote. The fact that there has never been a “World Jewish Federation” should be a huge red flag, don’t you think?
Another other popular quote, “Edom is in modern Jewry” is also problematic. Allegedly it came from the 1925 edition of the Jewish Encyclopedia, but no one has ever been able to confirm it. The earlier 1905 edition of the Jewish Encyclopedia does NOT include that quote, and you can read a facsimile of the page on Edom here:
https://jewishencyclopedia.com/search?keywords=v5+p41
Actually, both of your examples ARE verified….And have been sourced countless times. Some modern Jew can also be traced to Herod. And then there is the prophecy concerning Edom using an alliance of heathen against Gods people.
Ezekiel 38 (KJV)
38 And the word of YHVH came unto me, saying,
2 Son of man (, set thy face against Gog, the land of Magog, the chief prince of Meshech and Tubal (both cities in modern day Russia), and prophesy against him,
3 And say, Thus saith YHVH Elohim; Behold, I am against thee, O Gog, the chief prince of Meshech and Tubal: Sons of Japheth
4 And I will turn thee back, and put hooks into thy jaws, and I will bring thee forth, and all thine army, horses and horsemen, all of them clothed with all sorts of armor, even a great company with bucklers and shields, all of them handling swords:
5 Persia (Iran and the Middle East minus Arabia), Ethiopia, and Libya with them; all of them with shield and helmet:
6 Gomer, and all his bands; the house of Togarmah of the north quarters, and all his bands: and many people with thee. Muslims
7 Be thou prepared, and prepare for thyself, thou, and all thy company that are assembled unto thee, and be thou a guard unto them.
8 After many days thou shalt be visited: in the latter years thou shalt come into the land that is brought back from the sword , and is gathered out of many people, against the mountains of Israel which have been always waste: but it is brought forth out of the nations, and they shall dwell safely all of them.
9 Thou shalt ascend and come like a storm (sudden destruction), thou shalt be like a cloud to cover the land, thou, and all thy bands, and many people with thee.
10 Thus saith YHVH Elohim; It shall also come to pass, that at the same time shall things come into thy mind, and thou shalt think an evil thought:
11 And thou shalt say, I will go up (From South America) to the land of unwalled villages (United States); I will go to them that are at rest, that dwell safely, all of them dwelling without walls (Democrats Stopped the Wall), and having neither bars nor gates,
12 To take a spoil, and to take a prey; to turn thine hand upon the desolate places that are now inhabited (North America), and upon the people that are gathered out of the nations, (Tribes) which have gotten cattle and goods, that dwell in the midst of the land (Great Plains).
13 Sheba, and Dedan, and the merchants of Tarshish (Jews), with all the young lions (seeking whom they may devour like their father the devil, John 8:44) thereof, shall say unto thee, Art thou come to take a spoil? hast thou gathered thy company to take a prey? to carry away silver and gold, to take away cattle and goods, to take a great spoil?
14 Therefore, son of man, prophesy and say unto Gog, Thus saith YHVH Elohim; In that day when my people of Israel dwelleth safely, shalt thou not know it?
15 And thou shalt come from thy place out of the north (Bering Strait) parts, thou, and many people with thee, all of them riding upon horses, a great company, and a mighty army:
16 And thou shalt come up against my people of Israel (Not country of Israel), as a cloud to cover the land; it shall be in the latter days, and I will bring thee against my land, that the heathen may know me, when I shall be sanctified in thee, O Gog, before their eyes.
17 Thus saith YHVH Elohim; Art thou he of whom I have spoken in old time by my servants the prophets of Israel, which prophesied in those days many years that I would bring thee against them?
18 And it shall come to pass at the same time when Gog shall come against the land of Israel, saith YHVH Elohim, that my fury shall come up in my face.
19 For in my jealousy and in the fire of my wrath have I spoken, surely in that day there shall be a great shaking (earthquakes) in the land of Israel;
20 So that the fishes of the sea, and the fowls of the heaven, and the beasts of the field, and all creeping things that creep upon the earth, and all the men that are upon the face of the earth, shall shake at my presence, and the mountains shall be thrown down, and the steep places shall fall, and every wall shall fall to the ground.
21 And I will call for a sword against him throughout all my mountains, saith YHVH Elohim: every man’s sword shall be against his brother .
22 And I will plead against him with pestilence and with blood; and I will rain upon him, and upon his bands, and upon the many people that are with him, an overflowing rain, and great hailstones, fire, and brimstone .
23 Thus will I magnify myself and sanctify myself; and I will be known in the eyes of many nations, and they shall know that I am YHVH.
There have ALWAYS been dual seed lines. The seed of the woman, and the seed of the serpent. No where does it state this conflict ended and a new one began. There seems to be an effort by a couple of apologists to put distance between the seed line of Herod and modern day Jews, which is as ridiculous as the claim that God changed his mind and transferred the promises to Israel to everyone else.
I detect alot of scorn towards white people as well in a couple of these posts. Its subtle, but it is noticable for those who are on the lookout for it. To scorn our misguided people without effort to reach them, well…Thats a failure as a watchmen, and we are ALL watchmen. Every last white person who can see. if your critical of them without never having tried once to throw them a lifeline back to Christ, well, you may be in more danger then some of them are. Cynicism and hostility, nihalism and indifference is the LAST thing any of us need embrace.
YAHWEH bless.
R. Ahrens wrote, “Actually, both of your examples ARE verified….And have been sourced countless times.”
Could you please help by showing us the verification? Where exactly has it been verified?
R. Ahrens wrote, “Some modern Jew can also be traced to Herod.”
It’s not outside the realm of possibility that a modern Jew could trace their lineage to King David, but just because the Jew is a mixed-breed doesn’t make David a mixed-breed. Also no one doubts that the Herod family were Edomites.
R. Ahrens wrote, “And then there is the prophecy concerning Edom using an alliance of heathen against Gods people.”
All of us growing up in a world of geopolitical entities has somewhat seared our minds when reading about the “nations” in Scripture. When Scripture refers to nations like in Ezekiel 38, it is not referring to places, but rather it is referring to peoples as they are described in Genesis 10. Genesis 10 is not about places, but it is about people, and therefore when we read Ezekiel 38 as it pertains to end times prophecy, to ascribe it to places doesn’t make sense in my opinion.
I agree R. Aherns, this quote of “Gerald Soman” has indeed been “sourced countless times”, and I’ve sourced it myself, but that doesn’t mean it’s authentic. Fake quotes have been repeated millions of times as authentic. Read the book on fake quotes that everyone repeats as real called “They Never Said It”:
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/187352.They_Never_Said_It
Here are many examples of famous quotes that are fake:
https://whatculture.com/offbeat/20-famous-quotes-that-were-never-actually-spoken
https://thoughtcatalog.com/daniel-hayes/2015/09/misattributed-quotes/
Here are fake quotes attributed to Adolf Hitler:
http://www.ihr.org/other/weber2011fakequotations.html
And there are A LOT of fake quotes circulating in the so-called White Nationalist circles. In fact, there’s proof that the entire infamous Harold Rosenthal interview is an elaborate, well-intentioned hoax, yet people have sourced it as “verified” and “authentic” millions of times. The infamous quote from Rabbi Emanuel Rabinovich in Hungary in 1952 is also fake, and has been repeated millions of times as “authentic”.
Rule of thumb: if a quote seems just too good to be true, it probably is.
And lets not forget the excavation of Hittite Statues and artifacts which are UNDENIABLE likenesses of the Modern Jew. And the Hittites were the people Esau married into.
Heres one, though there are far better examples out there.
https://c8.alamy.com/comp/BMNTGD/royal-prince-neo-hittite-1000-bc-800-bc-from-orthostat-karkamis-gaziantep-BMNTGD.jpg
It is without question to ME that the Jew and Edom are one and the same, and I know many others whom have looked at the evidence and come to the same conclusions. Not as a matter of “Hate” or “Anti-semetism”….But because it is true. And a crucial thing in ANY war is to know your enemy. And make no mistake, these people HAVE declared war on the white Christian world, though its not a conventional war, it is war nonetheless.
Scriptures warn of of this serpent seed, and command us to separate from, and expose them. You guys seem very anxious to defend them. If we serve the same eternal King, then you should know them for what they are….I find that a bit odd. After all, are we not on the same side here?
Why so eager to jump to the defense of the people destroying the west and seeking the genocide of white European peoples?
Forgive me if I am wrong, but I find that a bit concerning. I have seen enough of thier online antics to know they are out in force, using the ADL, SPLC, and thier other organizations to monitor what Christians discuss and try to steer people away from the truth of who they are. Anti-Christ. The seed of the serpent, and the ancient enemy of every white European descendent of Adam.
I pray I am misreading your intent. Because I stand with ALL my people, not against them.
God bless.
R. Ahrens, I for one have no doubt that Jews are evil. However, denying a connection between Edom and Jews is not defending Jews.
If there is truth in the claim that Jews are Edom, then that truth ought to stand up to verification and scrutiny, especially in the Scripture.
I hope this clarifies things.
…..The seed of the serpent, and the ancient enemy of every white European descendent of Adam……
R. Ahrens,
Curious …… are you a believer in the “Satan had sex with Eve” dual seedline camp?
Is this what you mean by “seed of the serpent”?
Thanks.
westwins, Paul might as well have been speaking of two seedline doctrine when he wrote these lines — and I say that as someone who used to believe it:
“For the time is coming when people will not endure sound teaching, but having itching ears they will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own passions.” (2 Timothy 4:3)
Edom is a byword for an eternal enemy of Israel. It is a figure of speech, a metaphor for the God-less enemies of the Israelites. It does not need to be a literal bloodline of today’s Jews — it is a metaphor for today’s Jews.
If the “World Jewish Federation” never existed….and I looked it up, and could not find any proof of its existence outside the Soman quote in question….then why would anybody believe that Gerald Soman ever existed? Explain that to me….
R. Ahrens wrote, “Luke 11:50-51
Therefore this generation will be held responsible for the blood of all the prophets that has been shed since the beginning of the world,
From the blood of Abel unto the blood of Zacharias, which perished between the altar and the temple: verily I say unto you, It shall be required of this generation.”
Matthew 21:31-46, Matthew 23:30-33, Matthew 23:37 and Luke 13:34 all connect Israel to the “generation” who would ultimately murder the Lord Jesus, and Luke 13:34 will suffice to summarize:
Jerusalem, Jerusalem, the city that kills the prophets and stones those who have been sent to her! How often I wanted to gather your children together, just as a hen gathers her young under her wings, and you were unwilling!
The Lord has created a firm link between those who kill the prophets and those he would gather. Does this mean He wants to gather “Satan’s seed” as a hen gathers its children? It was Joash, king of Judah/Jerusalem who had Zechariah killed (2 Chronicles 24:20-22). Either Joash must be proven to be an Edomite, or we must surely relinquish this view that the murder of Christ is lain at the feet of Edomites?
Did Peter himself not charge the Israelites in Jerusalem with killing the Lord in Acts 2:36?
A quick note on “genea”: It most assuredly can refer to a generation in the way we refer to it today i.e. people alive at a specific point in time in the sense of what the present time has produced.
@ Johan
Your deflecting. Probably one of “that tribe”, because your twisting what is said to try and protect them.
If “Genea” meant “alive at that specific time” then these must have been immortal Jew or something, to have been alive from the time of Abel to the time of Zachariah….He wasn’t holding those present accountable, he was holding their RACE accountable. This is plain to anyone despite your word “acrobatics” to say otherwise.
He also refered to them as a race of vipers and serpents, and said they could never know him, because they were of a different father.
The truth is getting around. All things will be known and no lie wont be exposed before this is all over.
I pray the day of our LORD comes swiftly! Justice will come, and the river of blood shed from my people will be avenged on the great and terrible day of our LORD!
PROOF that the SAME group have been the enemies from the start.
Mathew 13:30
9‘No,’ he said, ‘if you pull the weeds now, you might uproot the wheat with them. 30Let both grow together until the harvest. At that time I will tell the harvesters: First collect the weeds and tie them in bundles to be burned; then gather the wheat into my barn.’”
“Let them grow together until the harvest”….The seed of the serpent are the tares. The wheat are the children of God. This says to let them grow together, so it is OBVIOUSLY one seedline growing alongside another…. The Jew, and the white Christians.
https://i1.wp.com/www.riksavisen.no/wp-content/uploads/Skip-Baker.jpg?resize=1000%2C500&ssl=1
There is no “third party”…Other then the heathen pre-Adamic peoples, who are in coalition with the tares. By defending the Jew, your calling God a liar. I think Ill take his word over yours.
God bless.
Reading the following verses together very solidly shows that Luke 11:51-52 is referring to Israelites: Matthew 21:33-46, Matthew 23:30-33, Matthew 23:37, Luke 13:34.
Here is a link for your convenience: https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew+21%3A33-46%2C+Matthew+23%3A30-33%2C+Matthew+23%3A37%2C+Luke+13%3A34%2C+Luke+11&version=NASB
With that in mind, the meaning of “genea” actually becomes entirely irrelevant. Even so, I’d encourage a look through some lexicons on the matter. Here is a link which provides comprehensive study of the word at your fingertips: https://biblehub.com/greek/1074.htm
As for Matthew 13:30, the parable of the wheat and the tares, I’m curious to get your opinion on this article’s take on the matter: https://christiansfortruth.com/will-all-israel-be-saved-or-just-a-remnant/
I’d like to reassure you though, I believe that only pure white people, the true Adamites of Scripture, are the only ones eligible for salvation.
However, my concern is for the will of the Lord Jesus. What does He truly desire in our hearts? He said in John 5:19, “Truly, truly, I say to you, the Son can do nothing of Himself, unless it is something He sees the Father doing; for whatever the Father does, these things the Son also does in the same way.”
Likewise, we can do nothing of ourselves, unless it is something we see the Son doing; for whatever the Son does, these things we also must do in the same way.
R. Aherns, if you accuse someone of being a Jew simply because they disagree with you on certain points, you will be banned from further commenting. There are websites who accept that behavior, but CFT is not one of them. We can assure you that Johan is not Jewish and has been a long-time and trustworthy commenter here. If you are offended for having your assumptions questioned, how are you any different from the Jews?
No one is defending Jews here. They are defending the truth. We need not repeat lies to defend the truth.
Scripture tells us to “Prove all things; hold fast that which is good.” (1 Thessalonians 5:21). If you cannot prove something that you’ve stated, it is your moral obligation to let it go. Stubbornly holding on to demonstrably false or unprovable ideas (lies) is a sin. If you resent having to prove what you say, or feel a need to slander those who want proof, perhaps it’s time to reassess what you think you believe.
Me and H.G Wellls is in 100% agreement with what R. Ahrens says here… if the Jews are not the Edomites/Khazars, WHO is going to be wiped out Ob. 1:18 ?
https://www.riksavisen.no/wp-content/uploads/ENOo1h-U4AAfpaX.jpg
R. Ahrens, you are spot on on this. I couldn’t have said it better myself. God bless you. Nadir Martello
Yes, the Jews hated Him and wanted Him dead.
But the Roman Empire was the ruling power and judicial authority who executed Him and was part of that continuum represented as the image in Nebuchadnezzar’s dream in Daniel Ch 2 and now latterly “that Great City, wherein also our Lord was crucified” (Rev 11:8), aka, the pre-eminent world power block which nowadays consists of the West, the natural successor to the Roman Empire, a West that spiritually is called Sodom (for its exaltation of Sodomy and fornication) and Egypt (for its luxury, hedonism and resentment of the Lord’s people living there).
When the Kingdom of Heaven begins on earth, i.e., when the stone cut out without hands smites Nebuchadnezzar’s image in the toes, the Jews worldwide – whatever their true ethnicity is – will have their eyes opened to Jesus as the Messiah and will embrace Him as Lord, precipitating the rapid advance of the Kingdom of Heaven, as foretold in Romans 11.
So, when you pray the Lord’s Prayer, remember the first order of business after the Father’s Name is hallowed: Thy Kingdom come… and remember, at the close of the Lord’s prayer… “for Thine is the Kingdom…” The Kingdom is the key to everything going on in the world today, especially now that it is so close to the time of its commencement as described in Daniel 2.
“Pilate said to them, “Shall I crucify your King?” The chief priests answered, “We have no king but Caesar.” So he [Pilate] delivered Him to them [the chief priests] to be crucified. THEY took Jesus therefore, and He went out, bearing His own cross, to the place called the Place of a Skull, which is called in Hebrew, Golgotha. There THEY crucified Him and with Him two other men, one on either side, and Jesus in between.” Jn.19:15-18
Jesus’ crucifixion is being reckoned as a murder, but only Levite priests could fulfill the law’s prophecies [ Lev. 17:3-5 ] . They failed to recognize His death as a sacrifice for sin, and thus did not apply the blood of Christ by faith to the altar of their hearts.
Christians ought not to blame anyone for Jesus’ sacrifice but admonish all men to apply His blood in the lawful manner, so that they might be justified by faith in His [ passover ] blood.
The gist of the article is correct in that the Pharasees conspired to kill Jesus. They burned themselves because the I AM of the Old Testament resurrected him on the 3rd day. He now sits at the right hand of God waiting for his disciples to properly represent him on earth and bring the Kingdom of God to the ends of the earth.
The 3rd chapter of Galatians declares that Jesus is the seed that fulfills the Abrahamic covenant. Later in the chapter Paul declares that those that believe are equal in the Kingdom. So squabbling over the douche Idumeans or the descendants of Old Testament characters is really irrelevant.
Humanity has been under spiritual assault since the time of Christ primarily from Talmudist Jews who are the direct descendants of the pukestain Pharasees. Our country has gone down the toilet because the Christian community has adopted the Talmudist inspired Dispensationalist interpretation of the bible that makes it all about them instead of about his majesty Jesus Christ.
These are the end times, Are you with Christ or against him? Praise God.
Reality check: According to the abundant documentary evidence of the Early Church, Non-“Khazar” Jews played an active role in the persecution of Christians , both as a community and in terms of serving the Roman state in that endeavor.
As St. Paul records in the mid-First Century A.D. , “the Jews, who killed the Lord Jesus and the prophets, who persecute us, anger God and are the enemies of mankind.” (1 Thess. 2:15)
This is what even Wikipedia admits about the “Jews” at the time of Christ:
“Strabo, a contemporary [of Herod and Jesus], held that the Idumaeans, whom he identified as of Nabataean origin, constituted the majority of the population of Western Judea, where they commingled with the Judaeans and adopted their customs. This is a view shared also by some modern scholarly works which consider Idumaeans as of Arab or Nabataean origins.”
Jesus called them ravenous wolves in sheep’s clothing, the race of vipers and the synagogue of satan, who “said they were Judeans but weren’t”.
Just how come could you claim that a real Israelite could ever reject, let alone murder Jesus?
Maybe he could when it’s us MEN shilling CI to him on 4chan but never when it’s the Shepherd Himself calling out their names.
Jesus did NOT call the Idumeans “wolves in sheep’s clothing”. Where did you get that idea? Can you please cite any verse in the entire New Testament that mentions either Idumeans or Edomites? No, you can’t because they aren’t mentioned at all, even once. And if Edomites “mingling” with the Judeans was such a big “scandal”, why doesn’t the NT address it explicitly anywhere?
John 1:1 clearly states that some of Christ’s “own” rejected him, called for his death. Christ asked His Father to forgive them for what they’d done — He wouldn’t have done that if they weren’t His “own” people under the Law.
The very fact that the Edomites are never mentioned distinctly in the New Testament is proof alone that the Edomites, all of them, were already “one with the Judeans” by the time of Christ.
For if they really were a distinct people occupying Judea, they would be mentioned at least once.
And as for John, the same guy has this to say later in his account:
“They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would no doubt have continued with us: but they went out, that they might be made manifest that they were not all of us.”
That’s the same “logic” that the Jewish head of Yad Vashem used to “prove” the “Holocaust”. He said the complete lack of physical evidence is “proof” that the Germans did it.
A complete lack of evidence is just that — a lack of evidence.
You quoted 1 John 2:19, but there is nothing in 1 John 2 to suggest he’s talking about Edomites. Where do you get that? John is talking about “antichrists” not Edomites among the Judeans. He tells us what he means by “antichrist” in that context — those who are “of this world” and “not of the Father”. Those who, because of their “lusts” and sin, are not “of us”. Israelites can be antichrists. You don’t have to be an “Edomite” to be an “antichrist”. How do we know that? Because there clearly were Israelites who rejected Christ and called for his death.
Yes, Jews are antichrist, but not all antichrists are Jews. Today most antichrists are NOT Jews. The number of White people who deny Christ is in the tens of millions. Europeans have abandoned Christianity and Christ and embrace paganism or antichrist humanism. There are many antichrists in our day now — and most of them are NOT Jews — they are White, which make it even worse.
I take it literally, because the words are there for us to do just that. God is far seeing. OF COURSE they didnt understand what they were admitting to, but scripture was intended for future readers- Nothing is there without purpose.
If Edom is the ancient seat of antichrist Jewry, then why did the Lord God have His seat in Edom, in Mt. Seir, and the “field of Edom”?
Witness, Deuteronomy 33:2, “And he said, The LORD came from Sinai, and rose up from Seir unto them; he shined forth from mount Paran, and he came with ten thousands of saints: from his right hand went a fiery law for them.”
Witness, Judges 5: 4-5, “4 LORD, when thou wentest out of Seir, when thou marchedst out of the field of Edom, the earth trembled, and the heavens dropped, the clouds also dropped water. 5 The mountains melted from before the LORD, [even] that Sinai from before the LORD God of Israel.”
Witness, Habakkuk 3:3, ““God came from Teman, and the Holy One from mount Paran. Selah. His glory covered the heavens, and the earth was full of his praise.”
“Selah” is the original Hebrew name for the capital of Edom, which the Greeks called Petra.
Three witness in the Bible that God dwelled in Edom. Houston, we have a serious problem with your “Edomite Jew” theory.
Bible books of Malachi 1:3 And I (God) hated Esau, and laid his mountains and his heritage waste for the dragons of the wilderness.
Romans 9:13 As it is written, Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated.
Obadiah 1:18 And the house of Jacob shall be a fire, and the house of Joseph a flame, and the house of Esau for stubble, and they shall kindle in them, and devour them; and there shall not be any remaining of the house of Esau; for the LORD hath spoken it and there shall not be any remaining of the house of Esau; for the LORD hath spoken it.
and there shall not be any remaining of the house of Esau; for the LORD hath spoken it.
Exodus 17:8 – Then came Amalek, and fought with Israel in Rephidim.
Exo 17:9 – And Moses said unto Joshua, Choose us out men, and go out, fight with Amalek:
to morrow I will stand on the top of the hill with the rod of God in mine hand.
Exodus 17:14 – And the LORD said unto Moses, Write this for a memorial in a book,
and rehearse it in the ears of Joshua: for I will utterly put out the remembrance of Amalek from under heaven. Amalek is the grandson of Esau.
Exodus 17:16 For he said, Because the LORD hath sworn that the LORD will have war with Amalek from generation to generation.
Who is AMALEK?
Gen 36:1 – Now these are the generations of Esau, who is Edom.
Gen 36:9 – And these are the generations of Esau the father of the Edomites in mount Seir:
Gen 36:12 – And Timna was concubine to Eliphaz Esau’s son; and she bare to Eliphaz Amalek:
these were the sons of Adah Esau’s wife.
Gen 36:16 – Duke Korah, duke Gatam, and duke Amalek: these are the dukes that came of Eliphaz
in the land of Edom; these were the sons of Adah.
Deut 25:17 – Remember what Amalek did unto thee by the way,
when ye were come forth out of Egypt;
Deu 25:19
Therefore it shall be, when the LORD thy God hath given thee rest from all thine enemies round about,
in the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee for an inheritance to possess it,
that thou shalt blot out the remembrance of Amalek from under heaven; thou shalt not forget it.
1 Sam 15:2 – Thus saith the LORD of hosts, I remember that which Amalek did to Israel,
how he laid wait for him in the way, when he came up from Egypt.
As you always do, Chaplain Bob, you merely throw a bunch of verses out as if that’s proof of your point. It isn’t. None of your verses prove Edom is mentioned in the New Testament or that “Amalek” in the OT is specifically Edom. Israel had many enemies, but that doesn’t make those enemies non-Adamic nations.
Must disagree – see Romans 9:13.
The Word plainly states that esau is edom, ergo…
amalek was a descendant of esau also.
Sorry, but it IS pretty plain.
luke2236, let’s read Romans 9:13, ““As it is written, Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated.”
Where is Edom mentioned in this verse? Esau is mentioned here, but in the context that God “hated” Esau before he was born, while he was still in the womb, before he had done anything “wrong” in life. Paul uses Romans 9:13 to illustrate an example of God’s choice or “election” (Romans 9:11), not to prove that Judea was crawling with “Edomite Jews” pretending to be pure Israelites. Why do you think Paul quoted this verse in Romans 9?
Deuteronomy 2,
4 and command the people, saying, “You are going to pass through the territory of your brothers the sons of Esau, who live in Seir; and they will be afraid of you. So be very careful; 5 do not provoke them, for I will not give you any of their land, not even as much as a footprint, because I have given Mount Seir to Esau as a possession.
Deuteronomy 23:7-8,
7 You shall not loathe an Edomite, for he is your brother; you shall not loathe an Egyptian, because you were a stranger in his land. 8 The sons of the third generation who are born to them may enter the assembly of the Lord.
No one denies Malachi 1:3, but clearly it means something other than what you think it means.
In Romans 9 Paul says,
12 it was said to her, “The older will serve the younger.” 13 Just as it is written: “Jacob I have loved, but Esau I have hated.”
Paul here is confirming how the promise of verse 12 necessarily resulted in the reality of verse 13. Malachi 1:3 is a consequence of the promise, not a prerequisite of the promise. In other words, Paul is saying that Malachi 1:3 came as a result of Genesis 25:23, because Malachi 1:3, which happened much later, proves Genesis 25:23.
Just like Esau was godless because he was not the child of the promise. He wasn’t not a child of the promise because he was godless.
Romans 9:11,
for though the twins were not yet born and had not done anything good or bad, so that God’s purpose according to His choice would stand, not because of works but because of Him who calls
Many pastors proven ChaplainBob right with scriptures backing it up.
God separated nations for a reason and not to cater to His enemies to. Don’t twist scriptures.
Facts 101 ……
“…..God separated nations for a reason and not to cater to His enemies to. Don’t twist scriptures…….”
Would you kindly elaborate?
Are you speaking of the Tower of Babel “separation” ….
or are you referring to God planting the various people groups (White, yellow, black, red) throughout the world — I.E., Adamics in the Garden of Eden; blacks in central Africa; Yellows in Central Asia; Reds in various places like Australia, South America etc.
If you are referring to the Tower of Babel event, you do realize those peoples were Adamic – the Genesis 10 Nations. At least this is the prevailing opinion here at CFT.
I don’t believe Adamic peoples were ever meant to be “enemies”.
Please elaborate, thanks.
Why would you bend to those who want your demise?
Why reverse course on such an important Study? It’s a very needed answer you were seeking and should be followed through on. God is watching to see if ANYONE will stand for HIM, for His TRUTH. Think about your responsibility to do so. The very thing you run from is the thing working to kill you – kill us all.
@CFT can you double check this,
very weird that somebody is posting under the same “Lisette” how many Lisette’s do you have commenting on this website with their real name?
Seems like somebody wants me to run away this website, LOL….
We checked that other “Lisette”, and it just seems to be a random coincidence with the name, though we’re not sure. But to avoid any confusion, since that other one has posted only three times, we changed her name to “Lise L.” so that people don’t confuse her with you. Hope this helps.
@CFT can you put me in your system as LisetteMbxl, to avoid confusion I will use this handle when commenting in the future. Thank you…!
Lisette, we don’t have a “system” to put you in. We don’t keep information about our users. If you want to use another handle, just do so. We know who you are by the content of your comments — unique to yourself.
Most in crowd chanted for his death! let Christs blood be on are people, and look what happened to them. Holocaust etc …
It seems peculiar to me that jews have so thrived in the world that Christians created.
For what they did to Christ, these hideous hook-nosed freaks should actually have been banished from society a couple of millennia ago.
It’s funny you say that. They basically were. It’s only been the last few hundred years that they really appeared back on the world stage, though, they have always lurked around.
This is a part of the thought process that goes into certain CI’s preterist/historicist view points of Revelation.
Although, it’s good to recognize, imo, that we can’t blame everything that happened to Christ on hook nosed Jews. I’m certain that there were adamites and Israelites amoung those whom chanted for His death. Had it not been so, then Christ would not have cried out stating “Father forgive them, for they know not what they are doing”. He was pleading for forgiveness of His people present.
That’s correct. God cannot “forgive” someone who is not under the Law, and non-Adamics are not under the law. Therefore, those who called for Christ’s death must be capable of being forgiven, and therefore, they must be Adamic.
Correct!
And any who doubt the reality of White man calling for the death of Christ need only look to the evils that we see our own kind doing to each other at this very moment in time… White liberals, greenys, commies, antifa idiots, degenerates, weirdos; all are antichrist, and all are of the devil because they sin. Some are born to sin, some are swayed by sin to sin, some are to be saved, some are born to be saved. Pretty hard to have an “elect” and a “remnant” if “all Israel will be saved”. That’s how I look at it, anyway. 🙂
Yes, Christ Is King, look at Sweden, the most atheistic country in all Europe, 95% White, and 70% atheist, meaning 70% antichrist. Less than 20% are professed Christians, and most of those are probably over 60 years old. That’s a lot of White antichrists compared to the small fraction of antichrist Jews, wouldn’t you say?
“That’s a lot of White antichrists compared to the small fraction of antichrist Jews, wouldn’t you say?”
So we can see Isaiah 43:1-4 repeating itself.
But saying “only a small fraction of antichrist Jews compared to White” is only have the story and more than a little disingenuous.
We know in the past the jew David Rockefeller spoke of bringing women into the force so they can be taxed and their children placed in government schools and others have tried to warn that having a tv in your home is like having a rabbi in your living room.
You might want to look into the Bonnier Group that controls almost all the media in Scandinavia and the family behind it.
“The Bonnier family is a Swedish family, originally of Jewish descent,[1] who since the beginning of the 19th century has been active in the book industry and later also in the mass media industry. They own the media group Bonnier Group, with the largest owners being Åke Bonnier and Jonas Bonnier. The group has 175 companies in 18 countries.[2][3][4]”
Reminds me of Al Golstein and his love for Christ.
Yes, please tell us about how this applies to Isaiah 43:1-4….. Are you denying that Sweden is full of antichrist white liberals? Or are you one of those white people who believe that whites can do no wrong, and that if they do wrong it’s only because of a tiny group of Jews who make them do wrong? I’ll bet every time you see a white person commit a terrible crime, you immediately look up to see if he’s a crypto Jew or a non-White, right? You’re in complete denial. God divorced Israel because they sinned and were lawless. Get used to it. God didn’t say, “Oh, Israel, I won’t divorce you. It’s okay, I know the Jews made you do it.” Seriously…..
Ganymede ……………….
HEAR, HEAR!
No man is an island. How can anyone take you seriously ganymede with such an emotional outburst. Only those who deny two seed line use such sophistry as their argument.
“And God looked upon the earth, and, behold, it was corrupt; for all flesh had corrupted his way upon the earth.
And God said unto Noah, The end of all flesh is come before me; for the earth is filled with violence through them; and, behold, I will destroy them with the earth”.
but Noah and his family were perfect in their generations!!!
I think that’s not just a matter of denial but also one of ignorance
So you deny that jews control all the media in Sweden, promote multiculturalism, miscegenation, porn and abortion? When did Sweden start becoming a cesspit flooded by mamzers?
“But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in yourselves, neither suffer ye them that are entering to go in”.
Transgression of the law is transgression. The law that was given to Israel only so hence Amos 3:2 and Isaiah 43:1-4. Making that the center point of your argument is like Friedrich Nietzsche. An anti Christ who surrounded himself with jews and we all know what happened to him.
“But if the watchman sees the sword coming and does not blow the trumpet to warn the people and the sword comes and takes someone’s life, that person’s life will be taken because of their sin, but I will hold the watchman accountable for their blood.'”
“And the mob yelled back, “His blood be on us and on our children!”
Now please accuse me of picking random verses.
Praise Christ. The God of true Israel and not of the serpent seed jews
Chris, you’re all over the place. No one denies that Jews own the media, but Christians and White people turn on their television sets knowing full well about the filth that it spews into their houses and brains. They themselves are responsible for turning on those televisions.
You think this so-called “serpent seed” has some kind of magic that exerts svengali control over White people? Really? Completely getting us off the moral hook for our decisions? It’s hard not to notice that none of your points address the essay above in question, most likely because you’d rather talk about peripheral issues and your own agenda than what everyone else it talking about — because you don’t know anything about it, and it interferes with your agenda.
“For of this sort are they which creep into houses, and lead captive silly women laden with sins, led away with divers lusts, 7Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth.” 2 Tim 3:6-7
Chris, why don’t you come and weigh in here: https://christiansfortruth.com/will-all-israel-be-saved-or-just-a-remnant/
Make sure to read the comments first though, lest you throw out pet verses which have already been used.
Of course, Christ is King, but saying all white people are antichrist is just fachism.the sabbatean frankists and illuminati bloodlines are the real evil on this earth brain washing alot of white people to hate themselves and causing self hating fachism the disgusting liberal agenda to destroy society within.the real israelites came from syria some from ethiopia and yemen.i totally agree with you on antifa blm communists ect thezse people are scum but not all white most behind this evil check the names.white people have nothing to with the murder of christ it was the pharasees end of story even alot of white people have sold out to their luciferian agenda.
Ross, Christ Is King never said ALL white people are antichrist. What he said was that there are a lot of antichrist white people. That’s very different, no? White people do a lot of damage to themselves by disobeying God. The Illuminati does try to cause a lot of trouble, but we sin voluntarily, no?
I think we all can agree on one thing — Who modern Jewry are not.
We should all here agree that the White peoples of the world are the Adamites of Scripture. Where the other people groups come from is open for debate.
I would suggest the Pre-Adamite theory makes the most sense — part of the animal creation.
Considering that, I would suggest Modern Jewry are Adamics who have non-white admixture.
It is interesting to compare the Jews of the turn of the 20th century, to the Jews of today. Compare Paul Newman with photos of the Bolsheviks as an example.
I have heard some suggest Modern Jewry has nothing to do with Israelites/Adamites. I would suggest the fairer skinned Jews have absolutely a connection to us in that they have inbred with us. It still doesn’t make them us.
But I have to figure that this “mixture” is an open door to the wrong spirit.
Seems a genetically pure non-white is far less dangerous than a mixed genetic White person. If that makes any sense.
There is a reason CFT exists. These people are a peculiar people. The reason we are able to identify them so.
But I think the question as to who Obadiah is referring to is a very interesting debate.
Well said.
Do you have any links for the pre adamite theory? I’ve never looked much into it.
http://esau.today/pre-adamites-humanoids-before-the-first-white-man/
Charles Weisman wrote a book — https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/6912703-the-origin-of-race-and-civilization
I believe there is a free PDF out there somewhere. I think even CFT has an article about this topic.
Pre-Adamite humanoids indeed. What was created before Adam? Beasts. What do you think?
Occam’s razor
read Ezekiel Chapter 31 carefully as the Assyrian was in the garden of eden with Adam and eve.
There are many large leaps of logic in that statement. Hopefully you can expound in more detail why you’ve stated that. In the mean time, I will give some thoughts…
Assyrians are Asshur, a son of Shem, which is a Genesis 10 nation. It is fundamentally impossible for them to have been in the garden of Eden.
Ezekiel 31 doesn’t mention Adam and Eve at all.
In verse 17 it even equates the cedars of Lebanon with the trees of Eden. In the garden of Eden there were very real trees, supposedly large and beautiful in appearance. The cedars of Lebanon were also very real trees, also large and beautiful in their appearance, even being used to build Solomon’s personal living quarters.
Given the above points, surely you can agree that this is a poetic/metaphorical juxtaposition in order to highlight the very real implications on the Assyrians in that time?
James, you bring up an interesting point vis a vis paul newman etc. I think the difference is that there are edomite jews – who, whether we like it or not, are ‘kin’ to us, as esau was Jacob’s ‘brother’ – so they will share some physical characteristics. These jews are actually a minority today, but are the most dangerous as well. The stereotypical jew – swarthy, hook nosed etc, arent Adamic at all, but are a mongral race, mostly khazars and other mongoloid/turk types. These people were conquered by the khazars and converted to babylonian talmudism. They found it very profitable and have clung to the religion and the teaching of their talmudic masters. Add in their natural tendency to barbarism, lying and theft, and they make ‘perfect’ jews…and have proliferated.
I believe we are both “observing” the same phenomena.
Ever notice also that the mixed race yellows, browns and blacks never defend their “white” side? Not to mention their white admixture is always lost.
Not a coincidence for sure.
Yes, I agree. For the most part the majority of mixed-blooded bi-peds, in my observations and from my experience – and there are many mixtures where I live (hoorah for multiculturalism! LOL) – always side with the non-white blood in them.
However, that being said… I know two mixed-bloods who really, really dislike anyone non-white… one a part Indian from India, and the other with a grandparent from New Guinea. Both are blokes, and both were raised White. BUT! Their Coloured relatives all hate Whites!
In this day the fashion is to love anyone non-white. As we all know, the sheep follow the fashion of the day. Only those with more sense can speak for themselves and observe with their own eyes… seems to be the same for mixed-bloods I would say.
This most simplest explanation makes the most sense. But I hope there is more to it. 🙂
Hey, James, speaking of Obadiah, don’t you think that prophecy about the destruction of Edom has been fulfilled already? Have you seen what Edom looks like today? Petra is in ruins, “left for stubble”. Take a look:
https://globalcastaway.com/inside-petra-guide/
ganymede ……
My reply to luke was to you.
The simplest explanation is probably the most accurate. But I hope there is more to that prophecy for sure.
I have seen the “Today’s Jews are Russian LARPers” idea on here before and I have some questions about it.
Are the Khazars doing double duty and are also the Edomites? If not, how do we square this with Obadiah’s prophecies of the Israelites finally eradicating the Edomites for their continued crimes against us?
How could the Khazars have picked up Babylonian Judaism on their own in 900 AD? Could it be that the Matthew 27:25 Jews who killed Christ have emigrated northward, particularly after they and their avowed Edomite rulers were routed by the Romans in 66 AD, and bred into the Khazars?
The people of that location are more Turkish than Mongolian, the Turks are essentially Hittites, mixed with Arabs and other peoples, including Edomites.
Here is some info on the Khazars – https://i.imgur.com/2hPmY1o.png
(The minister of Abd-al-Rahman asserted that there was a tradition amongst the Khazars that they had once lived near or around Mt Seir.)
So it is more like the exiled Jews (who were either Edomites who usurped power like Herod/ Antiper, or were Canaanite through Bathshua) intentionally travelled to where they knew their Edomitish brethren had migrated to, and convinced them or the ‘Khaganate’ to convert.
I’m not an avid reader of the Bible as I believe it takes a lot of time and dedication to fully understand it, – time which I currently don’t have.
Regarding the listings above, from Matthew to John, I also gather that the first time the word “Jew” was mentioned in the Bible was as recently in 1775 in an English play (Sheridan). The letter “J” was only invented in 1066 so WHO actually were/are these people? Am I to believe they are merely Hebrews and Yehudi “re-labelled” ‘Jews’ in Cromwellian times and not Edomites or Sephardic “Jews” ?!? AshkeNAZI aside…
Yes, the letter “J” and the “J” sound aren’t in the original Hebrew either.
The word “jew” comes mainly for the Greek work for “Judean”, which was a Roman province in the time of Christ which was named after the tribe of Judah.
So the word “jew” is a transliteration which appeared much later, which refers to the mixed-bloods we now call “jews” today. The modern “jews” and original white Judeans of Scripture are not at all the same thing, although the Jews would have you believe that they were.
Well, the usage of Jew in the NT refers to Judeans. Which were the inhabitants of and practitioners of the religion in Judea. It has no racial connotation.
So, when Judeans are addressed in the NT, we have nothing to go off of that it didn’t include Israelites/judahites. At the same time, we have nothing that excludes the inclusion of edomites/Caananites/non Israelites either.
Sephardi are just as bad.